Comparison of a covered metallic ureteral stent and a double-J stent for malignant ureteral obstruction in advanced gastric cancer

To compare the patency and safety of covered metallic stents (CMS) and the double-J stent (DJS) for treating malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Between 2016 and 2018, the medical records of 61 patients (84 ureters; CMS, 39 patients, 54 ureters; DJS, 22 patients, 3...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical radiology 2021-07, Vol.76 (7), p.519-525
Hauptverfasser: Kim, E.T., Yang, W.J., Shin, J.H., Cho, S.J., Song, S.-Y., Song, M.G., Kang, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 525
container_issue 7
container_start_page 519
container_title Clinical radiology
container_volume 76
creator Kim, E.T.
Yang, W.J.
Shin, J.H.
Cho, S.J.
Song, S.-Y.
Song, M.G.
Kang, D.
description To compare the patency and safety of covered metallic stents (CMS) and the double-J stent (DJS) for treating malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Between 2016 and 2018, the medical records of 61 patients (84 ureters; CMS, 39 patients, 54 ureters; DJS, 22 patients, 30 ureters) with MUO caused by AGC were reviewed retrospectively. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate differences of primary or assisted primary patency between groups. Cox regression was conducted separately for early (within 7 days) and late (after 7 days) primary patency. Technical success of CMS placement was 100% (54/54) and 96.8% (29/30) for DJS (p=0.357). The cumulative stent patency rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 77%, 74%, 70%, and 70%, in the CMS group and 72%, 60%, 53%, and 26%, in the DJS group. Apart from the period within 7 days (p=0.784), primary patency was consistently higher in the CMS group when compared to the DJS group over the entire follow-up period (p=0.034). Assisted primary patency was consistently higher in the CMS group than in the DJS group over the entire follow-up period (p=0.001). The CMS group was more likely to have complications than the DJS group (48.1% versus 16.7%, p=0.004). Complications were minor, self-limiting events such as haematuria/haematoma. CMS had better late patency and assisted primary patency than DJS. Procedure-related minor complications more frequently occurred with CMS. •CMS for MUO in AGC have high primary and assisted primary patency rates.•Patency rates of CMS for MUO in AGC were higher than DJS.•Complications were higher in CMS than DJS but were minor and self-limiting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.crad.2021.02.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503630475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0009926021001227</els_id><sourcerecordid>2503630475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7fcd18078f8f685e52f5721e1529614a2c69c3c28e3f632f604afce6ba35c4d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEuLFDEUhYMoTjv6B1xIlm6qzKOSqgI30owvBtwouAu3k5shTVWlTVINbv3lpuh2lq4u53DOB_cQ8pqzljOu3x1bm8C1ggneMtFW6wnZcalVI8T48ynZMcbGZhSa3ZAXOR832YnuObmRspd66Mcd-bOP8wlSyHGh0VOgNp4xoaMzFpimYOmasGCCieaCS6GwuJpycT1M2Hy9mj4mOsMUHhao6rERD7mk1ZZQ4WGh4M6w2Mp-gOpXtN1kekmeeZgyvrreW_Lj4933_efm_tunL_sP942VSpem99bxgfWDH7weFCrhVS84ciVGzTsQVo9WWjGg9FoKr1kH3qI-gFS2c4O8JW8v3FOKv1bMxcwhW5wmWDCu2QjFpJas61WNikvUpphzQm9OKcyQfhvOzLa9OZpte7Ntb5gw1aqlN1f-epjRPVb-jV0D7y8BrF-eAyaTbcBtkZDQFuNi-B__L827l00</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503630475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of a covered metallic ureteral stent and a double-J stent for malignant ureteral obstruction in advanced gastric cancer</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kim, E.T. ; Yang, W.J. ; Shin, J.H. ; Cho, S.J. ; Song, S.-Y. ; Song, M.G. ; Kang, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, E.T. ; Yang, W.J. ; Shin, J.H. ; Cho, S.J. ; Song, S.-Y. ; Song, M.G. ; Kang, D.</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the patency and safety of covered metallic stents (CMS) and the double-J stent (DJS) for treating malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Between 2016 and 2018, the medical records of 61 patients (84 ureters; CMS, 39 patients, 54 ureters; DJS, 22 patients, 30 ureters) with MUO caused by AGC were reviewed retrospectively. