Stakeholder mapping in animal health surveillance: A comparative assessment of networks in intensive dairy cattle and extensive sheep production in Australia

The capacity to rapidly identify and respond to suspicion of animal disease is fundamental to protecting the integrity of the Australian livestock industry. An incursion of a nationally significant endemic, emerging or exotic animal disease could be disruptive and economically damaging for the indus...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive veterinary medicine 2021-05, Vol.190, p.105326-105326, Article 105326
Hauptverfasser: Hayes, Lynne, Manyweathers, Jennifer, Maru, Yiheyis, Loechel, Barton, Kelly, Jennifer, Kruger, Heleen, Woodgate, Robert, Hernandez-Jover, Marta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105326
container_issue
container_start_page 105326
container_title Preventive veterinary medicine
container_volume 190
creator Hayes, Lynne
Manyweathers, Jennifer
Maru, Yiheyis
Loechel, Barton
Kelly, Jennifer
Kruger, Heleen
Woodgate, Robert
Hernandez-Jover, Marta
description The capacity to rapidly identify and respond to suspicion of animal disease is fundamental to protecting the integrity of the Australian livestock industry. An incursion of a nationally significant endemic, emerging or exotic animal disease could be disruptive and economically damaging for the industry, broader community and national economy. To counter this potential threat, a surveillance system that includes general and targeted activities exists at a jurisdictional and national level. Such a system requires a collaborative effort from all involved to work towards a common goal, reflecting the notion of shared responsibility. As in all systems, the animal health surveillance system can be enhanced or constrained by the relationships of the players involved. This study focusses on two livestock industries, dairy cattle and sheep, exploring the interrelationships between all stakeholders, and their role within the Australian animal health surveillance system. A stakeholder mapping exercise was undertaken, including a depiction of the perceived level of stakeholder interest and influence on producers’ animal health surveillance practices and/or the surveillance system. Results from these activities were expanded upon through interviews. The findings reveal complex networks and a system that is, at times, constrained by institutional and individual barriers such as communication between and within stakeholders, and uncertainty about the consequences of reporting a suspected emergency disease. Whilst these challenges have the potential to negatively impact the robustness of the animal disease surveillance system, the study also provides clear evidence of strong and effective relationships amongst many of the key individuals and organisations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105326
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503438874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167587721000702</els_id><sourcerecordid>2503438874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-b5cf2ba4b58d369ec2263951cee5222eae1112291e18fe4693bad5ddd70d9f1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi1ERYfCK4CXbDL4EscOu1FVLlIlFi1ry7FPGE8TJ9jOQB-Gd62j6bBldaRzvv_cfoTeU7KlhDYfD9s5whHyCG7LCKMlKzhrXqANVZJXVNLmJdoUUlZCSXmJXqd0IIQ0jRKv0CXnkgtF1Qb9vcvmAfbT4CDi0cyzDz-xD9gEP5oB78EMeY_TEo_gh8EEC5_wDttpnE002R8Bm5QgpRFCxlOPA-TfU3xIaw8fMoS0Ms74-IityXkoguAw_DmX0h5gxnOc3GKzn1YV3i0pRzN48wZd9GZI8PY5XqEfn2_ur79Wt9-_fLve3Va2ZiRXnbA960zdCeV404JlrOGtoBZAMMbAAKWUsZYCVT3UTcs744RzThLX9rTnV-jDqW_Z49cCKevRJwvrwTAtSTNBeM2VknVB5Qm1cUopQq_nWF4VHzUlevVGH_Q_b_TqjT55U5Tvnocs3Vo7685mFGB3AqCcevQQdbIeysudj2CzdpP_75AnG8GpRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503438874</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stakeholder mapping in animal health surveillance: A comparative assessment of networks in intensive dairy cattle and extensive sheep production in Australia</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Hayes, Lynne ; Manyweathers, Jennifer ; Maru, Yiheyis ; Loechel, Barton ; Kelly, Jennifer ; Kruger, Heleen ; Woodgate, Robert ; Hernandez-Jover, Marta</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Lynne ; Manyweathers, Jennifer ; Maru, Yiheyis ; Loechel, Barton ; Kelly, Jennifer ; Kruger, Heleen ; Woodgate, Robert ; Hernandez-Jover, Marta</creatorcontrib><description>The capacity to rapidly identify and respond to suspicion of animal disease is fundamental to protecting the integrity of the Australian livestock industry. An incursion of a nationally significant endemic, emerging or exotic animal disease could be disruptive and economically damaging for the industry, broader community and national economy. To counter this potential threat, a surveillance system that includes general and targeted activities exists at a jurisdictional and national level. Such a system requires a collaborative effort from all involved to work towards a common goal, reflecting the notion of shared responsibility. As in all systems, the animal health surveillance system can be enhanced or constrained by the relationships of the players involved. This study focusses on two livestock industries, dairy cattle and sheep, exploring the interrelationships between all stakeholders, and their role within the