Sulfoxaflor insecticide and azoxystrobin fungicide have no major impact on honeybees in a realistic-exposure semi-field experiment
Exposure to pesticides is considered a major threat to bees and several neonicotinoid insecticides were recently banned in cropland within the European Union in light of evidence of their potential detrimental effects. Nonetheless, bees remain exposed to many pesticides whose effects are poorly unde...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Science of the total environment 2021-07, Vol.778, p.146084-146084, Article 146084 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 146084 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 146084 |
container_title | The Science of the total environment |
container_volume | 778 |
creator | Tamburini, Giovanni Wintermantel, Dimitry Allan, Matthew J. Dean, Robin R. Knauer, Anina Albrecht, Matthias Klein, Alexandra-Maria |
description | Exposure to pesticides is considered a major threat to bees and several neonicotinoid insecticides were recently banned in cropland within the European Union in light of evidence of their potential detrimental effects. Nonetheless, bees remain exposed to many pesticides whose effects are poorly understood. Recent evidence suggests that one of the most prominent replacements of the banned neonicotinoids – the insecticide sulfoxaflor - harms bees and that fungicides may have been overlooked as a driver of bee declines. Realistic-exposure studies are, however, lacking. Here, we assess the impact of the insecticide Closer (active ingredient: sulfoxaflor) and the widely used fungicide Amistar (a.i.: azoxystrobin) on honeybees in a semi-field study (10 flight cages containing a honeybee colony, for each of three treatments: Closer, Amistar, control). The products were applied according to label instructions either before (Closer) or during (Amistar) the bloom of purple tansy. We found no significant effects of Closer or Amistar on honeybee colony development or foraging activity. Our study suggests that these pesticides pose no notable risk to honeybees when applied in isolation, following stringent label instructions. The findings on Closer indicate that a safety-period of 5–6 days between application and bloom, which is only prescribed in a few EU member states, may prevent its impacts on honeybees. However, to conclude whether Closer and Amistar can safely be applied, further realistic-exposure studies should examine their effects in combination with other chemical or biological stressors on various pollinator species.
[Display omitted]
•Peer-reviewed field realistic studies on the potential threat of novel insecticides and fungicides for bees are rare•Sulfoxaflor insecticide (Closer) shows no impact on honeybees when applied in isolation six days before bloom•Azoxystrobin fungicide (Amistar) sprayed during bloom poses no notable risk to honeybees under semi-field conditions•Mandatory safety periods between application of sulfoxaflor products and crop bloom may be crucial to limit risk for bees |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146084 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501258874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969721011517</els_id><sourcerecordid>2501258874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-af1ff3df72b7d79bdfadce0e2f069e2c6d15a719e8c0f6c91175c7e2f3a6713c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUT1v2zAQJYoGjePkL7Qcu8jhUbIojUHQpAUCdEgyExR5rGlIpEtKht0xvzw0lGTtLQfcvffu4xHyDdgKGNTX21XSbgwj-v2KMw4rqGrWVJ_IAhrRFsB4_ZksGKuaoq1bcU4uUtqyHKKBL-S8LAVUwKoFeXmcehsOyvYhUucT6tFpZ5Aqb6j6Fw7HNMbQOU_t5P_MrY3aI_WBDmp7Ig07pUcaPN0Ej8cOMWUhqmhE1buU5Qo87EKaItKEgyusw97QXMPoBvTjJTmzqk949ZaX5Pnux9Ptz-Lh9_2v25uHQlecjYWyYG1prOCdMKLtjFVGI0NuWd0i17WBtRLQYqOZrXULINZa5HapagGlLpfk-6y7i-HvhGmUg0sa-155DFOSfM2Ar5tGVBkqZqiOIaWIVu7yrioeJTB5MkBu5YcB8mSAnA3IzK9vQ6ZuQPPBe_94BtzMAMyn7h3GkxB6jcbF_HxpgvvvkFdalZ_1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501258874</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sulfoxaflor insecticide and azoxystrobin fungicide have no major impact on honeybees in a realistic-exposure semi-field experiment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tamburini, Giovanni ; Wintermantel, Dimitry ; Allan, Matthew J. ; Dean, Robin R. ; Knauer, Anina ; Albrecht, Matthias ; Klein, Alexandra-Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Tamburini, Giovanni ; Wintermantel, Dimitry ; Allan, Matthew J. ; Dean, Robin R. ; Knauer, Anina ; Albrecht, Matthias ; Klein, Alexandra-Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Exposure to pesticides is considered a major threat to bees and several neonicotinoid insecticides were recently banned in cropland within the European Union in light of evidence of their potential detrimental effects. Nonetheless, bees remain exposed to many pesticides whose effects are poorly understood. Recent evidence suggests that one of the most prominent replacements of the banned neonicotinoids – the insecticide sulfoxaflor - harms bees and that fungicides may have been overlooked as a driver of bee declines. Realistic-exposure studies are, however, lacking. Here, we assess the impact of the insecticide Closer (active ingredient: sulfoxaflor) and the widely used fungicide Amistar (a.i.: azoxystrobin) on honeybees in a semi-field study (10 flight cages containing a honeybee colony, for each of three treatments: Closer, Amistar, control). The products were applied according to label instructions either before (Closer) or during (Amistar) the bloom of purple tansy. We found no significant effects of Closer or Amistar on honeybee colony development or foraging activity. Our study suggests that these pesticides pose no notable risk to honeybees when applied in isolation, following stringent label instructions. The findings on Closer indicate that a safety-period of 5–6 days between application and bloom, which is only prescribed in a few EU member states, may prevent its impacts on honeybees. However, to conclude whether Closer and Amistar can safely be applied, further realistic-exposure studies should examine their effects in combination with other chemical or biological stressors on various pollinator species.
