Gender Differences in Milestone Ratings and Medical Knowledge Examination Scores Among Internal Medicine Residents

To examine whether there are group differences in milestone ratings submitted by program directors working with clinical competency committees (CCCs) based on gender for internal medicine (IM) residents and whether women and men rated similarly on milestones perform comparably on subsequent in-train...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic Medicine 2021-06, Vol.96 (6), p.876-884
Hauptverfasser: Hauer, Karen E., Jurich, Daniel, Vandergrift, Jonathan, Lipner, Rebecca S., McDonald, Furman S., Yamazaki, Kenji, Chick, Davoren, McAllister, Kevin, Holmboe, Eric S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 884
container_issue 6
container_start_page 876
container_title Academic Medicine
container_volume 96
creator Hauer, Karen E.
Jurich, Daniel
Vandergrift, Jonathan
Lipner, Rebecca S.
McDonald, Furman S.
Yamazaki, Kenji
Chick, Davoren
McAllister, Kevin
Holmboe, Eric S.
description To examine whether there are group differences in milestone ratings submitted by program directors working with clinical competency committees (CCCs) based on gender for internal medicine (IM) residents and whether women and men rated similarly on milestones perform comparably on subsequent in-training and certification examinations. This national retrospective study examined end-of-year medical knowledge (MK) and patient care (PC) milestone ratings and IM In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) and IM Certification Examination (IM-CE) scores for 2 cohorts (2014-2017, 2015-2018) of U.S. IM residents at ACGME-accredited programs. It included 20,098/21,440 (94%) residents, with 9,424 women (47%) and 10,674 men (53%). Descriptive statistics and differential prediction techniques using hierarchical linear models were performed. For MK milestone ratings in PGY-1, men and women showed no statistical difference at a significance level of .01 (P = .02). In PGY-2 and PGY-3, men received statistically higher average MK ratings than women (P = .002 and P < .001, respectively). In contrast, men and women received equivalent average PC ratings in each PGY (P = .47, P = .72, and P = .80, for PGY-1, PGY-2, and PGY-3, respectively). Men slightly outperformed women with similar MK or PC ratings in PGY-1 and PGY-2 on the IM-ITE by about 1.7 and 1.5 percentage points, respectively, after adjusting for covariates. For PGY-3 ratings, women and men with similar milestone ratings performed equivalently on the IM-CE. Milestone ratings were largely similar for women and men. Generally, women and men with similar MK or PC milestone ratings performed similarly on future examinations. Although there were small differences favoring men on earlier examinations, these differences disappeared by the final training year. It is questionable whether these small differences are educationally or clinically meaningful. The findings suggest fair, unbiased milestone ratings generated by program directors and CCCs assessing residents.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501266555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501266555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-f01465e806978c17ed3840342decca2b5cccdce0413e118970ea55c52d2a90be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9PGzEQxa2qqEDgGyDkYy-b-u-u9xilgSKIkGiRuK0ceza49drU3ijw7esAhaqeg8ej9541P4ROKJlS0jZfZvPllPxzRKkP6IC2XFWKqLuPpS-jiglR76PDnH8WUd1I_gntc95QqgQ9QOkcgoWEv7q-hwTBQMYu4KXzkMcYAN_o0YV1xjpYvATrjPb4MsStB7sGvHjUgwtFEgP-bmIq7tkQwxpfhBFSKNpnj9sFQXYWwpiP0F6vfYbj13uCbs8WP-bfqqvr84v57KoyvFWy6gkVtQRF6rZRhjZguRKEC2bBGM1W0hhjDRBBOZRl2oaAltJIZpluyQr4BH1-yX1I8femrNMNLhvwXgeIm9wxSSirayllkYoXqUkx5wR995DcoNNTR0m3o90V2t3_tIvt9PWHzWoA-2b6i_c9dxt94ZF_-c0WUncP2o_3z3lUKVUxwiipy6vaJUv-B1hhipY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501266555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender Differences in Milestone Ratings and Medical Knowledge Examination Scores Among Internal Medicine Residents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hauer, Karen E. ; Jurich, Daniel ; Vandergrift, Jonathan ; Lipner, Rebecca S. ; McDonald, Furman S. ; Yamazaki, Kenji ; Chick, Davoren ; McAllister, Kevin ; Holmboe, Eric S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hauer, Karen E. ; Jurich, Daniel ; Vandergrift, Jonathan ; Lipner, Rebecca S. ; McDonald, Furman S. ; Yamazaki, Kenji ; Chick, Davoren ; McAllister, Kevin ; Holmboe, Eric S.</creatorcontrib><description>To examine whether there are group differences in milestone ratings submitted by program directors working with clinical competency committees (CCCs) based on gender for internal medicine (IM) residents and whether women and men rated similarly on milestones perform comparably on subsequent in-training and certification examinations. This national retrospective study examined end-of-year medical knowledge (MK) and patient care (PC) milestone ratings and IM In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) and IM Certification Examination (IM-CE) scores for 2 cohorts (2014-2017, 2015-2018) of U.S. IM residents at ACGME-accredited programs. It included 20,098/21,440 (94%) residents, with 9,424 women (47%) and 10,674 men (53%). Descriptive statistics and differential prediction techniques using hierarchical linear models were performed. For MK milestone ratings in PGY-1, men and women showed no statistical difference at a significance level of .01 (P = .02). In PGY-2 and PGY-3, men received statistically higher average