Impact of maternal underweight on obstetric and neonatal prognosis: A retrospective study

Maternal underweight (BMI < 18.5) is an uncommon situation with potentially serious obstetric consequences, though data in the literature are scarce. To compare the obstetrical prognosis of patients with normal BMI and BMI < 18.5. We performed a retrospective study in France (Normandy). We inc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2021-05, Vol.260, p.6-9
Hauptverfasser: Salmon, Capucine, Thibon, Pascal, Prime, Ludovic, Renouf, Solène, Dreyfus, Michel, Dolley, Patricia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue
container_start_page 6
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
container_volume 260
creator Salmon, Capucine
Thibon, Pascal
Prime, Ludovic
Renouf, Solène
Dreyfus, Michel
Dolley, Patricia
description Maternal underweight (BMI < 18.5) is an uncommon situation with potentially serious obstetric consequences, though data in the literature are scarce. To compare the obstetrical prognosis of patients with normal BMI and BMI < 18.5. We performed a retrospective study in France (Normandy). We included 14,246 patients between January 2011 and November 2017, among whom 12,648 (88.8 %) had normal BMI, 1269 were considered mild underweight (17 ≤ BMI < 18.5 kg/m²) and 329 (2.3 %) were considered severe to moderate underweight (BMI < 17 kg/m²). The risk of preterm birth was all the greater as the thinness was severe (ORa: 1.34 [1.12−1.60] and ORa 1.77 [1.31−2.34]) and the risk of intrauterine growth retardation also increased with severe thinness (ORa: 1.63 [1.35−1.96] and ORa 2.28 [1.69−3.07]). The risk of a caesarean section or scheduled labour was no different. Neonatal parameters were comparable between the groups. Our study confirms an increased risk of preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation with increased thinness after adjusting for confounding factors. This link had only been shown previously in 2 studies Neither the type of prematurity (induced or spontaneous) nor the severity of prematurity is influenced by the severity of thinness; however, the low prevalence of thinness limits the power of these data. It would be interesting to study the medico-economic relevance of a policy of close maternal-foetal surveillance in this target population.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501267395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211520308344</els_id><sourcerecordid>2501267395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-be946335f8f3ef471aa9afd7fd5926b1da671fb5e8154a66f849d6224ccbc40e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWqv_QCRHL1vztdmuB6EUPwqCFz14CtlkUlO6uzXJVvz3Rlo9OpfA8MzMmwehC0omlFB5vZrAql-GZsIIyy02IYIcoBGdVqyoZCkO0YhwQgtGaXmCTmNckVyc18fohPOKSMbkCL0t2o02CfcOtzpB6PQaD52F8Al--Z77He6bmCAFb7DuLO6g73TK1Cb0y66PPt7gGQ4Z6OMGTPJbwDEN9usMHTm9jnC-f8fo9f7uZf5YPD0_LOazp8JwyVLRQC0k56WbOg5OVFTrWjtbOVvWTDbUallR15QwpaXQUrqpqG3OLoxpjCDAx-hqtzcH-hggJtX6aGC91jnqEBUrCWWy4nWZUbFDTQ4bAzi1Cb7V4UtRon6kqpXaSVU_UhVlKkvNY5f7C0PTgv0b-rWYgdsdAPmfWw9BReOhM2B9yEqU7f3_F74B5-aLgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501267395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of maternal underweight on obstetric and neonatal prognosis: A retrospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Salmon, Capucine ; Thibon, Pascal ; Prime, Ludovic ; Renouf, Solène ; Dreyfus, Michel ; Dolley, Patricia</creator><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Capucine ; Thibon, Pascal ; Prime, Ludovic ; Renouf, Solène ; Dreyfus, Michel ; Dolley, Patricia</creatorcontrib><description>Maternal underweight (BMI &lt; 18.5) is an uncommon situation with potentially serious obstetric consequences, though data in the literature are scarce. To compare the obstetrical prognosis of patients with normal BMI and BMI &lt; 18.5. We performed a retrospective study in France (Normandy). We included 14,246 patients between January 2011 and November 2017, among whom 12,648 (88.8 %) had normal BMI, 1269 were considered mild underweight (17 ≤ BMI &lt; 18.5 kg/m²) and 329 (2.3 %) were considered severe to moderate underweight (BMI &lt; 17 kg/m²). The risk of preterm birth was all the greater as the thinness was severe (ORa: 1.34 [1.12−1.60] and ORa 1.77 [1.31−2.34]) and the risk of intrauterine growth retardation also increased with severe thinness (ORa: 1.63 [1.35−1.96] and ORa 2.28 [1.69−3.07]). The risk of a caesarean section or scheduled labour was no different. Neonatal parameters were comparable between the groups. Our study confirms an increased risk of preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation with increased thinness after adjusting for confounding factors. This link had only been shown previously in 2 studies Neither the type of prematurity (induced or spontaneous) nor the severity of prematurity is influenced by the severity of thinness; however, the low prevalence of thinness limits the power of these data. It would be interesting to study the medico-economic relevance of a policy of close maternal-foetal surveillance in this target population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33706226</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Body Mass Index ; Cesarean Section ; Female ; France - epidemiology ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Neonatal issues ; Obstetrical complications ; Pregnancy ; Premature Birth - epidemiology ; Premature Birth - etiology ; Preterm birth ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Thinness ; Thinness - epidemiology ; Underweight</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology, 2021-05, Vol.260, p.6-9</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-be946335f8f3ef471aa9afd7fd5926b1da671fb5e8154a66f849d6224ccbc40e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-be946335f8f3ef471aa9afd7fd5926b1da671fb5e8154a66f849d6224ccbc40e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4342-4391</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211520308344$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33706226$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Capucine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thibon, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prime, Ludovic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renouf, Solène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreyfus, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolley, Patricia</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of maternal underweight on obstetric and neonatal prognosis: A retrospective study</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Maternal underweight (BMI &lt; 18.5) is an uncommon situation with potentially serious obstetric consequences, though data in the literature are scarce. To compare the obstetrical prognosis of patients with normal BMI and BMI &lt; 18.5. We performed a retrospective study in France (Normandy). We included 14,246 patients between January 2011 and November 2017, among whom 12,648 (88.8 %) had normal BMI, 1269 were considered mild underweight (17 ≤ BMI &lt; 18.5 kg/m²) and 329 (2.3 %) were considered severe to moderate underweight (BMI &lt; 17 kg/m²). The risk of preterm birth was all the greater as the thinness was severe (ORa: 1.34 [1.12−1.60] and ORa 1.77 [1.31−2.34]) and the risk of intrauterine growth retardation also increased with severe thinness (ORa: 1.63 [1.35−1.96] and ORa 2.28 [1.69−3.07]). The risk of a caesarean section or scheduled labour was no different. Neonatal parameters were comparable between the groups. Our study confirms an increased risk of preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation with increased thinness after adjusting for confounding factors. This link had only been shown previously in 2 studies Neither the type of prematurity (induced or spontaneous) nor the severity of prematurity is influenced by the severity of thinness; however, the low prevalence of thinness limits the power of these data. It would be interesting to study the medico-economic relevance of a policy of close maternal-foetal surveillance in this target population.</description><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Neonatal issues</subject><subject>Obstetrical complications</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Premature Birth - epidemiology</subject><subject>Premature Birth - etiology</subject><subject>Preterm birth</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Thinness</subject><subject>Thinness - epidemiology</subject><subject>Underweight</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWqv_QCRHL1vztdmuB6EUPwqCFz14CtlkUlO6uzXJVvz3Rlo9OpfA8MzMmwehC0omlFB5vZrAql-GZsIIyy02IYIcoBGdVqyoZCkO0YhwQgtGaXmCTmNckVyc18fohPOKSMbkCL0t2o02CfcOtzpB6PQaD52F8Al--Z77He6bmCAFb7DuLO6g73TK1Cb0y66PPt7gGQ4Z6OMGTPJbwDEN9usMHTm9jnC-f8fo9f7uZf5YPD0_LOazp8JwyVLRQC0k56WbOg5OVFTrWjtbOVvWTDbUallR15QwpaXQUrqpqG3OLoxpjCDAx-hqtzcH-hggJtX6aGC91jnqEBUrCWWy4nWZUbFDTQ4bAzi1Cb7V4UtRon6kqpXaSVU_UhVlKkvNY5f7C0PTgv0b-rWYgdsdAPmfWw9BReOhM2B9yEqU7f3_F74B5-aLgw</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Salmon, Capucine</creator><creator>Thibon, Pascal</creator><creator>Prime, Ludovic</creator><creator>Renouf, Solène</creator><creator>Dreyfus, Michel</creator><creator>Dolley, Patricia</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4342-4391</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Impact