The experimental range extension of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) influences the metabolic activity of tropical streams
The ecological consequences of biological range extensions reflect the interplay between the functional characteristics of the newly arrived species and their recipient ecosystems. Teasing apart the relative contribution of each component is difficult because most colonization events are studied ret...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oecologia 2021-04, Vol.195 (4), p.1053-1069 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1069 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1053 |
container_title | Oecologia |
container_volume | 195 |
creator | Leduc, Antoine O. H. C. Thomas, Steven A. Bassar, Ronald D. López-Sepulcre, Andrés MacNeill, Keeley El-Sabaawi, Rana Reznick, David N. Flecker, Alexander S. Travis, Joseph |
description | The ecological consequences of biological range extensions reflect the interplay between the functional characteristics of the newly arrived species and their recipient ecosystems. Teasing apart the relative contribution of each component is difficult because most colonization events are studied retrospectively, i.e., after a species became established and its consequences apparent. We conducted a prospective experiment to study the ecosystem consequences of a consumer introduction, using whole-stream metabolism as our integrator of ecosystem activity. In four Trinidadian streams, we extended the range of a native fish, the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), by introducing it over barrier waterfalls that historically excluded it from these upper reaches. To assess the context dependence of these range extensions, we thinned the riparian forest canopy on two of these streams to increase benthic algal biomass and productivity. Guppy’s range extension into upper stream reaches significantly impacted stream metabolism but the effects depended upon the specific stream into which they had been introduced. Generally, increases in guppy biomass caused an increase in gross primary production (GPP) and community respiration (CR). The effects guppies had on GPP were similar to those induced by increased light level and were larger in strength than the effects stream stage had on CR. These results, combined with results from prior experiments, contribute to our growing understanding of how consumers impact stream ecosystem function when they expand their range into novel habitats. Further study will reveal whether local adaptation, known to occur rapidly in these guppy populations, modifies the ecological consequences of this species introduction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00442-021-04884-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503630386</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A658783194</galeid><jstor_id>48696413</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A658783194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-a15292c0c4ef7d1737f6c31dc9944a0763eb1e10f91fe8196243b71eaa054ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt1rFDEUxYModl39BwRlwJf2YerNx3zkcSnaCgv6sO8hm73ZZpmZjEmm2v_erNNuUUTyELj5nUPO5RDylsIlBWg-RgAhWAmMliDaVpTwjCyo4KykksvnZAHAZNlWQp6RVzEeAKigVfWSnHHe8LZi1YL82NxigT9HDK7HIemuCHrYH0cJh-j8UHhb7KdxdBiL828ejeucLgImZ6ZOJ31RuMF2Ew4mAymb9Zj01nfOFNokd-fS_dEiBT86k-1jCqj7-Jq8sLqL-ObhXpLN50-bq5ty_fX6y9VqXRohZCo1rZhkBoxA2-xowxtbG053RkohNDQ1xy1FClZSiy2VNRN821DUGiphLV-Si9n2VndqzBl1uFdeO3WzWqvjDHh2yuu6o5k9n9kx-O8TxqR6Fw12nR7QT1GxCnjNgbd1Rj_8hR78FIYcJFOUCwaikU_UXneo8pp8CtocTdWqrtqm5VSKTF3-g8pnh70zfkDr8vwPAZsFJvgYA9pTMArqWAw1F0PlYqjfxcgpl-T9w4-nbY-7k-SxCRngMxDzU25AeIr0X9t3s-oQkw8nV9HWshaU819d1ctj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2513420479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The experimental range extension of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) influences the metabolic activity of tropical streams</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Leduc, Antoine O. H. C. ; Thomas, Steven A. ; Bassar, Ronald D. ; López-Sepulcre, Andrés ; MacNeill, Keeley ; El-Sabaawi, Rana ; Reznick, David N. ; Flecker, Alexander S. ; Travis, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Leduc, Antoine O. H. C. ; Thomas, Steven A. ; Bassar, Ronald D. ; López-Sepulcre, Andrés ; MacNeill, Keeley ; El-Sabaawi, Rana ; Reznick, David N. ; Flecker, Alexander S. ; Travis, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>The ecological consequences of biological range extensions reflect the interplay between the functional characteristics of the newly arrived species and their recipient ecosystems. Teasing apart the relative contribution of each component is difficult because most colonization events are studied retrospectively, i.e., after a species became established and its consequences apparent. We conducted a prospective experiment to study the ecosystem consequences of a consumer introduction, using whole-stream metabolism as our integrator of ecosystem activity. In four Trinidadian streams, we extended the range of a native fish, the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), by introducing it over barrier waterfalls that historically excluded it from these upper reaches. To assess the context dependence of these range extensions, we thinned the riparian forest canopy on two of these streams to increase benthic algal biomass and productivity. Guppy’s range extension into upper stream reaches significantly impacted stream metabolism but the effects depended upon the specific stream into which they had been introduced. Generally, increases in guppy biomass caused an increase in gross primary production (GPP) and community respiration (CR). The effects guppies had on GPP were similar to those induced by