Sulfoxaflor insecticide and azoxystrobin fungicide have no major impact on honeybees in a realistic-exposure semi-field experiment

Exposure to pesticides is considered a major threat to bees and several neonicotinoid insecticides were recently banned in cropland within the European Union in light of evidence of their potential detrimental effects. Nonetheless, bees remain exposed to many pesticides whose effects are poorly unde...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2021-07, Vol.778, p.146084-146084, Article 146084
Hauptverfasser: Tamburini, Giovanni, Wintermantel, Dimitry, Allan, Matthew J., Dean, Robin R., Knauer, Anina, Albrecht, Matthias, Klein, Alexandra-Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 146084
container_issue
container_start_page 146084
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 778
creator Tamburini, Giovanni
Wintermantel, Dimitry
Allan, Matthew J.
Dean, Robin R.
Knauer, Anina
Albrecht, Matthias
Klein, Alexandra-Maria
description Exposure to pesticides is considered a major threat to bees and several neonicotinoid insecticides were recently banned in cropland within the European Union in light of evidence of their potential detrimental effects. Nonetheless, bees remain exposed to many pesticides whose effects are poorly understood. Recent evidence suggests that one of the most prominent replacements of the banned neonicotinoids – the insecticide sulfoxaflor - harms bees and that fungicides may have been overlooked as a driver of bee declines. Realistic-exposure studies are, however, lacking. Here, we assess the impact of the insecticide Closer (active ingredient: sulfoxaflor) and the widely used fungicide Amistar (a.i.: azoxystrobin) on honeybees in a semi-field study (10 flight cages containing a honeybee colony, for each of three treatments: Closer, Amistar, control). The products were applied according to label instructions either before (Closer) or during (Amistar) the bloom of purple tansy. We found no significant effects of Closer or Amistar on honeybee colony development or foraging activity. Our study suggests that these pesticides pose no notable risk to honeybees when applied in isolation, following stringent label instructions. The findings on Closer indicate that a safety-period of 5–6 days between application and bloom, which is only prescribed in a few EU member states, may prevent its impacts on honeybees. However, to conclude whether Closer and Amistar can safely be applied, further realistic-exposure studies should examine their effects in combination with other chemical or biological stressors on various pollinator species. [Display omitted] •Peer-reviewed field realistic studies on the potential threat of novel insecticides and fungicides for bees are rare•Sulfoxaflor insecticide (Closer) shows no impact on honeybees when applied in isolation six days before bloom•Azoxystrobin fungicide (Amistar) sprayed during bloom poses no notable risk to honeybees under semi-field conditions•Mandatory safety periods between application of sulfoxaflor products and crop bloom may be crucial to limit risk for bees
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146084
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501258874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969721011517</els_id><sourcerecordid>2501258874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-af1ff3df72b7d79bdfadce0e2f069e2c6d15a719e8c0f6c91175c7e2f3a6713c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUT1v2zAQJYoGjePkL7Qcu8jhUbIojUHQpAUCdEgyExR5rGlIpEtKht0xvzw0lGTtLQfcvffu4xHyDdgKGNTX21XSbgwj-v2KMw4rqGrWVJ_IAhrRFsB4_ZksGKuaoq1bcU4uUtqyHKKBL-S8LAVUwKoFeXmcehsOyvYhUucT6tFpZ5Aqb6j6Fw7HNMbQOU_t5P_MrY3aI_WBDmp7Ig07pUcaPN0Ej8cOMWUhqmhE1buU5Qo87EKaItKEgyusw97QXMPoBvTjJTmzqk949ZaX5Pnux9Ptz-Lh9_2v25uHQlecjYWyYG1prOCdMKLtjFVGI0NuWd0i17WBtRLQYqOZrXULINZa5HapagGlLpfk-6y7i-HvhGmUg0sa-155DFOSfM2Ar5tGVBkqZqiOIaWIVu7yrioeJTB5MkBu5YcB8mSAnA3IzK9vQ6ZuQPPBe_94BtzMAMyn7h3GkxB6jcbF_HxpgvvvkFdalZ_1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501258874</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sulfoxaflor insecticide and azoxystrobin fungicide have no major impact on honeybees in a realistic-exposure semi-field experiment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tamburini, Giovanni ; Wintermantel, Dimitry ; Allan, Matthew J. ; Dean, Robin R. ; Knauer, Anina ; Albrecht, Matthias ; Klein, Alexandra-Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Tamburini, Giovanni ; Wintermantel, Dimitry ; Allan, Matthew J. ; Dean, Robin R. ; Knauer, Anina ; Albrecht, Matthias ; Klein, Alexandra-Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Exposure to pesticides is considered a major threat to bees and several neonicotinoid insecticides were recently banned in cropland within the European Union in light of evidence of their potential detrimental effects. Nonetheless, bees remain exposed to many pesticides whose effects are poorly understood. Recent evidence suggests that one of the most prominent replacements of the banned neonicotinoids – the insecticide sulfoxaflor - harms bees and that fungicides may have been overlooked as a driver of bee declines. Realistic-exposure studies are, however, lacking. Here, we assess the impact of the insecticide Closer (active ingredient: sulfoxaflor) and the widely used fungicide Amistar (a.i.: azoxystrobin) on honeybees in a semi-field study (10 flight cages containing a honeybee colony, for each of three treatments: Closer, Amistar, control). The products were applied according to label instructions either before (Closer) or during (Amistar) the bloom of purple tansy. We found no significant effects of Closer or Amistar on honeybee colony development or