Effects of Cardiac Massage and β-Blocker Pretreatment on the Success Rate of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Assessed by the Canine Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Ventricular Fibrillation Model

Background:Effects of rapid electrical defibrillation and β-blockade on coronary ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remain unknown.Methods and Results:After induction of VF by 30 min of ischemia followed by reperfusion, animals were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation Journal 2021/09/24, Vol.85(10), pp.1885-1891
Hauptverfasser: Wada, Takeshi, Hagiwara-Nagasawa, Mihoko, Kambayashi, Ryuichi, Goto, Ai, Chiba, Koki, Nunoi, Yoshio, Izumi-Nakaseko, Hiroko, Koga, Tadashi, Matsumoto, Akio, Nakazato, Yuji, Lurie, Keith G., Sugiyama, Atsushi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1891
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1885
container_title Circulation Journal
container_volume 85
creator Wada, Takeshi
Hagiwara-Nagasawa, Mihoko
Kambayashi, Ryuichi
Goto, Ai
Chiba, Koki
Nunoi, Yoshio
Izumi-Nakaseko, Hiroko
Koga, Tadashi
Matsumoto, Akio
Nakazato, Yuji
Lurie, Keith G.
Sugiyama, Atsushi
description Background:Effects of rapid electrical defibrillation and β-blockade on coronary ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remain unknown.Methods and Results:After induction of VF by 30 min of ischemia followed by reperfusion, animals were treated with defibrillation alone (Group A, n=13), 2 min of open-chest cardiac massage followed by defibrillation (Group B, n=11), or the same therapy to Group B with propranolol (1 mg/kg, i.v.) treatment before ischemia/reperfusion (Group C, n=11). If return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was not attained, each therapy was repeated ≤3 times (Set-1). When ROSC was not obtained within Set-1, cardiac massage was applied to all animals followed by defibrillation, which was repeated ≤3 times (Set-2). ROSC after Set-1 was 8% in Group A, 82% in Group B and 82% in Group C, whereas that after Set-2 was 62% in Group A, 100% in Group B and 82% in Group C. Each animal with ROSC in Groups A (n=8) and B (n=11) showed sinus rhythm, whereas those in Group C (n=9) had sinus rhythm (n=5), atrial fibrillation (n=1), accelerated idioventricular rhythm (n=2) and atrioventricular block (n=1). Post ROSC heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in Group C.Conclusions:Cardiac massage increased the likelihood of ROSC vs. rapid defibrillation, but β-blocker pretreatment may worsen hemodynamics and electrical stability after ROSC.
doi_str_mv 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0897
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2505359504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2505359504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-15ceb06dcaf586d192ff7ba41571137f444c034897eae0202e0642da812c3003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkcluFDEURUsIRAbYs0JesqnEYw3LUEpCR4lATcTWcrmeaTc1NH6uRX6LD-AT-Ka4Bzob24tzz7PezbIPjF4wrsSl9cGuL5q7nNOcVnX5KjtlQpa5rDh9vXsXeV1JcZKdIa4p5TVV9dvsRIiy4Iqr0-zvtXNgI5LJkcaEzhtLHgyi-QnEjB359yf_3E_2FwTyLUAMYOIAYyTTSOIKyPfZWkAkSxPhqJg2cz9MowlPZAk4o_XRRJ8SV4gJho60T7t0Y0Y_AlmgXcHgzeUSNhDcjInNF2M324T-SNOCt3NvArnxbfB9v5c9TB3077I3zvQI7w_3efZ4c_3YfMnvv94umqv73MpaxZwpCy0tOmucqoqO1dy5sjWSqZIxUToppaVCpg2CAcopB1pI3pmKcSsoFefZp712E6bfM2DUg0cL6SsjTDNqrqgSqlZUJpTuURsmxABOb4If0i40o3pbmt6Vpps7zanelpYiHw_2uR2gOwb-t5SA2z2wxpiKOQImRG97OBgrtR2Rzhf1C7EyQcMongGQ8bG6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2505359504</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Cardiac Massage and β-Blocker Pretreatment on the Success Rate of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Assessed by the Canine Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Ventricular Fibrillation Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>J-STAGE (Japan Science &amp; Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wada, Takeshi ; Hagiwara-Nagasawa, Mihoko ; Kambayashi, Ryuichi ; Goto, Ai ; Chiba, Koki ; Nunoi, Yoshio ; Izumi-Nakaseko, Hiroko ; Koga, Tadashi ; Matsumoto, Akio ; Nakazato, Yuji ; Lurie, Keith G. ; Sugiyama, Atsushi</creator><creatorcontrib>Wada, Takeshi ; Hagiwara-Nagasawa, Mihoko ; Kambayashi, Ryuichi ; Goto, Ai ; Chiba, Koki ; Nunoi, Yoshio ; Izumi-Nakaseko, Hiroko ; Koga, Tadashi ; Matsumoto, Akio ; Nakazato, Yuji ; Lurie, Keith G. ; Sugiyama, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><description>Background:Effects of rapid electrical defibrillation and β-blockade on coronary ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remain unknown.Methods and Results:After induction of VF by 30 min of ischemia followed by reperfusion, animals were treated with defibrillation alone (Group A, n=13), 2 min of open-chest cardiac massage followed by defibrillation (Group B, n=11), or the same therapy to Group B with propranolol (1 mg/kg, i.v.) treatment before ischemia/reperfusion (Group C, n=11). If return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was not attained, each therapy was repeated ≤3 times (Set-1). When ROSC was not obtained within Set-1, cardiac massage was applied to all animals followed by defibrillation, which was repeated ≤3 times (Set-2). ROSC after Set-1 was 8% in Group A, 82% in Group B and 82% in Group C, whereas that after Set-2 was 62% in Group A, 100% in Group B and 82% in Group C. Each animal with ROSC in Groups A (n=8) and B (n=11) showed sinus rhythm, whereas those in Group C (n=9) had sinus rhythm (n=5), atrial fibrillation (n=1), accelerated idioventricular rhythm (n=2) and atrioventricular block (n=1). Post ROSC heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in Group C.Conclusions:Cardiac massage increased the likelihood of ROSC vs. rapid defibrillation, but β-blocker pretreatment may worsen hemodynamics and electrical stability after ROSC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1346-9843</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1347-4820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1347-4820</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0897</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33762525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: The Japanese Circulation Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Beta-blocker pretreatment ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Disease Models, Animal ; Dogs ; Electric Countershock ; Heart Arrest - therapy ; Heart Massage ; Humans ; Ischemia ; Ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation ; Rapid defibrillation ; Reperfusion ; ROSC rate ; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><ispartof>Circulation Journal, 2021/09/24, Vol.85(10), pp.1885-1891</ispartof><rights>2021, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-15ceb06dcaf586d192ff7ba41571137f444c034897eae0202e0642da812c3003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-15ceb06dcaf586d192ff7ba41571137f444c034897eae0202e0642da812c3003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1883,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33762525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wada, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagiwara-Nagasawa, Mihoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kambayashi, Ryuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goto, Ai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Koki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunoi, Yoshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi-Nakaseko, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koga, Tadashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Akio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakazato, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lurie, Keith G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Cardiac Massage and β-Blocker Pretreatment on the Success Rate of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Assessed by the Canine Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Ventricular Fibrillation Model</title><title>Circulation Journal</title><addtitle>Circ J</addtitle><description>Background:Effects of rapid electrical defibrillation and β-blockade on coronary ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remain unknown.Methods and Results:After induction of VF by 30 min of ischemia followed by reperfusion, animals were treated with defibrillation alone (Group A, n=13), 2 min of open-chest cardiac massage followed by defibrillation (Group B, n=11), or the same