Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast
Breast MRI is used as a reference for screening breast cancer among women with a genetic high risk. Its sensitivity and specificity might decrease because of the background parenchymal enhancement. Therefore, it is recommended to plan the MRI between the 7th and the 14th day of the menstrual cycle d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité & sénologie obstétrique, fertilité & sénologie, 2021-12, Vol.49 (12), p.923-929 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; fre |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 929 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 923 |
container_title | Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité & sénologie |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | de Kermadec, E Thomassin, I Daraï, E Kolanska, K Chabbert-Buffet, N |
description | Breast MRI is used as a reference for screening breast cancer among women with a genetic high risk. Its sensitivity and specificity might decrease because of the background parenchymal enhancement. Therefore, it is recommended to plan the MRI between the 7th and the 14th day of the menstrual cycle despite of the burden of this organization. Our aim was to evaluate the interpretation (performance) of the MRI performance when it was done out of this period.
We analyzed the MRI done in the Tenon Hospital among patients with a genetic high risk, without a history of breast cancer, between 2006 and 2016. We analyzed the rate of enhancement hindering the interpretation (EH) - that is to say grade III and IV -, the rate of additional explorations (MRI and biopsy), and the occurrence of interval events in 2 groups according to the programming of the examination: appropriate programming (D7-D14) and inappropriate programming (outside this period).
In total, 126 MRI were analyzed, done in a population of 62 women with a genetic predisposition to Breast Cancer (BRCA 1 or 2: 91%, others: 9%), median age was 34.5 years old. 84 were in appropriate programming and 42 were in an inappropriate one. The rate of EH was comparable between the two groups (respectively 31% and 35.7%, P=1), as well as the rate of additional explorations (respectively 31% and 45%, P=0.11).
Our results suggest that the programming of screening MRI could be simplified among patients with a genetic predisposition of breast cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.03.024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2506278861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2506278861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-4638ef5189113a26362b574ec6791cc3e64e97c578749b70171757ed1d3b0993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtqwzAQRUWhNCHND3RRtOzGrh62ZC9L6COQUijZG1kZp05ly5FkQj6g_10lTVcDd85cOIPQHSUpJVQ87tKtbXzKCKMp4Slh2RWaskwUiaRFOUFz73eEECrznNPsBk04l5JKXkzRz7IblA7YNjh8Ae6g98GNymB91Aaw7c_xPiZtOJ6otg_gBgdBhTZuL3fvn0vswI8mROCcNNYYe0jG4YQcbCzGKuAt9BBajV3rvyPicO1A-XCLrhtlPMwvc4bWL8_rxVuy-nhdLp5WycAoDUkmeAFNHp0o5YoJLlidywy0kCXVmoPIoJQ6l4XMylpG4agsYUM3vCZlyWfo4a92cHY_gg9V13oNxqge7OgrlhPBZFEIGtH7CzrWHWyqwbWdcsfq_3P8FzOtcC8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2506278861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>de Kermadec, E ; Thomassin, I ; Daraï, E ; Kolanska, K ; Chabbert-Buffet, N</creator><creatorcontrib>de Kermadec, E ; Thomassin, I ; Daraï, E ; Kolanska, K ; Chabbert-Buffet, N</creatorcontrib><description>Breast MRI is used as a reference for screening breast cancer among women with a genetic high risk. Its sensitivity and specificity might decrease because of the background parenchymal enhancement. Therefore, it is recommended to plan the MRI between the 7th and the 14th day of the menstrual cycle despite of the burden of this organization. Our aim was to evaluate the interpretation (performance) of the MRI performance when it was done out of this period.
We analyzed the MRI done in the Tenon Hospital among patients with a genetic high risk, without a history of breast cancer, between 2006 and 2016. We analyzed the rate of enhancement hindering the interpretation (EH) - that is to say grade III and IV -, the rate of additional explorations (MRI and biopsy), and the occurrence of interval events in 2 groups according to the programming of the examination: appropriate programming (D7-D14) and inappropriate programming (outside this period).
In total, 126 MRI were analyzed, done in a population of 62 women with a genetic predisposition to Breast Cancer (BRCA 1 or 2: 91%, others: 9%), median age was 34.5 years old. 84 were in appropriate programming and 42 were in an inappropriate one. The rate of EH was comparable between the two groups (respectively 31% and 35.7%, P=1), as well as the rate of additional explorations (respectively 31% and 45%, P=0.11).
Our results suggest that the programming of screening MRI could be simplified among patients with a genetic predisposition of breast cancer.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2468-7189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.03.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33771738</identifier><language>eng ; fre</language><publisher>France</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Breast - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Menstrual Cycle ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité & sénologie, 2021-12, Vol.49 (12), p.923-929</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771738$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Kermadec, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomassin, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daraï, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolanska, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chabbert-Buffet, N</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast</title><title>Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité & sénologie</title><addtitle>Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol</addtitle><description>Breast MRI is used as a reference for screening breast cancer among women with a genetic high risk. Its sensitivity and specificity might decrease because of the background parenchymal enhancement. Therefore, it is recommended to plan the MRI between the 7th and the 14th day of the menstrual cycle despite of the burden of this organization. Our aim was to evaluate the interpretation (performance) of the MRI performance when it was done out of this period.
