Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
•27 RCTs with 1204 depressed patients were included in this meta-analysis.•Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS in modulating depressive symptoms.•The response and remission rates were comparable between active- and sham-tDCS.•A 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min tDCS session may augment the effic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 2021-07, Vol.126, p.481-490 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 490 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 481 |
container_title | Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Zhang, Ruibin Lam, Charlene L.M. Peng, Xiaoling Zhang, Dongming Zhang, Chichen Huang, Ruiwang Lee, Tatia M.C. |
description | •27 RCTs with 1204 depressed patients were included in this meta-analysis.•Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS in modulating depressive symptoms.•The response and remission rates were comparable between active- and sham-tDCS.•A 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min tDCS session may augment the efficacy.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising nonpharmacological intervention for treating depression. We aimed to provide an updated meta-analysis assessing the anti-depressant efficacy of tDCS.
We searched the literature from the first available date to 30 December 2020 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
27 RCTs (N = 1204 patients, 653 in active tDCS and 551 in sham tDCS) were included. Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS (g = 0.46, 95 % CI 0.15−0.76) in modulating depressive symptoms measured by depression rating scales. Active tDCS was also superior to sham tDCS in reducing response and remission rates, but these differences did not reach statistically significant levels (ORresponse = 1.75, 95 % CI 0.85–3.58; ORremission = 1.29, 95 % CI 0.59–2.83). The two groups had comparable dropout rates (OR = 1.28, 95 % CI 0.62–1.64).
For treatments of depressive episodes, tDCS may be efficacious. Specific tDCS parameters (e.g., a 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min sessions) and clinical characteristics (e.g., antidepressant-free) may augment the treatment efficacy of tDCS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2507729510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149763421001433</els_id><sourcerecordid>2507729510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-cc96b17b6eda1813551e4f207d36ed2e06813dd86456f21285bba1255af188963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUctuFDEQtBCIbAK_AD5ymcGP8WO4raJAkCJxgbPlsXuQVzP2YnsiLR_BN-PVhly5dLdL1VVyF0LvKekpofLjoY-wTSFleOwZYbQnvCdMvkA7qhXvlGD6JdoROoydkny4QtelHAghjHDxGl1xrvRIhd6hP3fzHJx1J2yjx9Y5OFY7hSXUE04zrtnG4loJdsE-ZHAVuy1niBWXGtZtsTWkiOeUGxfaI_7EHo4ZSmn4J7zHK1Tb2WiXUwnlrNnUfFrDb_DYpVhzWpY21twsyhv0am4N3j71G_Tj89332_vu4duXr7f7h84NWtbOuVFOVE0SvKWaciEoDDMjyvMGMSCygd5rOQg5M8q0mCZLmRB2plqPkt-gDxfdY06_NijVrKE4WBYbIW3FMEGUYqOgpFHVhepyKiXDbI45rDafDCXmHIY5mOcwzDkMQ7hpYbTNd08m27SCf977d_1G2F8I0L76GCCb4gJEB5dLG5_Cf03-AkkUowM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2507729510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Zhang, Ruibin ; Lam, Charlene L.M. ; Peng, Xiaoling ; Zhang, Dongming ; Zhang, Chichen ; Huang, Ruiwang ; Lee, Tatia M.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ruibin ; Lam, Charlene L.M. ; Peng, Xiaoling ; Zhang, Dongming ; Zhang, Chichen ; Huang, Ruiwang ; Lee, Tatia M.C.</creatorcontrib><description>•27 RCTs with 1204 depressed patients were included in this meta-analysis.•Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS in modulating depressive symptoms.•The response and remission rates were comparable between active- and sham-tDCS.•A 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min tDCS session may augment the efficacy.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising nonpharmacological intervention for treating depression. We aimed to provide an updated meta-analysis assessing the anti-depressant efficacy of tDCS.
We searched the literature from the first available date to 30 December 2020 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
27 RCTs (N = 1204 patients, 653 in active tDCS and 551 in sham tDCS) were included. Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS (g = 0.46, 95 % CI 0.15−0.76) in modulating depressive symptoms measured by depression rating scales. Active tDCS was also superior to sham tDCS in reducing response and remission rates, but these differences did not reach statistically significant levels (ORresponse = 1.75, 95 % CI 0.85–3.58; ORremission = 1.29, 95 % CI 0.59–2.83). The two groups had comparable dropout rates (OR = 1.28, 95 % CI 0.62–1.64).
For treatments of depressive episodes, tDCS may be efficacious. Specific tDCS parameters (e.g., a 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min sessions) and clinical characteristics (e.g., antidepressant-free) may augment the treatment efficacy of tDCS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7634</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33789158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Clinical response ; Depression ; Meta-analysis ; Remission ; tDCS</subject><ispartof>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2021-07, Vol.126, p.481-490</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-cc96b17b6eda1813551e4f207d36ed2e06813dd86456f21285bba1255af188963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-cc96b17b6eda1813551e4f207d36ed2e06813dd86456f21285bba1255af188963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763421001433$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ruibin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Charlene L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Dongming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chichen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ruiwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Tatia M.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><title>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</title><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><description>•27 RCTs with 1204 depressed patients were included in this meta-analysis.•Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS in modulating depressive symptoms.•The response and remission rates were comparable between active- and sham-tDCS.•A 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min tDCS session may augment the efficacy.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising nonpharmacological intervention for treating depression. We aimed to provide an updated meta-analysis assessing the anti-depressant efficacy of tDCS.
