Regional anaesthesia on the finger: Traditional dorsal digital nerve block versus subcutaneous volar nerve block, a randomized controlled trial

•Different anaesthetic techniques are available in patients with a finger injury•Pain score of injection does not differ between volar and dorsal block anaesthesia•Extent of anaesthesia is important in deciding which anaesthetic technique to us•Volar block anaesthesia is preferable in injuries on th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2021-04, Vol.52 (4), p.883-888
Hauptverfasser: Clement, PAJ, Doomen, LTA, van Hooft, MAA, Hessels, RAPA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 888
container_issue 4
container_start_page 883
container_title Injury
container_volume 52
creator Clement, PAJ
Doomen, LTA
van Hooft, MAA
Hessels, RAPA
description •Different anaesthetic techniques are available in patients with a finger injury•Pain score of injection does not differ between volar and dorsal block anaesthesia•Extent of anaesthesia is important in deciding which anaesthetic technique to us•Volar block anaesthesia is preferable in injuries on the volar side of the finger•Volar block anaesthesia is preferable by two-third of the clinicians To identify the most comfortable digital nerve block by comparing painfulness and efficiency of two commonly used digital nerve blocks: the volar subcutaneous nerve block and the traditional dorsal nerve block. Patients, age ≥ 18 years, presenting with an injury of the finger requiring regional anaesthesia were included. Patients were blindly randomized in receiving the one-injection subcutaneous volar nerve block (intervention group) or the two-injection traditional dorsal digital nerve block (control group). Primary outcome measure was discomfort of the injection. Secondary outcome measures were extent of anaesthesia in different regions of the finger, complication rate and satisfaction of the clinician. In total, 409 patients were randomly allocated to the intervention group (N=209) or control group (N=200). Discomfort of the injection was not different between both anaesthetic techniques. The mean pain score (Numerical Rating Scale – NRS) of the intervention group was 4.57 (range 0 – 9, CI 4.27 – 4.87, SD 2.18). The mean pain scores of the control group were 4.63 for the first injection (range 0 - 10; CI 4.28 – 4.99, SD 2.36) and 4.51 for the second injection (range 0 – 10; CI 4.14 – 4.87, SD 2.44). The traditional dorsal digital nerve block was better in anesthetizing the dorsal side of the finger. The subcutaneous volar nerve block was better or equivalent in terms of extent of anaesthesia on the volar side of the finger. In patients requiring digital anaesthesia in the Emergency Department, the anaesthetic technique affects both the discomfort of the injection and extent of anaesthesia. The traditional dorsal digital nerve block is preferred for dorsal injuries. The subcutaneous volar nerve block is preferred for volar injuries.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2502802547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020138321002205</els_id><sourcerecordid>2502802547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0c22fc7d7d3d5b305a6a3b3f731a018c44b4570c68fc6728d2c2c46269b4fa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQxkVpaTZJ36AUHXuI3ZFkW94eCiHkTyFQKMlZyNJ4q61WSiV7IX2JvnK0OCk99fTNwG9m9Okj5D2DmgHrPm1rF7Zzeqw5cFaDqAHaV2TFermugHfyNVkBcKiY6MUROc55C8AkCPGWHAkhBeNrtiJ_vuPGxaA91UFjnn5gdprGQEtFRxc2mD7Tu6StmxbMxpQP4jZuKhow7ZEOPpqfdI8pz5nmeTDzpAPG0uyj1-lf6oxqmnSwced-o6UmhilF70s5Jaf9KXkzap_x3bOekPury7uLm-r22_XXi_PbyoiOT9UIhvPRSCutsO0goNWdFoMYiy8NrDdNMzStBNP1o-kk7y033DQd79ZDM2opTsjHZe9Dir_mYlztXDbo_fJuxVvgPfC2OaDNgpoUc044qofkdjo9KgbqEIXaqiUKdYhCgVAlijL24fnCPOzQ_h16-fsCfFkALD73DpPKxmEwaF1CMykb3f8vPAEXA5-X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2502802547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional anaesthesia on the finger: Traditional dorsal digital nerve block versus subcutaneous volar nerve block, a randomized controlled trial</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Clement, PAJ ; Doomen, LTA ; van Hooft, MAA ; Hessels, RAPA</creator><creatorcontrib>Clement, PAJ ; Doomen, LTA ; van Hooft, MAA ; Hessels, RAPA</creatorcontrib><description>•Different anaesthetic techniques are available in patients with a finger injury•Pain score of injection does not differ between volar and dorsal block anaesthesia•Extent of anaesthesia is important in deciding which anaesthetic technique to us•Volar block anaesthesia is preferable in injuries on the volar side of the finger•Volar block anaesthesia is preferable by two-third of the clinicians To identify the most comfortable digital nerve block by comparing painfulness and efficiency of two commonly used digital nerve blocks: the volar subcutaneous nerve block and the traditional dorsal nerve block. Patients, age ≥ 18 years, presenting with an injury of the finger requiring regional anaesthesia were included. Patients were blindly randomized in receiving the one-injection subcutaneous volar nerve block (intervention group) or the two-injection traditional dorsal digital nerve block (control group). Primary outcome measure was discomfort