MK ratings than women (P = .002 and P &lt; .001, respectively). In contrast, men and women received equivalent average PC ratings in each PGY (P = .47, P = .72, and P = .80, for PGY-1, PGY-2, and PGY-3, respectively). Men slightly outperformed women with similar MK or PC ratings in PGY-1 and PGY-2 on the IM-ITE by about 1.7 and 1.5 percentage points, respectively, after adjusting for covariates. For PGY-3 ratings, women and men with similar milestone ratings performed equivalently on the IM-CE. Milestone ratings were largely similar for women and men. Generally, women and men with similar MK or PC milestone ratings performed similarly on future examinations. Although there were small differences favoring men on earlier examinations, these differences disappeared by the final training year. It is questionable whether these small differences are educationally or clinically meaningful. The findings suggest fair, unbiased milestone ratings generated by program directors and CCCs assessing residents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-2446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-808X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33711841</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Certification ; Clinical Competence ; Educational Measurement ; Female ; Humans ; Internal Medicine - education ; Internship and Residency ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Sex Factors ; Sexism ; United States</subject><ispartof>Academic Medicine, 2021-06, Vol.96 (6), p.876-884</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 by the Association of American Medical Colleges.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-f01465e806978c17ed3840342decca2b5cccdce0413e118970ea55c52d2a90be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-f01465e806978c17ed3840342decca2b5cccdce0413e118970ea55c52d2a90be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00001888-202106000-00045$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00001888-202106000-00045$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4609,27924,27925,64666,65461</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33711841$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hauer, Karen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurich, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandergrift, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipner, Rebecca S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Furman S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chick, Davoren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAllister, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmboe, Eric S.</creatorcontrib><title>Gender Differences in Milestone Ratings and Medical Knowledge Examination Scores Among Internal Medicine Residents</title><title>Academic Medicine</title><addtitle>Acad Med</addtitle><description>To examine whether there are group differences in milestone ratings submitted by program directors working with clinical competency committees (CCCs) based on gender for internal medicine (IM) residents and whether women and men rated similarly on milestones perform comparably on subsequent in-training and certification examinations. This national retrospective study examined end-of-year medical knowledge (MK) and patient care (PC) milestone ratings and IM In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) and IM Certification Examination (IM-CE) scores for 2 cohorts (2014-2017, 2015-2018) of U.S. IM residents at ACGME-accredited programs. It included 20,098/21,440 (94%) residents, with 9,424 women (47%) and 10,674 men (53%). Descriptive statistics and differential prediction techniques using hierarchical linear models were performed. For MK milestone ratings in PGY-1, men and women showed no statistical difference at a significance level of .01 (P = .02). In PGY-2 and PGY-3, men received statistically higher average MK ratings than women (P = .002 and P &lt; .001, respectively). In contrast, men and women received equivalent average PC ratings in each PGY (P = .47, P = .72, and P = .80, for PGY-1, PGY-2, and PGY-3, respectively). Men slightly outperformed women with similar MK or PC ratings in PGY-1 and PGY-2 on the IM-ITE by about 1.7 and 1.5 percentage points, respectively, after adjusting for covariates. For PGY-3 ratings, women and men with similar milestone ratings performed equivalently on the IM-CE. Milestone ratings were largely similar for women and men. Generally, women and men with similar MK or PC milestone ratings performed similarly on future examinations. Although there were small differences favoring men on earlier examinations, these differences disappeared by the final training year. It is questionable whether these small differences are educationally or clinically meaningful. The findings suggest fair, unbiased milestone ratings generated by program directors and CCCs assessing residents.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine - education</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Sexism</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1040-2446</issn><issn>1938-808X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE9PGzEQxa2qqEDgGyDkYy-b-u-u9xilgSKIkGiRuK0ceza49drU3ijw7esAhaqeg8ej9541P4ROKJlS0jZfZvPllPxzRKkP6IC2XFWKqLuPpS-jiglR76PDnH8WUd1I_gntc95QqgQ9QOkcgoWEv7q-hwTBQMYu4KXzkMcYAN_o0YV1xjpYvATrjPb4MsStB7sGvHjUgwtFEgP-bmIq7tkQwxpfhBFSKNpnj9sFQXYWwpiP0F6vfYbj13uCbs8WP-bfqqvr84v57KoyvFWy6gkVtQRF6rZRhjZguRKEC2bBGM1W0hhjDRBBOZRl2oaAltJIZpluyQr4BH1-yX1I8femrNMNLhvwXgeIm9wxSSirayllkYoXqUkx5wR995DcoNNTR0m3o90V2t3_tIvt9PWHzWoA-2b6i_c9dxt94ZF_-c0WUncP2o_3z3lUKVUxwiipy6vaJUv-B1hhipY</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Hauer, Karen E.