Estimation and comparison of integral dose to target and organs at risk in three-dimensional computed tomography image-based treatment planning of carcinoma uterine cervix with two high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources: 60Co and 192Ir

Background: Iridium-192 (192Ir) has been a widely accepted radioisotope for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Recently, Cobalt-60 (60Co) radioisotope with a longer half-life (5.26 years) has been gaining popularity due to economic and logistical reasons as compared with the traditional 192Ir. Aim:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer research and therapeutics 2021-01, Vol.17 (1), p.191-197
Hauptverfasser: Yadav, Suresh, Singh, O, Choudhary, S, Saroj, Dinesh, Yogi, Veenita, Goswami, Brijesh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 197
container_issue 1
container_start_page 191
container_title Journal of cancer research and therapeutics
container_volume 17
creator Yadav, Suresh
Singh, O
Choudhary, S
Saroj, Dinesh
Yogi, Veenita
Goswami, Brijesh
description Background: Iridium-192 (192Ir) has been a widely accepted radioisotope for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Recently, Cobalt-60 (60Co) radioisotope with a longer half-life (5.26 years) has been gaining popularity due to economic and logistical reasons as compared with the traditional 192Ir. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the integral dose (ID) to the target and organs at risk (OARs) with two HDR brachytherapy sources in brachytherapy treatment of carcinoma uterine cervix to find appropriate HDR radioisotopes for clinical benefit. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 52 computed tomography image-based brachytherapy plans of 52 patients who have received intracavitary treatment with 192Ir HDR source. For each patient plan, one additional set of plan was created using 60Co source in place of 192Ir source keeping the same dwell position, and again dose was optimized. The volume and mean dose for target, OARs, and volume structures of 400%, 200%, 150%, 100%, and 50% were recorded for the estimation and comparison of ID. Results: The mean ID to high-risk clinical target volume was significantly higher by 5.84% in 60Co plan than that in 192Ir plan. For OARs, the mean ID to the rectum was significantly higher by 2.60% in 60Co plan as compared to 192Ir plan, whereas for bladder and sigmoid colon, it was lower in 60Co plan than that in 192Ir plan. The mean ID of central dose volume structures of 400%, 200%, 150%, 100%, and 50% was higher by 12.97%, 9.77%, 8.16%, 6.10%, and 3.22%, respectively, in 60Co plan than that of 192Ir plan. Conclusion: The results of our study concluded that 192Ir HDR radioisotope should be preferred for intracavitary brachytherapy due to its ideal physical characteristics for better clinical outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_199_19
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501850177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A655948381</galeid><sourcerecordid>A655948381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351i-4f77990127ff10757f3be19264573e3163d23302daa6aa6c885996e643163d4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kl2P1CAUhhujiePqvZck3njTEUpbWu_WyaprNjEx6zVh6GnLTAsjUOv8ZP-FpzMaPzIGSAs873sOcJLkOaPrnFH-aqd9XH_YfLqXrK5xPEhW-FOlOePVw2RFa8FTllfZ4-RJCDtKC5Fl1Sr5fhOiGVU0zhJlG6LdeFDeBJy6lhgbofNqII0LQKIjUfkO4ol0vlM2EBUJ4ntESew9QNqYEWxAP5QtblOEBqWjQ6NDfyQYrYN0q8Ky7EFFxCM5DMpaY7slqlZeG-tGRVDrjQWiwX8138hsYk_i7Ehvuj5dckq9ikC2Xun-GHvACEcS3OQ1hNekpBt3SpXV2a1_mjxq1RDg2c_vVfL57c395n169_Hd7eb6LtW8YCbNWyHqmrJMtC2johAt3wIalHkhOHBW8ibjnGaNUiV2XVVFXZdQ5qetXPOr5OXZ9-DdlwlClKMJGgY8ILgpyKygrMIhBKIv_kF3mDte3ELxrCyqkte_qU4NII1tXcTzLqbyuiyKOq94xZBKL1AdWLyUwVloDS7_xa8v8NgaGI2-KKBngfYuBA-tPHh8S3-UjMqlBOVSgvKPEkTJm7NkdgO-ZNgP0wxejtDsrZv_q8PO5K-65D8A8z3qJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2532658639</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimation and comparison of integral dose to target and organs at risk in three-dimensional computed tomography image-based treatment planning of carcinoma uterine cervix with two high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources: 60Co and 192Ir</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Yadav, Suresh ; Singh, O ; Choudhary, S ; Saroj, Dinesh ; Yogi, Veenita ; Goswami, Brijesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Suresh ; Singh, O ; Choudhary, S ; Saroj, Dinesh ; Yogi, Veenita ; Goswami, Brijesh</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Iridium-192 (192Ir) has been a widely accepted radioisotope for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Recently, Cobalt-60 (60Co) radioisotope with a longer half-life (5.26 years) has been gaining popularity due to economic and logistical reasons as compared with the traditional 192Ir. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the integral dose (ID) to the target and organs at risk (OARs) with two HDR brachytherapy sources in brachytherapy treatment of carcinoma uterine cervix to find appropriate HDR radioisotopes for clinical benefit. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 52 computed tomography image-based brachytherapy plans of 52 patients who have received intracavitary treatment with 192Ir HDR source. For each patient plan, one additional set of plan was created using 60Co source in place of 192Ir source keeping the same dwell position, and again dose was optimized. The volume and mean dose for target, OARs, and volume structures of 400%, 200%, 150%, 100%, and 50% were recorded for the estimation and comparison of ID. Results: The mean ID to high-risk clinical target volume was significantly higher by 5.84% in 60Co plan than that in 192Ir plan. For OARs, the mean ID to the rectum was significantly higher by 2.60% in 60Co plan as compared to 192Ir plan, whereas for bladder and sigmoid colon, it was lower in 60Co plan than that in 192Ir plan. The mean ID of central dose volume structures of 400%, 200%, 150%, 100%, and 50% was higher by 12.97%, 9.77%, 8.16%, 6.10%, and 3.22%, respectively, in 60Co plan than that of 192Ir plan. Conclusion: The results of our study concluded that 192Ir HDR radioisotope should be preferred for intracavitary brachytherapy due to its ideal physical characteristics for better clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-1482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_199_19</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Cervix ; Comparative analysis ; Dosage and administration ; Methods ; Radiation therapy ; Radioisotope brachytherapy ; Radioisotopes ; Uterine cancer</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics, 2021-01, Vol.17 (1), p.191-197</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351i-4f77990127ff10757f3be19264573e3163d23302daa6aa6c885996e643163d4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27457,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Suresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saroj, Dinesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yogi, Veenita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goswami, Brijesh</creatorcontrib><title>Estimation and comparison of integral dose to target and organs at risk in three-dimensional computed tomography image-based treatment planning of carcinoma uterine cervix with two high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources: 60Co and 192Ir</title><title>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics</title><description>Background: Iridium-192 (192Ir) has been a widely accepted radioisotope for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Recently, Cobalt-60 (60Co) radioisotope with a longer half-life (5.26 years) has been gaining popularity due to economic and logistical reasons as compared with the traditional 192Ir. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the integral dose (ID) to the target and organs at risk (OARs) with two HDR brachytherapy sources in brachytherapy treatment of carcinoma uterine cervix to find appropriate HDR radioisotopes for clinical benefit. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 52 computed tomography image-based brachytherapy plans of 52 patients who have received intracavitary treatment with 192Ir HDR source. For each patient plan, one additional set of plan was created using 60Co source in place of 192Ir source keeping the same dwell position, and again dose was optimized. The volume and mean dose for target, OARs, and volume structures of 400%, 200%, 150%, 100%, and 50% were recorded for the estimation and comparison of ID. Results: The mean ID to high-risk clinical target volume was significantly higher by 5.84% in 60Co plan than that in 192Ir plan. For OARs, the mean ID to the rectum was significantly higher by 2.60% in 60Co plan as compared to 192Ir plan, whereas for bladder and sigmoid colon, it was lower in 60Co plan than that in 192Ir plan. The mean ID of central dose volume structures of 400%, 200%, 150%, 100%, and 50% was higher by 12.97%, 9.77%, 8.16%, 6.10%, and 3.22%, respectively, in 60Co plan than that of 192Ir plan. Conclusion: The results of our study concluded that 192Ir HDR radioisotope should be preferred for intracavitary brachytherapy due to its ideal physical characteristics for better clinical outcomes.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radioisotope brachytherapy</subject><subject>Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Uterine cancer</subject><issn>0973-1482</issn><issn>1998-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kl2P1CAUhhujiePqvZck3njTEUpbWu_WyaprNjEx6zVh6GnLTAsjUOv8ZP-FpzMaPzIGSAs873sOcJLkOaPrnFH-aqd9XH_YfLqXrK5xPEhW-FOlOePVw2RFa8FTllfZ4-RJCDtKC5Fl1Sr5fhOiGVU0zhJlG6LdeFDeBJy6lhgbofNqII0LQKIjUfkO4ol0vlM2EBUJ4ntESew9QNqYEWxAP5QtblOEBqWjQ6NDfyQYrYN0q8Ky7EFFxCM5DMpaY7slqlZeG-tGRVDrjQWiwX8138hsYk_i7Ehvuj5dckq9ikC2Xun-GHvACEcS3OQ1hNekpBt3SpXV2a1_mjxq1RDg2c_vVfL57c395n169_Hd7eb6LtW8YCbNWyHqmrJMtC2johAt3wIalHkhOHBW8ibjnGaNUiV2XVVFXZdQ5qetXPOr5OXZ9-DdlwlClKMJGgY8ILgpyKygrMIhBKIv_kF3mDte3ELxrCyqkte_qU4NII1tXcTzLqbyuiyKOq94xZBKL1AdWLyUwVloDS7_xa8v8NgaGI2-KKBngfYuBA-tPHh8S3-UjMqlBOVSgvKPEkTJm7NkdgO-ZNgP0wxejtDsrZv_q8PO5K-65D8A8z3qJg</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Yadav, Suresh</creator><creator>Singh, O</creator><creator>Choudhary, S</creator><creator>Saroj, Dinesh</creator><creator>Yogi, Veenita</creator><creator>Goswami, Brijesh</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Estimation