Welfare assessment in intensive and semi‐intensive dairy cattle management system in Sicily
The present study aimed to compare the welfare of dairy cows kept in two traditional husbandry systems (semi‐intensive and intensive farming) in south‐eastern Sicily. A total of 18 dairy farms (nine semi‐intensive and nine intensive) were evaluated with a multicriteria system adapted for Sicilian co...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Animal science journal 2021-01, Vol.92 (1), p.e13546-n/a |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | n/a |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | e13546 |
| container_title | Animal science journal |
| container_volume | 92 |
| creator | Pugliese, Michela Biondi, Vito Passantino, Annamaria Licitra, Francesca Alibrandi, Angela Zanghi, Antonina Conte, Francesca Marino, Gabriele |
| description | The present study aimed to compare the welfare of dairy cows kept in two traditional husbandry systems (semi‐intensive and intensive farming) in south‐eastern Sicily. A total of 18 dairy farms (nine semi‐intensive and nine intensive) were evaluated with a multicriteria system adapted for Sicilian conditions and obtained simplifying the model of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Values of welfare measures, collected by inspections of the farms (general well‐being indicators, ventilation system, resting areas [cubicles or bedding], flooring, milking parlours and waiting area, manger and watering equipment), and those of health categories (cases of abortions, hypocalcemia, displacement of abomasum, acidosis/ketosis, enteritis, hoof problems, and mastitis) obtained through the farm records, were compared using Mann–Whitney and Chi‐squared tests, respectively. Data showed significant differences (p ≤ .05) about the variables related to welfare categories such as housing ventilation system, resting area, manger, and water equipment that were better in the semi‐intensive system than the intensive system. No significant differences were observed about the variables related to health indicators. The results demonstrated that in Sicily the semi‐intensive farm is better than the intensive to satisfy the conditions of animal welfare. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/asj.13546 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2505362061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2799033598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3776-9046e91d7166ce85fe7fe5a33f3b629db0e7e6b3f682beb874c47c3a313723343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoXkYXvoAU3OiiTtKTJs1SBq8ILlRcSUjbU8nQdrSno3TnI_iMPonR8QKCh8AJP18-ws_YtuAHIszY0fRAQCrVElsXWvKYm8QshztIGYORYo1tEE05F9rwdJWtAWgFRmXr7O4W68p1GDkiJGqw7SPfhtNjS_4p5G0ZETb-7eX1Nyyd74aocH1fY9S41t3j50saqMfmQ3DlC18Pm2ylcjXh1tcesZvjo-vJaXxxeXI2ObyIC9BaxYZLhUaUWihVYJZWqCtMHUAFuUpMmXPUqHKoVJbkmGdaFlIX4ECATgAkjNjewvvQzR7nSL1tPBVY167F2ZxskvIUVMKVCOjuH3Q6m3dt-J1NtDEcIDVZoPYXVNHNiDqs7EPnG9cNVnD70bkNndvPzgO782Wc5w2WP-R3yQEYL4BnX-Pwv8keXp0vlO_6i4v7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2799033598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Welfare assessment in intensive and semi‐intensive dairy cattle management system in Sicily</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pugliese, Michela ; Biondi, Vito ; Passantino, Annamaria ; Licitra, Francesca ; Alibrandi, Angela ; Zanghi, Antonina ; Conte, Francesca ; Marino, Gabriele</creator><creatorcontrib>Pugliese, Michela ; Biondi, Vito ; Passantino, Annamaria ; Licitra, Francesca ; Alibrandi, Angela ; Zanghi, Antonina ; Conte, Francesca ; Marino, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><description>The present study aimed to compare the welfare of dairy cows kept in two traditional husbandry systems (semi‐intensive and intensive farming) in south‐eastern Sicily. A total of 18 dairy farms (nine semi‐intensive and nine intensive) were evaluated with a multicriteria system adapted for Sicilian conditions and obtained simplifying the model of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Values of welfare measures, collected by inspections of the farms (general well‐being indicators, ventilation system, resting areas [cubicles or bedding], flooring, milking parlours and waiting area, manger and watering equipment), and those of health categories (cases of abortions, hypocalcemia, displacement of abomasum, acidosis/ketosis, enteritis, hoof problems, and mastitis) obtained through the farm records, were compared using Mann–Whitney and Chi‐squared tests, respectively. Data showed significant differences (p ≤ .05) about the variables related to welfare categories such as housing ventilation system, resting area, manger, and water equipment that were better in the semi‐intensive system than the intensive system. No significant differences were observed about the variables related to health indicators. The results demonstrated that in Sicily the semi‐intensive farm is better than the intensive to satisfy the conditions of animal welfare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1344-3941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-0929</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/asj.13546</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33763968</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abomasum ; Acidosis ; Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animal welfare ; Animal Welfare - statistics & numerical data ; Animals ; Cattle ; Dairy cattle ; dairy cow ; Dairy farming ; Dairy farms ; Dairying - methods ; Dairying - statistics & numerical data ; Enteritis ; Farms ; Female ; Housing, Animal ; Hypocalcemia ; Indicators ; intensive ; Intensive farming ; Mastitis ; Milking ; Milking parlours ; Multiple criterion ; pasture ; production system ; Sicily - epidemiology ; Ventilation ; Ventilation - methods</subject><ispartof>Animal science journal, 2021-01, Vol.92 (1), p.e13546-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Animal Science</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Animal Science Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Animal Science.