Impact of Fever Prevention in Brain-Injured Patients (INTREPID): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Background Multiple studies demonstrate that fever/elevated temperature is associated with poor outcomes in patients with vascular brain injury; however, there are no conclusive studies that demonstrate that fever prevention/controlled normothermia is associated with better outcomes. The primary obj...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurocritical care 2021-10, Vol.35 (2), p.577-589 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 589 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 577 |
container_title | Neurocritical care |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Greer, David M. Ritter, Jaime Helbok, Raimund Badjatia, Neeraj Ko, Sang-Bae Guanci, Mary Sheth, Kevin N. |
description | Background
Multiple studies demonstrate that fever/elevated temperature is associated with poor outcomes in patients with vascular brain injury; however, there are no conclusive studies that demonstrate that fever prevention/controlled normothermia is associated with better outcomes. The primary objective of the INTREPID (Impact of Fever Prevention in Brain-Injured Patients) trial is to test the hypothesis that fever prevention is superior to standard temperature management in patients with acute vascular brain injury.
Methods
INTREPID is a prospective randomized open blinded endpoint study of fever prevention versus usual care in patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. The fever prevention intervention utilizes the Arctic Sun System and will be compared to standard care patients in whom fever may spontaneously develop. Ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage patients will be included within disease-specific time-windows. Both awake and sedated patients will be included, and treatment is initiated immediately upon enrollment. Eligible patients are expected to require intensive care for at least 72 h post-injury, will not be deemed unlikely to survive without severe disability, and will be treated for up to 14 days, or until deemed ready for discharge from the ICU, whichever comes first. Fifty sites in the USA and worldwide will participate, with a target enrollment of 1176 patients (1000 evaluable). The target temperature is 37.0 °C. The primary efficacy outcome is the total fever burden by °C-h, defined as the area under the temperature curve above 37.9 °C. The primary secondary outcome, on which the sample size is based, is the modified Rankin Scale Score at 3 months. All efficacy analyses including the primary and key secondary endpoints will be primarily based on an intention-to-treat population. Analysis of the as-treated and per protocol populations will also be performed on the primary and key secondary endpoints as sensitivity analyses.
Discussion
The INTREPID trial will provide the first results of the impact of a pivotal fever prevention intervention in patients with acute stroke (
www.clinicaltrials.gov
; NCT02996266; registered prospectively 05DEC2016). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12028-021-01208-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2505367897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2920181711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-222ffbc92f301753d65441c7418c433114fc5e9bee6f2c0be5582751cfd3720a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9P3DAQxS3Uiv9fgENlqRd6cOux4zjhBltoIyFYwXK2vI6NskrsxU6Q6KfH24VW6qGnedL83puRHkInQL8CpfJbAkZZRSgDQrOsCOygfRCiJLQu4cNGF0DKmvM9dJDSilImayl20R7nsgSAeh89NcNamxEHh6_ss414HvPwYxc87jy-iLrzpPGrKdoWz_XY5V3Cp83N4u5y3nz_cobvx6l9ybYwBhN67ELEGt9p34ah-5VNs-DHGPo-y0XsdH-EPjrdJ3v8Ng_Rw9XlYvaTXN_-aGbn18RwKUbCGHNuaWrmOAUpeFuKogAjC6hMwTlA4Yyw9dLa0jFDl1aIikkBxrVcMqr5ITrd5q5jeJpsGtXQJWP7XnsbpqSYoIKXsqplRj__g67CFH3-TrGaUahAAmSKbSkTQ0rROrWO3aDjiwKqNoWobSEqF6J-F6I2pk9v0dNysO0fy3sDGeBbIOWVf7Tx7-3_xL4CqeiT9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920181711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Fever Prevention in Brain-Injured Patients (INTREPID): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Greer, David M. ; Ritter, Jaime ; Helbok, Raimund ; Badjatia, Neeraj ; Ko, Sang-Bae ; Guanci, Mary ; Sheth, Kevin N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Greer, David M. ; Ritter, Jaime ; Helbok, Raimund ; Badjatia, Neeraj ; Ko, Sang-Bae ; Guanci, Mary ; Sheth, Kevin N.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Multiple studies demonstrate that fever/elevated temperature is associated with poor outcomes in patients with vascular brain injury; however, there are no conclusive studies that demonstrate that fever prevention/controlled normothermia is associated with better outcomes. The primary objective of the INTREPID (Impact of Fever Prevention in Brain-Injured Patients) trial is to test the hypothesis that fever prevention is superior to standard temperature management in patients with acute vascular brain injury.