of maternal underweight on obstetric and neonatal prognosis: A retrospective study</title><author>Salmon, Capucine ; Thibon, Pascal ; Prime, Ludovic ; Renouf, Solène ; Dreyfus, Michel ; Dolley, Patricia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-be946335f8f3ef471aa9afd7fd5926b1da671fb5e8154a66f849d6224ccbc40e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Neonatal issues</topic><topic>Obstetrical complications</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Premature Birth - epidemiology</topic><topic>Premature Birth - etiology</topic><topic>Preterm birth</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Thinness</topic><topic>Thinness - epidemiology</topic><topic>Underweight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Capucine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thibon, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prime, Ludovic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renouf, Solène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreyfus, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolley, Patricia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salmon, Capucine</au><au>Thibon, Pascal</au><au>Prime, Ludovic</au><au>Renouf, Solène</au><au>Dreyfus, Michel</au><au>Dolley, Patricia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of maternal underweight on obstetric and neonatal prognosis: A retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>260</volume><spage>6</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>6-9</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>Maternal underweight (BMI &lt; 18.5) is an uncommon situation with potentially serious obstetric consequences, though data in the literature are scarce. To compare the obstetrical prognosis of patients with normal BMI and BMI &lt; 18.5. We performed a retrospective study in France (Normandy). We included 14,246 patients between January 2011 and November 2017, among whom 12,648 (88.8 %) had normal BMI, 1269 were considered mild underweight (17 ≤ BMI &lt; 18.5 kg/m²) and 329 (2.3 %) were considered severe to moderate underweight (BMI &lt; 17 kg/m²). The risk of preterm birth was all the greater as the thinness was severe (ORa: 1.34 [1.12−1.60] and ORa 1.77 [1.31−2.34]) and the risk of intrauterine growth retardation also increased with severe thinness (ORa: 1.63 [1.35−1.96] and ORa 2.28 [1.69−3.07]). The risk of a caesarean section or scheduled labour was no different. Neonatal parameters were comparable between the groups. Our study confirms an increased risk of preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation with increased thinness after adjusting for confounding factors. This link had only been shown previously in 2 studies Neither the type of prematurity (induced or spontaneous) nor the severity of prematurity is influenced by the severity of thinness; however, the low prevalence of thinness limits the power of these data. It would be interesting to study the medico-economic relevance of a policy of close maternal-foetal surveillance in this target population.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33706226</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.040</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4342-4391</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2021-05, Vol.260, p.6-9
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501267395
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Body Mass Index
Cesarean Section
Female
France - epidemiology
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Neonatal issues
Obstetrical complications
Pregnancy
Premature Birth - epidemiology
Premature Birth - etiology
Preterm birth
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Thinness
Thinness - epidemiology
Underweight
title Impact of maternal underweight on obstetric and neonatal prognosis: A retrospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A10%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20maternal%20underweight%20on%20obstetric%20and%20neonatal%20prognosis:%20A%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Salmon,%20Capucine&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=260&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=6-9&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501267395%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501267395&rft_id=info:pmid/33706226&rft_els_id=S0301211520308344&rfr_iscdi=true