Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

•27 RCTs with 1204 depressed patients were included in this meta-analysis.•Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS in modulating depressive symptoms.•The response and remission rates were comparable between active- and sham-tDCS.•A 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min tDCS session may augment the effic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 2021-07, Vol.126, p.481-490
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Ruibin, Lam, Charlene L.M., Peng, Xiaoling, Zhang, Dongming, Zhang, Chichen, Huang, Ruiwang, Lee, Tatia M.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 490
container_issue
container_start_page 481
container_title Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
container_volume 126
creator Zhang, Ruibin
Lam, Charlene L.M.
Peng, Xiaoling
Zhang, Dongming
Zhang, Chichen
Huang, Ruiwang
Lee, Tatia M.C.
description •27 RCTs with 1204 depressed patients were included in this meta-analysis.•Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS in modulating depressive symptoms.•The response and remission rates were comparable between active- and sham-tDCS.•A 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min tDCS session may augment the efficacy. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising nonpharmacological intervention for treating depression. We aimed to provide an updated meta-analysis assessing the anti-depressant efficacy of tDCS. We searched the literature from the first available date to 30 December 2020 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). 27 RCTs (N = 1204 patients, 653 in active tDCS and 551 in sham tDCS) were included. Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS (g = 0.46, 95 % CI 0.15−0.76) in modulating depressive symptoms measured by depression rating scales. Active tDCS was also superior to sham tDCS in reducing response and remission rates, but these differences did not reach statistically significant levels (ORresponse = 1.75, 95 % CI 0.85–3.58; ORremission = 1.29, 95 % CI 0.59–2.83). The two groups had comparable dropout rates (OR = 1.28, 95 % CI 0.62–1.64). For treatments of depressive episodes, tDCS may be efficacious. Specific tDCS parameters (e.g., a 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min sessions) and clinical characteristics (e.g., antidepressant-free) may augment the treatment efficacy of tDCS.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2507729510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149763421001433</els_id><sourcerecordid>2507729510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-cc96b17b6eda1813551e4f207d36ed2e06813dd86456f21285bba1255af188963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUctuFDEQtBCIbAK_AD5ymcGP8WO4raJAkCJxgbPlsXuQVzP2YnsiLR_BN-PVhly5dLdL1VVyF0LvKekpofLjoY-wTSFleOwZYbQnvCdMvkA7qhXvlGD6JdoROoydkny4QtelHAghjHDxGl1xrvRIhd6hP3fzHJx1J2yjx9Y5OFY7hSXUE04zrtnG4loJdsE-ZHAVuy1niBWXGtZtsTWkiOeUGxfaI_7EHo4ZSmn4J7zHK1Tb2WiXUwnlrNnUfFrDb_DYpVhzWpY21twsyhv0am4N3j71G_Tj89332_vu4duXr7f7h84NWtbOuVFOVE0SvKWaciEoDDMjyvMGMSCygd5rOQg5M8q0mCZLmRB2plqPkt-gDxfdY06_NijVrKE4WBYbIW3FMEGUYqOgpFHVhepyKiXDbI45rDafDCXmHIY5mOcwzDkMQ7hpYbTNd08m27SCf977d_1G2F8I0L76GCCb4gJEB5dLG5_Cf03-AkkUowM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2507729510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Zhang, Ruibin ; Lam, Charlene L.M. ; Peng, Xiaoling ; Zhang, Dongming ; Zhang, Chichen ; Huang, Ruiwang ; Lee, Tatia M.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ruibin ; Lam, Charlene L.M. ; Peng, Xiaoling ; Zhang, Dongming ; Zhang, Chichen ; Huang, Ruiwang ; Lee, Tatia M.C.</creatorcontrib><description>•27 RCTs with 1204 depressed patients were included in this meta-analysis.•Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS in modulating depressive symptoms.•The response and remission rates were comparable between active- and sham-tDCS.•A 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min tDCS session may augment the efficacy. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising nonpharmacological intervention for treating depression. We aimed to provide an updated meta-analysis assessing the anti-depressant efficacy of tDCS. We searched the literature from the first available date to 30 December 2020 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). 27 RCTs (N = 1204 patients, 653 in active tDCS and 551 in sham tDCS) were included. Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS (g = 0.46, 95 % CI 0.15−0.76) in modulating depressive symptoms measured by depression rating scales. Active tDCS was also superior to sham tDCS in reducing response and remission rates, but these differences did not reach statistically significant levels (ORresponse = 1.75, 95 % CI 0.85–3.58; ORremission = 1.29, 95 % CI 0.59–2.83). The two groups had comparable dropout rates (OR = 1.28, 95 % CI 0.62–1.64). For treatments of depressive episodes, tDCS may be efficacious. Specific tDCS parameters (e.g., a 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min sessions) and clinical characteristics (e.g., antidepressant-free) may augment the treatment efficacy of tDCS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7634</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33789158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Clinical response ; Depression ; Meta-analysis ; Remission ; tDCS</subject><ispartof>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2021-07, Vol.126, p.481-490</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-cc96b17b6eda1813551e4f207d36ed2e06813dd86456f21285bba1255af188963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-cc96b17b6eda1813551e4f207d36ed2e06813dd86456f21285bba1255af188963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763421001433$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ruibin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Charlene L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Dongming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chichen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ruiwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Tatia M.