Spine and pelvis coordination variability in rowers with and without chronic low back pain during rowing

[Display omitted] The aim of this study was to compare the spine-pelvis coordination and coordination variability (CV) during rowing in elite rowers with and without chronic low back pain (CLBP). Fourteen professional rowers (6 healthy and 8 with CLBP) participated in this study. 3D kinematic of upp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanics 2021-05, Vol.120, p.110356-110356, Article 110356
Hauptverfasser: Alijanpour, Elham, Abbasi, Ali, Needham, Robert A., Naemi, Roozbeh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110356
container_issue
container_start_page 110356
container_title Journal of biomechanics
container_volume 120
creator Alijanpour, Elham
Abbasi, Ali
Needham, Robert A.
Naemi, Roozbeh
description [Display omitted] The aim of this study was to compare the spine-pelvis coordination and coordination variability (CV) during rowing in elite rowers with and without chronic low back pain (CLBP). Fourteen professional rowers (6 healthy and 8 with CLBP) participated in this study. 3D kinematic of upper trunk (UT), lower trunk (LT), lower back (LB), and pelvis segments during ergometer rowing at 70% and 100% of peak power were captured. The adjacent segments’ coordination and CV were calculated using modified vector coding method. The results showed that segments’ range of motion increased in both groups with increasing intensity, especially in CLBP rowers. CLBP rowers showed significantly lower: LT dominancy in LT/LB coordination at both intensities; anti-phase pattern in LB/Pelvis coordination at 100% intensity; UT/LT CV in early recovery, and significantly higher LB/Pelvis CV in final recovery and catch position (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110356
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2502809517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929021001366</els_id><sourcerecordid>2518999963</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-fc3ec78d9f05fb5141a6f6260f5c534d2955d091a8405473db3a3fff062496963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCX6gsceGSZWzHTnwDVYUiVeIAnC3HH6xD1g52sqv-e7xsy4ELc5mR5nlnRvMidE1gS4CId-N2HELaO7PbUqBkSwgwLp6hDek71lDWw3O0gdppJJVwgS5LGQGgazv5El0w1jHgvN-g3dc5RId1tHh20yEUbFLKNkS9hBTxQeeghzCF5QGHiHM6ulzwMSy7P5JTkdYFm11OMRg8pSMetPmJZ11pu-YQf5xENb1CL7yeinv9mK_Q94-3327umvsvnz7ffLhvTNu2S-MNc6brrfTA_cBJS7Twggrw3HDWWio5tyCJ7lvgbcfswDTz3oOgrRRSsCv09jx3zunX6sqi9qEYN006urQWRTnQHiQnXUXf_IOOac2xXlcp0ssaglVKnCmTUynZeTXnsNf5QRFQJy_UqJ68UCcv1NmLKrx-HL8Oe2f_yp6eX4H3Z8DVfxyCy6qY4KJxNmRnFmVT-N-O3_1Znd4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518999963</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spine and pelvis coordination variability in rowers with and without chronic low back pain during rowing</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Alijanpour, Elham ; Abbasi, Ali ; Needham, Robert A. ; Naemi, Roozbeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Alijanpour, Elham ; Abbasi, Ali ; Needham, Robert A. ; Naemi, Roozbeh</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] The aim of this study was to compare the spine-pelvis coordination and coordination variability (CV) during rowing in elite rowers with and without chronic low back pain (CLBP). Fourteen professional rowers (6 healthy and 8 with CLBP) participated in this study. 3D kinematic of upper trunk (UT), lower trunk (LT), lower back (LB), and pelvis segments during ergometer rowing at 70% and 100% of peak power were captured. The adjacent segments’ coordination and CV were calculated using modified vector coding method. The results showed that segments’ range of motion increased in both groups with increasing intensity, especially in CLBP rowers. CLBP rowers showed significantly lower: LT dominancy in LT/LB coordination at both intensities; anti-phase pattern in LB/Pelvis coordination at 100% intensity; UT/LT CV in early recovery, and significantly higher LB/Pelvis CV in final recovery and catch position (p &lt; 0.05). Moreover, both groups showed significantly lower UT dominancy for UT/LT coordination in sagittal plane; higher anti-phase pattern in frontal plane; lower UT/LT CV in sagittal plane, lower LT/LB CV in sagittal and transverse plane, lower LB/Pelvis CV in frontal plane in trunk preparation phase, and