and comparison of integral dose to target and organs at risk in three-dimensional computed tomography image-based treatment planning of carcinoma uterine cervix with two high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources: 60Co and 192Ir</title><author>Yadav, Suresh ; Singh, O ; Choudhary, S ; Saroj, Dinesh ; Yogi, Veenita ; Goswami, Brijesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351i-4f77990127ff10757f3be19264573e3163d23302daa6aa6c885996e643163d4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radioisotope brachytherapy</topic><topic>Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Uterine cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Suresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saroj, Dinesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yogi, Veenita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goswami, Brijesh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yadav, Suresh</au><au>Singh, O</au><au>Choudhary, S</au><au>Saroj, Dinesh</au><au>Yogi, Veenita</au><au>Goswami, Brijesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimation and comparison of integral dose to target and organs at risk in three-dimensional computed tomography image-based treatment planning of carcinoma uterine cervix with two high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources: 60Co and 192Ir</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>191-197</pages><issn>0973-1482</issn><eissn>1998-4138</eissn><abstract>Background: Iridium-192 (192Ir) has been a widely accepted radioisotope for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Recently, Cobalt-60 (60Co) radioisotope with a longer half-life (5.26 years) has been gaining popularity due to economic and logistical reasons as compared with the traditional 192Ir. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the integral dose (ID) to the target and organs at risk (OARs) with two HDR brachytherapy sources in brachytherapy treatment of carcinoma uterine cervix to find appropriate HDR radioisotopes for clinical benefit. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 52 computed tomography image-based brachytherapy plans of 52 patients who have received intracavitary treatment with 192Ir HDR source. For each patient plan, one additional set of plan was created using 60Co source in place of 192Ir source keeping the same dwell position, and again dose was optimized. The volume and mean dose for target, OARs, and volume structures of 400%, 200%, 150%, 100%, and 50% were recorded for the estimation and comparison of ID. Results: The mean ID to high-risk clinical target volume was significantly higher by 5.84% in 60Co plan than that in 192Ir plan. For OARs, the mean ID to the rectum was significantly higher by 2.60% in 60Co plan as compared to 192Ir plan, whereas for bladder and sigmoid colon, it was lower in 60Co plan than that in 192Ir plan. The mean ID of central dose volume structures of 400%, 200%, 150%, 100%, and 50% was higher by 12.97%, 9.77%, 8.16%, 6.10%, and 3.22%, respectively, in 60Co plan than that of 192Ir plan. Conclusion: The results of our study concluded that 192Ir HDR radioisotope should be preferred for intracavitary brachytherapy due to its ideal physical characteristics for better clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_199_19</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0973-1482
ispartof Journal of cancer research and therapeutics, 2021-01, Vol.17 (1), p.191-197
issn 0973-1482
1998-4138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501850177
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Care and treatment
Cervix
Comparative analysis
Dosage and administration
Methods
Radiation therapy
Radioisotope brachytherapy
Radioisotopes
Uterine cancer
title Estimation and comparison of integral dose to target and organs at risk in three-dimensional computed tomography image-based treatment planning of carcinoma uterine cervix with two high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources: 60Co and 192Ir
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T17%3A04%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimation%20and%20comparison%20of%20integral%20dose%20to%20target%20and%20organs%20at%20risk%20in%20three-dimensional%20computed%20tomography%20image-based%20treatment%20planning%20of%20carcinoma%20uterine%20cervix%20with%20two%20high-dose-rate%20brachytherapy%20sources:%2060Co%20and%20192Ir&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20research%20and%20therapeutics&rft.au=Yadav,%20Suresh&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=191-197&rft.issn=0973-1482&rft.eissn=1998-4138&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_199_19&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA655948381%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2532658639&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A655948381&rfr_iscdi=true