Methods
INTREPID is a prospective randomized open blinded endpoint study of fever prevention versus usual care in patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. The fever prevention intervention utilizes the Arctic Sun System and will be compared to standard care patients in whom fever may spontaneously develop. Ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage patients will be included within disease-specific time-windows. Both awake and sedated patients will be included, and treatment is initiated immediately upon enrollment. Eligible patients are expected to require intensive care for at least 72 h post-injury, will not be deemed unlikely to survive without severe disability, and will be treated for up to 14 days, or until deemed ready for discharge from the ICU, whichever comes first. Fifty sites in the USA and worldwide will participate, with a target enrollment of 1176 patients (1000 evaluable). The target temperature is 37.0 °C. The primary efficacy outcome is the total fever burden by °C-h, defined as the area under the temperature curve above 37.9 °C. The primary secondary outcome, on which the sample size is based, is the modified Rankin Scale Score at 3 months. All efficacy analyses including the primary and key secondary endpoints will be primarily based on an intention-to-treat population. Analysis of the as-treated and per protocol populations will also be performed on the primary and key secondary endpoints as sensitivity analyses.
Discussion
The INTREPID trial will provide the first results of the impact of a pivotal fever prevention intervention in patients with acute stroke (
www.clinicaltrials.gov
; NCT02996266; registered prospectively 05DEC2016).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-6933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-0961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12028-021-01208-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33761119</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Body temperature ; Brain ; Clinical outcomes ; COVID-19 ; Critical Care ; Critical Care Medicine ; Delirium ; Disease prevention ; Fever ; Humans ; Intensive ; Intensive care ; Internal Medicine ; Ischemia ; Length of stay ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mortality ; NCT ; NCT02996266 ; Neurology ; Neurosurgery ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Stroke ; Take a Closer Look at Trials ; Traumatic brain injury</subject><ispartof>Neurocritical care, 2021-10, Vol.35 (2), p.577-589</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2021</rights><rights>2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-222ffbc92f301753d65441c7418c433114fc5e9bee6f2c0be5582751cfd3720a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-222ffbc92f301753d65441c7418c433114fc5e9bee6f2c0be5582751cfd3720a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2026-8333</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12028-021-01208-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920181711?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21369,21370,27905,27906,33511,33512,33725,33726,41469,42538,43640,43786,51300,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761119$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greer, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helbok, Raimund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badjatia, Neeraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Sang-Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guanci, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Kevin N.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Fever Prevention in Brain-Injured Patients (INTREPID): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Neurocritical care</title><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><description>Background
Multiple studies demonstrate that fever/elevated temperature is associated with poor outcomes in patients with vascular brain injury; however, there are no conclusive studies that demonstrate that fever prevention/controlled normothermia is associated with better outcomes. The primary objective of the INTREPID (Impact of Fever Prevention in Brain-Injured Patients) trial is to test the hypothesis that fever prevention is superior to standard temperature management in patients with acute vascular brain injury.
Methods
INTREPID is a prospective randomized open blinded endpoint study of fever prevention versus usual care in patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. The fever prevention intervention utilizes the Arctic Sun System and will be compared to standard care patients in whom fever may spontaneously develop. Ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage patients will be included within disease-specific time-windows. Both awake and sedated patients will be included, and treatment is initiated immediately upon enrollment. Eligible patients are expected to require intensive care for at least 72 h post-injury, will not be deemed unlikely to survive without severe disability, and will be treated for up to 14 days, or until deemed ready for discharge from the ICU, whichever comes first. Fifty sites in the USA and worldwide will participate, with a target enrollment of 1176 patients (1000 evaluable). The target temperature is 37.0 °C. The primary efficacy outcome is the total fever burden by °C-h, defined as the area under the temperature curve above 37.9 °C. The primary secondary outcome, on which the sample size is based, is the modified Rankin Scale Score at 3 months. All efficacy analyses including the primary and key secondary endpoints will be primarily based on an intention-to-treat population. Analysis of the as-treated and per protocol populations will also be performed on the primary and key secondary endpoints as sensitivity analyses.
