True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature
The paucity of targeted treatments available in patients with RAS mutant colorectal cancers contributes to the poor prognosis of this patient group compared to those with RAS wild-type disease. Recent liquid biopsy-driven studies have demonstrated that RAS mutant clones might disappear in plasma dur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer letters 2021-06, Vol.507, p.89-96 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 96 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Cancer letters |
container_volume | 507 |
creator | Nicolazzo, Chiara Barault, Ludovic Caponnetto, Salvatore De Renzi, Gianluigi Belardinilli, Francesca Bottillo, Irene Bargiacchi, Simone Macagno, Marco Grammatico, Paola Giannini, Giuseppe Cortesi, Enrico Di Nicolantonio, Federica Gazzaniga, Paola |
description | The paucity of targeted treatments available in patients with RAS mutant colorectal cancers contributes to the poor prognosis of this patient group compared to those with RAS wild-type disease. Recent liquid biopsy-driven studies have demonstrated that RAS mutant clones might disappear in plasma during the clonal evolution of the disease, opening new unforeseen perspectives for EGFR blockade in these patients. Nevertheless, the lack of detection of RAS mutations in plasma might depend on the low amount of released circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), making it necessary a more accurate selection of patients with true RAS mutation conversions. In this liquid biopsy-based study, we assessed RAS mutational status in initially RAS-mutant patients at the time of progressive disease from any line of therapy and investigated the incidence of true conversions to plasma RAS wild-type, comparing a colon cancer specific methylation profile with a mutational signature of ctDNA. Globally, considering either mutational panel or methylation profile as reliable tests to confirm or exclude the presence of ctDNA, the percentage of “true RAS converters” was 37.5%. In our series we observed a trend toward a better PFS in patients who received anti-EGFR as second or subsequent treatment lines compared to those who did not.
•RAS mutant colorectal cancer patients often switch to RAS wild-type at progression.•The presence of ctDNA in plasma must be confirmed by NGS or methylation assay.•Clinical trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR blockade in RAS converters. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503656851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304383521001191</els_id><sourcerecordid>2507655211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-bc8070da0ff0b4e7fd22d79ce18d6de6e70a1597705b8cff1d194094acdcc2133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdGK1DAUhoso7uzqG4gEvPGm9aRpmvZGGHZ1FRYFXa9DJjldM7TJmKQr80i-pel09cIL4UBI8v3_OZy_KF5QqCjQ9s2-0sqNmKoaaloBq4A2j4oN7URdir6Dx8UGGDQl6xg_K85j3AMAbwR_WpwxJpqGdf2m-HUbZiTau3sM0XoXyRD8RL5sv5JpTsolkvzp9tOOpkzHAxLriLZBz6NK1t2RNE8-kKtP21U5YVIx5S-dXUcfUCc1kjyqxkAO-R1dikQtFTGXIbvjIvp-XPy8I8qZU-vlkpXR3jmV5oDPiieDGiM-fzgvim_v391efihvPl9_vNzelJpDncqd7kCAUTAMsGtQDKaujeg10s60BlsUoCjvhQC-6_QwUEP7BvpGaaN1TRm7KF6vvofgf8wYk5xs1DiOyqGfo6w5sJa3HacZffUPuvdzyFOfKNFyXtOFalZKBx9jwEEegp1UOEoKcolS7uUapVyilMBkjjLLXj6Yz7sJzV_Rn-wy8HYFMG_j3mKQUeftajR22bo03v6_w2-LTrT8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2507655211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Nicolazzo, Chiara ; Barault, Ludovic ; Caponnetto, Salvatore ; De Renzi, Gianluigi ; Belardinilli, Francesca ; Bottillo, Irene ; Bargiacchi, Simone ; Macagno, Marco ; Grammatico, Paola ; Giannini, Giuseppe ; Cortesi, Enrico ; Di Nicolantonio, Federica ; Gazzaniga, Paola</creator><creatorcontrib>Nicolazzo, Chiara ; Barault, Ludovic ; Caponnetto, Salvatore ; De Renzi, Gianluigi ; Belardinilli, Francesca ; Bottillo, Irene ; Bargiacchi, Simone ; Macagno, Marco ; Grammatico, Paola ; Giannini, Giuseppe ; Cortesi, Enrico ; Di Nicolantonio, Federica ; Gazzaniga, Paola</creatorcontrib><description>The paucity of targeted treatments available in patients with RAS mutant colorectal cancers contributes to the poor prognosis of this patient group compared to those with RAS wild-type disease. Recent liquid biopsy-driven studies have demonstrated that RAS mutant clones might disappear in plasma during the clonal evolution of the disease, opening new unforeseen perspectives for EGFR blockade in these patients. Nevertheless, the lack of detection of RAS mutations in plasma might depend on the low amount of released circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), making it necessary a more accurate selection of patients with true RAS mutation conversions. In this liquid biopsy-based study, we assessed RAS mutational status in initially RAS-mutant patients at the time of progressive disease from any line of therapy and investigated the incidence of true conversions to plasma RAS wild-type, comparing a colon cancer specific methylation profile with a mutational signature of ctDNA. Globally, considering either mutational panel or methylation profile as reliable tests to confirm or exclude the presence of ctDNA, the percentage of “true RAS converters” was 37.5%. In our series we observed a trend toward a better PFS in patients who received anti-EGFR as second or subsequent treatment lines compared to those who did not.