a lower UT/LT CV in frontal plane for acceleration phase at 100% versus 70% intensity. In conclusion rowers with CLBP cannot adapt their coordination pattern and its variability with increase in intensity, and the movement in the kinematic chain from pelvis to UT stops in spine-pelvic junction. These findings have practical implications in designing coaching and rehabilitation strategies to facilitate performance and prevent injuries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33730558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Coordination ; Injuries ; Injury prevention ; Investigations ; Kinematics ; Low back pain ; Pain ; Pelvis ; Recovery ; Rehabilitation ; Rowing ; Segments ; Software ; Spine ; Stroke ; Variability</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2021-05, Vol.120, p.110356-110356, Article 110356</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-fc3ec78d9f05fb5141a6f6260f5c534d2955d091a8405473db3a3fff062496963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-fc3ec78d9f05fb5141a6f6260f5c534d2955d091a8405473db3a3fff062496963</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9733-6501 ; 0000-0002-9751-7094</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2518999963?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33730558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alijanpour, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbasi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Needham, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naemi, Roozbeh</creatorcontrib><title>Spine and pelvis coordination variability in rowers with and without chronic low back pain during rowing</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>[Display omitted] The aim of this study was to compare the spine-pelvis coordination and coordination variability (CV) during rowing in elite rowers with and without chronic low back pain (CLBP). Fourteen professional rowers (6 healthy and 8 with CLBP) participated in this study. 3D kinematic of upper trunk (UT), lower trunk (LT), lower back (LB), and pelvis segments during ergometer rowing at 70% and 100% of peak power were captured. The adjacent segments’ coordination and CV were calculated using modified vector coding method. The results showed that segments’ range of motion increased in both groups with increasing intensity, especially in CLBP rowers. CLBP rowers showed significantly lower: LT dominancy in LT/LB coordination at both intensities; anti-phase pattern in LB/Pelvis coordination at 100% intensity; UT/LT CV in early recovery, and significantly higher LB/Pelvis CV in final recovery and catch position (p &lt; 0.05). Moreover, both groups showed significantly lower UT dominancy for UT/LT coordination in sagittal plane; higher anti-phase pattern in frontal plane; lower UT/LT CV in sagittal plane, lower LT/LB CV in sagittal and transverse plane, lower LB/Pelvis CV in frontal plane in trunk preparation phase, and a lower UT/LT CV in frontal plane for acceleration phase at 100% versus 70% intensity. In conclusion rowers with CLBP cannot adapt their coordination pattern and its variability with increase in intensity, and the movement in the kinematic chain from pelvis to UT stops in spine-pelvic junction. These findings have practical implications in designing coaching and rehabilitation strategies to facilitate performance and prevent injuries.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rowing</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Variability</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCX6gsceGSZWzHTnwDVYUiVeIAnC3HH6xD1g52sqv-e7xsy4ELc5mR5nlnRvMidE1gS4CId-N2HELaO7PbUqBkSwgwLp6hDek71lDWw3O0gdppJJVwgS5LGQGgazv5El0w1jHgvN-g3dc5RId1tHh20yEUbFLKNkS9hBTxQeeghzCF5QGHiHM6ulzwMSy7P5JTkdYFm11OMRg8pSMetPmJZ11pu-YQf5xENb1CL7yeinv9mK_Q94-3327umvsvnz7ffLhvTNu2S-MNc6brrfTA_cBJS7Twggrw3HDWWio5tyCJ7lvgbcfswDTz3oOgrRRSsCv09jx3zunX6sqi9qEYN006urQWRTnQHiQnXUXf_IOOac2xXlcp0ssaglVKnCmTUynZeTXnsNf5QRFQJy_UqJ68UCcv1NmLKrx-HL8Oe2f_yp6eX4H3Z8DVfxyCy6qY4KJxNmRnFmVT-N-O3_1Znd4</recordid><startdate>20210507</startdate><enddate>20210507</enddate><creator>Alijanpour, Elham</creator><creator>Abbasi, Ali</creator><creator>Needham, Robert A.