</creator><creator>Jurich, Daniel</creator><creator>Vandergrift, Jonathan</creator><creator>Lipner, Rebecca S.</creator><creator>McDonald, Furman S.</creator><creator>Yamazaki, Kenji</creator><creator>Chick, Davoren</creator><creator>McAllister, Kevin</creator><creator>Holmboe, Eric S.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Gender Differences in Milestone Ratings and Medical Knowledge Examination Scores Among Internal Medicine Residents</title><author>Hauer, Karen E. ; Jurich, Daniel ; Vandergrift, Jonathan ; Lipner, Rebecca S. ; McDonald, Furman S. ; Yamazaki, Kenji ; Chick, Davoren ; McAllister, Kevin ; Holmboe, Eric S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-f01465e806978c17ed3840342decca2b5cccdce0413e118970ea55c52d2a90be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine - education</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Sexism</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hauer, Karen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurich, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandergrift, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipner, Rebecca S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Furman S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chick, Davoren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAllister, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmboe, Eric S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hauer, Karen E.</au><au>Jurich, Daniel</au><au>Vandergrift, Jonathan</au><au>Lipner, Rebecca S.</au><au>McDonald, Furman S.</au><au>Yamazaki, Kenji</au><au>Chick, Davoren</au><au>McAllister, Kevin</au><au>Holmboe, Eric S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender Differences in Milestone Ratings and Medical Knowledge Examination Scores Among Internal Medicine Residents</atitle><jtitle>Academic Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Med</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>876</spage><epage>884</epage><pages>876-884</pages><issn>1040-2446</issn><eissn>1938-808X</eissn><abstract>To examine whether there are group differences in milestone ratings submitted by program directors working with clinical competency committees (CCCs) based on gender for internal medicine (IM) residents and whether women and men rated similarly on milestones perform comparably on subsequent in-training and certification examinations. This national retrospective study examined end-of-year medical knowledge (MK) and patient care (PC) milestone ratings and IM In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) and IM Certification Examination (IM-CE) scores for 2 cohorts (2014-2017, 2015-2018) of U.S. IM residents at ACGME-accredited programs. It included 20,098/21,440 (94%) residents, with 9,424 women (47%) and 10,674 men (53%). Descriptive statistics and differential prediction techniques using hierarchical linear models were performed. For MK milestone ratings in PGY-1, men and women showed no statistical difference at a significance level of .01 (P = .02). In PGY-2 and PGY-3, men received statistically higher average MK ratings than women (P = .002 and P &lt; .001, respectively). In contrast, men and women received equivalent average PC ratings in each PGY (P = .47, P = .72, and P = .80, for PGY-1, PGY-2, and PGY-3, respectively). Men slightly outperformed women with similar MK or PC ratings in PGY-1 and PGY-2 on the IM-ITE by about 1.7 and 1.5 percentage points, respectively, after adjusting for covariates. For PGY-3 ratings, women and men with similar milestone ratings performed equivalently on the IM-CE. Milestone ratings were largely similar for women and men. Generally, women and men with similar MK or PC milestone ratings performed similarly on future examinations. Although there were small differences favoring men on earlier examinations, these differences disappeared by the final training year. It is questionable whether these small differences are educationally or clinically meaningful. The findings suggest fair, unbiased milestone ratings generated by program directors and CCCs assessing residents.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>33711841</pmid><doi>10.1097/ACM.0000000000004040</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-2446
ispartof Academic Medicine, 2021-06, Vol.96 (6), p.876-884
issn 1040-2446
1938-808X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501266555
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Certification
Clinical Competence
Educational Measurement
Female
Humans
Internal Medicine - education
Internship and Residency
Male
Retrospective Studies
Sex Factors
Sexism
United States
title Gender Differences in Milestone Ratings and Medical Knowledge Examination Scores Among Internal Medicine Residents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A58%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20Differences%20in%20Milestone%20Ratings%20and%20Medical%20Knowledge%20Examination%20Scores%20Among%20Internal%20Medicine%20Residents&rft.jtitle=Academic%20Medicine&rft.au=Hauer,%20Karen%20E.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=876&rft.epage=884&rft.pages=876-884&rft.issn=1040-2446&rft.eissn=1938-808X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501266555%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501266555&rft_id=info:pmid/33711841&rfr_iscdi=true