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3776-9046e91d7166ce85fe7fe5a33f3b629db0e7e6b3f682beb874c47c3a313723343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3776-9046e91d7166ce85fe7fe5a33f3b629db0e7e6b3f682beb874c47c3a313723343</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1701-3636 ; 0000-0001-5020-9070 ; 0000-0002-8717-1966 ; 0000-0002-5504-8189 ; 0000-0001-6695-151X ; 0000-0001-6519-406X ; 0000-0002-0440-5457</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fasj.13546$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fasj.13546$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33763968$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pugliese, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biondi, Vito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passantino, Annamaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Licitra, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alibrandi, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanghi, Antonina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conte, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marino, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><title>Welfare assessment in intensive and semi‐intensive dairy cattle management system in Sicily</title><title>Animal science journal</title><addtitle>Anim Sci J</addtitle><description>The present study aimed to compare the welfare of dairy cows kept in two traditional husbandry systems (semi‐intensive and intensive farming) in south‐eastern Sicily. A total of 18 dairy farms (nine semi‐intensive and nine intensive) were evaluated with a multicriteria system adapted for Sicilian conditions and obtained simplifying the model of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Values of welfare measures, collected by inspections of the farms (general well‐being indicators, ventilation system, resting areas [cubicles or bedding], flooring, milking parlours and waiting area, manger and watering equipment), and those of health categories (cases of abortions, hypocalcemia, displacement of abomasum, acidosis/ketosis, enteritis, hoof problems, and mastitis) obtained through the farm records, were compared using Mann–Whitney and Chi‐squared tests, respectively. Data showed significant differences (p ≤ .05) about the variables related to welfare categories such as housing ventilation system, resting area, manger, and water equipment that were better in the semi‐intensive system than the intensive system. No significant differences were observed about the variables related to health indicators. The results demonstrated that in Sicily the semi‐intensive farm is better than the intensive to satisfy the conditions of animal welfare.</description><subject>Abomasum</subject><subject>Acidosis</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>Animal Welfare - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Dairy cattle</subject><subject>dairy cow</subject><subject>Dairy farming</subject><subject>Dairy farms</subject><subject>Dairying - methods</subject><subject>Dairying - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Enteritis</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>Hypocalcemia</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>intensive</subject><subject>Intensive farming</subject><subject>Mastitis</subject><subject>Milking</subject><subject>Milking parlours</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>pasture</subject><subject>production system</subject><subject>Sicily - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Ventilation - methods</subject><issn>1344-3941</issn><issn>1740-0929</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoXkYXvoAU3OiiTtKTJs1SBq8ILlRcSUjbU8nQdrSno3TnI_iMPonR8QKCh8AJP18-ws_YtuAHIszY0fRAQCrVElsXWvKYm8QshztIGYORYo1tEE05F9rwdJWtAWgFRmXr7O4W68p1GDkiJGqw7SPfhtNjS_4p5G0ZETb-7eX1Nyyd74aocH1fY9S41t3j50saqMfmQ3DlC18Pm2ylcjXh1tcesZvjo-vJaXxxeXI2ObyIC9BaxYZLhUaUWihVYJZWqCtMHUAFuUpMmXPUqHKoVJbkmGdaFlIX4ECATgAkjNjewvvQzR7nSL1tPBVY167F2ZxskvIUVMKVCOjuH3Q6m3dt-J1NtDEcIDVZoPYXVNHNiDqs7EPnG9cNVnD70bkNndvPzgO782Wc5w2WP-R3yQEYL4BnX-Pwv8keXp0vlO_6i4v7</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Pugliese, Michela</creator><creator>Biondi, Vito</creator><creator>Passantino, Annamaria</creator><creator>Licitra, Francesca</creator><creator>Alibrandi, Angela</creator><creator>Zanghi, Antonina</creator><creator>Conte, Francesca</creator><creator>Marino, Gabriele</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1701-3636</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5020-9070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8717-1966</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5504-8189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-151X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6519-406X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0440-5457</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Welfare assessment in intensive and semi‐intensive dairy cattle management system in Sicily</title><author>Pugliese, Michela ; Biondi, Vito ; Passantino, Annamaria ; Licitra, Francesca ; Alibrandi, Angela ; Zanghi, Antonina ; Conte, Francesca ; Marino, Gabriele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3776-9046e91d7166ce85fe7fe5a33f3b629db0e7e6b3f682beb874c47c3a313723343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abomasum</topic><topic>Acidosis</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>Animal Welfare - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Dairy cattle</topic><topic>dairy cow</topic><topic>Dairy farming</topic><topic>Dairy farms</topic><topic>Dairying - methods</topic><topic>Dairying - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Enteritis</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>Hypocalcemia</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>intensive</topic><topic>Intensive farming</topic><topic>Mastitis</topic><topic>Milking</topic><topic>Milking parlours</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>pasture</topic><topic>production system</topic><topic>Sicily - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Ventilation - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pugliese, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biondi, Vito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passantino, Annamaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Licitra, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alibrandi, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanghi, Antonina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conte, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marino, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal science journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pugliese, Michela</au><au>Biondi, Vito</au><au>Passantino, Annamaria</au><au>Licitra, Francesca</au><au>Alibrandi, Angela</au><au>Zanghi, Antonina</au><au>Conte, Francesca</au><au>Marino, Gabriele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Welfare assessment in intensive and semi‐intensive dairy cattle management system in Sicily</atitle><jtitle>Animal science journal</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Sci J</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e13546</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13546-n/a</pages><issn>1344-3941</issn><eissn>1740-0929</eissn><abstract>The present study aimed to compare the welfare of dairy cows kept in two traditional husbandry systems (semi‐intensive and intensive farming) in south‐eastern Sicily. A total of 18 dairy farms (nine semi‐intensive and nine intensive) were evaluated with a multicriteria system adapted for Sicilian conditions and obtained simplifying the model of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Values of welfare measures, collected by inspections of the farms (general well‐being indicators, ventilation system, resting areas [cubicles or bedding], flooring, milking parlours and waiting area, manger and watering equipment), and those of health categories (cases of abortions, hypocalcemia, displacement of abomasum, acidosis/ketosis, enteritis, hoof problems, and mastitis) obtained through the farm records, were compared using Mann–Whitney and Chi‐squared tests, respectively. Data showed significant differences (p ≤ .05) about the variables related to welfare categories such as housing ventilation system, resting area, manger, and water equipment that were better in the semi‐intensive system than the intensive system. No significant differences were observed about the variables related to health indicators. The results demonstrated that in Sicily the semi‐intensive farm is better than the intensive to satisfy the conditions of animal welfare.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33763968</pmid><doi>10.1111/asj.13546</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1701-3636</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5020-9070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8717-1966</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5504-8189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-151X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6519-406X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0440-5457</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1344-3941 |
| ispartof | Animal science journal, 2021-01, Vol.92 (1), p.e13546-n/a |
| issn | 1344-3941 1740-0929 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2505362061 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Abomasum Acidosis Animal Husbandry - methods Animal welfare Animal Welfare - statistics & numerical data Animals Cattle Dairy cattle dairy cow Dairy farming Dairy farms Dairying - methods Dairying - statistics & numerical data Enteritis Farms Female Housing, Animal Hypocalcemia Indicators intensive Intensive farming Mastitis Milking Milking parlours Multiple criterion pasture production system Sicily - epidemiology Ventilation Ventilation - methods |
| title | Welfare assessment in intensive and semi‐intensive dairy cattle management system in Sicily |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T01%3A41%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Welfare%20assessment%20in%20intensive%20and%20semi%E2%80%90intensive%20dairy%20cattle%20management%20system%20in%20Sicily&rft.jtitle=Animal%20science%20journal&rft.au=Pugliese,%20Michela&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e13546&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13546-n/a&rft.issn=1344-3941&rft.eissn=1740-0929&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/asj.13546&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2799033598%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2799033598&rft_id=info:pmid/33763968&rfr_iscdi=true |