</creator><creator>Naemi, Roozbeh</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9733-6501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9751-7094</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210507</creationdate><title>Spine and pelvis coordination variability in rowers with and without chronic low back pain during rowing</title><author>Alijanpour, Elham ; Abbasi, Ali ; Needham, Robert A. ; Naemi, Roozbeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-fc3ec78d9f05fb5141a6f6260f5c534d2955d091a8405473db3a3fff062496963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rowing</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alijanpour, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbasi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Needham, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naemi, Roozbeh</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alijanpour, Elham</au><au>Abbasi, Ali</au><au>Needham, Robert A.</au><au>Naemi, Roozbeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spine and pelvis coordination variability in rowers with and without chronic low back pain during rowing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2021-05-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>120</volume><spage>110356</spage><epage>110356</epage><pages>110356-110356</pages><artnum>110356</artnum><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] The aim of this study was to compare the spine-pelvis coordination and coordination variability (CV) during rowing in elite rowers with and without chronic low back pain (CLBP). Fourteen professional rowers (6 healthy and 8 with CLBP) participated in this study. 3D kinematic of upper trunk (UT), lower trunk (LT), lower back (LB), and pelvis segments during ergometer rowing at 70% and 100% of peak power were captured. The adjacent segments’ coordination and CV were calculated using modified vector coding method. The results showed that segments’ range of motion increased in both groups with increasing intensity, especially in CLBP rowers. CLBP rowers showed significantly lower: LT dominancy in LT/LB coordination at both intensities; anti-phase pattern in LB/Pelvis coordination at 100% intensity; UT/LT CV in early recovery, and significantly higher LB/Pelvis CV in final recovery and catch position (p &lt; 0.05). Moreover, both groups showed significantly lower UT dominancy for UT/LT coordination in sagittal plane; higher anti-phase pattern in frontal plane; lower UT/LT CV in sagittal plane, lower LT/LB CV in sagittal and transverse plane, lower LB/Pelvis CV in frontal plane in trunk preparation phase, and a lower UT/LT CV in frontal plane for acceleration phase at 100% versus 70% intensity. In conclusion rowers with CLBP cannot adapt their coordination pattern and its variability with increase in intensity, and the movement in the kinematic chain from pelvis to UT stops in spine-pelvic junction. These findings have practical implications in designing coaching and rehabilitation strategies to facilitate performance and prevent injuries.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33730558</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110356</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9733-6501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9751-7094</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9290
ispartof Journal of biomechanics, 2021-05, Vol.120, p.110356-110356, Article 110356
issn 0021-9290
1873-2380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2502809517
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Back pain
Coordination
Injuries
Injury prevention
Investigations
Kinematics
Low back pain
Pain
Pelvis
Recovery
Rehabilitation
Rowing
Segments
Software
Spine
Stroke
Variability
title Spine and pelvis coordination variability in rowers with and without chronic low back pain during rowing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T21%3A05%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spine%20and%20pelvis%20coordination%20variability%20in%20rowers%20with%20and%20without%20chronic%20low%20back%20pain%20during%20rowing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Alijanpour,%20Elham&rft.date=2021-05-07&rft.volume=120&rft.spage=110356&rft.epage=110356&rft.pages=110356-110356&rft.artnum=110356&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2518999963%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518999963&rft_id=info:pmid/33730558&rft_els_id=S0021929021001366&rfr_iscdi=true