therapy to Group B with propranolol (1 mg/kg, i.v.) treatment before ischemia/reperfusion (Group C, n=11). If return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was not attained, each therapy was repeated ≤3 times (Set-1). When ROSC was not obtained within Set-1, cardiac massage was applied to all animals followed by defibrillation, which was repeated ≤3 times (Set-2). ROSC after Set-1 was 8% in Group A, 82% in Group B and 82% in Group C, whereas that after Set-2 was 62% in Group A, 100% in Group B and 82% in Group C. Each animal with ROSC in Groups A (n=8) and B (n=11) showed sinus rhythm, whereas those in Group C (n=9) had sinus rhythm (n=5), atrial fibrillation (n=1), accelerated idioventricular rhythm (n=2) and atrioventricular block (n=1). Post ROSC heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in Group C.Conclusions:Cardiac massage increased the likelihood of ROSC vs. rapid defibrillation, but β-blocker pretreatment may worsen hemodynamics and electrical stability after ROSC.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Beta-blocker pretreatment</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Electric Countershock</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Heart Massage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation</subject><subject>Rapid defibrillation</subject><subject>Reperfusion</subject><subject>ROSC rate</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><issn>1346-9843</issn><issn>1347-4820</issn><issn>1347-4820</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkcluFDEURUsIRAbYs0JesqnEYw3LUEpCR4lATcTWcrmeaTc1NH6uRX6LD-AT-Ka4Bzob24tzz7PezbIPjF4wrsSl9cGuL5q7nNOcVnX5KjtlQpa5rDh9vXsXeV1JcZKdIa4p5TVV9dvsRIiy4Iqr0-zvtXNgI5LJkcaEzhtLHgyi-QnEjB359yf_3E_2FwTyLUAMYOIAYyTTSOIKyPfZWkAkSxPhqJg2cz9MowlPZAk4o_XRRJ8SV4gJho60T7t0Y0Y_AlmgXcHgzeUSNhDcjInNF2M324T-SNOCt3NvArnxbfB9v5c9TB3077I3zvQI7w_3efZ4c_3YfMnvv94umqv73MpaxZwpCy0tOmucqoqO1dy5sjWSqZIxUToppaVCpg2CAcopB1pI3pmKcSsoFefZp712E6bfM2DUg0cL6SsjTDNqrqgSqlZUJpTuURsmxABOb4If0i40o3pbmt6Vpps7zanelpYiHw_2uR2gOwb-t5SA2z2wxpiKOQImRG97OBgrtR2Rzhf1C7EyQcMongGQ8bG6</recordid><startdate>20210924</startdate><enddate>20210924</enddate><creator>Wada, Takeshi</creator><creator>Hagiwara-Nagasawa, Mihoko</creator><creator>Kambayashi, Ryuichi</creator><creator>Goto, Ai</creator><creator>Chiba, Koki</creator><creator>Nunoi, Yoshio</creator><creator>Izumi-Nakaseko, Hiroko</creator><creator>Koga, Tadashi</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Akio</creator><creator>Nakazato, Yuji</creator><creator>Lurie, Keith G.</creator><creator>Sugiyama, Atsushi</creator><general>The Japanese Circulation Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210924</creationdate><title>Effects of Cardiac Massage and β-Blocker Pretreatment on the Success Rate of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Assessed by the Canine Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Ventricular Fibrillation Model</title><author>Wada, Takeshi ; Hagiwara-Nagasawa, Mihoko ; Kambayashi, Ryuichi ; Goto, Ai ; Chiba, Koki ; Nunoi, Yoshio ; Izumi-Nakaseko, Hiroko ; Koga, Tadashi ; Matsumoto, Akio ; Nakazato, Yuji ; Lurie, Keith G. ; Sugiyama, Atsushi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-15ceb06dcaf586d192ff7ba41571137f444c034897eae0202e0642da812c3003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Beta-blocker pretreatment</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Electric Countershock</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Heart Massage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation</topic><topic>Rapid defibrillation</topic><topic>Reperfusion</topic><topic>ROSC rate</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wada, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagiwara-Nagasawa, Mihoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kambayashi, Ryuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goto, Ai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Koki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunoi, Yoshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi-Nakaseko, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koga, Tadashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Akio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakazato, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lurie, Keith G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wada, Takeshi</au><au>Hagiwara-Nagasawa, Mihoko</au><au>Kambayashi, Ryuichi</au><au>Goto, Ai</au><au>Chiba, Koki</au><au>Nunoi, Yoshio</au><au>Izumi-Nakaseko, Hiroko</au><au>Koga, Tadashi</au><au>Matsumoto, Akio</au><au>Nakazato, Yuji</au><au>Lurie, Keith G.