[Display omitted]
•Peer-reviewed field realistic studies on the potential threat of novel insecticides and fungicides for bees are rare•Sulfoxaflor insecticide (Closer) shows no impact on honeybees when applied in isolation six days before bloom•Azoxystrobin fungicide (Amistar) sprayed during bloom poses no notable risk to honeybees under semi-field conditions•Mandatory safety periods between application of sulfoxaflor products and crop bloom may be crucial to limit risk for bees</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33714104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Amistar ; Animals ; Apis mellifera ; Bee stressors ; Bees ; Closer ; Foraging activity ; Fungicides, Industrial - toxicity ; Insecticides - toxicity ; Neonicotinoids ; Pesticides ; Pyridines ; Pyrimidines ; Strobilurins - toxicity ; Sulfur Compounds</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2021-07, Vol.778, p.146084-146084, Article 146084</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-af1ff3df72b7d79bdfadce0e2f069e2c6d15a719e8c0f6c91175c7e2f3a6713c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-af1ff3df72b7d79bdfadce0e2f069e2c6d15a719e8c0f6c91175c7e2f3a6713c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721011517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33714104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tamburini, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintermantel, Dimitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allan, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Robin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knauer, Anina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Alexandra-Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Sulfoxaflor insecticide and azoxystrobin fungicide have no major impact on honeybees in a realistic-exposure semi-field experiment</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>Exposure to pesticides is considered a major threat to bees and several neonicotinoid insecticides were recently banned in cropland within the European Union in light of evidence of their potential detrimental effects. Nonetheless, bees remain exposed to many pesticides whose effects are poorly understood. Recent evidence suggests that one of the most prominent replacements of the banned neonicotinoids – the insecticide sulfoxaflor - harms bees and that fungicides may have been overlooked as a driver of bee declines. Realistic-exposure studies are, however, lacking. Here, we assess the impact of the insecticide Closer (active ingredient: sulfoxaflor) and the widely used fungicide Amistar (a.i.: azoxystrobin) on honeybees in a semi-field study (10 flight cages containing a honeybee colony, for each of three treatments: Closer, Amistar, control). The products were applied according to label instructions either before (Closer) or during (Amistar) the bloom of purple tansy. We found no significant effects of Closer or Amistar on honeybee colony development or foraging activity. Our study suggests that these pesticides pose no notable risk to honeybees when applied in isolation, following stringent label instructions. The findings on Closer indicate that a safety-period of 5–6 days between application and bloom, which is only prescribed in a few EU member states, may prevent its impacts on honeybees. However, to conclude whether Closer and Amistar can safely be applied, further realistic-exposure studies should examine their effects in combination with other chemical or biological stressors on various pollinator species.
[Display omitted]
•Peer-reviewed field realistic studies on the potential threat of novel insecticides and fungicides for bees are rare•Sulfoxaflor insecticide (Closer) shows no impact on honeybees when applied in isolation six days before bloom•Azoxystrobin fungicide (Amistar) sprayed during bloom poses no notable risk to honeybees under semi-field conditions•Mandatory safety periods between application of sulfoxaflor products and crop bloom may be crucial to limit risk for bees</description><subject>Amistar</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Bee stressors</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Closer</subject><subject>Foraging activity</subject><subject>Fungicides, Industrial - toxicity</subject><subject>Insecticides - toxicity</subject><subject>Neonicotinoids</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pyridines</subject><subject>Pyrimidines</subject><subject>Strobilurins - toxicity</subject><subject>Sulfur Compounds</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUT1v2zAQJYoGjePkL7Qcu8jhUbIojUHQpAUCdEgyExR5rGlIpEtKht0xvzw0lGTtLQfcvffu4xHyDdgKGNTX21XSbgwj-v2KMw4rqGrWVJ_IAhrRFsB4_ZksGKuaoq1bcU4uUtqyHKKBL-S8LAVUwKoFeXmcehsOyvYhUucT6tFpZ5Aqb6j6Fw7HNMbQOU_t5P_MrY3aI_WBDmp7Ig07pUcaPN0Ej8cOMWUhqmhE1buU5Qo87EKaItKEgyusw97QXMPoBvTjJTmzqk949ZaX5Pnux9Ptz-Lh9_2v25uHQlecjYWyYG1prOCdMKLtjFVGI0NuWd0i17WBtRLQYqOZrXULINZa5HapagGlLpfk-6y7i-HvhGmUg0sa-155DFOSfM2Ar5tGVBkqZqiOIaWIVu7yrioeJTB5MkBu5YcB8mSAnA3IzK9vQ6ZuQPPBe_94BtzMAMyn7h3GkxB6jcbF_HxpgvvvkFdalZ_1</recordid><startdate>20210715</startdate><enddate>20210715</enddate><creator>Tamburini, Giovanni</creator><creator>Wintermantel, Dimitry</creator><creator>Allan, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Dean, Robin R.