Outcomes of neovascular glaucoma in eyes presenting with moderate to good visual potential

Purpose To compare the disease characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) presenting with visual acuity (VA) 6/60 or better in two different health systems. Methods Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with NVG who presented between January 2016...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International ophthalmology 2021-07, Vol.41 (7), p.2359-2368
Hauptverfasser: Rani, Padmaja Kumari, Sen, Piyali, Sahoo, Niroj Kumar, Senthil, Sirisha, Chakurkar, Renuka, Anup, Manju, Behera, Umesh Chandra, Sivaprasad, Sobha, Das, Taraprasad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2368
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2359
container_title International ophthalmology
container_volume 41
creator Rani, Padmaja Kumari
Sen, Piyali
Sahoo, Niroj Kumar
Senthil, Sirisha
Chakurkar, Renuka
Anup, Manju
Behera, Umesh Chandra
Sivaprasad, Sobha
Das, Taraprasad
description Purpose To compare the disease characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) presenting with visual acuity (VA) 6/60 or better in two different health systems. Methods Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with NVG who presented between January 2016 to January 2018 in 5 tertiary-centres in India and one eye-specialist centre in London (UK) was performed. The baseline characteristics, treatment provisions, and visual outcomes in the India and UK cohorts were compared. Results At presentation, 18% (83 of 451) and 22% (59 of 270) of patients with NVG had VA 6/60 or better in India and the UK cohorts, respectively. The aetiologies of NVG were similar with proliferative diabetic retinopathy being the most common cause (60.9%, India; 64.4%, UK; p  = 0.38). Previous panretinal photocoagulation was more prevalent in the UK cohort compared to the India cohort (94.9% versus 66.3%, respectively; p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10792-021-01789-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503673290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2503673290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df2537b202098c8510830f8a2ecc6911950b5204def80b3fe5f4ec46c6b27a713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOxDAQRS0EguXxAxTIEg1NYGzHcVwixEtCooGGxnKcyRKUxIudgPbv8bI8JAoqF_fMHc8h5JDBKQNQZ5GB0jwDzjJgqtTZcoPMmFQi44WATTIDVshMKmA7ZDfGFwDQShfbZEcIlUsQakae7qfR-R4j9Q0d0L_Z6KbOBjrv7JQCS9uB4jLli4ARh7Ed5vS9HZ9p72sMdkQ6ejr3vqZvbZxsRxd-XGG22ydbje0iHny9e-Tx6vLh4ia7u7--vTi_y5xQcszqhkuhKg4cdOlKyaAU0JSWo3OFZkxLqCSHvMamhEo0KJscXV64ouLKKib2yMm6dxH864RxNH0bHXadTfdM0fB0aaEE15DQ4z_oi5_CkH6XqFwqLVW5oviacsHHGLAxi9D2NiwNA7Myb9bmTTJvPs2bZRo6-qqeqh7rn5Fv1QkQayCmaJhj-N39T-0HsKWPDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2545795780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of neovascular glaucoma in eyes presenting with moderate to good visual potential</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rani, Padmaja Kumari ; Sen, Piyali ; Sahoo, Niroj Kumar ; Senthil, Sirisha ; Chakurkar, Renuka ; Anup, Manju ; Behera, Umesh Chandra ; Sivaprasad, Sobha ; Das, Taraprasad</creator><creatorcontrib>Rani, Padmaja Kumari ; Sen, Piyali ; Sahoo, Niroj Kumar ; Senthil, Sirisha ; Chakurkar, Renuka ; Anup, Manju ; Behera, Umesh Chandra ; Sivaprasad, Sobha ; Das, Taraprasad ; India Retinal Disease Study Group ; on behalf of India Retinal Disease Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To compare the disease characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) presenting with visual acuity (VA) 6/60 or better in two different health systems. Methods Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with NVG who presented between January 2016 to January 2018 in 5 tertiary-centres in India and one eye-specialist centre in London (UK) was performed. The baseline characteristics, treatment provisions, and visual outcomes in the India and UK cohorts were compared. Results At presentation, 18% (83 of 451) and 22% (59 of 270) of patients with NVG had VA 6/60 or better in India and the UK cohorts, respectively. The aetiologies of NVG were similar with proliferative diabetic retinopathy being the most common cause (60.9%, India; 64.4%, UK; p  = 0.38). Previous panretinal photocoagulation was more prevalent in the UK cohort compared to the India cohort (94.9% versus 66.3%, respectively; p  &lt; 0.001). The mean number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections per eye was higher in the Indian cohort (1.65 ± 0.97 versus 1.14 ± 1.02 injections; p  &lt; 0.001). The number of eyes with closed angles (36.9% India versus 30.5% UK; p  = 0.45) and the number of eyes needing glaucoma interventions (52.1% India; 62.7% UK; p  = 0.82) were similar in two cohorts. Among glaucoma surgeries, trabeculectomies were more commonly performed in the Indian cohort (23 vs 4; p  &lt; 0.001),while glaucoma drainage device surgeries were more prevalent in the UK cohort (18 vs 4 p  &lt; 0.001). After a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR 8.4–34.8 India; 24–36 months UK), favourable visual outcomes (vision stable or improved) were similar in both health systems (52.5% in the Indian cohort vs 43.4% in the UK cohort; p  = 0.28). On multivariate regression analysis, the need for trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation was associated with worse visual outcomes in both cohorts. Conclusions The causes and clinical profile of neovascular glaucoma with presenting visual acuity 6/60 or better in India and the UK were similar. Only up to 50% of eyes achieved favourable visual outcomes with current management protocols in both health systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-01789-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33745037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Bevacizumab - therapeutic use ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Eye ; Eye (anatomy) ; Glaucoma ; Glaucoma, Neovascular - diagnosis ; Glaucoma, Neovascular - epidemiology ; Glaucoma, Neovascular - etiology ; Health