True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature

The paucity of targeted treatments available in patients with RAS mutant colorectal cancers contributes to the poor prognosis of this patient group compared to those with RAS wild-type disease. Recent liquid biopsy-driven studies have demonstrated that RAS mutant clones might disappear in plasma dur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer letters 2021-06, Vol.507, p.89-96
Hauptverfasser: Nicolazzo, Chiara, Barault, Ludovic, Caponnetto, Salvatore, De Renzi, Gianluigi, Belardinilli, Francesca, Bottillo, Irene, Bargiacchi, Simone, Macagno, Marco, Grammatico, Paola, Giannini, Giuseppe, Cortesi, Enrico, Di Nicolantonio, Federica, Gazzaniga, Paola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue
container_start_page 89
container_title Cancer letters
container_volume 507
creator Nicolazzo, Chiara
Barault, Ludovic
Caponnetto, Salvatore
De Renzi, Gianluigi
Belardinilli, Francesca
Bottillo, Irene
Bargiacchi, Simone
Macagno, Marco
Grammatico, Paola
Giannini, Giuseppe
Cortesi, Enrico
Di Nicolantonio, Federica
Gazzaniga, Paola
description The paucity of targeted treatments available in patients with RAS mutant colorectal cancers contributes to the poor prognosis of this patient group compared to those with RAS wild-type disease. Recent liquid biopsy-driven studies have demonstrated that RAS mutant clones might disappear in plasma during the clonal evolution of the disease, opening new unforeseen perspectives for EGFR blockade in these patients. Nevertheless, the lack of detection of RAS mutations in plasma might depend on the low amount of released circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), making it necessary a more accurate selection of patients with true RAS mutation conversions. In this liquid biopsy-based study, we assessed RAS mutational status in initially RAS-mutant patients at the time of progressive disease from any line of therapy and investigated the incidence of true conversions to plasma RAS wild-type, comparing a colon cancer specific methylation profile with a mutational signature of ctDNA. Globally, considering either mutational panel or methylation profile as reliable tests to confirm or exclude the presence of ctDNA, the percentage of “true RAS converters” was 37.5%. In our series we observed a trend toward a better PFS in patients who received anti-EGFR as second or subsequent treatment lines compared to those who did not. •RAS mutant colorectal cancer patients often switch to RAS wild-type at progression.•The presence of ctDNA in plasma must be confirmed by NGS or methylation assay.•Clinical trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR blockade in RAS converters.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503656851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304383521001191</els_id><sourcerecordid>2507655211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-bc8070da0ff0b4e7fd22d79ce18d6de6e70a1597705b8cff1d194094acdcc2133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdGK1DAUhoso7uzqG4gEvPGm9aRpmvZGGHZ1FRYFXa9DJjldM7TJmKQr80i-pel09cIL4UBI8v3_OZy_KF5QqCjQ9s2-0sqNmKoaaloBq4A2j4oN7URdir6Dx8UGGDQl6xg_K85j3AMAbwR_WpwxJpqGdf2m-HUbZiTau3sM0XoXyRD8RL5sv5JpTsolkvzp9tOOpkzHAxLriLZBz6NK1t2RNE8-kKtP21U5YVIx5S-dXUcfUCc1kjyqxkAO-R1dikQtFTGXIbvjIvp-XPy8I8qZU-vlkpXR3jmV5oDPiieDGiM-fzgvim_v391efihvPl9_vNzelJpDncqd7kCAUTAMsGtQDKaujeg10s60BlsUoCjvhQC-6_QwUEP7BvpGaaN1TRm7KF6vvofgf8wYk5xs1DiOyqGfo6w5sJa3HacZffUPuvdzyFOfKNFyXtOFalZKBx9jwEEegp1UOEoKcolS7uUapVyilMBkjjLLXj6Yz7sJzV_Rn-wy8HYFMG_j3mKQUeftajR22bo03v6_w2-LTrT8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2507655211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Nicolazzo, Chiara ; Barault, Ludovic ; Caponnetto, Salvatore ; De Renzi, Gianluigi ; Belardinilli, Francesca ; Bottillo, Irene ; Bargiacchi, Simone ; Macagno, Marco ; Grammatico, Paola ; Giannini, Giuseppe ; Cortesi, Enrico ; Di Nicolantonio, Federica ; Gazzaniga, Paola</creator><creatorcontrib>Nicolazzo, Chiara ; Barault, Ludovic ; Caponnetto, Salvatore ; De Renzi, Gianluigi ; Belardinilli, Francesca ; Bottillo, Irene ; Bargiacchi, Simone ; Macagno, Marco ; Grammatico, Paola ; Giannini, Giuseppe ; Cortesi, Enrico ; Di Nicolantonio, Federica ; Gazzaniga, Paola</creatorcontrib><description>The paucity of targeted treatments available in patients with RAS mutant colorectal cancers contributes to the poor prognosis of this patient group compared to those with RAS wild-type disease. Recent liquid biopsy-driven studies have demonstrated that RAS mutant clones might disappear in plasma during the clonal evolution of the disease, opening new unforeseen perspectives for EGFR blockade in these patients. Nevertheless, the lack of detection of RAS mutations in plasma might depend on the low amount of released circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), making it necessary a more accurate selection of patients with true RAS mutation conversions. In this liquid biopsy-based study, we assessed RAS mutational status in initially RAS-mutant patients at the time of progressive disease from any line of therapy and investigated the incidence of true conversions to plasma RAS wild-type, comparing a colon cancer specific methylation profile with a mutational signature of ctDNA. Globally, considering either mutational panel or methylation profile as reliable tests to confirm or exclude the presence of ctDNA, the percentage of “true RAS converters” was 37.5%. In our series we observed a trend toward a better PFS in patients who received anti-EGFR as second or subsequent treatment lines compared to those who did not. •RAS mutant colorectal cancer patients often switch to RAS wild-type at progression.•The presence of ctDNA in plasma must be confirmed by NGS or methylation assay.