We analyzed the MRI done in the Tenon Hospital among patients with a genetic high risk, without a history of breast cancer, between 2006 and 2016. We analyzed the rate of enhancement hindering the interpretation (EH) - that is to say grade III and IV -, the rate of additional explorations (MRI and biopsy), and the occurrence of interval events in 2 groups according to the programming of the examination: appropriate programming (D7-D14) and inappropriate programming (outside this period).
In total, 126 MRI were analyzed, done in a population of 62 women with a genetic predisposition to Breast Cancer (BRCA 1 or 2: 91%, others: 9%), median age was 34.5 years old. 84 were in appropriate programming and 42 were in an inappropriate one. The rate of EH was comparable between the two groups (respectively 31% and 35.7%, P=1), as well as the rate of additional explorations (respectively 31% and 45%, P=0.11).
Our results suggest that the programming of screening MRI could be simplified among patients with a genetic predisposition of breast cancer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Menstrual Cycle</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>2468-7189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMtqwzAQRUWhNCHND3RRtOzGrh62ZC9L6COQUijZG1kZp05ly5FkQj6g_10lTVcDd85cOIPQHSUpJVQ87tKtbXzKCKMp4Slh2RWaskwUiaRFOUFz73eEECrznNPsBk04l5JKXkzRz7IblA7YNjh8Ae6g98GNymB91Aaw7c_xPiZtOJ6otg_gBgdBhTZuL3fvn0vswI8mROCcNNYYe0jG4YQcbCzGKuAt9BBajV3rvyPicO1A-XCLrhtlPMwvc4bWL8_rxVuy-nhdLp5WycAoDUkmeAFNHp0o5YoJLlidywy0kCXVmoPIoJQ6l4XMylpG4agsYUM3vCZlyWfo4a92cHY_gg9V13oNxqge7OgrlhPBZFEIGtH7CzrWHWyqwbWdcsfq_3P8FzOtcC8</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>de Kermadec, E</creator><creator>Thomassin, I</creator><creator>Daraï, E</creator><creator>Kolanska, K</creator><creator>Chabbert-Buffet, N</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast</title><author>de Kermadec, E ; Thomassin, I ; Daraï, E ; Kolanska, K ; Chabbert-Buffet, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-4638ef5189113a26362b574ec6791cc3e64e97c578749b70171757ed1d3b0993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; fre</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Menstrual Cycle</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Kermadec, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomassin, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daraï, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolanska, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chabbert-Buffet, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité & sénologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Kermadec, E</au><au>Thomassin, I</au><au>Daraï, E</au><au>Kolanska, K</au><au>Chabbert-Buffet, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast</atitle><jtitle>Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité & sénologie</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>923</spage><epage>929</epage><pages>923-929</pages><eissn>2468-7189</eissn><abstract>Breast MRI is used as a reference for screening breast cancer among women with a genetic high risk. Its sensitivity and specificity might decrease because of the background parenchymal enhancement. Therefore, it is recommended to plan the MRI between the 7th and the 14th day of the menstrual cycle despite of the burden of this organization. Our aim was to evaluate the interpretation (performance) of the MRI performance when it was done out of this period.
We analyzed the MRI done in the Tenon Hospital among patients with a genetic high risk, without a history of breast cancer, between 2006 and 2016. We analyzed the rate of enhancement hindering the interpretation (EH) - that is to say grade III and IV -, the rate of additional explorations (MRI and biopsy), and the occurrence of interval events in 2 groups according to the programming of the examination: appropriate programming (D7-D14) and inappropriate programming (outside this period).
In total, 126 MRI were analyzed, done in a population of 62 women with a genetic predisposition to Breast Cancer (BRCA 1 or 2: 91%, others: 9%), median age was 34.5 years old. 84 were in appropriate programming and 42 were in an inappropriate one. The rate of EH was comparable between the two groups (respectively 31% and 35.7%, P=1), as well as the rate of additional explorations (respectively 31% and 45%, P=0.11).
Our results suggest that the programming of screening MRI could be simplified among patients with a genetic predisposition of breast cancer.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>33771738</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gofs.2021.03.024</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2468-7189 |
ispartof | Gynécologie, obstétrique, fertilité & sénologie, 2021-12, Vol.49 (12), p.923-929 |
issn | 2468-7189 |
language | eng ; fre |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2506278861 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Breast - diagnostic imaging Breast - pathology Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - genetics Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Menstrual Cycle Retrospective Studies |
title | Impact of the menstrual cycle on the quality of interpretation of the MRI result in the follow-up of women at genetic risk for breast |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T02%3A03%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20the%20menstrual%20cycle%20on%20the%20quality%20of%20interpretation%20of%20the%20MRI%20result%20in%20the%20follow-up%20of%20women%20at%20genetic%20risk%20for%20breast&rft.jtitle=Gyn%C3%A9cologie,%20obst%C3%A9trique,%20fertilit%C3%A9%20&%20s%C3%A9nologie&rft.au=de%20Kermadec,%20E&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=923&rft.epage=929&rft.pages=923-929&rft.eissn=2468-7189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.03.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2506278861%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2506278861&rft_id=info:pmid/33771738&rfr_iscdi=true |