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate differences of primary or assisted primary patency between groups. Cox regression was conducted separately for early (within 7 days) and late (after 7 days) primary patency. Technical success of CMS placement was 100% (54/54) and 96.8% (29/30) for DJS (p=0.357). The cumulative stent patency rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 77%, 74%, 70%, and 70%, in the CMS group and 72%, 60%, 53%, and 26%, in the DJS group. Apart from the period within 7 days (p=0.784), primary patency was consistently higher in the CMS group when compared to the DJS group over the entire follow-up period (p=0.034). Assisted primary patency was consistently higher in the CMS group than in the DJS group over the entire follow-up period (p=0.001). The CMS group was more likely to have complications than the DJS group (48.1% versus 16.7%, p=0.004). Complications were minor, self-limiting events such as haematuria/haematoma. CMS had better late patency and assisted primary patency than DJS. Procedure-related minor complications more frequently occurred with CMS. •CMS for MUO in AGC have high primary and assisted primary patency rates.•Patency rates of CMS for MUO in AGC were higher than DJS.•Complications were higher in CMS than DJS but were minor and self-limiting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-229X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.02.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33736879</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Clinical radiology, 2021-07, Vol.76 (7), p.519-525</ispartof><rights>2021 The Royal College of Radiologists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7fcd18078f8f685e52f5721e1529614a2c69c3c28e3f632f604afce6ba35c4d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7fcd18078f8f685e52f5721e1529614a2c69c3c28e3f632f604afce6ba35c4d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926021001227$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33736879$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, E.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, S.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of a covered metallic ureteral stent and a double-J stent for malignant ureteral obstruction in advanced gastric cancer</title><title>Clinical radiology</title><addtitle>Clin Radiol</addtitle><description>To compare the patency and safety of covered metallic stents (CMS) and the double-J stent (DJS) for treating malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Between 2016 and 2018, the medical records of 61 patients (84 ureters; CMS, 39 patients, 54 ureters; DJS, 22 patients, 30 ureters) with MUO caused by AGC were reviewed retrospectively. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate differences of primary or assisted primary patency between groups. Cox regression was conducted separately for early (within 7 days) and late (after 7 days) primary patency. Technical success of CMS placement was 100% (54/54) and 96.8% (29/30) for DJS (p=0.357). The cumulative stent patency rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 77%, 74%, 70%, and 70%, in the CMS group and 72%, 60%, 53%, and 26%, in the DJS group. Apart from the period within 7 days (p=0.784), primary patency was consistently higher in the CMS group when compared to the DJS group over the entire follow-up period (p=0.034). Assisted primary patency was consistently higher in the CMS group than in the DJS group over the entire follow-up period (p=0.001). The CMS group was more likely to have complications than the DJS group (48.1% versus 16.7%, p=0.004). Complications were minor, self-limiting events such as haematuria/haematoma. CMS had better late patency and assisted primary patency than DJS. Procedure-related minor complications more frequently occurred with CMS. •CMS for MUO in AGC have high primary and assisted primary patency rates.•Patency rates of CMS for MUO in AGC were higher than DJS.•Complications were higher in CMS than DJS but were minor and self-limiting.</description><issn>0009-9260</issn><issn>1365-229X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEuLFDEUhYMoTjv6B1xIlm6qzKOSqgI30owvBtwouAu3k5shTVWlTVINbv3lpuh2lq4u53DOB_cQ8pqzljOu3x1bm8C1ggneMtFW6wnZcalVI8T48ynZMcbGZhSa3ZAXOR832YnuObmRspd66Mcd-bOP8wlSyHGh0VOgNp4xoaMzFpimYOmasGCCieaCS6GwuJpycT1M2Hy9mj4mOsMUHhao6rERD7mk1ZZQ4WGh4M6w2Mp-gOpXtN1kekmeeZgyvrreW_Lj4933_efm_tunL_sP942VSpem99bxgfWDH7weFCrhVS84ciVGzTsQVo9WWjGg9FoKr1kH3qI-gFS2c4O8JW8v3FOKv1bMxcwhW5wmWDCu2QjFpJas61WNikvUpphzQm9OKcyQfhvOzLa9OZpte7Ntb5gw1aqlN1f-epjRPVb-jV0D7y8BrF-eAyaTbcBtkZDQFuNi-B__L827l00</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Kim, E.T.