increased light level and were larger in strength than the effects stream stage had on CR. These results, combined with results from prior experiments, contribute to our growing understanding of how consumers impact stream ecosystem function when they expand their range into novel habitats. Further study will reveal whether local adaptation, known to occur rapidly in these guppy populations, modifies the ecological consequences of this species introduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04884-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33738525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Algae ; Animals ; Benthos ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Colonization ; Ecological effects ; Ecological function ; Ecology ; Ecology, environment ; Ecosystem ; ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Sciences ; Fish ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Introduced species ; Life Sciences ; Light levels ; Metabolism ; Physiological aspects ; Plant cover ; Plant Sciences ; Poecilia ; Poecilia reticulata ; Primary production ; Prospective Studies ; Range extension ; Retrospective Studies ; Riparian forests ; Rivers ; Streams ; Tropical climate ; Waterfalls</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2021-04, Vol.195 (4), p.1053-1069</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-a15292c0c4ef7d1737f6c31dc9944a0763eb1e10f91fe8196243b71eaa054ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8471-2114</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00442-021-04884-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00442-021-04884-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33738525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03994193$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leduc, Antoine O. H. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassar, Ronald D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Sepulcre, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacNeill, Keeley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Sabaawi, Rana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reznick, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flecker, Alexander S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Travis, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>The experimental range extension of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) influences the metabolic activity of tropical streams</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>The ecological consequences of biological range extensions reflect the interplay between the functional characteristics of the newly arrived species and their recipient ecosystems. Teasing apart the relative contribution of each component is difficult because most colonization events are studied retrospectively, i.e., after a species became established and its consequences apparent. We conducted a prospective experiment to study the ecosystem consequences of a consumer introduction, using whole-stream metabolism as our integrator of ecosystem activity. In four Trinidadian streams, we extended the range of a native fish, the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), by introducing it over barrier waterfalls that historically excluded it from these upper reaches. To assess the context dependence of these range extensions, we thinned the riparian forest canopy on two of these streams to increase benthic algal biomass and productivity. Guppy’s range extension into upper stream reaches significantly impacted stream metabolism but the effects depended upon the specific stream into which they had been introduced. Generally, increases in guppy biomass caused an increase in gross primary production (GPP) and community respiration (CR). The effects guppies had on GPP were similar to those induced by increased light level and were larger in strength than the effects stream stage had on CR. These results, combined with results from prior experiments, contribute to our growing understanding of how consumers impact stream ecosystem function when they expand their range into novel habitats. Further study will reveal whether local adaptation, known to occur rapidly in these guppy populations, modifies the ecological consequences of this species introduction.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology, environment</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Light levels</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Poecilia</subject><subject>Poecilia reticulata</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Range extension</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Riparian forests</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Waterfalls</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt1rFDEUxYModl39BwRlwJf2YerNx3zkcSnaCgv6sO8hm73ZZpmZjEmm2v_erNNuUUTyELj5nUPO5RDylsIlBWg-RgAhWAmMliDaVpTwjCyo4KykksvnZAHAZNlWQp6RVzEeAKigVfWSnHHe8LZi1YL82NxigT9HDK7HIemuCHrYH0cJh-j8UHhb7KdxdBiL828ejeucLgImZ6ZOJ31RuMF2Ew4mAymb9Zj01nfOFNokd-fS_dEiBT86k-1jCqj7-Jq8sLqL-ObhXpLN50-bq5ty_fX6y9VqXRohZCo1rZhkBoxA2-xowxtbG053RkohNDQ1xy1FClZSiy2VNRN821DUGiphLV-Si9n2VndqzBl1uFdeO3WzWqvjDHh2yuu6o5k9n9kx-O8TxqR6Fw12nR7QT1GxCnjNgbd1Rj_8hR78FIYcJFOUCwaikU_UXneo8pp8CtocTdWqrtqm5VSKTF3-g8pnh70zfkDr8vwPAZsFJvgYA9pTMArqWAw1F0PlYqjfxcgpl-T9w4-nbY-7k-SxCRngMxDzU25AeIr0X9t3s-oQkw8nV9HWshaU819d1ctj</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Leduc, Antoine O. H. C.</creator><creator>Thomas, Steven A.</creator><creator>Bassar, Ronald D.</creator><creator>López-Sepulcre, Andrés</creator><creator>MacNeill, Keeley</creator><creator>El-Sabaawi, Rana</creator><creator>Reznick, David N.</creator><creator>Flecker, Alexander S.