Australian animal health surveillance system. A stakeholder mapping exercise was undertaken, including a depiction of the perceived level of stakeholder interest and influence on producers’ animal health surveillance practices and/or the surveillance system. Results from these activities were expanded upon through interviews. The findings reveal complex networks and a system that is, at times, constrained by institutional and individual barriers such as communication between and within stakeholders, and uncertainty about the consequences of reporting a suspected emergency disease. Whilst these challenges have the potential to negatively impact the robustness of the animal disease surveillance system, the study also provides clear evidence of strong and effective relationships amongst many of the key individuals and organisations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5877</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105326</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33735818</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Emergency animal disease ; Networks ; Relationships Australian sheep and dairy industry ; Stakeholders ; Surveillance</subject><ispartof>Preventive veterinary medicine, 2021-05, Vol.190, p.105326-105326, Article 105326</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-b5cf2ba4b58d369ec2263951cee5222eae1112291e18fe4693bad5ddd70d9f1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-b5cf2ba4b58d369ec2263951cee5222eae1112291e18fe4693bad5ddd70d9f1f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5172-0281 ; 0000-0001-6441-4892</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587721000702$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33735818$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manyweathers, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maru, Yiheyis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loechel, Barton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Heleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodgate, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez-Jover, Marta</creatorcontrib><title>Stakeholder mapping in animal health surveillance: A comparative assessment of networks in intensive dairy cattle and extensive sheep production in Australia</title><title>Preventive veterinary medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Vet Med</addtitle><description>The capacity to rapidly identify and respond to suspicion of animal disease is fundamental to protecting the integrity of the Australian livestock industry. An incursion of a nationally significant endemic, emerging or exotic animal disease could be disruptive and economically damaging for the industry, broader community and national economy. To counter this potential threat, a surveillance system that includes general and targeted activities exists at a jurisdictional and national level. Such a system requires a collaborative effort from all involved to work towards a common goal, reflecting the notion of shared responsibility. As in all systems, the animal health surveillance system can be enhanced or constrained by the relationships of the players involved. This study focusses on two livestock industries, dairy cattle and sheep, exploring the interrelationships between all stakeholders, and their role within the Australian animal health surveillance system. A stakeholder mapping exercise was undertaken, including a depiction of the perceived level of stakeholder interest and influence on producers’ animal health surveillance practices and/or the surveillance system. Results from these activities were expanded upon through interviews. The findings reveal complex networks and a system that is, at times, constrained by institutional and individual barriers such as communication between and within stakeholders, and uncertainty about the consequences of reporting a suspected emergency disease. Whilst these challenges have the potential to negatively impact the robustness of the animal disease surveillance system, the study also provides clear evidence of strong and effective relationships amongst many of the key individuals and organisations.</description><subject>Emergency animal disease</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Relationships Australian sheep and dairy industry</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><issn>0167-5877</issn><issn>1873-1716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi1ERYfCK4CXbDL4EscOu1FVLlIlFi1ry7FPGE8TJ9jOQB-Gd62j6bBldaRzvv_cfoTeU7KlhDYfD9s5whHyCG7LCKMlKzhrXqANVZJXVNLmJdoUUlZCSXmJXqd0IIQ0jRKv0CXnkgtF1Qb9vcvmAfbT4CDi0cyzDz-xD9gEP5oB78EMeY_TEo_gh8EEC5_wDttpnE002R8Bm5QgpRFCxlOPA-TfU3xIaw8fMoS0Ms74-IityXkoguAw_DmX0h5gxnOc3GKzn1YV3i0pRzN48wZd9GZI8PY5XqEfn2_ur79Wt9-_fLve3Va2ZiRXnbA960zdCeV404JlrOGtoBZAMMbAAKWUsZYCVT3UTcs744RzThLX9rTnV-jDqW_Z49cCKevRJwvrwTAtSTNBeM2VknVB5Qm1cUopQq_nWF4VHzUlevVGH_Q_b_TqjT55U5Tvnocs3Vo7685mFGB3AqCcevQQdbIeysudj2CzdpP_75AnG8GpRQ</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Hayes, Lynne</creator><creator>Manyweathers, Jennifer</creator><creator>Maru, Yiheyis</creator><creator>Loechel, Barton</creator><creator>Kelly, Jennifer</creator><creator>Kruger, Heleen</creator><creator>Woodgate, Robert</creator><creator>Hernandez-Jover, Marta</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5172-0281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6441-4892</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Stakeholder