</creator><creator>Knauer, Anina</creator><creator>Albrecht, Matthias</creator><creator>Klein, Alexandra-Maria</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210715</creationdate><title>Sulfoxaflor insecticide and azoxystrobin fungicide have no major impact on honeybees in a realistic-exposure semi-field experiment</title><author>Tamburini, Giovanni ; Wintermantel, Dimitry ; Allan, Matthew J. ; Dean, Robin R. ; Knauer, Anina ; Albrecht, Matthias ; Klein, Alexandra-Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-af1ff3df72b7d79bdfadce0e2f069e2c6d15a719e8c0f6c91175c7e2f3a6713c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amistar</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Bee stressors</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Closer</topic><topic>Foraging activity</topic><topic>Fungicides, Industrial - toxicity</topic><topic>Insecticides - toxicity</topic><topic>Neonicotinoids</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pyridines</topic><topic>Pyrimidines</topic><topic>Strobilurins - toxicity</topic><topic>Sulfur Compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tamburini, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintermantel, Dimitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allan, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Robin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knauer, Anina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Alexandra-Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tamburini, Giovanni</au><au>Wintermantel, Dimitry</au><au>Allan, Matthew J.</au><au>Dean, Robin R.</au><au>Knauer, Anina</au><au>Albrecht, Matthias</au><au>Klein, Alexandra-Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sulfoxaflor insecticide and azoxystrobin fungicide have no major impact on honeybees in a realistic-exposure semi-field experiment</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2021-07-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>778</volume><spage>146084</spage><epage>146084</epage><pages>146084-146084</pages><artnum>146084</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Exposure to pesticides is considered a major threat to bees and several neonicotinoid insecticides were recently banned in cropland within the European Union in light of evidence of their potential detrimental effects. Nonetheless, bees remain exposed to many pesticides whose effects are poorly understood. Recent evidence suggests that one of the most prominent replacements of the banned neonicotinoids – the insecticide sulfoxaflor - harms bees and that fungicides may have been overlooked as a driver of bee declines. Realistic-exposure studies are, however, lacking. Here, we assess the impact of the insecticide Closer (active ingredient: sulfoxaflor) and the widely used fungicide Amistar (a.i.: azoxystrobin) on honeybees in a semi-field study (10 flight cages containing a honeybee colony, for each of three treatments: Closer, Amistar, control). The products were applied according to label instructions either before (Closer) or during (Amistar) the bloom of purple tansy. We found no significant effects of Closer or Amistar on honeybee colony development or foraging activity. Our study suggests that these pesticides pose no notable risk to honeybees when applied in isolation, following stringent label instructions. The findings on Closer indicate that a safety-period of 5–6 days between application and bloom, which is only prescribed in a few EU member states, may prevent its impacts on honeybees. However, to conclude whether Closer and Amistar can safely be applied, further realistic-exposure studies should examine their effects in combination with other chemical or biological stressors on various pollinator species.
[Display omitted]
•Peer-reviewed field realistic studies on the potential threat of novel insecticides and fungicides for bees are rare•Sulfoxaflor insecticide (Closer) shows no impact on honeybees when applied in isolation six days before bloom•Azoxystrobin fungicide (Amistar) sprayed during bloom poses no notable risk to honeybees under semi-field conditions•Mandatory safety periods between application of sulfoxaflor products and crop bloom may be crucial to limit risk for bees</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33714104</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146084</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-9697 |
ispartof | The Science of the total environment, 2021-07, Vol.778, p.146084-146084, Article 146084 |
issn | 0048-9697 1879-1026 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501258874 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Amistar Animals Apis mellifera Bee stressors Bees Closer Foraging activity Fungicides, Industrial - toxicity Insecticides - toxicity Neonicotinoids Pesticides Pyridines Pyrimidines Strobilurins - toxicity Sulfur Compounds |
title | Sulfoxaflor insecticide and azoxystrobin fungicide have no major impact on honeybees in a realistic-exposure semi-field experiment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T00%3A24%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sulfoxaflor%20insecticide%20and%20azoxystrobin%20fungicide%20have%20no%20major%20impact%20on%20honeybees%20in%20a%20realistic-exposure%20semi-field%20experiment&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Tamburini,%20Giovanni&rft.date=2021-07-15&rft.volume=778&rft.spage=146084&rft.epage=146084&rft.pages=146084-146084&rft.artnum=146084&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501258874%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501258874&rft_id=info:pmid/33714104&rft_els_id=S0048969721011517&rfr_iscdi=true |