Virtual reality in presurgical patient education: A scoping review and recommended trial design guidelines
Bekelis et al. at Dartmouth Neurosurgery found statistically increased pre-operative satisfaction and reduced pre-operative anxiety scores after the use of VR to simulate the perioperative experience as compared to a control group.7 Noben et al. at Maxima Medical Center focused on the day-of-surgery...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2021-10, Vol.222 (4), p.704-705 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 705 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 704 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 222 |
creator | Mahajan, Uma V. Sunshine, Kerrin S. Herring, Eric Z. Labak, Collin M. Wright, James M. Smith, Gabriel |
description | Bekelis et al. at Dartmouth Neurosurgery found statistically increased pre-operative satisfaction and reduced pre-operative anxiety scores after the use of VR to simulate the perioperative experience as compared to a control group.7 Noben et al. at Maxima Medical Center focused on the day-of-surgery experience in cesarean sections. [...]when reporting results, to bolster consistency investigators should provide technical details including software and hardware utilized. Better educating patients in the presurgical setting leads to improved patient comprehension, which in turn can lead to reduced anxiety, better management of expectations, and higher patient satisfaction, and ultimately improves delivery of care.Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.Acknowledgements We thank Amber Stout, Medical Librarian at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, for assistance with the literature search.Appendix A Supplementary data The following are the Supplementary data to this article: |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2504355527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961021001574</els_id><sourcerecordid>2504355527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae3dde7a53b4274b80c7b3469a557602fcfe7f20381313a686e90d09b343a91b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2L1TAUxYMoznP0T1ACbty05qNpUjcyDH7BgBt1G9Lk9pHSpjVpHea_9z7e04UbV7kJv3NuOIeQl5zVnPH27Vi7eSx7PtaCCV4zWTMhHpEDN7qruDHyMTkwxkTVtZxdkWeljHjlvJFPyZWUWgmjxYGMP2LedjfRDG6K2wONia4ZTsbR4_PqtghpoxB2j-OS3tEbWvyyxnREza8I99SlgKNf5hlSgEC3HFEZoMRjosc9BphigvKcPBncVODF5bwm3z9--Hb7ubr7-unL7c1d5WUnt8qBDAG0U7JvhG56w7zuZdN2TindMjH4AfQgmDRccula00LHAuuQka7jvbwmb86-a15-7lA2O8fiYZpcgmUvVijWSKWU0Ii-_gcdlz0n_B1SWhjTdKJBSp0pn5dSMgx2zXF2-cFyZk9l2NFeyrCnMiyTFstA3auL-97PEP6q_qSPwPszABgHRplt8Zi2hxAxz82GJf5nxW-rt54a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572884924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Virtual reality in presurgical patient education: A scoping review and recommended trial design guidelines</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Mahajan, Uma V. ; Sunshine, Kerrin S. ; Herring, Eric Z. ; Labak, Collin M. ; Wright, James M. ; Smith, Gabriel</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Uma V. ; Sunshine, Kerrin S. ; Herring, Eric Z. ; Labak, Collin M. ; Wright, James M. ; Smith, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><description>Bekelis et al. at Dartmouth Neurosurgery found statistically increased pre-operative satisfaction and reduced pre-operative anxiety scores after the use of VR to simulate the perioperative experience as compared to a control group.7 Noben et al. at Maxima Medical Center focused on the day-of-surgery experience in cesarean sections. [...]when reporting results, to bolster consistency investigators should provide technical details including software and hardware utilized. Better educating patients in the presurgical setting leads to improved patient comprehension, which in turn can lead to reduced anxiety, better management of expectations, and higher patient satisfaction, and ultimately improves delivery of care.Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.Acknowledgements We thank Amber Stout, Medical Librarian at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, for assistance with the literature search.Appendix A Supplementary data The following are the Supplementary data to this article:</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33752872</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Colonoscopy ; Computer applications ; Conflicts of interest ; Health care facilities ; Neurosurgery ; Patient compliance ; Patient education ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Virtual reality</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2021-10, Vol.222 (4), p.704-705</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae3dde7a53b4274b80c7b3469a557602fcfe7f20381313a686e90d09b343a91b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae3dde7a53b4274b80c7b3469a557602fcfe7f20381313a686e90d09b343a91b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4482-7582 ; 0000-0003-0154-0677 ; 0000-0002-3834-9318</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2572884924?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33752872$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Uma V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunshine, Kerrin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herring, Eric Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labak, Collin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><title>Virtual reality in presurgical patient education: A scoping review and recommended trial design guidelines</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Bekelis et al. at Dartmouth Neurosurgery found statistically increased pre-operative satisfaction and reduced pre-operative anxiety scores after the use of VR to simulate the perioperative experience as compared to a control group.7 Noben et al. at Maxima Medical Center focused on the day-of-surgery experience in cesarean sections. [...]when reporting results, to bolster consistency investigators should provide technical details including software and hardware utilized. Better educating patients in the presurgical setting leads to improved patient comprehension, which in turn can lead to reduced anxiety, better management of expectations, and higher patient satisfaction, and ultimately improves delivery of care.Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.Acknowledgements We thank Amber Stout, Medical Librarian at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, for assistance with the literature search.Appendix A Supplementary data The following are the Supplementary data to this article:</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Patient compliance</subject><subject>Patient education</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Virtual reality</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2L1TAUxYMoznP0T1ACbty05qNpUjcyDH7BgBt1G9Lk9pHSpjVpHea_9z7e04UbV7kJv3NuOIeQl5zVnPH27Vi7eSx7PtaCCV4zWTMhHpEDN7qruDHyMTkwxkTVtZxdkWeljHjlvJFPyZWUWgmjxYGMP2LedjfRDG6K2wONia4ZTsbR4_PqtghpoxB2j-OS3tEbWvyyxnREza8I99SlgKNf5hlSgEC3HFEZoMRjosc9BphigvKcPBncVODF5bwm3z9--Hb7ubr7-unL7c1d5WUnt8qBDAG0U7JvhG56w7zuZdN2TindMjH4AfQgmDRccula00LHAuuQka7jvbwmb86-a15-7lA2O8fiYZpcgmUvVijWSKWU0Ii-_gcdlz0n_B1SWhjTdKJBSp0pn5dSMgx2zXF2-cFyZk9l2NFeyrCnMiyTFstA3auL-97PEP6q_qSPwPszABgHRplt8Zi2hxAxz82GJf5nxW-rt54a</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Mahajan, Uma V.</creator><creator>Sunshine, Kerrin S.</creator><creator>Herring, Eric Z.</creator><creator>Labak, Collin M.</creator><creator>Wright, James M.</creator><creator>Smith, Gabriel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4482-7582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-0677</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3834-9318</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Virtual reality in presurgical patient education: A scoping review and recommended trial design guidelines</title><author>Mahajan, Uma V. ; Sunshine, Kerrin S. ; Herring, Eric Z. ; Labak, Collin M. ; Wright, James M. ; Smith, Gabriel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae3dde7a53b4274b80c7b3469a557602fcfe7f20381313a686e90d09b343a91b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Patient compliance</topic><topic>Patient education</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Virtual reality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Uma V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunshine, Kerrin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herring, Eric Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labak, Collin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahajan, Uma V.</au><au>Sunshine, Kerrin S.</au><au>Herring, Eric Z.</au><au>Labak, Collin M.</au><au>Wright, James M.</au><au>Smith, Gabriel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Virtual reality in presurgical patient education: A scoping review and recommended trial design guidelines</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>222</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>704</spage><epage>705</epage><pages>704-705</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Bekelis et al. at Dartmouth Neurosurgery found statistically increased pre-operative satisfaction and reduced pre-operative anxiety scores after the use of VR to simulate the perioperative experience as compared to a control group.7 Noben et al. at Maxima Medical Center focused on the day-of-surgery experience in cesarean sections. [...]when reporting results, to bolster consistency investigators should provide technical details including software and hardware utilized. Better educating patients in the presurgical setting leads to improved patient comprehension, which in turn can lead to reduced anxiety, better management of expectations, and higher patient satisfaction, and ultimately improves delivery of care.Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.Acknowledgements We thank Amber Stout, Medical Librarian at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, for assistance with the literature search.Appendix A Supplementary data The following are the Supplementary data to this article:</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33752872</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.022</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4482-7582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-0677</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3834-9318</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2021-10, Vol.222 (4), p.704-705 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2504355527 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Anxiety Colonoscopy Computer applications Conflicts of interest Health care facilities Neurosurgery Patient compliance Patient education Patient satisfaction Patients Surgery Surgical outcomes Virtual reality |
title | Virtual reality in presurgical patient education: A scoping review and recommended trial design guidelines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A02%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Virtual%20reality%20in%20presurgical%20patient%20education:%20A%20scoping%20review%20and%20recommended%20trial%20design%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Mahajan,%20Uma%20V.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=222&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=705&rft.pages=704-705&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2504355527%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572884924&rft_id=info:pmid/33752872&rft_els_id=S0002961021001574&rfr_iscdi=true |