of the injection. Secondary outcome measures were extent of anaesthesia in different regions of the finger, complication rate and satisfaction of the clinician. In total, 409 patients were randomly allocated to the intervention group (N=209) or control group (N=200). Discomfort of the injection was not different between both anaesthetic techniques. The mean pain score (Numerical Rating Scale – NRS) of the intervention group was 4.57 (range 0 – 9, CI 4.27 – 4.87, SD 2.18). The mean pain scores of the control group were 4.63 for the first injection (range 0 - 10; CI 4.28 – 4.99, SD 2.36) and 4.51 for the second injection (range 0 – 10; CI 4.14 – 4.87, SD 2.44). The traditional dorsal digital nerve block was better in anesthetizing the dorsal side of the finger. The subcutaneous volar nerve block was better or equivalent in terms of extent of anaesthesia on the volar side of the finger. In patients requiring digital anaesthesia in the Emergency Department, the anaesthetic technique affects both the discomfort of the injection and extent of anaesthesia. The traditional dorsal digital nerve block is preferred for dorsal injuries. The subcutaneous volar nerve block is preferred for volar injuries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33731291</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaesthetic techniques ; Digital nerve block ; Emergency Care ; Finger injury ; Local anaesthesia ; Wound Care</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2021-04, Vol.52 (4), p.883-888</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0c22fc7d7d3d5b305a6a3b3f731a018c44b4570c68fc6728d2c2c46269b4fa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0c22fc7d7d3d5b305a6a3b3f731a018c44b4570c68fc6728d2c2c46269b4fa73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5395-6829 ; 0000-0002-2425-9899 ; 0000-0001-8704-7511</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138321002205$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731291$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clement, PAJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doomen, LTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hooft, MAA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hessels, RAPA</creatorcontrib><title>Regional anaesthesia on the finger: Traditional dorsal digital nerve block versus subcutaneous volar nerve block, a randomized controlled trial</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>•Different anaesthetic techniques are available in patients with a finger injury•Pain score of injection does not differ between volar and dorsal block anaesthesia•Extent of anaesthesia is important in deciding which anaesthetic technique to us•Volar block anaesthesia is preferable in injuries on the volar side of the finger•Volar block anaesthesia is preferable by two-third of the clinicians To identify the most comfortable digital nerve block by comparing painfulness and efficiency of two commonly used digital nerve blocks: the volar subcutaneous nerve block and the traditional dorsal nerve block. Patients, age ≥ 18 years, presenting with an injury of the finger requiring regional anaesthesia were included. Patients were blindly randomized in receiving the one-injection subcutaneous volar nerve block (intervention group) or the two-injection traditional dorsal digital nerve block (control group). Primary outcome measure was discomfort of the injection. Secondary outcome measures were extent of anaesthesia in different regions of the finger, complication rate and satisfaction of the clinician. In total, 409 patients were randomly allocated to the intervention group (N=209) or control group (N=200). Discomfort of the injection was not different between both anaesthetic techniques. The mean pain score (Numerical Rating Scale – NRS) of the intervention group was 4.57 (range 0 – 9, CI 4.27 – 4.87, SD 2.18). The mean pain scores of the control group were 4.63 for the first injection (range 0 - 10; CI 4.28 – 4.99, SD 2.36) and 4.51 for the second injection (range 0 – 10; CI 4.14 – 4.87, SD 2.44). The traditional dorsal digital nerve block was better in anesthetizing the dorsal side of the finger. The subcutaneous volar nerve block was better or equivalent in terms of extent of anaesthesia on the volar side of the finger. In patients requiring digital anaesthesia in the Emergency Department, the anaesthetic technique affects both the discomfort of the injection and extent of anaesthesia. The traditional dorsal digital nerve block is preferred for dorsal injuries. The subcutaneous volar nerve block is preferred for volar injuries.