Quantifying the Effect of Abdominal Body Wall on In Situ Peak Rarefaction Pressure During Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging

In this study, 3-D non-linear ultrasound simulations and experimental measurements were used to estimate the range of in situ pressures that can occur during transcutaneous abdominal imaging and to identify the sources of error when estimating in situ peak rarefaction pressures (PRPs) using linear d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2021-06, Vol.47 (6), p.1548-1558
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Bofeng, Pinton, Gianmarco F., Deng, Yufeng, Nightingale, Kathryn R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1558
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1548
container_title Ultrasound in medicine & biology
container_volume 47
creator Zhang, Bofeng
Pinton, Gianmarco F.
Deng, Yufeng
Nightingale, Kathryn R.
description In this study, 3-D non-linear ultrasound simulations and experimental measurements were used to estimate the range of in situ pressures that can occur during transcutaneous abdominal imaging and to identify the sources of error when estimating in situ peak rarefaction pressures (PRPs) using linear derating, as specified by the mechanical index (MI) guideline. Using simulations, it was found that, for a large transmit aperture (F/1.5), MI consistently over-estimated in situ PRP by 20%–48% primarily owing to phase aberration. For a medium transmit aperture (F/3), the MI accurately estimated the in situ PRP to within 8%. For a small transmit aperture (F/5), MI consistently underestimated the in situ PRP by 32%–50%, with peak locations occurring 1–2 cm before the focal depth, often within the body wall itself. The large variability across body wall samples and focal configurations demonstrates the limitations of the simplified linear derating scheme. The results suggest that patient-specific in situ PRP estimation would allow for increases in transmit pressures, particularly for tightly focused beams, to improve diagnostic image quality while ensuring patient safety.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.01.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501849207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301562921000533</els_id><sourcerecordid>2501849207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-4b796808a0c4598d82d1b49f60e31387021d08bd5d408c262c9c3c596db6d5df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1vFCEUhonR2G3rXzDEK29me4D5AO9qt9VNmlitjd4RBpiVdQYqMJr997Ldarw0OQkJ73s-3gehVwSWBEh7tl3OY44qTdb0LiwpULKEUpQ_QQvCO1FRQb4-RQtgQKqmpeIIHae0BYCuZd1zdMRYR2nNxAL9-jgrn92wc36D8zeLL4fB6ozDgM97Eybn1YjfBrPDX9Q44uDx2uNbl2d8Y9V3_ElFOyidXRFuok1pjhav5riftnJq40PKTuO7h3vD7A1eT2pT1FP0bFBjsi8e3xN0d3X5-eJ9df3h3fri_LrSNaO5qvtOtBy4Al03ghtODelrMbRgGWG8K9EN8N40pgauaUu10Ew3ojV9Wz4HdoJeH-bex_BjtinLySVtx1F5G-YkaQOE14JCV6xvDlYdQ0oll7yPblJxJwnIPXi5lf-Cl3vwEkpRXppfPu6Z-yL_bf1DuhhWB4MtaX86G2XSznptjYsFuDTB_c-e30ECnB4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501849207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying the Effect of Abdominal Body Wall on In Situ Peak Rarefaction Pressure During Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Zhang, Bofeng ; Pinton, Gianmarco F. ; Deng, Yufeng ; Nightingale, Kathryn R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bofeng ; Pinton, Gianmarco F. ; Deng, Yufeng ; Nightingale, Kathryn R.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, 3-D non-linear ultrasound simulations and experimental measurements were used to estimate the range of in situ pressures that can occur during transcutaneous abdominal imaging and to identify the sources of error when estimating in situ peak rarefaction pressures (PRPs) using linear derating, as specified by the mechanical index (MI) guideline. Using simulations, it was found that, for a large transmit aperture (F/1.5), MI consistently over-estimated in situ PRP by 20%–48% primarily owing to phase aberration. For a medium transmit aperture (F/3), the MI accurately estimated the in situ PRP to within 8%. For a small transmit aperture (F/5), MI consistently underestimated the in situ PRP by 32%–50%, with peak locations occurring 1–2 cm before the focal depth, often within the body wall itself. The large variability across body wall samples and focal configurations demonstrates the limitations of the simplified linear derating scheme. The results suggest that patient-specific in situ PRP estimation would allow for increases in transmit pressures, particularly for tightly focused beams, to improve diagnostic image quality while ensuring patient safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-5629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.01.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33722439</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abdominal ultrasound ; In situ pressure ; Measurement techniques ; Mechanical index ; Simulation ; Tissue harmonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology, 2021-06, Vol.47 (6), p.1548-1558</ispartof><rights>2021 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine &amp; Biology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine &amp; Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-4b796808a0c4598d82d1b49f60e31387021d08bd5d408c262c9c3c596db6d5df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-4b796808a0c4598d82d1b49f60e31387021d08bd5d408c262c9c3c596db6d5df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.01.028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33722439$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinton, Gianmarco F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nightingale, Kathryn R.