Practicality and cost-effectiveness of using MRI compatible EEG system in the critical care setting

•Using MRI compatible EEG reduces non-monitored time for patients in the critical care unit.•MRI compatible EEG electrodes do not interfere with the quality of MRI scans.•Using MRI Compatible EEG is cost-effective because it needs a single hookup and reduces burden for the EEG technician. Continuous...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epilepsy research 2021-07, Vol.173, p.106623-106623, Article 106623
Hauptverfasser: Nayak, Chetan S., Nattanmai, Premkumar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106623
container_issue
container_start_page 106623
container_title Epilepsy research
container_volume 173
creator Nayak, Chetan S.
Nattanmai, Premkumar
description •Using MRI compatible EEG reduces non-monitored time for patients in the critical care unit.•MRI compatible EEG electrodes do not interfere with the quality of MRI scans.•Using MRI Compatible EEG is cost-effective because it needs a single hookup and reduces burden for the EEG technician. Continuous video-EEG (cvEEG) monitoring is a vastly utilized tool for monitoring critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Our study investigates the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of using MRI Compatible EEG electrode system for patients being monitored in the intensive care unit. This retrospective study included 14 critically ill patients who underwent cvEEG between March 2019 to March 2020. They were classified into 2 subgroups: Group 1- ‘MRI-compatible EEG’ (mean age: 56.00 ± 19.99 years; M:F = 2:5; N = 7), Group 2 – ‘Conventional EEG’ (mean age: 49.14 ± 24.76 years; M:F = 4:3; N = 7). The EEG monitoring times as well as cost-effectiveness of cvEEG between the groups were compared using Mann-Whitney Test (p ≤ 0.05). We also compared the MRI quality between the groups using Chi-squared test (p ≤ 0.05). The EEG non-monitored time in Group 2 (7.62 ± 6.45 h) was significantly higher than Group 1 (2.71 ± 2.34 h)] (p = 0.025). The average daily cost for cvEEG in Group 1 ($2098.53 ± 493.58) and Group 2 ($2230.58 ± 142.73) was comparable (p = 0.896). The quality of MRI scans between Group 1 (6/7) and 2 (6/7) were also comparable (p = 1.000). The monitoring time lost in patients with MRI Compatible EEG electrodes was significantly lower than the patients with Conventional EEG electrodes. The daily cost of monitoring and the quality of MRI scans were comparable between the 2 groups. We conclude that the use of MRI Compatible EEG electrodes is a practical and cost-effective method to improve the quality of monitoring in critically ill patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106623
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2507148653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0920121121000760</els_id><sourcerecordid>2507148653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-851f113872fce3d22af2083b6a69cf0356c9731b36ecb383773a191496f1c0383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtuFDEQRS0EIpPAL0ResumJy-5xu5chmoRIQaAorC23uwwe9SsuT6T5exwmgSUrW7furcdhjINYgwB9sVvjMuBCh4S0lkJCkbWW6g1bgWlkpU1dv2Ur0UpRgQQ4YadEOyFEI-r6PTtRqjHlb1bMf0_O5-jdEPOBu6nnfqZcYQhY5CeckIjPge8pTj_51_vbUh8Xl2M3IN9ubzgdKOPI48TzL-Q-xT_NuHcJOWHOJfaBvQtuIPz48p6xH9fbh6sv1d23m9ury7vKq6bOldlAAFBl_-BR9VK6IIVRnXa69UGojfZto6BTGn2njGoa5aCFutUBvCjCGft07Luk-XGPlO0YyeMwuAnnPVm5EQ3URm9UsZqj1aeZKGGwS4qjSwcLwj4jtjv7D7F9RmyPiEv0_GXKvhux_xt8ZVoMn48GLLc-RUyWfMTJYx9TgWr7Of5_ym_i8JH4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2507148653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practicality and cost-effectiveness of using MRI compatible EEG system in the critical care setting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nayak, Chetan S. ; Nattanmai, Premkumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Chetan S. ; Nattanmai, Premkumar</creatorcontrib><description>•Using MRI compatible EEG reduces non-monitored time for patients in the critical care unit.•MRI compatible EEG electrodes do not interfere with the quality of MRI scans.•Using MRI Compatible EEG is cost-effective because it needs a single hookup and reduces burden for the EEG technician. Continuous video-EEG (cvEEG) monitoring is a vastly utilized tool for monitoring critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Our study investigates the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of using MRI Compatible EEG electrode system for patients being monitored in the intensive care unit. This retrospective study included 14 critically ill patients who underwent cvEEG between March 2019 to March 2020. They were classified into 2 subgroups: Group 1- ‘MRI-compatible EEG’ (mean age: 56.00 ± 19.99 years; M:F = 2:5; N = 7), Group 2 – ‘Conventional EEG’ (mean age: 49.14 ± 24.76 years; M:F = 4:3; N = 