Discussion
The INTREPID trial will provide the first results of the impact of a pivotal fever prevention intervention in patients with acute stroke (
www.clinicaltrials.gov
; NCT02996266; registered prospectively 05DEC2016).</description><subject>Body temperature</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Delirium</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Fever</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>NCT</subject><subject>NCT02996266</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Take a Closer Look at Trials</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><issn>1541-6933</issn><issn>1556-0961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9P3DAQxS3Uiv9fgENlqRd6cOux4zjhBltoIyFYwXK2vI6NskrsxU6Q6KfH24VW6qGnedL83puRHkInQL8CpfJbAkZZRSgDQrOsCOygfRCiJLQu4cNGF0DKmvM9dJDSilImayl20R7nsgSAeh89NcNamxEHh6_ss414HvPwYxc87jy-iLrzpPGrKdoWz_XY5V3Cp83N4u5y3nz_cobvx6l9ybYwBhN67ELEGt9p34ah-5VNs-DHGPo-y0XsdH-EPjrdJ3v8Ng_Rw9XlYvaTXN_-aGbn18RwKUbCGHNuaWrmOAUpeFuKogAjC6hMwTlA4Yyw9dLa0jFDl1aIikkBxrVcMqr5ITrd5q5jeJpsGtXQJWP7XnsbpqSYoIKXsqplRj__g67CFH3-TrGaUahAAmSKbSkTQ0rROrWO3aDjiwKqNoWobSEqF6J-F6I2pk9v0dNysO0fy3sDGeBbIOWVf7Tx7-3_xL4CqeiT9A</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Greer, David M.</creator><creator>Ritter, Jaime</creator><creator>Helbok, Raimund</creator><creator>Badjatia, Neeraj</creator><creator>Ko, Sang-Bae</creator><creator>Guanci, Mary</creator><creator>Sheth, Kevin N.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2026-8333</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Impact of Fever Prevention in Brain-Injured Patients (INTREPID): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Greer, David M. ; Ritter, Jaime ; Helbok, Raimund ; Badjatia, Neeraj ; Ko, Sang-Bae ; Guanci, Mary ; Sheth, Kevin N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-222ffbc92f301753d65441c7418c433114fc5e9bee6f2c0be5582751cfd3720a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Body temperature</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Delirium</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Fever</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>NCT</topic><topic>NCT02996266</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Take a Closer Look at Trials</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greer, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helbok, Raimund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badjatia, Neeraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Sang-Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guanci, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Kevin N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurocritical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greer, David M.</au><au>Ritter, Jaime</au><au>Helbok, Raimund</au><au>Badjatia, Neeraj</au><au>Ko, Sang-Bae</au><au>Guanci, Mary</au><au>Sheth, Kevin N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Fever Prevention in Brain-Injured Patients (INTREPID): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Neurocritical care</jtitle><stitle>Neurocrit Care</stitle><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>577</spage><epage>589</epage><pages>577-589</pages><issn>1541-6933</issn><eissn>1556-0961</eissn><abstract>Background
Multiple studies demonstrate that fever/elevated temperature is associated with poor outcomes in patients with vascular brain injury; however, there are no conclusive studies that demonstrate that fever prevention/controlled normothermia is associated with better outcomes. The primary objective of the INTREPID (Impact of Fever Prevention in Brain-Injured Patients) trial is to test the hypothesis that fever prevention is superior to standard temperature management in patients with acute vascular brain injury.
Methods
INTREPID is a prospective randomized open blinded endpoint study of fever prevention versus usual care in patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. The fever prevention intervention utilizes the Arctic Sun System and will be compared to standard care patients in whom fever may spontaneously develop. Ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage patients will be included within disease-specific time-windows. Both awake and sedated patients will be included, and treatment is initiated immediately upon enrollment. Eligible patients are expected to require intensive care for at least 72 h post-injury, will not be deemed unlikely to survive without severe disability, and will be treated for up to 14 days, or until deemed ready for discharge from the ICU, whichever comes first. Fifty sites in the USA and worldwide will participate, with a target enrollment of 1176 patients (1000 evaluable). The target temperature is 37.0 °C. The primary efficacy outcome is the total fever burden by °C-h, defined as the area under the temperature curve above 37.9 °C. The primary secondary outcome, on which the sample size is based, is the modified Rankin Scale Score at 3 months. All efficacy analyses including the primary and key secondary endpoints will be primarily based on an intention-to-treat population. Analysis of the as-treated and per protocol populations will also be performed on the primary and key secondary endpoints as sensitivity analyses.
Discussion
The INTREPID trial will provide the first results of the impact of a pivotal fever prevention intervention in patients with acute stroke (
www.clinicaltrials.gov
; NCT02996266; registered prospectively 05DEC2016).</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33761119</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12028-021-01208-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2026-8333</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1541-6933 |
ispartof | Neurocritical care, 2021-10, Vol.35 (2), p.577-589 |
issn | 1541-6933 1556-0961 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2505367897 |
source | MEDLINE; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Body temperature Brain Clinical outcomes COVID-19 Critical Care Critical Care Medicine Delirium Disease prevention Fever Humans Intensive Intensive care Internal Medicine Ischemia Length of stay Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mortality NCT NCT02996266 Neurology Neurosurgery Patients Prospective Studies Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic SARS-CoV-2 Stroke Take a Closer Look at Trials Traumatic brain injury |
title | Impact of Fever Prevention in Brain-Injured Patients (INTREPID): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A23%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Fever%20Prevention%20in%20Brain-Injured%20Patients%20(INTREPID):%20Study%20Protocol%20for%20a%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Neurocritical%20care&rft.au=Greer,%20David%20M.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=577&rft.epage=589&rft.pages=577-589&rft.issn=1541-6933&rft.eissn=1556-0961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12028-021-01208-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2920181711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920181711&rft_id=info:pmid/33761119&rfr_iscdi=true |