Are the target exposure index and deviation index used efficiently?
Exposure index (EI) is important to evaluate correct exposure in radiography and thus important for image quality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the target exposure index (EIT) and deviation index (DI) were used efficiently. Radiography departments in Iceland, using
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Radiography (London, England. 1995) England. 1995), 2021-08, Vol.27 (3), p.903-907 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 907 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 903 |
| container_title | Radiography (London, England. 1995) |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Guðjónsdóttir, J. Paalsson, K.E. Sveinsdóttir, G.P. |
| description | Exposure index (EI) is important to evaluate correct exposure in radiography and thus important for image quality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the target exposure index (EIT) and deviation index (DI) were used efficiently.
Radiography departments in Iceland, using |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.radi.2021.02.012 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501268672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1078817421000201</els_id><sourcerecordid>2501268672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4ed8e6231afa977b1c6a8b3221b796c47f916066d68691708d9ef02b5e2450103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AQ-So5fE2Umym4AgpfgFBS96XjbZiW5pk7qblPbfu6XVo4dhh-F5X9iHsWsOCQcu7haJ08YmCMgTwAQ4nrAxz1OMsUj5adhBFnHBZTZiF94vAAAzLM7ZKE0lSMhhzGZTR1H_FUa7T-oj2q47P4SbbQ1tI92ayNDG6t527fE2eDIRNY2tLbX9cvdwyc4avfR0dXwn7OPp8X32Es_fnl9n03lcp7no44xMQQJTrhtdSlnxWuiiShF5JUtRZ7IpuQAhjChEySUUpqQGsMoJsxw4pBN2e-hdu-57IN-rlfU1LZe6pW7wCgOFISwxoHhAa9d576hRa2dX2u0UB7WXpxZqL0_t5SlAFZIhdHPsH6oVmb_Ir60A3B8ACr_cWHLK7x3UZKyjulems__1_wC0iX6R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501268672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are the target exposure index and deviation index used efficiently?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Guðjónsdóttir, J. ; Paalsson, K.E. ; Sveinsdóttir, G.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Guðjónsdóttir, J. ; Paalsson, K.E. ; Sveinsdóttir, G.P.</creatorcontrib><description>Exposure index (EI) is important to evaluate correct exposure in radiography and thus important for image quality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the target exposure index (EIT) and deviation index (DI) were used efficiently.
Radiography departments in Iceland, using <10 years old equipment, were invited to participate. For each x-ray unit, admin users were asked about the use of EIT and data was gathered on EIT for five body parts (BP); lumbar spine, chest, hip, knee and hand. For each of the five BP, 100 examinations from the past year were selected randomly (or all, if < 100). The EI from one predefined view was recorded and the corresponding DI calculated.
A total of ten x-ray units, from four manufacturers and located at eight departments, were included in the study. The departments involved are comprised of a university hospital, smaller hospitals, and miscellaneous private departments. Two departments (25%) had not set EIT, five (62.5%) used default values and only one had revised EIT values. In four departments (50%) radiographers favored “acceptable EI range” over DI.
The mean EI was significantly different (p < 0.05) from the EIT in the majority of the five BP, in four out of the six departments that had defined EIT. In total 30% of images from all departments combined had DI outside the range of −3.0 < DI < +3.0. The standard deviation of DI was from 1.4 to 2.7.
The study shows that the EIT and DI are not used efficiently, regardless of equipment vendor or department characteristics.
Current recommendations on targeting the mean DI of 0 need to be reinforced. Theoretical knowledge and training need to be improved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-8174</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.02.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33707050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Digital radiography ; Dose indicator ; Dose optimization ; Radiation exposure</subject><ispartof>Radiography (London, England. 1995), 2021-08, Vol.27 (3), p.903-907</ispartof><rights>2021 The College of Radiographers</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4ed8e6231afa977b1c6a8b3221b796c47f916066d68691708d9ef02b5e2450103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4ed8e6231afa977b1c6a8b3221b796c47f916066d68691708d9ef02b5e2450103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.02.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33707050$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guðjónsdóttir, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paalsson, K.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveinsdóttir, G.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Are the target exposure index and deviation index used efficiently?</title><title>Radiography (London, England. 1995)</title><addtitle>Radiography (Lond)</addtitle><description>Exposure index (EI) is important to evaluate correct exposure in radiography and thus important for image quality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the target exposure index (EIT) and deviation index (DI) were used efficiently.
Radiography departments in Iceland, using <10 years old equipment, were invited to participate. For each x-ray unit, admin users were asked about the use of EIT and data was gathered on EIT for five body parts (BP); lumbar spine, chest, hip, knee and hand. For each of the five BP, 100 examinations from the past year were selected randomly (or all, if < 100). The EI from one predefined view was recorded and the corresponding DI calculated.
A total of ten x-ray units, from four manufacturers and located at eight departments, were included in the study. The departments involved are comprised of a university hospital, smaller hospitals, and miscellaneous private departments. Two departments (25%) had not set EIT, five (62.5%) used default values and only one had revised EIT values. In four departments (50%) radiographers favored “acceptable EI range” over DI.