7). The EEG monitoring times as well as cost-effectiveness of cvEEG between the groups were compared using Mann-Whitney Test (p ≤ 0.05). We also compared the MRI quality between the groups using Chi-squared test (p ≤ 0.05). The EEG non-monitored time in Group 2 (7.62 ± 6.45 h) was significantly higher than Group 1 (2.71 ± 2.34 h)] (p = 0.025). The average daily cost for cvEEG in Group 1 ($2098.53 ± 493.58) and Group 2 ($2230.58 ± 142.73) was comparable (p = 0.896). The quality of MRI scans between Group 1 (6/7) and 2 (6/7) were also comparable (p = 1.000). The monitoring time lost in patients with MRI Compatible EEG electrodes was significantly lower than the patients with Conventional EEG electrodes. The daily cost of monitoring and the quality of MRI scans were comparable between the 2 groups. We conclude that the use of MRI Compatible EEG electrodes is a practical and cost-effective method to improve the quality of monitoring in critically ill patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-1211</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106623</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33780708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Continuous electroencephalography ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Critical Care ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Middle Aged ; MRI compatible EEG ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Epilepsy research, 2021-07, Vol.173, p.106623-106623, Article 106623</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-851f113872fce3d22af2083b6a69cf0356c9731b36ecb383773a191496f1c0383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-851f113872fce3d22af2083b6a69cf0356c9731b36ecb383773a191496f1c0383</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6399-2508</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121121000760$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33780708$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Chetan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nattanmai, Premkumar</creatorcontrib><title>Practicality and cost-effectiveness of using MRI compatible EEG system in the critical care setting</title><title>Epilepsy research</title><addtitle>Epilepsy Res</addtitle><description>•Using MRI compatible EEG reduces non-monitored time for patients in the critical care unit.•MRI compatible EEG electrodes do not interfere with the quality of MRI scans.•Using MRI Compatible EEG is cost-effective because it needs a single hookup and reduces burden for the EEG technician. Continuous video-EEG (cvEEG) monitoring is a vastly utilized tool for monitoring critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Our study investigates the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of using MRI Compatible EEG electrode system for patients being monitored in the intensive care unit. This retrospective study included 14 critically ill patients who underwent cvEEG between March 2019 to March 2020. They were classified into 2 subgroups: Group 1- ‘MRI-compatible EEG’ (mean age: 56.00 ± 19.99 years; M:F = 2:5; N = 7), Group 2 – ‘Conventional EEG’ (mean age: 49.14 ± 24.76 years; M:F = 4:3; N = 7). The EEG monitoring times as well as cost-effectiveness of cvEEG between the groups were compared using Mann-Whitney Test (p ≤ 0.05). We also compared the MRI quality between the groups using Chi-squared test (p ≤ 0.05). The EEG non-monitored time in Group 2 (7.62 ± 6.45 h) was significantly higher than Group 1 (2.71 ± 2.34 h)] (p = 0.025). The average daily cost for cvEEG in Group 1 ($2098.53 ± 493.58) and Group 2 ($2230.58 ± 142.73) was comparable (p = 0.896). The quality of MRI scans between Group 1 (6/7) and 2 (6/7) were also comparable (p = 1.000). The monitoring time lost in patients with MRI Compatible EEG electrodes was significantly lower than the patients with Conventional EEG electrodes. The daily cost of monitoring and the quality of MRI scans were comparable between the 2 groups. We conclude that the use of MRI Compatible EEG electrodes is a practical and cost-effective method to improve the quality of monitoring in critically ill patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Continuous electroencephalography</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>MRI compatible EEG</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0920-1211</issn><issn>1872-6844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtuFDEQRS0EIpPAL0ResumJy-5xu5chmoRIQaAorC23uwwe9SsuT6T5exwmgSUrW7furcdhjINYgwB9sVvjMuBCh4S0lkJCkbWW6g1bgWlkpU1dv2Ur0UpRgQQ4YadEOyFEI-r6PTtRqjHlb1bMf0_O5-jdEPOBu6nnfqZcYQhY5CeckIjPge8pTj_51_vbUh8Xl2M3IN9ubzgdKOPI48TzL-Q-xT_NuHcJOWHOJfaBvQtuIPz48p6xH9fbh6sv1d23m9ury7vKq6bOldlAAFBl_-BR9VK6IIVRnXa69UGojfZto6BTGn2njGoa5aCFutUBvCjCGft07Luk-XGPlO0YyeMwuAnnPVm5EQ3URm9UsZqj1aeZKGGwS4qjSwcLwj4jtjv7D7F9RmyPiEv0_GXKvhux_xt8ZVoMn48GLLc-RUyWfMTJYx9TgWr7Of5_ym_i8JH4</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Nayak, Chetan S.