services ; Humans ; India - epidemiology ; Intraocular Pressure ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Ophthalmology ; Original Paper ; Patients ; Regression analysis ; Retinopathy ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Vascular endothelial growth factor ; Visual acuity</subject><ispartof>International ophthalmology, 2021-07, Vol.41 (7), p.2359-2368</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df2537b202098c8510830f8a2ecc6911950b5204def80b3fe5f4ec46c6b27a713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df2537b202098c8510830f8a2ecc6911950b5204def80b3fe5f4ec46c6b27a713</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7069-8238</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10792-021-01789-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10792-021-01789-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33745037$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rani, Padmaja Kumari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Piyali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Niroj Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senthil, Sirisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakurkar, Renuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anup, Manju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behera, Umesh Chandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivaprasad, Sobha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Taraprasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>India Retinal Disease Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of India Retinal Disease Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of neovascular glaucoma in eyes presenting with moderate to good visual potential</title><title>International ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose To compare the disease characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) presenting with visual acuity (VA) 6/60 or better in two different health systems. Methods Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with NVG who presented between January 2016 to January 2018 in 5 tertiary-centres in India and one eye-specialist centre in London (UK) was performed. The baseline characteristics, treatment provisions, and visual outcomes in the India and UK cohorts were compared. Results At presentation, 18% (83 of 451) and 22% (59 of 270) of patients with NVG had VA 6/60 or better in India and the UK cohorts, respectively. The aetiologies of NVG were similar with proliferative diabetic retinopathy being the most common cause (60.9%, India; 64.4%, UK; p  = 0.38). Previous panretinal photocoagulation was more prevalent in the UK cohort compared to the India cohort (94.9% versus 66.3%, respectively; p  &lt; 0.001). The mean number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections per eye was higher in the Indian cohort (1.65 ± 0.97 versus 1.14 ± 1.02 injections; p  &lt; 0.001). The number of eyes with closed angles (36.9% India versus 30.5% UK; p  = 0.45) and the number of eyes needing glaucoma interventions (52.1% India; 62.7% UK; p  = 0.82) were similar in two cohorts. Among glaucoma surgeries, trabeculectomies were more commonly performed in the Indian cohort (23 vs 4; p  &lt; 0.001),while glaucoma drainage device surgeries were more prevalent in the UK cohort (18 vs 4 p  &lt; 0.001). After a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR 8.4–34.8 India; 24–36 months UK), favourable visual outcomes (vision stable or improved) were similar in both health systems (52.5% in the Indian cohort vs 43.4% in the UK cohort; p  = 0.28). On multivariate regression analysis, the need for trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation was associated with worse visual outcomes in both cohorts. Conclusions The causes and clinical profile of neovascular glaucoma with presenting visual acuity 6/60 or better in India and the UK were similar. Only up to 50% of eyes achieved favourable visual outcomes with current management protocols in both health systems.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bevacizumab - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eye (anatomy)</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Neovascular - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Neovascular - epidemiology</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Neovascular - etiology</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India - epidemiology</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retinopathy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Vascular endothelial growth factor</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><issn>0165-5701</issn><issn>1573-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtOxDAQRS0EguXxAxTIEg1NYGzHcVwixEtCooGGxnKcyRKUxIudgPbv8bI8JAoqF_fMHc8h5JDBKQNQZ5GB0jwDzjJgqtTZcoPMmFQi44WATTIDVshMKmA7ZDfGFwDQShfbZEcIlUsQakae7qfR-R4j9Q0d0L_Z6KbOBjrv7JQCS9uB4jLli4ARh7Ed5vS9HZ9p72sMdkQ6ejr3vqZvbZxsRxd-XGG22ydbje0iHny9e-Tx6vLh4ia7u7--vTi_y5xQcszqhkuhKg4cdOlKyaAU0JSWo3OFZkxLqCSHvMamhEo0KJscXV64ouLKKib2yMm6dxH864RxNH0bHXadTfdM0fB0aaEE15DQ4z_oi5_CkH6XqFwqLVW5oviacsHHGLAxi9D2NiwNA7Myb9bmTTJvPs2bZRo6-qqeqh7rn5Fv1QkQayCmaJhj-N39T-0HsKWPDg</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Rani, Padmaja Kumari</creator><creator>Sen, Piyali</creator><creator>Sahoo, Niroj Kumar</creator><creator>Senthil, Sirisha</creator><creator>Chakurkar, Renuka</creator><creator>Anup, Manju</creator><creator>Behera, Umesh Chandra</creator><creator>Sivaprasad, Sobha</creator><creator>Das, Taraprasad</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7069-8238</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Outcomes of neovascular glaucoma in eyes presenting with moderate to good visual potential</title><author>Rani, Padmaja Kumari ; Sen, Piyali ; Sahoo, Niroj Kumar ; Senthil, Sirisha ; Chakurkar, Renuka ; Anup, Manju ; Behera, Umesh Chandra ; Sivaprasad, Sobha ; Das, Taraprasad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df2537b202098c8510830f8a2ecc6911950b5204def80b3fe5f4ec46c6b27a713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bevacizumab - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eye (anatomy)</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Neovascular - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Neovascular - epidemiology</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Neovascular - etiology</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India - epidemiology</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retinopathy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Vascular endothelial growth factor</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rani, Padmaja Kumari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Piyali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Niroj Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senthil, Sirisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakurkar, Renuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anup, Manju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behera, Umesh Chandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivaprasad, Sobha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Taraprasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>India Retinal Disease Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of India Retinal Disease Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rani, Padmaja Kumari</au><au>Sen, Piyali</au><au>Sahoo, Niroj Kumar</au><au>Senthil, Sirisha</au><au>Chakurkar, Renuka</au><au>Anup, Manju</au><au>Behera, Umesh Chandra</au><au>Sivaprasad, Sobha</au><au>Das, Taraprasad</au><aucorp>India Retinal Disease Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of India Retinal Disease Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of neovascular glaucoma in eyes presenting with moderate to good visual potential</atitle><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Int Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2359</spage><epage>2368</epage><pages>2359-2368</pages><issn>0165-5701</issn><eissn>1573-2630</eissn><abstract>Purpose To compare the disease characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) presenting with visual acuity (VA) 6/60 or better in two different health systems. Methods Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with NVG who presented between January 2016 to January 2018 in 5 tertiary-centres in India and one eye-specialist centre in London (UK) was performed. The baseline characteristics, treatment provisions, and visual outcomes in the India and UK cohorts were compared. Results At presentation, 18% (83 of 451) and 22% (59 of 270) of patients with NVG had VA 6/60 or better in India and the UK cohorts, respectively. The aetiologies of NVG were similar with proliferative diabetic retinopathy being the most common cause (60.9%, India; 64.4%, UK; p  = 0.38). Previous panretinal photocoagulation was more prevalent in the UK cohort compared to the India cohort (94.9% versus 66.3%, respectively; p  &lt; 0.001). The mean number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections per eye was higher in the Indian cohort (1.65 ± 0.97 versus 1.14 ± 1.02 injections; p  &lt; 0.001). The number of eyes with closed angles (36.9% India versus 30.5% UK; p  = 0.45) and the number of eyes needing glaucoma interventions (52.1% India; 62.7% UK; p  = 0.82) were similar in two cohorts. Among glaucoma surgeries, trabeculectomies were more commonly performed in the Indian cohort (23 vs 4; p  &lt; 0.001),while glaucoma drainage device surgeries were more prevalent in the UK cohort (18 vs 4 p  &lt; 0.001). After a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR 8.4–34.8 India; 24–36 months UK), favourable visual outcomes (vision stable or improved) were similar in both health systems (52.5% in the Indian cohort vs 43.4% in the UK cohort; p  = 0.28). On multivariate regression analysis, the need for trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation was associated with worse visual outcomes in both cohorts. Conclusions The causes and clinical profile of neovascular glaucoma with presenting visual acuity 6/60 or better in India and the UK were similar. Only up to 50% of eyes achieved favourable visual outcomes with current management protocols in both health systems.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>33745037</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10792-021-01789-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7069-8238</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5701
ispartof International ophthalmology, 2021-07, Vol.41 (7), p.2359-2368
issn 0165-5701
1573-2630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503673290
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acuity
Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Bevacizumab - therapeutic use
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetic retinopathy
Eye
Eye (anatomy)
Glaucoma
Glaucoma, Neovascular - diagnosis
Glaucoma, Neovascular - epidemiology
Glaucoma, Neovascular - etiology
Health services
Humans
India - epidemiology
Intraocular Pressure
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Ophthalmology
Original Paper
Patients
Regression analysis
Retinopathy
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Vascular endothelial growth factor
Visual acuity
title Outcomes of neovascular glaucoma in eyes presenting with moderate to good visual potential
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T14%3A08%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20neovascular%20glaucoma%20in%20eyes%20presenting%20with%20moderate%20to%20good%20visual%20potential&rft.jtitle=International%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Rani,%20Padmaja%20Kumari&rft.aucorp=India%20Retinal%20Disease%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2359&rft.epage=2368&rft.pages=2359-2368&rft.issn=0165-5701&rft.eissn=1573-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10792-021-01789-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2503673290%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2545795780&rft_id=info:pmid/33745037&rfr_iscdi=true