The mean EI was significantly different (p < 0.05) from the EIT in the majority of the five BP, in four out of the six departments that had defined EIT. In total 30% of images from all departments combined had DI outside the range of −3.0 < DI < +3.0. The standard deviation of DI was from 1.4 to 2.7.
The study shows that the EIT and DI are not used efficiently, regardless of equipment vendor or department characteristics.
Current recommendations on targeting the mean DI of 0 need to be reinforced. Theoretical knowledge and training need to be improved.</description><subject>Digital radiography</subject><subject>Dose indicator</subject><subject>Dose optimization</subject><subject>Radiation exposure</subject><issn>1078-8174</issn><issn>1532-2831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AQ-So5fE2Umym4AgpfgFBS96XjbZiW5pk7qblPbfu6XVo4dhh-F5X9iHsWsOCQcu7haJ08YmCMgTwAQ4nrAxz1OMsUj5adhBFnHBZTZiF94vAAAzLM7ZKE0lSMhhzGZTR1H_FUa7T-oj2q47P4SbbQ1tI92ayNDG6t527fE2eDIRNY2tLbX9cvdwyc4avfR0dXwn7OPp8X32Es_fnl9n03lcp7no44xMQQJTrhtdSlnxWuiiShF5JUtRZ7IpuQAhjChEySUUpqQGsMoJsxw4pBN2e-hdu-57IN-rlfU1LZe6pW7wCgOFISwxoHhAa9d576hRa2dX2u0UB7WXpxZqL0_t5SlAFZIhdHPsH6oVmb_Ir60A3B8ACr_cWHLK7x3UZKyjulems__1_wC0iX6R</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Guðjónsdóttir, J.</creator><creator>Paalsson, K.E.</creator><creator>Sveinsdóttir, G.P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Are the target exposure index and deviation index used efficiently?</title><author>Guðjónsdóttir, J. ; Paalsson, K.E. ; Sveinsdóttir, G.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4ed8e6231afa977b1c6a8b3221b796c47f916066d68691708d9ef02b5e2450103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Digital radiography</topic><topic>Dose indicator</topic><topic>Dose optimization</topic><topic>Radiation exposure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guðjónsdóttir, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paalsson, K.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveinsdóttir, G.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiography (London, England. 1995)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guðjónsdóttir, J.</au><au>Paalsson, K.E.</au><au>Sveinsdóttir, G.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are the target exposure index and deviation index used efficiently?</atitle><jtitle>Radiography (London, England. 1995)</jtitle><addtitle>Radiography (Lond)</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>903</spage><epage>907</epage><pages>903-907</pages><issn>1078-8174</issn><eissn>1532-2831</eissn><abstract>Exposure index (EI) is important to evaluate correct exposure in radiography and thus important for image quality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the target exposure index (EIT) and deviation index (DI) were used efficiently.
Radiography departments in Iceland, using <10 years old equipment, were invited to participate. For each x-ray unit, admin users were asked about the use of EIT and data was gathered on EIT for five body parts (BP); lumbar spine, chest, hip, knee and hand. For each of the five BP, 100 examinations from the past year were selected randomly (or all, if < 100). The EI from one predefined view was recorded and the corresponding DI calculated.
A total of ten x-ray units, from four manufacturers and located at eight departments, were included in the study. The departments involved are comprised of a university hospital, smaller hospitals, and miscellaneous private departments. Two departments (25%) had not set EIT, five (62.5%) used default values and only one had revised EIT values. In four departments (50%) radiographers favored “acceptable EI range” over DI.
The mean EI was significantly different (p < 0.05) from the EIT in the majority of the five BP, in four out of the six departments that had defined EIT. In total 30% of images from all departments combined had DI outside the range of −3.0 < DI < +3.0. The standard deviation of DI was from 1.4 to 2.7.
The study shows that the EIT and DI are not used efficiently, regardless of equipment vendor or department characteristics.
Current recommendations on targeting the mean DI of 0 need to be reinforced. Theoretical knowledge and training need to be improved.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33707050</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.radi.2021.02.012</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1078-8174 |
| ispartof | Radiography (London, England. 1995), 2021-08, Vol.27 (3), p.903-907 |
| issn | 1078-8174 1532-2831 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501268672 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Digital radiography Dose indicator Dose optimization Radiation exposure |
| title | Are the target exposure index and deviation index used efficiently? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A06%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20the%20target%20exposure%20index%20and%20deviation%20index%20used%20efficiently?&rft.jtitle=Radiography%20(London,%20England.%201995)&rft.au=Gu%C3%B0j%C3%B3nsd%C3%B3ttir,%20J.&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=903&rft.epage=907&rft.pages=903-907&rft.issn=1078-8174&rft.eissn=1532-2831&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radi.2021.02.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501268672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501268672&rft_id=info:pmid/33707050&rft_els_id=S1078817421000201&rfr_iscdi=true |