•RAS mutant colorectal cancer patients often switch to RAS wild-type at progression.•The presence of ctDNA in plasma must be confirmed by NGS or methylation assay.•Clinical trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR blockade in RAS converters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3835</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33744389</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Cancer therapies ; Circulating tumor DNA ; Cloning ; Colon cancer ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA methylation ; EGFR blockade ; Epidermal growth factor receptors ; Genes ; Genetic testing ; Medical research ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Methylation ; Mutants ; Mutation ; Plasma ; RAS conversion ; Software ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer letters, 2021-06, Vol.507, p.89-96</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-bc8070da0ff0b4e7fd22d79ce18d6de6e70a1597705b8cff1d194094acdcc2133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-bc8070da0ff0b4e7fd22d79ce18d6de6e70a1597705b8cff1d194094acdcc2133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1749-7813 ; 0000-0002-8671-0155 ; 0000-0001-5227-5047 ; 0000-0001-9618-2010 ; 0000-0003-0396-7981 ; 0000-0002-2551-8979 ; 0000-0001-5276-7500</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33744389$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nicolazzo, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barault, Ludovic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caponnetto, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Renzi, Gianluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belardinilli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottillo, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bargiacchi, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macagno, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grammatico, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortesi, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Nicolantonio, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzaniga, Paola</creatorcontrib><title>True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature</title><title>Cancer letters</title><addtitle>Cancer Lett</addtitle><description>The paucity of targeted treatments available in patients with RAS mutant colorectal cancers contributes to the poor prognosis of this patient group compared to those with RAS wild-type disease. Recent liquid biopsy-driven studies have demonstrated that RAS mutant clones might disappear in plasma during the clonal evolution of the disease, opening new unforeseen perspectives for EGFR blockade in these patients. Nevertheless, the lack of detection of RAS mutations in plasma might depend on the low amount of released circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), making it necessary a more accurate selection of patients with true RAS mutation conversions. In this liquid biopsy-based study, we assessed RAS mutational status in initially RAS-mutant patients at the time of progressive disease from any line of therapy and investigated the incidence of true conversions to plasma RAS wild-type, comparing a colon cancer specific methylation profile with a mutational signature of ctDNA. Globally, considering either mutational panel or methylation profile as reliable tests to confirm or exclude the presence of ctDNA, the percentage of “true RAS converters” was 37.5%. In our series we observed a trend toward a better PFS in patients who received anti-EGFR as second or subsequent treatment lines compared to those who did not.
•RAS mutant colorectal cancer patients often switch to RAS wild-type at progression.•The presence of ctDNA in plasma must be confirmed by NGS or methylation assay.•Clinical trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR blockade in RAS converters.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Circulating tumor DNA</subject><subject>Cloning</subject><subject>Colon cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA methylation</subject><subject>EGFR blockade</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor receptors</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Methylation</subject><subject>Mutants</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>RAS conversion</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0304-3835</issn><issn>1872-7980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kdGK1DAUhoso7uzqG4gEvPGm9aRpmvZGGHZ1FRYFXa9DJjldM7TJmKQr80i-pel09cIL4UBI8v3_OZy_KF5QqCjQ9s2-0sqNmKoaaloBq4A2j4oN7URdir6Dx8UGGDQl6xg_K85j3AMAbwR_WpwxJpqGdf2m-HUbZiTau3sM0XoXyRD8RL5sv5JpTsolkvzp9tOOpkzHAxLriLZBz6NK1t2RNE8-kKtP21U5YVIx5S-dXUcfUCc1kjyqxkAO-R1dikQtFTGXIbvjIvp-XPy8I8qZU-vlkpXR3jmV5oDPiieDGiM-fzgvim_v391efihvPl9_vNzelJpDncqd7kCAUTAMsGtQDKaujeg10s60BlsUoCjvhQC-6_QwUEP7BvpGaaN1TRm7KF6vvofgf8wYk5xs1DiOyqGfo6w5sJa3HacZffUPuvdzyFOfKNFyXtOFalZKBx9jwEEegp1UOEoKcolS7uUapVyilMBkjjLLXj6Yz7sJzV_Rn-wy8HYFMG_j3mKQUeftajR22bo03v6_w2-LTrT8</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Nicolazzo, Chiara</creator><creator>Barault, Ludovic</creator><creator>Caponnetto, Salvatore</creator><creator>De Renzi, Gianluigi</creator><creator>Belardinilli, Francesca</creator><creator>Bottillo, Irene</creator><creator>Bargiacchi, Simone</creator><creator>Macagno, Marco</creator><creator>Grammatico, Paola</creator><creator>Giannini, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Cortesi, Enrico</creator><creator>Di Nicolantonio, Federica</creator><creator>Gazzaniga, Paola</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-7813</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-0155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5227-5047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9618-2010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0396-7981</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-8979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5276-7500</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature</title><author>Nicolazzo, Chiara ; Barault, Ludovic ; Caponnetto, Salvatore ; De Renzi, Gianluigi ; Belardinilli, Francesca ; Bottillo, Irene ; Bargiacchi, Simone ; Macagno, Marco ; Grammatico, Paola ; Giannini, Giuseppe ; Cortesi, Enrico ; Di Nicolantonio, Federica ; Gazzaniga, Paola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-bc8070da0ff0b4e7fd22d79ce18d6de6e70a1597705b8cff1d194094acdcc2133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Circulating tumor DNA</topic><topic>Cloning</topic><topic>Colon cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA methylation</topic><topic>EGFR blockade</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor receptors</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Methylation</topic><topic>Mutants</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>RAS conversion</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nicolazzo, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barault, Ludovic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caponnetto, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Renzi, Gianluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belardinilli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottillo, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bargiacchi, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macagno, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grammatico, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortesi, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Nicolantonio, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzaniga, Paola</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nicolazzo, Chiara</au><au>Barault, Ludovic</au><au>Caponnetto, Salvatore</au><au>De Renzi, Gianluigi</au><au>Belardinilli, Francesca</au><au>Bottillo, Irene</au><au>Bargiacchi, Simone</au><au>Macagno, Marco</au><au>Grammatico, Paola</au><au>Giannini, Giuseppe</au><au>Cortesi, Enrico</au><au>Di Nicolantonio, Federica</au><au>Gazzaniga, Paola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature</atitle><jtitle>Cancer letters</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Lett</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>507</volume><spage>89</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>89-96</pages><issn>0304-3835</issn><eissn>1872-7980</eissn><abstract>The paucity of targeted treatments available in patients with RAS mutant colorectal cancers contributes to the poor prognosis of this patient group compared to those with RAS wild-type disease. Recent liquid biopsy-driven studies have demonstrated that RAS mutant clones might disappear in plasma during the clonal evolution of the disease, opening new unforeseen perspectives for EGFR blockade in these patients. Nevertheless, the lack of detection of RAS mutations in plasma might depend on the low amount of released circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), making it necessary a more accurate selection of patients with true RAS mutation conversions. In this liquid biopsy-based study, we assessed RAS mutational status in initially RAS-mutant patients at the time of progressive disease from any line of therapy and investigated the incidence of true conversions to plasma RAS wild-type, comparing a colon cancer specific methylation profile with a mutational signature of ctDNA. Globally, considering either mutational panel or methylation profile as reliable tests to confirm or exclude the presence of ctDNA, the percentage of “true RAS converters” was 37.5%. In our series we observed a trend toward a better PFS in patients who received anti-EGFR as second or subsequent treatment lines compared to those who did not.
•RAS mutant colorectal cancer patients often switch to RAS wild-type at progression.•The presence of ctDNA in plasma must be confirmed by NGS or methylation assay.•Clinical trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR blockade in RAS converters.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33744389</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.014</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-7813</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-0155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5227-5047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9618-2010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0396-7981</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-8979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5276-7500</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-3835 |
ispartof | Cancer letters, 2021-06, Vol.507, p.89-96 |
issn | 0304-3835 1872-7980 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503656851 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Biopsy Cancer therapies Circulating tumor DNA Cloning Colon cancer Colorectal cancer Colorectal carcinoma Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA methylation EGFR blockade Epidermal growth factor receptors Genes Genetic testing Medical research Metastases Metastasis Methylation Mutants Mutation Plasma RAS conversion Software Tumors |
title | True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A26%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=True%20conversions%20from%20RAS%20mutant%20to%20RAS%20wild-type%20in%20circulating%20tumor%20DNA%20from%20metastatic%20colorectal%20cancer%20patients%20as%20assessed%20by%20methylation%20and%20mutational%20signature&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20letters&rft.au=Nicolazzo,%20Chiara&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=507&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=89-96&rft.issn=0304-3835&rft.eissn=1872-7980&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2507655211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2507655211&rft_id=info:pmid/33744389&rft_els_id=S0304383521001191&rfr_iscdi=true |