</creator><creator>Yang, W.J.</creator><creator>Shin, J.H.</creator><creator>Cho, S.J.</creator><creator>Song, S.-Y.</creator><creator>Song, M.G.</creator><creator>Kang, D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Comparison of a covered metallic ureteral stent and a double-J stent for malignant ureteral obstruction in advanced gastric cancer</title><author>Kim, E.T. ; Yang, W.J. ; Shin, J.H. ; Cho, S.J. ; Song, S.-Y. ; Song, M.G. ; Kang, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7fcd18078f8f685e52f5721e1529614a2c69c3c28e3f632f604afce6ba35c4d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, E.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, S.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, E.T.</au><au>Yang, W.J.</au><au>Shin, J.H.</au><au>Cho, S.J.</au><au>Song, S.-Y.</au><au>Song, M.G.</au><au>Kang, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of a covered metallic ureteral stent and a double-J stent for malignant ureteral obstruction in advanced gastric cancer</atitle><jtitle>Clinical radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Radiol</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>519</spage><epage>525</epage><pages>519-525</pages><issn>0009-9260</issn><eissn>1365-229X</eissn><abstract>To compare the patency and safety of covered metallic stents (CMS) and the double-J stent (DJS) for treating malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Between 2016 and 2018, the medical records of 61 patients (84 ureters; CMS, 39 patients, 54 ureters; DJS, 22 patients, 30 ureters) with MUO caused by AGC were reviewed retrospectively. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate differences of primary or assisted primary patency between groups. Cox regression was conducted separately for early (within 7 days) and late (after 7 days) primary patency. Technical success of CMS placement was 100% (54/54) and 96.8% (29/30) for DJS (p=0.357). The cumulative stent patency rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 77%, 74%, 70%, and 70%, in the CMS group and 72%, 60%, 53%, and 26%, in the DJS group. Apart from the period within 7 days (p=0.784), primary patency was consistently higher in the CMS group when compared to the DJS group over the entire follow-up period (p=0.034). Assisted primary patency was consistently higher in the CMS group than in the DJS group over the entire follow-up period (p=0.001). The CMS group was more likely to have complications than the DJS group (48.1% versus 16.7%, p=0.004). Complications were minor, self-limiting events such as haematuria/haematoma. CMS had better late patency and assisted primary patency than DJS. Procedure-related minor complications more frequently occurred with CMS. •CMS for MUO in AGC have high primary and assisted primary patency rates.•Patency rates of CMS for MUO in AGC were higher than DJS.•Complications were higher in CMS than DJS but were minor and self-limiting.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33736879</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.crad.2021.02.016</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-9260
ispartof Clinical radiology, 2021-07, Vol.76 (7), p.519-525
issn 0009-9260
1365-229X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503630475
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title Comparison of a covered metallic ureteral stent and a double-J stent for malignant ureteral obstruction in advanced gastric cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T20%3A30%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20a%20covered%20metallic%20ureteral%20stent%20and%20a%20double-J%20stent%20for%20malignant%20ureteral%20obstruction%20in%20advanced%20gastric%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20radiology&rft.au=Kim,%20E.T.&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=519&rft.epage=525&rft.pages=519-525&rft.issn=0009-9260&rft.eissn=1365-229X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.crad.2021.02.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2503630475%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503630475&rft_id=info:pmid/33736879&rft_els_id=S0009926021001227&rfr_iscdi=true