foraging activity. Our study suggests that these pesticides pose no notable risk to honeybees when applied in isolation, following stringent label instructions. The findings on Closer indicate that a safety-period of 5–6 days between application and bloom, which is only prescribed in a few EU member states, may prevent its impacts on honeybees. However, to conclude whether Closer and Amistar can safely be applied, further realistic-exposure studies should examine their effects in combination with other chemical or biological stressors on various pollinator species. [Display omitted] •Peer-reviewed field realistic studies on the potential threat of novel insecticides and fungicides for bees are rare•Sulfoxaflor insecticide (Closer) shows no impact on honeybees when applied in isolation six days before bloom•Azoxystrobin fungicide (Amistar) sprayed during bloom poses no notable risk to honeybees under semi-field conditions•Mandatory safety periods between application of sulfoxaflor products and crop bloom may be crucial to limit risk for bees</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33714104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Amistar ; Animals ; Apis mellifera ; Bee stressors ; Bees ; Closer ; Foraging activity ; Fungicides, Industrial - toxicity ; Insecticides - toxicity ; Neonicotinoids ; Pesticides ; Pyridines ; Pyrimidines ; Strobilurins - toxicity ; Sulfur Compounds</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2021-07, Vol.778, p.146084-146084, Article 146084</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-af1ff3df72b7d79bdfadce0e2f069e2c6d15a719e8c0f6c91175c7e2f3a6713c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-af1ff3df72b7d79bdfadce0e2f069e2c6d15a719e8c0f6c91175c7e2f3a6713c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721011517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33714104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tamburini, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintermantel, Dimitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allan, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Robin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knauer, Anina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Alexandra-Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Sulfoxaflor insecticide and azoxystrobin fungicide have no major impact on honeybees in a realistic-exposure semi-field experiment</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>Exposure to pesticides is considered a major threat to bees and several neonicotinoid insecticides were recently banned in cropland within the European Union in light of evidence of their potential detrimental effects. Nonetheless, bees remain exposed to many pesticides whose effects are poorly understood. Recent evidence suggests that one of the most prominent replacements of the banned neonicotinoids – the insecticide sulfoxaflor - harms bees and that fungicides may have been overlooked as a driver of bee declines. Realistic-exposure studies are, however, lacking. Here, we assess the impact of the insecticide Closer (active ingredient: sulfoxaflor) and the widely used fungicide Amistar (a.i.: azoxystrobin) on honeybees in a semi-field study (10 flight cages containing a honeybee colony, for each of three treatments: Closer, Amistar, control). The products were applied according to label instructions either before (Closer) or during (Amistar) the bloom of purple tansy. We found no significant effects of Closer or Amistar on honeybee colony development or foraging activity. Our study suggests that these pesticides pose no notable risk to honeybees when applied in isolation, following stringent label instructions. The findings on Closer indicate that a safety-period of 5–6 days between application and bloom, which is only prescribed in a few EU member states, may prevent its impacts on honeybees. However, to conclude whether Closer and Amistar can safely be applied, further realistic-exposure studies should examine their effects in combination with other chemical or biological stressors on various pollinator species. [Display omitted] •Peer-reviewed field realistic studies on the potential threat of novel insecticides and fungicides for bees are rare•Sulfoxaflor insecticide (Closer) shows no impact on honeybees when applied in isolation six days before bloom•Azoxystrobin fungicide (Amistar) sprayed during bloom poses no notable risk to honeybees under semi-field conditions•Mandatory safety periods between application of sulfoxaflor products and crop bloom may be crucial to limit risk for bees</description><subject>Amistar</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Bee stressors</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Closer</subject><subject>Foraging activity</subject><subject>Fungicides, Industrial - toxicity</subject><subject>Insecticides - toxicity</subject><subject>Neonicotinoids</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pyridines</subject><subject>Pyrimidines</subject><subject>Strobilurins - toxicity</subject><subject>Sulfur Compounds</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUT1v2zAQJYoGjePkL7Qcu8jhUbIojUHQpAUCdEgyExR5rGlIpEtKht0xvzw0lGTtLQfcvffu4xHyDdgKGNTX21XSbgwj-v2KMw4rqGrWVJ_IAhrRFsB4_ZksGKuaoq1bcU4uUtqyHKKBL-S8LAVUwKoFeXmcehsOyvYhUucT6tFpZ5Aqb6j6Fw7HNMbQOU_t5P_MrY3aI_WBDmp7Ig07pUcaPN0Ej8cOMWUhqmhE1buU5Qo87EKaItKEgyusw97QXMPoBvTjJTmzqk949ZaX5Pnux9Ptz-Lh9_2v25uHQlecjYWyYG1prOCdMKLtjFVGI0NuWd0i17WBtRLQYqOZrXULINZa5HapagGlLpfk-6y7i-HvhGmUg0sa-155DFOSfM2Ar5tGVBkqZqiOIaWIVu7yrioeJTB5MkBu5YcB8mSAnA3IzK9vQ6ZuQPPBe_94BtzMAMyn7h3GkxB6jcbF_HxpgvvvkFdalZ_1</recordid><startdate>20210715</startdate><enddate>20210715</enddate><creator>Tamburini, Giovanni</creator><creator>Wintermantel, Dimitry</creator><creator>Allan, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Dean, Robin R.