Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast

Breast MRI is used as a reference for screening breast cancer among women with a genetic high risk. Its sensitivity and specificity might decrease because of the background parenchymal enhancement. Therefore, it is recommended to plan the MRI between the 7th and the 14th day of the menstrual cycle d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité & sénologie obstétrique, fertilité & sénologie, 2021-12, Vol.49 (12), p.923-929
Hauptverfasser: de Kermadec, E, Thomassin, I, Daraï, E, Kolanska, K, Chabbert-Buffet, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; fre
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 929
container_issue 12
container_start_page 923
container_title Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité & sénologie
container_volume 49
creator de Kermadec, E
Thomassin, I
Daraï, E
Kolanska, K
Chabbert-Buffet, N
description Breast MRI is used as a reference for screening breast cancer among women with a genetic high risk. Its sensitivity and specificity might decrease because of the background parenchymal enhancement. Therefore, it is recommended to plan the MRI between the 7th and the 14th day of the menstrual cycle despite of the burden of this organization. Our aim was to evaluate the interpretation (performance) of the MRI performance when it was done out of this period. We analyzed the MRI done in the Tenon Hospital among patients with a genetic high risk, without a history of breast cancer, between 2006 and 2016. We analyzed the rate of enhancement hindering the interpretation (EH) - that is to say grade III and IV -, the rate of additional explorations (MRI and biopsy), and the occurrence of interval events in 2 groups according to the programming of the examination: appropriate programming (D7-D14) and inappropriate programming (outside this period). In total, 126 MRI were analyzed, done in a population of 62 women with a genetic predisposition to Breast Cancer (BRCA 1 or 2: 91%, others: 9%), median age was 34.5 years old. 84 were in appropriate programming and 42 were in an inappropriate one. The rate of EH was comparable between the two groups (respectively 31% and 35.7%, P=1), as well as the rate of additional explorations (respectively 31% and 45%, P=0.11). Our results suggest that the programming of screening MRI could be simplified among patients with a genetic predisposition of breast cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.03.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2506278861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2506278861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-4638ef5189113a26362b574ec6791cc3e64e97c578749b70171757ed1d3b0993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtqwzAQRUWhNCHND3RRtOzGrh62ZC9L6COQUijZG1kZp05ly5FkQj6g_10lTVcDd85cOIPQHSUpJVQ87tKtbXzKCKMp4Slh2RWaskwUiaRFOUFz73eEECrznNPsBk04l5JKXkzRz7IblA7YNjh8Ae6g98GNymB91Aaw7c_xPiZtOJ6otg_gBgdBhTZuL3fvn0vswI8mROCcNNYYe0jG4YQcbCzGKuAt9BBajV3rvyPicO1A-XCLrhtlPMwvc4bWL8_rxVuy-nhdLp5WycAoDUkmeAFNHp0o5YoJLlidywy0kCXVmoPIoJQ6l4XMylpG4agsYUM3vCZlyWfo4a92cHY_gg9V13oNxqge7OgrlhPBZFEIGtH7CzrWHWyqwbWdcsfq_3P8FzOtcC8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2506278861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>de Kermadec, E ; Thomassin, I ; Daraï, E ; Kolanska, K ; Chabbert-Buffet, N</creator><creatorcontrib>de Kermadec, E ; Thomassin, I ; Daraï, E ; Kolanska, K ; Chabbert-Buffet, N</creatorcontrib><description>Breast MRI is used as a reference for screening breast cancer among women with a genetic high risk. Its sensitivity and specificity might decrease because of the background parenchymal enhancement. Therefore, it is recommended to plan the MRI between the 7th and the 14th day of the menstrual cycle despite of the burden of this organization. Our aim was to evaluate the interpretation (performance) of the MRI performance when it was done out of this period. We analyzed the MRI done in the Tenon Hospital among patients with a genetic high risk, without a history of breast cancer, between 2006 and 2016. We analyzed the rate of enhancement hindering the interpretation (EH) - that is to say grade III and IV -, the rate of additional explorations (MRI and biopsy), and the occurrence of interval events in 2 groups according to the programming of the examination: appropriate programming (D7-D14) and inappropriate programming (outside this period). In total, 126 MRI were analyzed, done in a population of 62 women with a genetic predisposition to Breast Cancer (BRCA 1 or 2: 91%, others: 9%), median age was 34.5 years old. 84 were in appropriate programming and 42 were in an inappropriate one. The rate of EH was comparable between the two groups (respectively 31% and 35.7%, P=1), as well as the rate of additional explorations (respectively 31% and 45%, P=0.11). Our results suggest that the programming of screening MRI could be simplified among patients with a genetic predisposition of breast cancer.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2468-7189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.03.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33771738</identifier><language>eng ; fre</language><publisher>France</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Breast - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Menstrual Cycle ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité &amp; sénologie, 2021-12, Vol.49 (12), p.923-929</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771738$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Kermadec, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomassin, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daraï, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolanska, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chabbert-Buffet, N</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast</title><title>Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité &amp; sénologie</title><addtitle>Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol</addtitle><description>Breast MRI is used as a reference for screening breast cancer among women with a genetic high risk. Its