A New Approach on the pain management of intramuscular injection: A Triple-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Pain management is an important part of care provided by nurses. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an innovative method named the skin traction, pressure, and rapid muscle release (TPR) on reducing IM injection pain compared with the Z-track injection method This triple-blind clin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pain management nursing 2022-06, Vol.23 (3), p.353-358 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 358 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 353 |
container_title | Pain management nursing |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Heshmatifar, Narges Salari, Maryam Rad, Mostafa Afshari Saleh, Tahoura Borzoee, Fateme Rastaghi, Sedighe |
description | Pain management is an important part of care provided by nurses.
The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an innovative method named the skin traction, pressure, and rapid muscle release (TPR) on reducing IM injection pain compared with the Z-track injection method
This triple-blind clinical trial investigated 63 patients who required Methocarbamol injection.
Two, 5-cc methocarbamol injections were given to each patient by the two techniques in two of his/her muscles. In the TPR technique, after applying skin traction and imposing deep pressure on the muscle, the needle was inserted at a 90° angle near the skin and the muscle was released rapidly towards the needle. Hence, the needle was embedded in the muscle. However, muscle release was not applied in the Z-track method. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure pain intensity. For data analysis, T-independent and χ2 tests were used.
The findings showed that the mean pain score in TPR and Z-track methods was 1.68 ± 1.20 and 3.76 ± 1.42, respectively. The difference was statistically significant.
The results of this study showed that the innovative method (TPR) can be used as a substitute for the Z-track method to reduce IM injection pain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.01.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501474837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1524904221000254</els_id><sourcerecordid>2501474837</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-630da0cdfb00dd5fc91528c47ca263aac5da545af19a7df12fd8c3ad0dee8d963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr3DAURkVJaB7tD-gmaJmNp1eSX9OsJkPSBoYGQroWN9J1ImPLjmS3pL8-MpN2GbigB-d-8B3GvghYCRDl13Y19n4lQYoVLAMf2LEolMzqUhUHy13m2RpyecROYmwBhChBfmRHSlUirwCOWbvhP-kP34xjGNA88cHz6Yn4iM7zHj0-Uk9-4kPDnZ8C9nM0c4chvVoykxv8N77h98GNHWWXnfOW36G3Q-_-kuXb9OEMdguA3Sd22GAX6fPbecp-XV_db39ku9vvN9vNLjOqUFNWKrAIxjYPANYWjVmnGrXJK4OyVIimsFjkBTZijZVthGxsbRRasES1XZfqlJ3vc1Ol55nipHsXDXUdehrmqGUBqXxeqyqhYo-aMMQYqNFjcD2GFy1AL4p1q5NivSjWsAyknbO3-PmhJ_t_45_TBFzsAUolfzsKOhpH3pB1ITnTdnDvxL8CbBGNXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501474837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A New Approach on the pain management of intramuscular injection: A Triple-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Heshmatifar, Narges ; Salari, Maryam ; Rad, Mostafa ; Afshari Saleh, Tahoura ; Borzoee, Fateme ; Rastaghi, Sedighe</creator><creatorcontrib>Heshmatifar, Narges ; Salari, Maryam ; Rad, Mostafa ; Afshari Saleh, Tahoura ; Borzoee, Fateme ; Rastaghi, Sedighe</creatorcontrib><description>Pain management is an important part of care provided by nurses.
The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an innovative method named the skin traction, pressure, and rapid muscle release (TPR) on reducing IM injection pain compared with the Z-track injection method
This triple-blind clinical trial investigated 63 patients who required Methocarbamol injection.
Two, 5-cc methocarbamol injections were given to each patient by the two techniques in two of his/her muscles. In the TPR technique, after applying skin traction and imposing deep pressure on the muscle, the needle was inserted at a 90° angle near the skin and the muscle was released rapidly towards the needle. Hence, the needle was embedded in the muscle. However, muscle release was not applied in the Z-track method. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure pain intensity. For data analysis, T-independent and χ2 tests were used.
The findings showed that the mean pain score in TPR and Z-track methods was 1.68 ± 1.20 and 3.76 ± 1.42, respectively. The difference was statistically significant.
The results of this study showed that the innovative method (TPR) can be used as a substitute for the Z-track method to reduce IM injection pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-9042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8635</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.01.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33714700</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Injections ; Intramuscular ; Methods ; Pain ; Tpr</subject><ispartof>Pain management nursing, 2022-06, Vol.23 (3), p.353-358</ispartof><rights>2021 American Society for Pain Management Nursing</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Society for Pain Management Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-630da0cdfb00dd5fc91528c47ca263aac5da545af19a7df12fd8c3ad0dee8d963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-630da0cdfb00dd5fc91528c47ca263aac5da545af19a7df12fd8c3ad0dee8d963</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1069-028X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904221000254$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33714700$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heshmatifar, Narges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salari, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rad, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afshari Saleh, Tahoura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borzoee, Fateme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rastaghi, Sedighe</creatorcontrib><title>A New Approach on the pain management of intramuscular injection: A Triple-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>Pain management nursing</title><addtitle>Pain Manag Nurs</addtitle><description>Pain management is an important part of care provided by nurses.
