Impact of a contrast-to-noise ratio driven and material specific exposure control on image quality and radiation exposure in angiography

Conventional detector-dose driven exposure controls (DEC) do not consider the contrasting material of interest in angiography. Considering the latter when choosing the acquisition parameters should allow for optimization of x-ray quality and consecutively lead to a substantial reduction of radiation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2021-03, Vol.66 (6), p.065020-065020
Hauptverfasser: Werncke, Thomas, Kemling, Marius, Tashenov, Stanislav, Hinrichs, Jan B, Meine, Timo C, Maschke, Sabine K, Kyriakou, Yiannis, Wacker, Frank K, Meyer, Bernhard C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 065020
container_issue 6
container_start_page 065020
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 66
creator Werncke, Thomas
Kemling, Marius
Tashenov, Stanislav
Hinrichs, Jan B
Meine, Timo C
Maschke, Sabine K
Kyriakou, Yiannis
Wacker, Frank K
Meyer, Bernhard C
description Conventional detector-dose driven exposure controls (DEC) do not consider the contrasting material of interest in angiography. Considering the latter when choosing the acquisition parameters should allow for optimization of x-ray quality and consecutively lead to a substantial reduction of radiation exposure. Therefore, the impact of a material-specific, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) driven exposure control (CEC) compared to DEC on radiation exposure was investigated. A 3D-printed phantom containing iron, tantalum, and platinum foils and cavities, filled with iodine, barium, and gas (carbon dioxide), was developed to measure the CNR. This phantom was placed within a stack of polymethylmethacrylate and aluminum plates simulating a patient equivalent thickness (PET) of 2.5-40 cm. Fluoroscopy and digital radiography (DR) were conducted applying either CEC or three, regular DEC protocols with parameter settings used in abdominal interventions. CEC protocols where chosen to achieve material-specific CNR values similar to those of DEC. Incident air kerma at the reference point(K ), using either CEC or DEC, was assessed and possible K reduction for similar CNR was estimated. We show that CEC provided similar CNR as DEC at the same or lower K . When imaging barium, iron, and iodine K was substantially reduced below a PET of 20 cm and between 25 cm and 30 cm for fluoroscopy and Dr When imaging platinum and tantalum using fluoroscopy and DR and gas using DR, the K reduction was substantially higher. We estimate the K reduction for these materials between 15% and 84% for fluoroscopy and DR between 15% and 93% depending on the PET. The results of this study demonstrate a high potential for skin dose reduction in abdominal radiology when using a material-specific CEC compared to DEC. This effect is substantial in imaging materials with higher energy K-edges, which is beneficial, for example, in long-lasting embolization procedures with tantalum-based embolization material in young patients with arterio-venous malformations.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6560/abe83a
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501257744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501257744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ed05aec747d42d7dc4c295f90bd51dda5c06c6f15eb0c5cb587f9a6fd0ef9bfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDtPwzAURi0EglLYmZBHllA7jvMYEeJRCYkF5ujGvi5GSZzaDqL_gJ9NQ6FMlq6-cyQfQi44u-asLBdc5DzJZc4W0GAp4IDM9qdDMmNM8KTiUp6Q0xDeGeO8TLNjciJEwapKFjPytewGUJE6Q4Eq10cPISbRJb2zAamHaB3V3n5gT6HXtIOI3kJLw4DKGqsofg4ujB53tGup66ntYIV0PUJr4-aH86Dt5Or_93YyrqxbeRjeNmfkyEAb8Pz3nZPX-7uX28fk6flheXvzlCghypigZhJQFVmhs1QXWmUqraSpWKMl1xqkYrnKDZfYMCVVI8vCVJAbzdBUjVFiTq523sG79Ygh1p0NCtsWenRjqFPJeCqLIsu2U7abKu9C8GjqwW9_5jc1Z_XUv55i11Psetd_i1z-2semQ70H_oKLb8Nhhfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501257744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of a contrast-to-noise ratio driven and material specific exposure control on image quality and radiation exposure in angiography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Institute of Physics Journals</source><creator>Werncke, Thomas ; Kemling, Marius ; Tashenov, Stanislav ; Hinrichs, Jan B ; Meine, Timo C ; Maschke, Sabine K ; Kyriakou, Yiannis ; Wacker, Frank K ; Meyer, Bernhard C</creator><creatorcontrib>Werncke, Thomas ; Kemling, Marius ; Tashenov, Stanislav ; Hinrichs, Jan B ; Meine, Timo C ; Maschke, Sabine K ; Kyriakou, Yiannis ; Wacker, Frank K ; Meyer, Bernhard C</creatorcontrib><description>Conventional detector-dose driven exposure controls (DEC) do not consider the contrasting material of interest in angiography. Considering the latter when choosing the acquisition parameters should allow for optimization of x-ray quality and consecutively lead to a substantial reduction of radiation exposure. Therefore, the impact of a material-specific, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) driven exposure control (CEC) compared to DEC on radiation exposure was investigated. A 3D-printed phantom containing iron, tantalum, and platinum foils and cavities, filled with iodine, barium, and gas (carbon dioxide), was developed to measure the CNR. This phantom was placed within a stack of polymethylmethacrylate and aluminum plates simulating a patient equivalent thickness (PET) of 2.5-40 cm. Fluoroscopy and digital radiography (DR) were conducted applying either CEC or three, regular DEC protocols with parameter settings used in abdominal interventions. CEC protocols where chosen to achieve material-specific CNR values similar to those of DEC. Incident air kerma at the reference point(K ), using either CEC or DEC, was assessed and possible K reduction for similar CNR was estimated. We show that CEC provided similar CNR as