Virtual reality in presurgical patient education: A scoping review and recommended trial design guidelines

Bekelis et al. at Dartmouth Neurosurgery found statistically increased pre-operative satisfaction and reduced pre-operative anxiety scores after the use of VR to simulate the perioperative experience as compared to a control group.7 Noben et al. at Maxima Medical Center focused on the day-of-surgery...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2021-10, Vol.222 (4), p.704-705
Hauptverfasser: Mahajan, Uma V., Sunshine, Kerrin S., Herring, Eric Z., Labak, Collin M., Wright, James M., Smith, Gabriel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 705
container_issue 4
container_start_page 704
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 222
creator Mahajan, Uma V.
Sunshine, Kerrin S.
Herring, Eric Z.
Labak, Collin M.
Wright, James M.
Smith, Gabriel
description Bekelis et al. at Dartmouth Neurosurgery found statistically increased pre-operative satisfaction and reduced pre-operative anxiety scores after the use of VR to simulate the perioperative experience as compared to a control group.7 Noben et al. at Maxima Medical Center focused on the day-of-surgery experience in cesarean sections. [...]when reporting results, to bolster consistency investigators should provide technical details including software and hardware utilized. Better educating patients in the presurgical setting leads to improved patient comprehension, which in turn can lead to reduced anxiety, better management of expectations, and higher patient satisfaction, and ultimately improves delivery of care.Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.Acknowledgements We thank Amber Stout, Medical Librarian at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, for assistance with the literature search.Appendix A Supplementary data The following are the Supplementary data to this article:
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2504355527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961021001574</els_id><sourcerecordid>2504355527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae3dde7a53b4274b80c7b3469a557602fcfe7f20381313a686e90d09b343a91b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2L1TAUxYMoznP0T1ACbty05qNpUjcyDH7BgBt1G9Lk9pHSpjVpHea_9z7e04UbV7kJv3NuOIeQl5zVnPH27Vi7eSx7PtaCCV4zWTMhHpEDN7qruDHyMTkwxkTVtZxdkWeljHjlvJFPyZWUWgmjxYGMP2LedjfRDG6K2wONia4ZTsbR4_PqtghpoxB2j-OS3tEbWvyyxnREza8I99SlgKNf5hlSgEC3HFEZoMRjosc9BphigvKcPBncVODF5bwm3z9--Hb7ubr7-unL7c1d5WUnt8qBDAG0U7JvhG56w7zuZdN2TindMjH4AfQgmDRccula00LHAuuQka7jvbwmb86-a15-7lA2O8fiYZpcgmUvVijWSKWU0Ii-_gcdlz0n_B1SWhjTdKJBSp0pn5dSMgx2zXF2-cFyZk9l2NFeyrCnMiyTFstA3auL-97PEP6q_qSPwPszABgHRplt8Zi2hxAxz82GJf5nxW-rt54a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572884924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Virtual reality in presurgical patient education: A scoping review and recommended trial design guidelines</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Mahajan, Uma V. ; Sunshine, Kerrin S. ; Herring, Eric Z. ; Labak, Collin M. ; Wright, James M. ; Smith, Gabriel</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Uma V. ; Sunshine, Kerrin S. ; Herring, Eric Z. ; Labak, Collin M. ; Wright, James M. ; Smith, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><description>Bekelis et al. at Dartmouth Neurosurgery found statistically increased pre-operative satisfaction and reduced pre-operative anxiety scores after the use of VR to simulate the perioperative experience as compared to a control group.7 Noben et al. at Maxima Medical Center focused on the day-of-surgery experience in cesarean sections. [...]when reporting results, to bolster consistency investigators should provide technical details including software and hardware utilized. Better educating patients in the presurgical setting leads to improved patient comprehension, which in turn can lead to reduced anxiety, better management of expectations, and higher patient satisfaction, and ultimately improves delivery of care.Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.Acknowledgements We thank Amber Stout, Medical Librarian at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, for assistance with the literature search.Appendix A Supplementary data The following are the Supplementary data to this article:</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33752872</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Colonoscopy ; Computer applications ; Conflicts of interest ; Health care facilities ; Neurosurgery ; Patient compliance ; Patient education ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Virtual reality</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2021-10, Vol.222 (4), p.704-705</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae3dde7a53b4274b80c7b3469a557602fcfe7f20381313a686e90d09b343a91b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae3dde7a53b4274b80c7b3469a557602fcfe7f20381313a686e90d09b343a91b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4482-7582 ; 0000-0003-0154-0677 ; 0000-0002-3834-9318</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2572884924?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33752872$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Uma V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunshine, Kerrin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herring, Eric Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labak, Collin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><title>Virtual reality in presurgical patient education: A scoping review and recommended trial design guidelines</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Bekelis et al. at Dartmouth Neurosurgery found statistically increased pre-operative satisfaction and reduced pre-operative anxiety scores after the use of VR to simulate the perioperative experience as compared to a control group.7 Noben et al. at Maxima Medical Center focused on the day-of-surgery experience in cesarean sections. [...]when reporting results, to bolster consistency investigators should provide technical details including software and hardware utilized. Better educating patients in the presurgical setting leads to improved patient comprehension, which in turn can lead to reduced anxiety, better management of expectations, and higher patient satisfaction, and ultimately improves delivery of care.Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.Acknowledgements We thank Amber Stout, Medical Librarian at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, for assistance with the literature search.Appendix A Supplementary data The following are the Supplementary data to this article:</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Patient compliance</subject><subject>Patient education</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Virtual reality</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2L1TAUxYMoznP0T1ACbty05qNpUjcyDH7BgBt1G9Lk9pHSpjVpHea_9z7e04UbV7kJv3NuOIeQl5zVnPH27Vi7eSx7PtaCCV4zWTMhHpEDN7qruDHyMTkwxkTVtZxdkWeljHjlvJFPyZWUWgmjxYGMP2LedjfRDG6K2wONia4ZTsbR4_PqtghpoxB2j-OS3tEbWvyyxnREza8I99SlgKNf5hlSgEC3HFEZoMRjosc9BphigvKcPBncVODF5bwm3z9--Hb7ubr7-unL7c1d5WUnt8qBDAG0U7JvhG56w7zuZdN2TindMjH4AfQgmDRccula00LHAuuQka7jvbwmb86-a15-7lA2O8fiYZpcgmUvVijWSKWU0Ii-_gcdlz0n_B1SWhjTdKJBSp0pn5dSMgx2zXF2-cFyZk9l2NFeyrCnMiyTFstA3auL-97PEP6q_qSPwPszABgHRplt8Zi2hxAxz82GJf5nxW-rt54a</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Mahajan, Uma V.</creator><creator>Sunshine, Kerrin S.</creator><creator>Herring, Eric Z.</creator><creator>Labak, Collin M.</creator><creator>Wright, James M.</creator><creator>Smith, Gabriel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4482-7582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-0677</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3834-9318</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Virtual reality in presurgical patient education: A scoping review and recommended trial design guidelines</title><author>Mahajan, Uma V. ; Sunshine, Kerrin S. ; Herring, Eric Z. ; Labak, Collin M. ; Wright, James M. ; Smith, Gabriel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae3dde7a53b4274b80c7b3469a557602fcfe7f20381313a686e90d09b343a91b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Patient compliance</topic><topic>Patient education</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Virtual reality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Uma V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunshine, Kerrin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herring, Eric Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labak, Collin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahajan, Uma V.</au><au>Sunshine, Kerrin S.</au><au>Herring, Eric Z.</au><au>Labak, Collin M.</au><au>Wright, James M.</au><au>Smith, Gabriel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Virtual reality in presurgical patient education: A scoping review and recommended trial design guidelines</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>222</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>704</spage><epage>705</epage><pages>704-705</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Bekelis et al. at Dartmouth Neurosurgery found statistically increased pre-operative satisfaction and reduced pre-operative anxiety scores after the use of VR to simulate the perioperative experience as compared to a control group.7 Noben et al. at Maxima Medical Center focused on the day-of-surgery experience in cesarean sections. [...]when reporting results, to bolster consistency investigators should provide technical details including software and hardware utilized. Better educating patients in the presurgical setting leads to improved patient comprehension, which in turn can lead to reduced anxiety, better management of expectations, and higher patient satisfaction, and ultimately improves delivery of care.Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.Acknowledgements We thank Amber Stout, Medical Librarian at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, for assistance with the literature search.Appendix A Supplementary data The following are the Supplementary data to this article:</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33752872</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.022</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4482-7582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-0677</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3834-9318</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 2021-10, Vol.222 (4), p.704-705
issn 0002-9610
1879-1883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2504355527
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Anxiety
Colonoscopy
Computer applications
Conflicts of interest
Health care facilities
Neurosurgery
Patient compliance
Patient education
Patient satisfaction
Patients
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Virtual reality
title Virtual reality in presurgical patient education: A scoping review and recommended trial design guidelines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A02%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Virtual%20reality%20in%20presurgical%20patient%20education:%20A%20scoping%20review%20and%20recommended%20trial%20design%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Mahajan,%20Uma%20V.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=222&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=705&rft.pages=704-705&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2504355527%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572884924&rft_id=info:pmid/33752872&rft_els_id=S0002961021001574&rfr_iscdi=true