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><title>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</title><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><description>•27 RCTs with 1204 depressed patients were included in this meta-analysis.•Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS in modulating depressive symptoms.•The response and remission rates were comparable between active- and sham-tDCS.•A 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min tDCS session may augment the efficacy. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising nonpharmacological intervention for treating depression. We aimed to provide an updated meta-analysis assessing the anti-depressant efficacy of tDCS. We searched the literature from the first available date to 30 December 2020 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). 27 RCTs (N = 1204 patients, 653 in active tDCS and 551 in sham tDCS) were included. Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS (g = 0.46, 95 % CI 0.15−0.76) in modulating depressive symptoms measured by depression rating scales. Active tDCS was also superior to sham tDCS in reducing response and remission rates, but these differences did not reach statistically significant levels (ORresponse = 1.75, 95 % CI 0.85–3.58; ORremission = 1.29, 95 % CI 0.59–2.83). The two groups had comparable dropout rates (OR = 1.28, 95 % CI 0.62–1.64). For treatments of depressive episodes, tDCS may be efficacious. Specific tDCS parameters (e.g., a 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min sessions) and clinical characteristics (e.g., antidepressant-free) may augment the treatment efficacy of tDCS.</description><subject>Clinical response</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>tDCS</subject><issn>0149-7634</issn><issn>1873-7528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUctuFDEQtBCIbAK_AD5ymcGP8WO4raJAkCJxgbPlsXuQVzP2YnsiLR_BN-PVhly5dLdL1VVyF0LvKekpofLjoY-wTSFleOwZYbQnvCdMvkA7qhXvlGD6JdoROoydkny4QtelHAghjHDxGl1xrvRIhd6hP3fzHJx1J2yjx9Y5OFY7hSXUE04zrtnG4loJdsE-ZHAVuy1niBWXGtZtsTWkiOeUGxfaI_7EHo4ZSmn4J7zHK1Tb2WiXUwnlrNnUfFrDb_DYpVhzWpY21twsyhv0am4N3j71G_Tj89332_vu4duXr7f7h84NWtbOuVFOVE0SvKWaciEoDDMjyvMGMSCygd5rOQg5M8q0mCZLmRB2plqPkt-gDxfdY06_NijVrKE4WBYbIW3FMEGUYqOgpFHVhepyKiXDbI45rDafDCXmHIY5mOcwzDkMQ7hpYbTNd08m27SCf977d_1G2F8I0L76GCCb4gJEB5dLG5_Cf03-AkkUowM</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Zhang, Ruibin</creator><creator>Lam, Charlene L.M.</creator><creator>Peng, Xiaoling</creator><creator>Zhang, Dongming</creator><creator>Zhang, Chichen</creator><creator>Huang, Ruiwang</creator><creator>Lee, Tatia M.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><author>Zhang, Ruibin ; Lam, Charlene L.M. ; Peng, Xiaoling ; Zhang, Dongming ; Zhang, Chichen ; Huang, Ruiwang ; Lee, Tatia M.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-cc96b17b6eda1813551e4f207d36ed2e06813dd86456f21285bba1255af188963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical response</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>tDCS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ruibin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Charlene L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Dongming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chichen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ruiwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Tatia M.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Ruibin</au><au>Lam, Charlene L.M.</au><au>Peng, Xiaoling</au><au>Zhang, Dongming</au><au>Zhang, Chichen</au><au>Huang, Ruiwang</au><au>Lee, Tatia M.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><spage>481</spage><epage>490</epage><pages>481-490</pages><issn>0149-7634</issn><eissn>1873-7528</eissn><abstract>•27 RCTs with 1204 depressed patients were included in this meta-analysis.•Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS in modulating depressive symptoms.•The response and remission rates were comparable between active- and sham-tDCS.•A 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min tDCS session may augment the efficacy. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising nonpharmacological intervention for treating depression. We aimed to provide an updated meta-analysis assessing the anti-depressant efficacy of tDCS. We searched the literature from the first available date to 30 December 2020 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). 27 RCTs (N = 1204 patients, 653 in active tDCS and 551 in sham tDCS) were included. Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS (g = 0.46, 95 % CI 0.15−0.76) in modulating depressive symptoms measured by depression rating scales. Active tDCS was also superior to sham tDCS in reducing response and remission rates, but these differences did not reach statistically significant levels (ORresponse = 1.75, 95 % CI 0.85–3.58; ORremission = 1.29, 95 % CI 0.59–2.83). The two groups had comparable dropout rates (OR = 1.28, 95 % CI 0.62–1.64). For treatments of depressive episodes, tDCS may be efficacious. Specific tDCS parameters (e.g., a 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min sessions) and clinical characteristics (e.g., antidepressant-free) may augment the treatment efficacy of tDCS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33789158</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.026</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-7634
ispartof Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2021-07, Vol.126, p.481-490
issn 0149-7634
1873-7528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2507729510
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Clinical response
Depression
Meta-analysis
Remission
tDCS
title Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A04%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20acceptability%20of%20transcranial%20direct%20current%20stimulation%20for%20treating%20depression:%20A%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience%20and%20biobehavioral%20reviews&rft.au=Zhang,%20Ruibin&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=126&rft.spage=481&rft.epage=490&rft.pages=481-490&rft.issn=0149-7634&rft.eissn=1873-7528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2507729510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2507729510&rft_id=info:pmid/33789158&rft_els_id=S0149763421001433&rfr_iscdi=true