DEC at the same or lower K . When imaging barium, iron, and iodine K was substantially reduced below a PET of 20 cm and between 25 cm and 30 cm for fluoroscopy and Dr When imaging platinum and tantalum using fluoroscopy and DR and gas using DR, the K reduction was substantially higher. We estimate the K reduction for these materials between 15% and 84% for fluoroscopy and DR between 15% and 93% depending on the PET. The results of this study demonstrate a high potential for skin dose reduction in abdominal radiology when using a material-specific CEC compared to DEC. This effect is substantial in imaging materials with higher energy K-edges, which is beneficial, for example, in long-lasting embolization procedures with tantalum-based embolization material in young patients with arterio-venous malformations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abe83a</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33709957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Angiography - methods ; Barium ; Contrast Media ; Fluoroscopy - methods ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Iodine ; Iron ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Exposure ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiography ; Skin - radiation effects ; X-Rays</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2021-03, Vol.66 (6), p.065020-065020</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ed05aec747d42d7dc4c295f90bd51dda5c06c6f15eb0c5cb587f9a6fd0ef9bfc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ed05aec747d42d7dc4c295f90bd51dda5c06c6f15eb0c5cb587f9a6fd0ef9bfc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4043-5506 ; 0000-0002-0135-7082</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33709957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Werncke, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemling, Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tashenov, Stanislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinrichs, Jan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meine, Timo C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maschke, Sabine K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyriakou, Yiannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wacker, Frank K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Bernhard C</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of a contrast-to-noise ratio driven and material specific exposure control on image quality and radiation exposure in angiography</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><description>Conventional detector-dose driven exposure controls (DEC) do not consider the contrasting material of interest in angiography. Considering the latter when choosing the acquisition parameters should allow for optimization of x-ray quality and consecutively lead to a substantial reduction of radiation exposure. Therefore, the impact of a material-specific, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) driven exposure control (CEC) compared to DEC on radiation exposure was investigated. A 3D-printed phantom containing iron, tantalum, and platinum foils and cavities, filled with iodine, barium, and gas (carbon dioxide), was developed to measure the CNR. This phantom was placed within a stack of polymethylmethacrylate and aluminum plates simulating a patient equivalent thickness (PET) of 2.5-40 cm. Fluoroscopy and digital radiography (DR) were conducted applying either CEC or three, regular DEC protocols with parameter settings used in abdominal interventions. CEC protocols where chosen to achieve material-specific CNR values similar to those of DEC. Incident air kerma at the reference point(K ), using either CEC or DEC, was assessed and possible K reduction for similar CNR was estimated. We show that CEC provided similar CNR as DEC at the same or lower K . When imaging barium, iron, and iodine K was substantially reduced below a PET of 20 cm and between 25 cm and 30 cm for fluoroscopy and Dr When imaging platinum and tantalum using fluoroscopy and DR and gas using DR, the K reduction was substantially higher. We estimate the K reduction for these materials between 15% and 84% for fluoroscopy and DR between 15% and 93% depending on the PET. The results of this study demonstrate a high potential for skin dose reduction in abdominal radiology when using a material-specific CEC compared to DEC. This effect is substantial in imaging materials with higher energy K-edges, which is beneficial, for example, in long-lasting embolization procedures with tantalum-based embolization material in young patients with arterio-venous malformations.</description><subject>Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Barium</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Iodine</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Exposure</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Skin - radiation effects</subject><subject>X-Rays</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkDtPwzAURi0EglLYmZBHllA7jvMYEeJRCYkF5ujGvi5GSZzaDqL_gJ9NQ6FMlq6-cyQfQi44u-asLBdc5DzJZc4W0GAp4IDM9qdDMmNM8KTiUp6Q0xDeGeO8TLNjciJEwapKFjPytewGUJE6Q4Eq10cPISbRJb2zAamHaB3V3n5gT6HXtIOI3kJLw4DKGqsofg4ujB53tGup66ntYIV0PUJr4-aH86Dt5Or_93YyrqxbeRjeNmfkyEAb8Pz3nZPX-7uX28fk6flheXvzlCghypigZhJQFVmhs1QXWmUqraSpWKMl1xqkYrnKDZfYMCVVI8vCVJAbzdBUjVFiTq523sG79Ygh1p0NCtsWenRjqFPJeCqLIsu2U7abKu9C8GjqwW9_5jc1Z_XUv55i11Psetd_i1z-2semQ70H_oKLb8Nhhfg</recordid><startdate>20210321</startdate><enddate>20210321</enddate><creator>Werncke, Thomas</creator><creator>Kemling, Marius</creator><creator>Tashenov, Stanislav</creator><creator>Hinrichs, Jan B</creator><creator>Meine, Timo C</creator><creator>Maschke, Sabine K</creator><creator>Kyriakou, Yiannis</creator><creator>Wacker, Frank K</creator><creator>Meyer, Bernhard