</creator><creator>Travis, Joseph</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8471-2114</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>The experimental range extension of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) influences the metabolic activity of tropical streams</title><author>Leduc, Antoine O. H. C. ; Thomas, Steven A. ; Bassar, Ronald D. ; López-Sepulcre, Andrés ; MacNeill, Keeley ; El-Sabaawi, Rana ; Reznick, David N. ; Flecker, Alexander S. ; Travis, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-a15292c0c4ef7d1737f6c31dc9944a0763eb1e10f91fe8196243b71eaa054ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology, environment</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Light levels</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Poecilia</topic><topic>Poecilia reticulata</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Range extension</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Riparian forests</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Waterfalls</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leduc, Antoine O. H. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassar, Ronald D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Sepulcre, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacNeill, Keeley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Sabaawi, Rana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reznick, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flecker, Alexander S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Travis, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leduc, Antoine O. H. C.</au><au>Thomas, Steven A.</au><au>Bassar, Ronald D.</au><au>López-Sepulcre, Andrés</au><au>MacNeill, Keeley</au><au>El-Sabaawi, Rana</au><au>Reznick, David N.</au><au>Flecker, Alexander S.</au><au>Travis, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The experimental range extension of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) influences the metabolic activity of tropical streams</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1053</spage><epage>1069</epage><pages>1053-1069</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><abstract>The ecological consequences of biological range extensions reflect the interplay between the functional characteristics of the newly arrived species and their recipient ecosystems. Teasing apart the relative contribution of each component is difficult because most colonization events are studied retrospectively, i.e., after a species became established and its consequences apparent. We conducted a prospective experiment to study the ecosystem consequences of a consumer introduction, using whole-stream metabolism as our integrator of ecosystem activity. In four Trinidadian streams, we extended the range of a native fish, the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), by introducing it over barrier waterfalls that historically excluded it from these upper reaches. To assess the context dependence of these range extensions, we thinned the riparian forest canopy on two of these streams to increase benthic algal biomass and productivity. Guppy’s range extension into upper stream reaches significantly impacted stream metabolism but the effects depended upon the specific stream into which they had been introduced. Generally, increases in guppy biomass caused an increase in gross primary production (GPP) and community respiration (CR). The effects guppies had on GPP were similar to those induced by increased light level and were larger in strength than the effects stream stage had on CR. These results, combined with results from prior experiments, contribute to our growing understanding of how consumers impact stream ecosystem function when they expand their range into novel habitats. Further study will reveal whether local adaptation, known to occur rapidly in these guppy populations, modifies the ecological consequences of this species introduction.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><pmid>33738525</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-021-04884-0</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8471-2114</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8549 |
ispartof | Oecologia, 2021-04, Vol.195 (4), p.1053-1069 |
issn | 0029-8549 1432-1939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503630386 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algae Animals Benthos Biodiversity and Ecology Biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Colonization Ecological effects Ecological function Ecology Ecology, environment Ecosystem ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH Ecosystems Environmental Sciences Fish Hydrology/Water Resources Introduced species Life Sciences Light levels Metabolism Physiological aspects Plant cover Plant Sciences Poecilia Poecilia reticulata Primary production Prospective Studies Range extension Retrospective Studies Riparian forests Rivers Streams Tropical climate Waterfalls |
title | The experimental range extension of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) influences the metabolic activity of tropical streams |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A46%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20experimental%20range%20extension%20of%20guppies%20(Poecilia%20reticulata)%20influences%20the%20metabolic%20activity%20of%20tropical%20streams&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Leduc,%20Antoine%20O.%20H.%20C.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1053&rft.epage=1069&rft.pages=1053-1069&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-021-04884-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_hal_p%3EA658783194%3C/gale_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2513420479&rft_id=info:pmid/33738525&rft_galeid=A658783194&rft_jstor_id=48696413&rfr_iscdi=true |