mapping in animal health surveillance: A comparative assessment of networks in intensive dairy cattle and extensive sheep production in Australia</title><author>Hayes, Lynne ; Manyweathers, Jennifer ; Maru, Yiheyis ; Loechel, Barton ; Kelly, Jennifer ; Kruger, Heleen ; Woodgate, Robert ; Hernandez-Jover, Marta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-b5cf2ba4b58d369ec2263951cee5222eae1112291e18fe4693bad5ddd70d9f1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Emergency animal disease</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Relationships Australian sheep and dairy industry</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manyweathers, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maru, Yiheyis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loechel, Barton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Heleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodgate, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez-Jover, Marta</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive veterinary medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayes, Lynne</au><au>Manyweathers, Jennifer</au><au>Maru, Yiheyis</au><au>Loechel, Barton</au><au>Kelly, Jennifer</au><au>Kruger, Heleen</au><au>Woodgate, Robert</au><au>Hernandez-Jover, Marta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stakeholder mapping in animal health surveillance: A comparative assessment of networks in intensive dairy cattle and extensive sheep production in Australia</atitle><jtitle>Preventive veterinary medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Vet Med</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>190</volume><spage>105326</spage><epage>105326</epage><pages>105326-105326</pages><artnum>105326</artnum><issn>0167-5877</issn><eissn>1873-1716</eissn><abstract>The capacity to rapidly identify and respond to suspicion of animal disease is fundamental to protecting the integrity of the Australian livestock industry. An incursion of a nationally significant endemic, emerging or exotic animal disease could be disruptive and economically damaging for the industry, broader community and national economy. To counter this potential threat, a surveillance system that includes general and targeted activities exists at a jurisdictional and national level. Such a system requires a collaborative effort from all involved to work towards a common goal, reflecting the notion of shared responsibility. As in all systems, the animal health surveillance system can be enhanced or constrained by the relationships of the players involved. This study focusses on two livestock industries, dairy cattle and sheep, exploring the interrelationships between all stakeholders, and their role within the Australian animal health surveillance system. A stakeholder mapping exercise was undertaken, including a depiction of the perceived level of stakeholder interest and influence on producers’ animal health surveillance practices and/or the surveillance system. Results from these activities were expanded upon through interviews. The findings reveal complex networks and a system that is, at times, constrained by institutional and individual barriers such as communication between and within stakeholders, and uncertainty about the consequences of reporting a suspected emergency disease. Whilst these challenges have the potential to negatively impact the robustness of the animal disease surveillance system, the study also provides clear evidence of strong and effective relationships amongst many of the key individuals and organisations.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33735818</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105326</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5172-0281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6441-4892</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5877
ispartof Preventive veterinary medicine, 2021-05, Vol.190, p.105326-105326, Article 105326
issn 0167-5877
1873-1716
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503438874
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Emergency animal disease
Networks
Relationships Australian sheep and dairy industry
Stakeholders
Surveillance
title Stakeholder mapping in animal health surveillance: A comparative assessment of networks in intensive dairy cattle and extensive sheep production in Australia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T02%3A01%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stakeholder%20mapping%20in%20animal%20health%20surveillance:%20A%20comparative%20assessment%20of%20networks%20in%20intensive%20dairy%20cattle%20and%20extensive%20sheep%20production%20in%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20veterinary%20medicine&rft.au=Hayes,%20Lynne&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=190&rft.spage=105326&rft.epage=105326&rft.pages=105326-105326&rft.artnum=105326&rft.issn=0167-5877&rft.eissn=1873-1716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105326&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2503438874%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503438874&rft_id=info:pmid/33735818&rft_els_id=S0167587721000702&rfr_iscdi=true