•Clinical trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR blockade in RAS converters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3835</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33744389</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Cancer therapies ; Circulating tumor DNA ; Cloning ; Colon cancer ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA methylation ; EGFR blockade ; Epidermal growth factor receptors ; Genes ; Genetic testing ; Medical research ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Methylation ; Mutants ; Mutation ; Plasma ; RAS conversion ; Software ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer letters, 2021-06, Vol.507, p.89-96</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-bc8070da0ff0b4e7fd22d79ce18d6de6e70a1597705b8cff1d194094acdcc2133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-bc8070da0ff0b4e7fd22d79ce18d6de6e70a1597705b8cff1d194094acdcc2133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1749-7813 ; 0000-0002-8671-0155 ; 0000-0001-5227-5047 ; 0000-0001-9618-2010 ; 0000-0003-0396-7981 ; 0000-0002-2551-8979 ; 0000-0001-5276-7500</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33744389$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nicolazzo, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barault, Ludovic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caponnetto, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Renzi, Gianluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belardinilli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottillo, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bargiacchi, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macagno, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grammatico, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortesi, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Nicolantonio, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzaniga, Paola</creatorcontrib><title>True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature</title><title>Cancer letters</title><addtitle>Cancer Lett</addtitle><description>The paucity of targeted treatments available in patients with RAS mutant colorectal cancers contributes to the poor prognosis of this patient group compared to those with RAS wild-type disease. Recent liquid biopsy-driven studies have demonstrated that RAS mutant clones might disappear in plasma during the clonal evolution of the disease, opening new unforeseen perspectives for EGFR blockade in these patients. Nevertheless, the lack of detection of RAS mutations in plasma might depend on the low amount of released circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), making it necessary a more accurate selection of patients with true RAS mutation conversions. In this liquid biopsy-based study, we assessed RAS mutational status in initially RAS-mutant patients at the time of progressive disease from any line of therapy and investigated the incidence of true conversions to plasma RAS wild-type, comparing a colon cancer specific methylation profile with a mutational signature of ctDNA. Globally, considering either mutational panel or methylation profile as reliable tests to confirm or exclude the presence of ctDNA, the percentage of “true RAS converters” was 37.5%. In our series we observed a trend toward a better PFS in patients who received anti-EGFR as second or subsequent treatment lines compared to those who did not. •RAS mutant colorectal cancer patients often switch to RAS wild-type at progression.•The presence of ctDNA in plasma must be confirmed by NGS or methylation assay.•Clinical trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR blockade in RAS converters.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Circulating tumor DNA</subject><subject>Cloning</subject><subject>Colon cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA methylation</subject><subject>EGFR blockade</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor receptors</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Methylation</subject><subject>Mutants</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>RAS conversion</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0304-3835</issn><issn>1872-7980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kdGK1DAUhoso7uzqG4gEvPGm9aRpmvZGGHZ1FRYFXa9DJjldM7TJmKQr80i-pel09cIL4UBI8v3_OZy_KF5QqCjQ9s2-0sqNmKoaaloBq4A2j4oN7URdir6Dx8UGGDQl6xg_K85j3AMAbwR_WpwxJpqGdf2m-HUbZiTau3sM0XoXyRD8RL5sv5JpTsolkvzp9tOOpkzHAxLriLZBz6NK1t2RNE8-kKtP21U5YVIx5S-dXUcfUCc1kjyqxkAO-R1dikQtFTGXIbvjIvp-XPy8I8qZU-vlkpXR3jmV5oDPiieDGiM-fzgvim_v391efihvPl9_vNzelJpDncqd7kCAUTAMsGtQDKaujeg10s60BlsUoCjvhQC-6_QwUEP7BvpGaaN1TRm7KF6vvofgf8wYk5xs1DiOyqGfo6w5sJa3HacZffUPuvdzyFOfKNFyXtOFalZKBx9jwEEegp1UOEoKcolS7uUapVyilMBkjjLLXj6Yz7sJzV_Rn-wy8HYFMG_j3mKQUeftajR22bo03v6_w2-LTrT8</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Nicolazzo, Chiara</creator><creator>Barault, Ludovic</creator><creator>Caponnetto, Salvatore</creator><creator>De Renzi, Gianluigi</creator><creator>Belardinilli, Francesca</creator><creator>Bottillo, Irene</creator><creator>Bargiacchi, Simone</creator><creator>Macagno, Marco</creator><creator>Grammatico, Paola</creator><creator>Giannini, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Cortesi, Enrico</creator><creator>Di Nicolantonio, Federica</creator><creator>Gazzaniga, Paola</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-7813</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-0155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5227-5047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9618-2010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0396-7981</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-8979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5276-7500</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature</title><author>Nicolazzo, Chiara ; Barault, Ludovic ; Caponnetto, Salvatore ; De Renzi, Gianluigi ; Belardinilli, Francesca ; Bottillo, Irene ; Bargiacchi, Simone ; Macagno, Marco ; Grammatico, Paola ; Giannini, Giuseppe ; Cortesi, Enrico ; Di Nicolantonio, Federica ; Gazzaniga, Paola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-bc8070da0ff0b4e7fd22d79ce18d6de6e70a1597705b8cff1d194094acdcc2133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Circulating tumor DNA</topic><topic>Cloning</topic><topic>Colon cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA methylation</topic><topic>EGFR blockade</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor receptors</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Methylation</topic><topic>Mutants</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>RAS conversion</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nicolazzo, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barault, Ludovic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caponnetto, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Renzi, Gianluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belardinilli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottillo, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bargiacchi, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macagno, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grammatico, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortesi, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Nicolantonio, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzaniga, Paola</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nicolazzo, Chiara</au><au>Barault, Ludovic</au><au>Caponnetto, Salvatore</au><au>De Renzi, Gianluigi</au><au>Belardinilli, Francesca</au><au>Bottillo, Irene</au><au>Bargiacchi, Simone</au><au>Macagno, Marco</au><au>Grammatico, Paola</au><au>Giannini, Giuseppe</au><au>Cortesi, Enrico</au><au>Di Nicolantonio, Federica</au><au>Gazzaniga, Paola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature</atitle><jtitle>Cancer letters</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Lett</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>507</volume><spage>89</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>89-96</pages><issn>0304-3835</issn><eissn>1872-7980</eissn><abstract>The paucity of targeted treatments available in patients with RAS mutant colorectal cancers contributes to the poor prognosis of this patient group compared to those with RAS wild-type disease. Recent liquid biopsy-driven studies have demonstrated that RAS mutant clones might disappear in plasma during the clonal evolution of the disease, opening new unforeseen perspectives for EGFR blockade in these patients. Nevertheless, the lack of detection of RAS mutations in plasma might depend on the low amount of released circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), making it necessary a more accurate selection of patients with true RAS mutation conversions. In this liquid biopsy-based study, we assessed RAS mutational status in initially RAS-mutant patients at the time of progressive disease from any line of therapy and investigated the incidence of true conversions to plasma RAS wild-type, comparing a colon cancer specific methylation profile with a mutational signature of ctDNA. Globally, considering either mutational panel or methylation profile as reliable tests to confirm or exclude the presence of ctDNA, the percentage of “true RAS converters” was 37.5%. In our series we observed a trend toward a better PFS in patients who received anti-EGFR as second or subsequent treatment lines compared to those who did not. •RAS mutant colorectal cancer patients often switch to RAS wild-type at progression.•The presence of ctDNA in plasma must be confirmed by NGS or methylation assay.•Clinical trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR blockade in RAS converters.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33744389</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.014</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-7813</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-0155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5227-5047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9618-2010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0396-7981</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-8979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5276-7500</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-3835
ispartof Cancer letters, 2021-06, Vol.507, p.89-96
issn 0304-3835
1872-7980
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503656851
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Biopsy
Cancer therapies
Circulating tumor DNA
Cloning
Colon cancer
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA methylation
EGFR blockade
Epidermal growth factor receptors
Genes
Genetic testing
Medical research
Metastases
Metastasis
Methylation
Mutants
Mutation
Plasma
RAS conversion
Software
Tumors
title True conversions from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type in circulating tumor DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients as assessed by methylation and mutational signature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A26%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=True%20conversions%20from%20RAS%20mutant%20to%20RAS%20wild-type%20in%20circulating%20tumor%20DNA%20from%20metastatic%20colorectal%20cancer%20patients%20as%20assessed%20by%20methylation%20and%20mutational%20signature&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20letters&rft.au=Nicolazzo,%20Chiara&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=507&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=89-96&rft.issn=0304-3835&rft.eissn=1872-7980&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2507655211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2507655211&rft_id=info:pmid/33744389&rft_els_id=S0304383521001191&rfr_iscdi=true