Validation of the Implementation Climate Scale in Nursing
Background One critical factor in effective implementation of evidence‐based practices (EBPs) in nursing is an organizational context that facilitates and supports implementation efforts. Measuring implementation climate can add useful insights on the extent to which the organizational context suppo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Worldviews on evidence-based nursing 2021-04, Vol.18 (2), p.85-92 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 92 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 85 |
| container_title | Worldviews on evidence-based nursing |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Ehrhart, Mark G. Shuman, Clayton J. Torres, Elisa M. Kath, Lisa M. Prentiss, Andrea Butler, Eve Aarons, Gregory A. |
| description | Background
One critical factor in effective implementation of evidence‐based practices (EBPs) in nursing is an organizational context that facilitates and supports implementation efforts. Measuring implementation climate can add useful insights on the extent to which the organizational context supports EBP implementation.
Aims
This study cross‐validates and examines the psychometric properties of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS), which measures nurses’ perceptions of their unit’s climate for EBP implementation.
Methods
This study analyzed ICS data from two cross‐sectional studies, including 203 nurses from California and 301 nurses from Florida. Analyses included evaluation of internal consistency, multilevel aggregation statistics, and confirmatory factor analyses.
Results
The 18‐item ICS demonstrated comparable psychometric properties to the original measure development paper in both samples. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the scale’s factor structure in both samples.
Linking Evidence to Practice
The ICS is a pragmatic measure that can be used to assess unit implementation climate in nursing contexts. Results from the ICS from nurses and nurse leaders can provide insights into implementation‐specific barriers and facilitators within the organizational context. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/wvn.12500 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2506287637</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2512667401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-3925fe7076b0971b3045c74a9100af865e52b7261757de19ebee650dd0e93ca33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgipvTg19ACl700O1N0iTtUYZ_BmMe1OmtpO1b7Ujb2bSOfXujnR4Ec0l4-fGQ9yHklMKYujPZfFRjygTAHhlSFVBfqlDtu7cIhE-BvQzIkbUrACYV44dkwLmSggs5JNFSmyLTbVFXXp177Rt6s3JtsMSq7adTU5S6Re8h1Qa9ovIWXWOL6vWYHOTaWDzZ3SPydHP9OL3z5_e3s-nV3E95GILPIyZyVKBkApGiCYdApCrQEQXQeSgFCpYoJqkSKkMaYYIoBWQZYMRTzfmIXPS566Z-79C2cVnYFI3RFdadjd3ekoVKcuXo-R-6qrumcr9zijIpVQDUqctepU1tbYN5vG7cis02phB_9Rm7PuPvPp092yV2SYnZr_wp0IFJDzaFwe3_SfHzctFHfgL0F3yK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2512667401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Implementation Climate Scale in Nursing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ehrhart, Mark G. ; Shuman, Clayton J. ; Torres, Elisa M. ; Kath, Lisa M. ; Prentiss, Andrea ; Butler, Eve ; Aarons, Gregory A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ehrhart, Mark G. ; Shuman, Clayton J. ; Torres, Elisa M. ; Kath, Lisa M. ; Prentiss, Andrea ; Butler, Eve ; Aarons, Gregory A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
One critical factor in effective implementation of evidence‐based practices (EBPs) in nursing is an organizational context that facilitates and supports implementation efforts. Measuring implementation climate can add useful insights on the extent to which the organizational context supports EBP implementation.
Aims
This study cross‐validates and examines the psychometric properties of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS), which measures nurses’ perceptions of their unit’s climate for EBP implementation.
Methods
This study analyzed ICS data from two cross‐sectional studies, including 203 nurses from California and 301 nurses from Florida. Analyses included evaluation of internal consistency, multilevel aggregation statistics, and confirmatory factor analyses.
Results
The 18‐item ICS demonstrated comparable psychometric properties to the original measure development paper in both samples. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the scale’s factor structure in both samples.
Linking Evidence to Practice
The ICS is a pragmatic measure that can be used to assess unit implementation climate in nursing contexts. Results from the ICS from nurses and nurse leaders can provide insights into implementation‐specific barriers and facilitators within the organizational context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-102X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12500</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33765356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitudes ; California ; Evidence-based nursing ; evidence‐based practice ; Female ; Florida ; Humans ; implementation ; instrument development ; Leadership ; Male ; Management of change ; Middle Aged ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing - methods ; Nursing - trends ; organizational climate ; Organizational Culture ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Psychometrics - methods ; Quality of care ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; survey methodology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; work environment ; working conditions</subject><ispartof>Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2021-04, Vol.18 (2), p.85-92</ispartof><rights>2021 Sigma Theta Tau International</rights><rights>2021 Sigma Theta Tau International.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-3925fe7076b0971b3045c74a9100af865e52b7261757de19ebee650dd0e93ca33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-3925fe7076b0971b3045c74a9100af865e52b7261757de19ebee650dd0e93ca33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6072-9739 ; 0000-0001-5751-9813 ; 0000-0003-2593-809X ; 0000-0001-8969-5002 ; 0000-0003-1846-7250</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fwvn.12500$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fwvn.12500$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27926,27927,45576,45577</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33765356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ehrhart, Mark G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuman, Clayton J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Elisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kath, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prentiss, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Eve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aarons, Gregory A.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Implementation Climate Scale in Nursing</title><title>Worldviews on evidence-based nursing</title><addtitle>Worldviews Evid Based Nurs</addtitle><description>Background
One critical factor in effective implementation of evidence‐based practices (EBPs) in nursing is an organizational context that facilitates and supports implementation efforts. Measuring implementation climate can add useful insights on the extent to which the organizational context supports EBP implementation.