</creator><creator>Nattanmai, Premkumar</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6399-2508</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Practicality and cost-effectiveness of using MRI compatible EEG system in the critical care setting</title><author>Nayak, Chetan S. ; Nattanmai, Premkumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-851f113872fce3d22af2083b6a69cf0356c9731b36ecb383773a191496f1c0383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Continuous electroencephalography</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>MRI compatible EEG</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Chetan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nattanmai, Premkumar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Epilepsy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nayak, Chetan S.</au><au>Nattanmai, Premkumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practicality and cost-effectiveness of using MRI compatible EEG system in the critical care setting</atitle><jtitle>Epilepsy research</jtitle><addtitle>Epilepsy Res</addtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>173</volume><spage>106623</spage><epage>106623</epage><pages>106623-106623</pages><artnum>106623</artnum><issn>0920-1211</issn><eissn>1872-6844</eissn><abstract>•Using MRI compatible EEG reduces non-monitored time for patients in the critical care unit.•MRI compatible EEG electrodes do not interfere with the quality of MRI scans.•Using MRI Compatible EEG is cost-effective because it needs a single hookup and reduces burden for the EEG technician. Continuous video-EEG (cvEEG) monitoring is a vastly utilized tool for monitoring critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Our study investigates the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of using MRI Compatible EEG electrode system for patients being monitored in the intensive care unit. This retrospective study included 14 critically ill patients who underwent cvEEG between March 2019 to March 2020. They were classified into 2 subgroups: Group 1- ‘MRI-compatible EEG’ (mean age: 56.00 ± 19.99 years; M:F = 2:5; N = 7), Group 2 – ‘Conventional EEG’ (mean age: 49.14 ± 24.76 years; M:F = 4:3; N = 7). The EEG monitoring times as well as cost-effectiveness of cvEEG between the groups were compared using Mann-Whitney Test (p ≤ 0.05). We also compared the MRI quality between the groups using Chi-squared test (p ≤ 0.05). The EEG non-monitored time in Group 2 (7.62 ± 6.45 h) was significantly higher than Group 1 (2.71 ± 2.34 h)] (p = 0.025). The average daily cost for cvEEG in Group 1 ($2098.53 ± 493.58) and Group 2 ($2230.58 ± 142.73) was comparable (p = 0.896). The quality of MRI scans between Group 1 (6/7) and 2 (6/7) were also comparable (p = 1.000). The monitoring time lost in patients with MRI Compatible EEG electrodes was significantly lower than the patients with Conventional EEG electrodes. The daily cost of monitoring and the quality of MRI scans were comparable between the 2 groups. We conclude that the use of MRI Compatible EEG electrodes is a practical and cost-effective method to improve the quality of monitoring in critically ill patients.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33780708</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106623</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6399-2508</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0920-1211
ispartof Epilepsy research, 2021-07, Vol.173, p.106623-106623, Article 106623
issn 0920-1211
1872-6844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2507148653
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Continuous electroencephalography
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Critical Care
Electroencephalography - methods
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Middle Aged
MRI compatible EEG
Retrospective Studies
Young Adult
title Practicality and cost-effectiveness of using MRI compatible EEG system in the critical care setting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A05%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practicality%20and%20cost-effectiveness%20of%20using%20MRI%20compatible%20EEG%20system%20in%20the%20critical%20care%20setting&rft.jtitle=Epilepsy%20research&rft.au=Nayak,%20Chetan%20S.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=173&rft.spage=106623&rft.epage=106623&rft.pages=106623-106623&rft.artnum=106623&rft.issn=0920-1211&rft.eissn=1872-6844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106623&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2507148653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2507148653&rft_id=info:pmid/33780708&rft_els_id=S0920121121000760&rfr_iscdi=true