</creator><creator>Knauer, Anina</creator><creator>Albrecht, Matthias</creator><creator>Klein, Alexandra-Maria</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210715</creationdate><title>Sulfoxaflor insecticide and azoxystrobin fungicide have no major impact on honeybees in a realistic-exposure semi-field experiment</title><author>Tamburini, Giovanni ; Wintermantel, Dimitry ; Allan, Matthew J. ; Dean, Robin R. ; Knauer, Anina ; Albrecht, Matthias ; Klein, Alexandra-Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-af1ff3df72b7d79bdfadce0e2f069e2c6d15a719e8c0f6c91175c7e2f3a6713c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amistar</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Bee stressors</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Closer</topic><topic>Foraging activity</topic><topic>Fungicides, Industrial - toxicity</topic><topic>Insecticides - toxicity</topic><topic>Neonicotinoids</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pyridines</topic><topic>Pyrimidines</topic><topic>Strobilurins - toxicity</topic><topic>Sulfur Compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tamburini, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintermantel, Dimitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allan, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Robin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knauer, Anina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Alexandra-Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tamburini, Giovanni</au><au>Wintermantel, Dimitry</au><au>Allan, Matthew J.</au><au>Dean, Robin R.</au><au>Knauer, Anina</au><au>Albrecht, Matthias</au><au>Klein, Alexandra-Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sulfoxaflor insecticide and azoxystrobin fungicide have no major impact on honeybees in a realistic-exposure semi-field experiment</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2021-07-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>778</volume><spage>146084</spage><epage>146084</epage><pages>146084-146084</pages><artnum>146084</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Exposure to pesticides is considered a major threat to bees and several neonicotinoid insecticides were recently banned in cropland within the European Union in light of evidence of their potential detrimental effects. Nonetheless, bees remain exposed to many pesticides whose effects are poorly understood. Recent evidence suggests that one of the most prominent replacements of the banned neonicotinoids – the insecticide sulfoxaflor - harms bees and that fungicides may have been overlooked as a driver of bee declines. Realistic-exposure studies are, however, lacking. Here, we assess the impact of the insecticide Closer (active ingredient: sulfoxaflor) and the widely used fungicide Amistar (a.i.: azoxystrobin) on honeybees in a semi-field study (10 flight cages containing a honeybee colony, for each of three treatments: Closer, Amistar, control). The products were applied according to label instructions either before (Closer) or during (Amistar) the bloom of purple tansy. We found no significant effects of Closer or Amistar on honeybee colony development or foraging activity. Our study suggests that these pesticides pose no notable risk to honeybees when applied in isolation, following stringent label instructions. The findings on Closer indicate that a safety-period of 5–6 days between application and bloom, which is only prescribed in a few EU member states, may prevent its impacts on honeybees. However, to conclude whether Closer and Amistar can safely be applied, further realistic-exposure studies should examine their effects in combination with other chemical or biological stressors on various pollinator species. [Display omitted] •Peer-reviewed field realistic studies on the potential threat of novel insecticides and fungicides for bees are rare•Sulfoxaflor insecticide (Closer) shows no impact on honeybees when applied in isolation six days before bloom•Azoxystrobin fungicide (Amistar) sprayed during bloom poses no notable risk to honeybees under semi-field conditions•Mandatory safety periods between application of sulfoxaflor products and crop bloom may be crucial to limit risk for bees</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33714104</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146084</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2021-07, Vol.778, p.146084-146084, Article 146084
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501258874
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Amistar
Animals
Apis mellifera
Bee stressors
Bees
Closer
Foraging activity
Fungicides, Industrial - toxicity
Insecticides - toxicity
Neonicotinoids
Pesticides
Pyridines
Pyrimidines
Strobilurins - toxicity
Sulfur Compounds
title Sulfoxaflor insecticide and azoxystrobin fungicide have no major impact on honeybees in a realistic-exposure semi-field experiment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T00%3A24%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sulfoxaflor%20insecticide%20and%20azoxystrobin%20fungicide%20have%20no%20major%20impact%20on%20honeybees%20in%20a%20realistic-exposure%20semi-field%20experiment&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Tamburini,%20Giovanni&rft.date=2021-07-15&rft.volume=778&rft.spage=146084&rft.epage=146084&rft.pages=146084-146084&rft.artnum=146084&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501258874%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501258874&rft_id=info:pmid/33714104&rft_els_id=S0048969721011517&rfr_iscdi=true