Aims
This study cross‐validates and examines the psychometric properties of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS), which measures nurses’ perceptions of their unit’s climate for EBP implementation.
Methods
This study analyzed ICS data from two cross‐sectional studies, including 203 nurses from California and 301 nurses from Florida. Analyses included evaluation of internal consistency, multilevel aggregation statistics, and confirmatory factor analyses.
Results
The 18‐item ICS demonstrated comparable psychometric properties to the original measure development paper in both samples. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the scale’s factor structure in both samples.
Linking Evidence to Practice
The ICS is a pragmatic measure that can be used to assess unit implementation climate in nursing contexts. Results from the ICS from nurses and nurse leaders can provide insights into implementation‐specific barriers and facilitators within the organizational context.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Evidence-based nursing</subject><subject>evidence‐based practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implementation</subject><subject>instrument development</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management of change</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing - methods</subject><subject>Nursing - trends</subject><subject>organizational climate</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>survey methodology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>work environment</subject><subject>working conditions</subject><issn>1545-102X</issn><issn>1741-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgipvTg19ACl700O1N0iTtUYZ_BmMe1OmtpO1b7Ujb2bSOfXujnR4Ec0l4-fGQ9yHklMKYujPZfFRjygTAHhlSFVBfqlDtu7cIhE-BvQzIkbUrACYV44dkwLmSggs5JNFSmyLTbVFXXp177Rt6s3JtsMSq7adTU5S6Re8h1Qa9ovIWXWOL6vWYHOTaWDzZ3SPydHP9OL3z5_e3s-nV3E95GILPIyZyVKBkApGiCYdApCrQEQXQeSgFCpYoJqkSKkMaYYIoBWQZYMRTzfmIXPS566Z-79C2cVnYFI3RFdadjd3ekoVKcuXo-R-6qrumcr9zijIpVQDUqctepU1tbYN5vG7cis02phB_9Rm7PuPvPp092yV2SYnZr_wp0IFJDzaFwe3_SfHzctFHfgL0F3yK</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Ehrhart, Mark G.</creator><creator>Shuman, Clayton J.</creator><creator>Torres, Elisa M.</creator><creator>Kath, Lisa M.</creator><creator>Prentiss, Andrea</creator><creator>Butler, Eve</creator><creator>Aarons, Gregory A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-9739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-9813</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2593-809X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8969-5002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1846-7250</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Validation of the Implementation Climate Scale in Nursing</title><author>Ehrhart, Mark G. ; Shuman, Clayton J. ; Torres, Elisa M. ; Kath, Lisa M. ; Prentiss, Andrea ; Butler, Eve ; Aarons, Gregory A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-3925fe7076b0971b3045c74a9100af865e52b7261757de19ebee650dd0e93ca33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Evidence-based nursing</topic><topic>evidence‐based practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implementation</topic><topic>instrument development</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management of change</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing - methods</topic><topic>Nursing - trends</topic><topic>organizational climate</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>survey methodology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>work environment</topic><topic>working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ehrhart, Mark G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuman, Clayton J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Elisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kath, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prentiss, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Eve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aarons, Gregory A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Worldviews on evidence-based nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ehrhart, Mark G.</au><au>Shuman, Clayton J.</au><au>Torres, Elisa M.</au><au>Kath, Lisa M.</au><au>Prentiss, Andrea</au><au>Butler, Eve</au><au>Aarons, Gregory A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Implementation Climate Scale in Nursing</atitle><jtitle>Worldviews on evidence-based nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Worldviews Evid Based Nurs</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>85-92</pages><issn>1545-102X</issn><eissn>1741-6787</eissn><abstract>Background
One critical factor in effective implementation of evidence‐based practices (EBPs) in nursing is an organizational context that facilitates and supports implementation efforts. Measuring implementation climate can add useful insights on the extent to which the organizational context supports EBP implementation.
Aims
This study cross‐validates and examines the psychometric properties of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS), which measures nurses’ perceptions of their unit’s climate for EBP implementation.
Methods
This study analyzed ICS data from two cross‐sectional studies, including 203 nurses from California and 301 nurses from Florida. Analyses included evaluation of internal consistency, multilevel aggregation statistics, and confirmatory factor analyses.
Results
The 18‐item ICS demonstrated comparable psychometric properties to the original measure development paper in both samples. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the scale’s factor structure in both samples.
Linking Evidence to Practice
The ICS is a pragmatic measure that can be used to assess unit implementation climate in nursing contexts. Results from the ICS from nurses and nurse leaders can provide insights into implementation‐specific barriers and facilitators within the organizational context.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33765356</pmid><doi>10.1111/wvn.12500</doi><tpages>0</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-9739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-9813</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2593-809X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8969-5002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1846-7250</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1545-102X |
| ispartof | Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2021-04, Vol.18 (2), p.85-92 |
| issn | 1545-102X 1741-6787 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2506287637 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Adult Attitudes California Evidence-based nursing evidence‐based practice Female Florida Humans implementation instrument development Leadership Male Management of change Middle Aged Nurses Nursing Nursing - methods Nursing - trends organizational climate Organizational Culture Psychometrics - instrumentation Psychometrics - methods Quality of care Quantitative psychology Questionnaires survey methodology Surveys and Questionnaires work environment working conditions |
| title | Validation of the Implementation Climate Scale in Nursing |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T01%3A08%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Implementation%20Climate%20Scale%20in%20Nursing&rft.jtitle=Worldviews%20on%20evidence-based%20nursing&rft.au=Ehrhart,%20Mark%20G.&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=85-92&rft.issn=1545-102X&rft.eissn=1741-6787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/wvn.12500&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2512667401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2512667401&rft_id=info:pmid/33765356&rfr_iscdi=true |