We searched the literature from the first available date to 30 December 2020 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
27 RCTs (N = 1204 patients, 653 in active tDCS and 551 in sham tDCS) were included. Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS (g = 0.46, 95 % CI 0.15−0.76) in modulating depressive symptoms measured by depression rating scales. Active tDCS was also superior to sham tDCS in reducing response and remission rates, but these differences did not reach statistically significant levels (ORresponse = 1.75, 95 % CI 0.85–3.58; ORremission = 1.29, 95 % CI 0.59–2.83). The two groups had comparable dropout rates (OR = 1.28, 95 % CI 0.62–1.64).
For treatments of depressive episodes, tDCS may be efficacious. Specific tDCS parameters (e.g., a 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min sessions) and clinical characteristics (e.g., antidepressant-free) may augment the treatment efficacy of tDCS.</description><subject>Clinical response</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>tDCS</subject><issn>0149-7634</issn><issn>1873-7528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUctuFDEQtBCIbAK_AD5ymcGP8WO4raJAkCJxgbPlsXuQVzP2YnsiLR_BN-PVhly5dLdL1VVyF0LvKekpofLjoY-wTSFleOwZYbQnvCdMvkA7qhXvlGD6JdoROoydkny4QtelHAghjHDxGl1xrvRIhd6hP3fzHJx1J2yjx9Y5OFY7hSXUE04zrtnG4loJdsE-ZHAVuy1niBWXGtZtsTWkiOeUGxfaI_7EHo4ZSmn4J7zHK1Tb2WiXUwnlrNnUfFrDb_DYpVhzWpY21twsyhv0am4N3j71G_Tj89332_vu4duXr7f7h84NWtbOuVFOVE0SvKWaciEoDDMjyvMGMSCygd5rOQg5M8q0mCZLmRB2plqPkt-gDxfdY06_NijVrKE4WBYbIW3FMEGUYqOgpFHVhepyKiXDbI45rDafDCXmHIY5mOcwzDkMQ7hpYbTNd08m27SCf977d_1G2F8I0L76GCCb4gJEB5dLG5_Cf03-AkkUowM</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Zhang, Ruibin</creator><creator>Lam, Charlene L.M.</creator><creator>Peng, Xiaoling</creator><creator>Zhang, Dongming</creator><creator>Zhang, Chichen</creator><creator>Huang, Ruiwang</creator><creator>Lee, Tatia M.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><author>Zhang, Ruibin ; Lam, Charlene L.M. ; Peng, Xiaoling ; Zhang, Dongming ; Zhang, Chichen ; Huang, Ruiwang ; Lee, Tatia M.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-cc96b17b6eda1813551e4f207d36ed2e06813dd86456f21285bba1255af188963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical response</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>tDCS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ruibin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Charlene L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Dongming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chichen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ruiwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Tatia M.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Ruibin</au><au>Lam, Charlene L.M.</au><au>Peng, Xiaoling</au><au>Zhang, Dongming</au><au>Zhang, Chichen</au><au>Huang, Ruiwang</au><au>Lee, Tatia M.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><spage>481</spage><epage>490</epage><pages>481-490</pages><issn>0149-7634</issn><eissn>1873-7528</eissn><abstract>•27 RCTs with 1204 depressed patients were included in this meta-analysis.•Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS in modulating depressive symptoms.•The response and remission rates were comparable between active- and sham-tDCS.•A 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min tDCS session may augment the efficacy.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising nonpharmacological intervention for treating depression. We aimed to provide an updated meta-analysis assessing the anti-depressant efficacy of tDCS.
We searched the literature from the first available date to 30 December 2020 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
27 RCTs (N = 1204 patients, 653 in active tDCS and 551 in sham tDCS) were included. Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS (g = 0.46, 95 % CI 0.15−0.76) in modulating depressive symptoms measured by depression rating scales. Active tDCS was also superior to sham tDCS in reducing response and remission rates, but these differences did not reach statistically significant levels (ORresponse = 1.75, 95 % CI 0.85–3.58; ORremission = 1.29, 95 % CI 0.59–2.83). The two groups had comparable dropout rates (OR = 1.28, 95 % CI 0.62–1.64).
For treatments of depressive episodes, tDCS may be efficacious. Specific tDCS parameters (e.g., a 2-mA stimulation current and 30-min sessions) and clinical characteristics (e.g., antidepressant-free) may augment the treatment efficacy of tDCS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33789158</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.026</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-7634 |
ispartof | Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2021-07, Vol.126, p.481-490 |
issn | 0149-7634 1873-7528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2507729510 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Clinical response Depression Meta-analysis Remission tDCS |
title | Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A04%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20acceptability%20of%20transcranial%20direct%20current%20stimulation%20for%20treating%20depression:%20A%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience%20and%20biobehavioral%20reviews&rft.au=Zhang,%20Ruibin&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=126&rft.spage=481&rft.epage=490&rft.pages=481-490&rft.issn=0149-7634&rft.eissn=1873-7528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2507729510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2507729510&rft_id=info:pmid/33789158&rft_els_id=S0149763421001433&rfr_iscdi=true |