</description><subject>Anaesthetic techniques</subject><subject>Digital nerve block</subject><subject>Emergency Care</subject><subject>Finger injury</subject><subject>Local anaesthesia</subject><subject>Wound Care</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQxkVpaTZJ36AUHXuI3ZFkW94eCiHkTyFQKMlZyNJ4q61WSiV7IX2JvnK0OCk99fTNwG9m9Okj5D2DmgHrPm1rF7Zzeqw5cFaDqAHaV2TFermugHfyNVkBcKiY6MUROc55C8AkCPGWHAkhBeNrtiJ_vuPGxaA91UFjnn5gdprGQEtFRxc2mD7Tu6StmxbMxpQP4jZuKhow7ZEOPpqfdI8pz5nmeTDzpAPG0uyj1-lf6oxqmnSwced-o6UmhilF70s5Jaf9KXkzap_x3bOekPury7uLm-r22_XXi_PbyoiOT9UIhvPRSCutsO0goNWdFoMYiy8NrDdNMzStBNP1o-kk7y033DQd79ZDM2opTsjHZe9Dir_mYlztXDbo_fJuxVvgPfC2OaDNgpoUc044qofkdjo9KgbqEIXaqiUKdYhCgVAlijL24fnCPOzQ_h16-fsCfFkALD73DpPKxmEwaF1CMykb3f8vPAEXA5-X</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Clement, PAJ</creator><creator>Doomen, LTA</creator><creator>van Hooft, MAA</creator><creator>Hessels, RAPA</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5395-6829</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-9899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8704-7511</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Regional anaesthesia on the finger: Traditional dorsal digital nerve block versus subcutaneous volar nerve block, a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Clement, PAJ ; Doomen, LTA ; van Hooft, MAA ; Hessels, RAPA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0c22fc7d7d3d5b305a6a3b3f731a018c44b4570c68fc6728d2c2c46269b4fa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anaesthetic techniques</topic><topic>Digital nerve block</topic><topic>Emergency Care</topic><topic>Finger injury</topic><topic>Local anaesthesia</topic><topic>Wound Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clement, PAJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doomen, LTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hooft, MAA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hessels, RAPA</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clement, PAJ</au><au>Doomen, LTA</au><au>van Hooft, MAA</au><au>Hessels, RAPA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional anaesthesia on the finger: Traditional dorsal digital nerve block versus subcutaneous volar nerve block, a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>888</epage><pages>883-888</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>•Different anaesthetic techniques are available in patients with a finger injury•Pain score of injection does not differ between volar and dorsal block anaesthesia•Extent of anaesthesia is important in deciding which anaesthetic technique to us•Volar block anaesthesia is preferable in injuries on the volar side of the finger•Volar block anaesthesia is preferable by two-third of the clinicians To identify the most comfortable digital nerve block by comparing painfulness and efficiency of two commonly used digital nerve blocks: the volar subcutaneous nerve block and the traditional dorsal nerve block. Patients, age ≥ 18 years, presenting with an injury of the finger requiring regional anaesthesia were included. Patients were blindly randomized in receiving the one-injection subcutaneous volar nerve block (intervention group) or the two-injection traditional dorsal digital nerve block (control group). Primary outcome measure was discomfort of the injection. Secondary outcome measures were extent of anaesthesia in different regions of the finger, complication rate and satisfaction of the clinician. In total, 409 patients were randomly allocated to the intervention group (N=209) or control group (N=200). Discomfort of the injection was not different between both anaesthetic techniques. The mean pain score (Numerical Rating Scale – NRS) of the intervention group was 4.57 (range 0 – 9, CI 4.27 – 4.87, SD 2.18). The mean pain scores of the control group were 4.63 for the first injection (range 0 - 10; CI 4.28 – 4.99, SD 2.36) and 4.51 for the second injection (range 0 – 10; CI 4.14 – 4.87, SD 2.44). The traditional dorsal digital nerve block was better in anesthetizing the dorsal side of the finger. The subcutaneous volar nerve block was better or equivalent in terms of extent of anaesthesia on the volar side of the finger. In patients requiring digital anaesthesia in the Emergency Department, the anaesthetic technique affects both the discomfort of the injection and extent of anaesthesia. The traditional dorsal digital nerve block is preferred for dorsal injuries. The subcutaneous volar nerve block is preferred for volar injuries.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33731291</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5395-6829</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-9899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8704-7511</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2021-04, Vol.52 (4), p.883-888
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2502802547
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anaesthetic techniques
Digital nerve block
Emergency Care
Finger injury
Local anaesthesia
Wound Care
title Regional anaesthesia on the finger: Traditional dorsal digital nerve block versus subcutaneous volar nerve block, a randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T13%3A36%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20anaesthesia%20on%20the%20finger:%20Traditional%20dorsal%20digital%20nerve%20block%20versus%20subcutaneous%20volar%20nerve%20block,%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Clement,%20PAJ&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=888&rft.pages=883-888&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2502802547%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2502802547&rft_id=info:pmid/33731291&rft_els_id=S0020138321002205&rfr_iscdi=true