sensitivity and specificity might decrease because of the background parenchymal enhancement. Therefore, it is recommended to plan the MRI between the 7th and the 14th day of the menstrual cycle despite of the burden of this organization. Our aim was to evaluate the interpretation (performance) of the MRI performance when it was done out of this period. We analyzed the MRI done in the Tenon Hospital among patients with a genetic high risk, without a history of breast cancer, between 2006 and 2016. We analyzed the rate of enhancement hindering the interpretation (EH) - that is to say grade III and IV -, the rate of additional explorations (MRI and biopsy), and the occurrence of interval events in 2 groups according to the programming of the examination: appropriate programming (D7-D14) and inappropriate programming (outside this period). In total, 126 MRI were analyzed, done in a population of 62 women with a genetic predisposition to Breast Cancer (BRCA 1 or 2: 91%, others: 9%), median age was 34.5 years old. 84 were in appropriate programming and 42 were in an inappropriate one. The rate of EH was comparable between the two groups (respectively 31% and 35.7%, P=1), as well as the rate of additional explorations (respectively 31% and 45%, P=0.11). Our results suggest that the programming of screening MRI could be simplified among patients with a genetic predisposition of breast cancer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Menstrual Cycle</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>2468-7189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMtqwzAQRUWhNCHND3RRtOzGrh62ZC9L6COQUijZG1kZp05ly5FkQj6g_10lTVcDd85cOIPQHSUpJVQ87tKtbXzKCKMp4Slh2RWaskwUiaRFOUFz73eEECrznNPsBk04l5JKXkzRz7IblA7YNjh8Ae6g98GNymB91Aaw7c_xPiZtOJ6otg_gBgdBhTZuL3fvn0vswI8mROCcNNYYe0jG4YQcbCzGKuAt9BBajV3rvyPicO1A-XCLrhtlPMwvc4bWL8_rxVuy-nhdLp5WycAoDUkmeAFNHp0o5YoJLlidywy0kCXVmoPIoJQ6l4XMylpG4agsYUM3vCZlyWfo4a92cHY_gg9V13oNxqge7OgrlhPBZFEIGtH7CzrWHWyqwbWdcsfq_3P8FzOtcC8</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>de Kermadec, E</creator><creator>Thomassin, I</creator><creator>Daraï, E</creator><creator>Kolanska, K</creator><creator>Chabbert-Buffet, N</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast</title><author>de Kermadec, E ; Thomassin, I ; Daraï, E ; Kolanska, K ; Chabbert-Buffet, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-4638ef5189113a26362b574ec6791cc3e64e97c578749b70171757ed1d3b0993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; fre</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Menstrual Cycle</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Kermadec, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomassin, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daraï, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolanska, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chabbert-Buffet, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité &amp; sénologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Kermadec, E</au><au>Thomassin, I</au><au>Daraï, E</au><au>Kolanska, K</au><au>Chabbert-Buffet, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast</atitle><jtitle>Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité &amp; sénologie</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>923</spage><epage>929</epage><pages>923-929</pages><eissn>2468-7189</eissn><abstract>Breast MRI is used as a reference for screening breast cancer among women with a genetic high risk. Its sensitivity and specificity might decrease because of the background parenchymal enhancement. Therefore, it is recommended to plan the MRI between the 7th and the 14th day of the menstrual cycle despite of the burden of this organization. Our aim was to evaluate the interpretation (performance) of the MRI performance when it was done out of this period. We analyzed the MRI done in the Tenon Hospital among patients with a genetic high risk, without a history of breast cancer, between 2006 and 2016. We analyzed the rate of enhancement hindering the interpretation (EH) - that is to say grade III and IV -, the rate of additional explorations (MRI and biopsy), and the occurrence of interval events in 2 groups according to the programming of the examination: appropriate programming (D7-D14) and inappropriate programming (outside this period). In total, 126 MRI were analyzed, done in a population of 62 women with a genetic predisposition to Breast Cancer (BRCA 1 or 2: 91%, others: 9%), median age was 34.5 years old. 84 were in appropriate programming and 42 were in an inappropriate one. The rate of EH was comparable between the two groups (respectively 31% and 35.7%, P=1), as well as the rate of additional explorations (respectively 31% and 45%, P=0.11). Our results suggest that the programming of screening MRI could be simplified among patients with a genetic predisposition of breast cancer.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>33771738</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gofs.2021.03.024</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2468-7189
ispartof Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité & sénologie, 2021-12, Vol.49 (12), p.923-929
issn 2468-7189
language eng ; fre
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2506278861
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Breast - diagnostic imaging
Breast - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Menstrual Cycle
Retrospective Studies
title Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T02%3A03%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20the%20menstrual%20cycle%20on%20the%20quality%20of%20interpretation%20of%20the%20MRI%20result%20in%20the%20follow-up%20of%20women%20at%20genetic%20risk%20for%20breast&rft.jtitle=Gyn%C3%A9cologie,%20obst%C3%A9trique,%20fertilit%C3%A9%20&%20s%C3%A9nologie&rft.au=de%20Kermadec,%20E&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=923&rft.epage=929&rft.pages=923-929&rft.eissn=2468-7189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.03.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2506278861%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2506278861&rft_id=info:pmid/33771738&rfr_iscdi=true