C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4043-5506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-7082</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210321</creationdate><title>Impact of a contrast-to-noise ratio driven and material specific exposure control on image quality and radiation exposure in angiography</title><author>Werncke, Thomas ; Kemling, Marius ; Tashenov, Stanislav ; Hinrichs, Jan B ; Meine, Timo C ; Maschke, Sabine K ; Kyriakou, Yiannis ; Wacker, Frank K ; Meyer, Bernhard C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ed05aec747d42d7dc4c295f90bd51dda5c06c6f15eb0c5cb587f9a6fd0ef9bfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Barium</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Iodine</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Exposure</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Skin - radiation effects</topic><topic>X-Rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Werncke, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemling, Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tashenov, Stanislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinrichs, Jan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meine, Timo C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maschke, Sabine K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyriakou, Yiannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wacker, Frank K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Bernhard C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Werncke, Thomas</au><au>Kemling, Marius</au><au>Tashenov, Stanislav</au><au>Hinrichs, Jan B</au><au>Meine, Timo C</au><au>Maschke, Sabine K</au><au>Kyriakou, Yiannis</au><au>Wacker, Frank K</au><au>Meyer, Bernhard C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of a contrast-to-noise ratio driven and material specific exposure control on image quality and radiation exposure in angiography</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><date>2021-03-21</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>065020</spage><epage>065020</epage><pages>065020-065020</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><abstract>Conventional detector-dose driven exposure controls (DEC) do not consider the contrasting material of interest in angiography. Considering the latter when choosing the acquisition parameters should allow for optimization of x-ray quality and consecutively lead to a substantial reduction of radiation exposure. Therefore, the impact of a material-specific, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) driven exposure control (CEC) compared to DEC on radiation exposure was investigated. A 3D-printed phantom containing iron, tantalum, and platinum foils and cavities, filled with iodine, barium, and gas (carbon dioxide), was developed to measure the CNR. This phantom was placed within a stack of polymethylmethacrylate and aluminum plates simulating a patient equivalent thickness (PET) of 2.5-40 cm. Fluoroscopy and digital radiography (DR) were conducted applying either CEC or three, regular DEC protocols with parameter settings used in abdominal interventions. CEC protocols where chosen to achieve material-specific CNR values similar to those of DEC. Incident air kerma at the reference point(K ), using either CEC or DEC, was assessed and possible K reduction for similar CNR was estimated. We show that CEC provided similar CNR as DEC at the same or lower K . When imaging barium, iron, and iodine K was substantially reduced below a PET of 20 cm and between 25 cm and 30 cm for fluoroscopy and Dr When imaging platinum and tantalum using fluoroscopy and DR and gas using DR, the K reduction was substantially higher. We estimate the K reduction for these materials between 15% and 84% for fluoroscopy and DR between 15% and 93% depending on the PET. The results of this study demonstrate a high potential for skin dose reduction in abdominal radiology when using a material-specific CEC compared to DEC. This effect is substantial in imaging materials with higher energy K-edges, which is beneficial, for example, in long-lasting embolization procedures with tantalum-based embolization material in young patients with arterio-venous malformations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>33709957</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6560/abe83a</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4043-5506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-7082</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2021-03, Vol.66 (6), p.065020-065020
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501257744
source MEDLINE; Institute of Physics Journals
subjects Angiography - methods
Barium
Contrast Media
Fluoroscopy - methods
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Iodine
Iron
Phantoms, Imaging
Positron-Emission Tomography
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Exposure
Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods
Radiography
Skin - radiation effects
X-Rays
title Impact of a contrast-to-noise ratio driven and material specific exposure control on image quality and radiation exposure in angiography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T05%3A52%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20a%20contrast-to-noise%20ratio%20driven%20and%20material%20specific%20exposure%20control%20on%20image%20quality%20and%20radiation%20exposure%20in%20angiography&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Werncke,%20Thomas&rft.date=2021-03-21&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=065020&rft.epage=065020&rft.pages=065020-065020&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6560/abe83a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501257744%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501257744&rft_id=info:pmid/33709957&rfr_iscdi=true