</au><au>Sugiyama, Atsushi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Cardiac Massage and β-Blocker Pretreatment on the Success Rate of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Assessed by the Canine Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Ventricular Fibrillation Model</atitle><jtitle>Circulation Journal</jtitle><addtitle>Circ J</addtitle><date>2021-09-24</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1885</spage><epage>1891</epage><pages>1885-1891</pages><artnum>CJ-20-0897</artnum><issn>1346-9843</issn><issn>1347-4820</issn><eissn>1347-4820</eissn><abstract>Background:Effects of rapid electrical defibrillation and β-blockade on coronary ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remain unknown.Methods and Results:After induction of VF by 30 min of ischemia followed by reperfusion, animals were treated with defibrillation alone (Group A, n=13), 2 min of open-chest cardiac massage followed by defibrillation (Group B, n=11), or the same therapy to Group B with propranolol (1 mg/kg, i.v.) treatment before ischemia/reperfusion (Group C, n=11). If return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was not attained, each therapy was repeated ≤3 times (Set-1). When ROSC was not obtained within Set-1, cardiac massage was applied to all animals followed by defibrillation, which was repeated ≤3 times (Set-2). ROSC after Set-1 was 8% in Group A, 82% in Group B and 82% in Group C, whereas that after Set-2 was 62% in Group A, 100% in Group B and 82% in Group C. Each animal with ROSC in Groups A (n=8) and B (n=11) showed sinus rhythm, whereas those in Group C (n=9) had sinus rhythm (n=5), atrial fibrillation (n=1), accelerated idioventricular rhythm (n=2) and atrioventricular block (n=1). Post ROSC heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in Group C.Conclusions:Cardiac massage increased the likelihood of ROSC vs. rapid defibrillation, but β-blocker pretreatment may worsen hemodynamics and electrical stability after ROSC.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>The Japanese Circulation Society</pub><pmid>33762525</pmid><doi>10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0897</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1346-9843
ispartof Circulation Journal, 2021/09/24, Vol.85(10), pp.1885-1891
issn 1346-9843
1347-4820
1347-4820
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2505359504
source MEDLINE; J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animals
Beta-blocker pretreatment
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Disease Models, Animal
Dogs
Electric Countershock
Heart Arrest - therapy
Heart Massage
Humans
Ischemia
Ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation
Rapid defibrillation
Reperfusion
ROSC rate
Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy
title Effects of Cardiac Massage and β-Blocker Pretreatment on the Success Rate of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Assessed by the Canine Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Ventricular Fibrillation Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A04%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Cardiac%20Massage%20and%20%CE%B2-Blocker%20Pretreatment%20on%20the%20Success%20Rate%20of%20Cardiopulmonary%20Resuscitation%20Assessed%20by%20the%20Canine%20Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced%20Ventricular%20Fibrillation%20Model&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20Journal&rft.au=Wada,%20Takeshi&rft.date=2021-09-24&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1885&rft.epage=1891&rft.pages=1885-1891&rft.artnum=CJ-20-0897&rft.issn=1346-9843&rft.eissn=1347-4820&rft_id=info:doi/10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0897&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2505359504%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2505359504&rft_id=info:pmid/33762525&rfr_iscdi=true