The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an innovative method named the skin traction, pressure, and rapid muscle release (TPR) on reducing IM injection pain compared with the Z-track injection method
This triple-blind clinical trial investigated 63 patients who required Methocarbamol injection.
Two, 5-cc methocarbamol injections were given to each patient by the two techniques in two of his/her muscles. In the TPR technique, after applying skin traction and imposing deep pressure on the muscle, the needle was inserted at a 90° angle near the skin and the muscle was released rapidly towards the needle. Hence, the needle was embedded in the muscle. However, muscle release was not applied in the Z-track method. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure pain intensity. For data analysis, T-independent and χ2 tests were used.
The findings showed that the mean pain score in TPR and Z-track methods was 1.68 ± 1.20 and 3.76 ± 1.42, respectively. The difference was statistically significant.
The results of this study showed that the innovative method (TPR) can be used as a substitute for the Z-track method to reduce IM injection pain.</description><subject>Injections</subject><subject>Intramuscular</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Tpr</subject><issn>1524-9042</issn><issn>1532-8635</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtr3DAURkVJaB7tD-gmaJmNp1eSX9OsJkPSBoYGQroWN9J1ImPLjmS3pL8-MpN2GbigB-d-8B3GvghYCRDl13Y19n4lQYoVLAMf2LEolMzqUhUHy13m2RpyecROYmwBhChBfmRHSlUirwCOWbvhP-kP34xjGNA88cHz6Yn4iM7zHj0-Uk9-4kPDnZ8C9nM0c4chvVoykxv8N77h98GNHWWXnfOW36G3Q-_-kuXb9OEMdguA3Sd22GAX6fPbecp-XV_db39ku9vvN9vNLjOqUFNWKrAIxjYPANYWjVmnGrXJK4OyVIimsFjkBTZijZVthGxsbRRasES1XZfqlJ3vc1Ol55nipHsXDXUdehrmqGUBqXxeqyqhYo-aMMQYqNFjcD2GFy1AL4p1q5NivSjWsAyknbO3-PmhJ_t_45_TBFzsAUolfzsKOhpH3pB1ITnTdnDvxL8CbBGNXA</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Heshmatifar, Narges</creator><creator>Salari, Maryam</creator><creator>Rad, Mostafa</creator><creator>Afshari Saleh, Tahoura</creator><creator>Borzoee, Fateme</creator><creator>Rastaghi, Sedighe</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1069-028X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>A New Approach on the pain management of intramuscular injection: A Triple-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Heshmatifar, Narges ; Salari, Maryam ; Rad, Mostafa ; Afshari Saleh, Tahoura ; Borzoee, Fateme ; Rastaghi, Sedighe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-630da0cdfb00dd5fc91528c47ca263aac5da545af19a7df12fd8c3ad0dee8d963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Injections</topic><topic>Intramuscular</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Tpr</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heshmatifar, Narges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salari, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rad, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afshari Saleh, Tahoura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borzoee, Fateme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rastaghi, Sedighe</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain management nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heshmatifar, Narges</au><au>Salari, Maryam</au><au>Rad, Mostafa</au><au>Afshari Saleh, Tahoura</au><au>Borzoee, Fateme</au><au>Rastaghi, Sedighe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A New Approach on the pain management of intramuscular injection: A Triple-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Pain management nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Manag Nurs</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>353-358</pages><issn>1524-9042</issn><eissn>1532-8635</eissn><abstract>Pain management is an important part of care provided by nurses.
The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an innovative method named the skin traction, pressure, and rapid muscle release (TPR) on reducing IM injection pain compared with the Z-track injection method
This triple-blind clinical trial investigated 63 patients who required Methocarbamol injection.
Two, 5-cc methocarbamol injections were given to each patient by the two techniques in two of his/her muscles. In the TPR technique, after applying skin traction and imposing deep pressure on the muscle, the needle was inserted at a 90° angle near the skin and the muscle was released rapidly towards the needle. Hence, the needle was embedded in the muscle. However, muscle release was not applied in the Z-track method. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure pain intensity. For data analysis, T-independent and χ2 tests were used.
The findings showed that the mean pain score in TPR and Z-track methods was 1.68 ± 1.20 and 3.76 ± 1.42, respectively. The difference was statistically significant.
The results of this study showed that the innovative method (TPR) can be used as a substitute for the Z-track method to reduce IM injection pain.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33714700</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pmn.2021.01.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1069-028X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1524-9042 |
ispartof | Pain management nursing, 2022-06, Vol.23 (3), p.353-358 |
issn | 1524-9042 1532-8635 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501474837 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Injections Intramuscular Methods Pain Tpr |
title | A New Approach on the pain management of intramuscular injection: A Triple-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A36%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20New%20Approach%20on%20the%20pain%20management%20of%20intramuscular%20injection:%20A%20Triple-Blind%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Pain%20management%20nursing&rft.au=Heshmatifar,%20Narges&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=353-358&rft.issn=1524-9042&rft.eissn=1532-8635&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pmn.2021.01.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501474837%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501474837&rft_id=info:pmid/33714700&rft_els_id=S1524904221000254&rfr_iscdi=true |