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying the Effect of Abdominal Body Wall on In Situ Peak Rarefaction Pressure During Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging</title><title>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Med Biol</addtitle><description>In this study, 3-D non-linear ultrasound simulations and experimental measurements were used to estimate the range of in situ pressures that can occur during transcutaneous abdominal imaging and to identify the sources of error when estimating in situ peak rarefaction pressures (PRPs) using linear derating, as specified by the mechanical index (MI) guideline. Using simulations, it was found that, for a large transmit aperture (F/1.5), MI consistently over-estimated in situ PRP by 20%–48% primarily owing to phase aberration. For a medium transmit aperture (F/3), the MI accurately estimated the in situ PRP to within 8%. For a small transmit aperture (F/5), MI consistently underestimated the in situ PRP by 32%–50%, with peak locations occurring 1–2 cm before the focal depth, often within the body wall itself. The large variability across body wall samples and focal configurations demonstrates the limitations of the simplified linear derating scheme. The results suggest that patient-specific in situ PRP estimation would allow for increases in transmit pressures, particularly for tightly focused beams, to improve diagnostic image quality while ensuring patient safety.</description><subject>Abdominal ultrasound</subject><subject>In situ pressure</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Mechanical index</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Tissue harmonic imaging</subject><issn>0301-5629</issn><issn>1879-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1vFCEUhonR2G3rXzDEK29me4D5AO9qt9VNmlitjd4RBpiVdQYqMJr997Ldarw0OQkJ73s-3gehVwSWBEh7tl3OY44qTdb0LiwpULKEUpQ_QQvCO1FRQb4-RQtgQKqmpeIIHae0BYCuZd1zdMRYR2nNxAL9-jgrn92wc36D8zeLL4fB6ozDgM97Eybn1YjfBrPDX9Q44uDx2uNbl2d8Y9V3_ElFOyidXRFuok1pjhav5riftnJq40PKTuO7h3vD7A1eT2pT1FP0bFBjsi8e3xN0d3X5-eJ9df3h3fri_LrSNaO5qvtOtBy4Al03ghtODelrMbRgGWG8K9EN8N40pgauaUu10Ew3ojV9Wz4HdoJeH-bex_BjtinLySVtx1F5G-YkaQOE14JCV6xvDlYdQ0oll7yPblJxJwnIPXi5lf-Cl3vwEkpRXppfPu6Z-yL_bf1DuhhWB4MtaX86G2XSznptjYsFuDTB_c-e30ECnB4</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Zhang, Bofeng</creator><creator>Pinton, Gianmarco F.</creator><creator>Deng, Yufeng</creator><creator>Nightingale, Kathryn R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Quantifying the Effect of Abdominal Body Wall on In Situ Peak Rarefaction Pressure During Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging</title><author>Zhang, Bofeng ; Pinton, Gianmarco F. ; Deng, Yufeng ; Nightingale, Kathryn R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-4b796808a0c4598d82d1b49f60e31387021d08bd5d408c262c9c3c596db6d5df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abdominal ultrasound</topic><topic>In situ pressure</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Mechanical index</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Tissue harmonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinton, Gianmarco F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nightingale, Kathryn R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Bofeng</au><au>Pinton, Gianmarco F.</au><au>Deng, Yufeng</au><au>Nightingale, Kathryn R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying the Effect of Abdominal Body Wall on In Situ Peak Rarefaction Pressure During Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Med Biol</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1548</spage><epage>1558</epage><pages>1548-1558</pages><issn>0301-5629</issn><eissn>1879-291X</eissn><abstract>In this study, 3-D non-linear ultrasound simulations and experimental measurements were used to estimate the range of in situ pressures that can occur during transcutaneous abdominal imaging and to identify the sources of error when estimating in situ peak rarefaction pressures (PRPs) using linear derating, as specified by the mechanical index (MI) guideline. Using simulations, it was found that, for a large transmit aperture (F/1.5), MI consistently over-estimated in situ PRP by 20%–48% primarily owing to phase aberration. For a medium transmit aperture (F/3), the MI accurately estimated the in situ PRP to within 8%. For a small transmit aperture (F/5), MI consistently underestimated the in situ PRP by 32%–50%, with peak locations occurring 1–2 cm before the focal depth, often within the body wall itself. The large variability across body wall samples and focal configurations demonstrates the limitations of the simplified linear derating scheme. The results suggest that patient-specific in situ PRP estimation would allow for increases in transmit pressures, particularly for tightly focused beams, to improve diagnostic image quality while ensuring patient safety.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33722439</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.01.028</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-5629
ispartof Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2021-06, Vol.47 (6), p.1548-1558
issn 0301-5629
1879-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501849207
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Abdominal ultrasound
In situ pressure
Measurement techniques
Mechanical index
Simulation
Tissue harmonic imaging
title Quantifying the Effect of Abdominal Body Wall on In Situ Peak Rarefaction Pressure During Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A28%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20the%20Effect%20of%20Abdominal%20Body%20Wall%20on%20In%20Situ%20Peak%20Rarefaction%20Pressure%20During%20Diagnostic%20Ultrasound%20Imaging&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Zhang,%20Bofeng&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1548&rft.epage=1558&rft.pages=1548-1558&rft.issn=0301-5629&rft.eissn=1879-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.01.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501849207%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501849207&rft_id=info:pmid/33722439&rft_els_id=S0301562921000533&rfr_iscdi=true