Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements
An algorithm is developed and evaluated for discriminating between clouds, snow-covered land and snowfree land in satellite image data. The multispectral technique uses daytime images of NOAA AVHRR channels 1 (0.63 μm), 3 (3.7 μm), and 4 11.0 (μm). eflectance is derived for channel 3 by using the ch...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied meteorology (1988) 1990-10, Vol.29 (10), p.994-1004 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1004 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 994 |
container_title | Journal of applied meteorology (1988) |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Allen, Robert C. Durkee, Philip A. Wash, Carlyle H. |
description | An algorithm is developed and evaluated for discriminating between clouds, snow-covered land and snowfree land in satellite image data. The multispectral technique uses daytime images of NOAA AVHRR channels 1 (0.63 μm), 3 (3.7 μm), and 4 11.0 (μm). eflectance is derived for channel 3 by using the channel 4 emission temperature to estimate and remove the channel 3 thermal emission. Separation of clouds from snow and land is based primarily on the derived channel 3 reflectance. Observed reflectance in channel 3 is 0.02 to 0.04 for snow, 0.03 to 0.10 for land, 0.02 to 0.27 for ice clouds and 0.08 to 0.36 for liquid clouds. These ranges overlap for thin cirrus and snow, so the routine attempts analysis of cirrus based on differences in transmission between channels 3 and 4. Six cases were analyzed and the total cloud cover was verified against a total of 110 surface observations in the standard categories of clear, scattered, broken and overcast. One of the cases is presented in detail to illustrate the algorithm procedures and results. Analysis of cloud cover from the satellite algorithm matched surface observations at 55% of the stations and was one category different at 33% of the stations. The algorithm differed from the surface observations by two categories at 9% of the stations and by three categories at 4% of the stations. A major remaining problem is discrimination between ice clouds and snow cover. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0994:SDWMSM>2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25004751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26185785</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26185785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3ce3a88954fe7132b23c80adb0d1b80b502363a6ff21a593a13ac505dace793d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFKw0AQhhdRsFYfQchBRA9pZ3ezSVZFkFSr0NJDFY_LdLPBlDSpuxuKb29CS09zmI9__vkIGVMYUZqIMRUMQogE3FEp4R6YfAIpo4fl5Hu-nD-zEYyyxSM7IYMjeUoGkMooTJOYn5ML59YAQHmUDEi2rJvdOKuaNg8mpdO23JQ1-rKpg13pf4J5W_nSbY32Fqtgid5UVelNMDfoWms2pvbukpwVWDlzdZhD8vX2-pm9h7PF9CN7mYWax5EPuTYc01SKqDAJ5WzFuE4B8xXkdJXCSgDjMce4KBhFITlSjlqAyFGbRPKcD8ntPndrm9_WOK82XeOuENamaZ1iAiBKBO3A6R7UtnHOmkJtu7_Q_ikKqpeoejWqV6N6iaqTqHqJai9RMQUqWyjWJd0cTqLTWBUWa126Y1wkBac86bDrPbZ2vrHHNYtpKpJU8H9MGn-E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>25004751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Allen, Robert C. ; Durkee, Philip A. ; Wash, Carlyle H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, Robert C. ; Durkee, Philip A. ; Wash, Carlyle H.</creatorcontrib><description>An algorithm is developed and evaluated for discriminating between clouds, snow-covered land and snowfree land in satellite image data. The multispectral technique uses daytime images of NOAA AVHRR channels 1 (0.63 μm), 3 (3.7 μm), and 4 11.0 (μm). eflectance is derived for channel 3 by using the channel 4 emission temperature to estimate and remove the channel 3 thermal emission. Separation of clouds from snow and land is based primarily on the derived channel 3 reflectance. Observed reflectance in channel 3 is 0.02 to 0.04 for snow, 0.03 to 0.10 for land, 0.02 to 0.27 for ice clouds and 0.08 to 0.36 for liquid clouds. These ranges overlap for thin cirrus and snow, so the routine attempts analysis of cirrus based on differences in transmission between channels 3 and 4. Six cases were analyzed and the total cloud cover was verified against a total of 110 surface observations in the standard categories of clear, scattered, broken and overcast. One of the cases is presented in detail to illustrate the algorithm procedures and results. Analysis of cloud cover from the satellite algorithm matched surface observations at 55% of the stations and was one category different at 33% of the stations. The algorithm differed from the surface observations by two categories at 9% of the stations and by three categories at 4% of the stations. A major remaining problem is discrimination between ice clouds and snow cover.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8763</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0994:SDWMSM>2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOAMEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Artificial satellites ; Cirrus clouds ; Cloud cover ; Clouds ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models ; Ice clouds ; Infrared reflection ; Reflectance ; Signal reflection ; Snow ; Snow cover</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied meteorology (1988), 1990-10, Vol.29 (10), p.994-1004</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990, American Meteorological Society (AMS)</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26185785$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26185785$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4953137$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durkee, Philip A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wash, Carlyle H.</creatorcontrib><title>Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements</title><title>Journal of applied meteorology (1988)</title><description>An algorithm is developed and evaluated for discriminating between clouds, snow-covered land and snowfree land in satellite image data. The multispectral technique uses daytime images of NOAA AVHRR channels 1 (0.63 μm), 3 (3.7 μm), and 4 11.0 (μm). eflectance is derived for channel 3 by using the channel 4 emission temperature to estimate and remove the channel 3 thermal emission. Separation of clouds from snow and land is based primarily on the derived channel 3 reflectance. Observed reflectance in channel 3 is 0.02 to 0.04 for snow, 0.03 to 0.10 for land, 0.02 to 0.27 for ice clouds and 0.08 to 0.36 for liquid clouds. These ranges overlap for thin cirrus and snow, so the routine attempts analysis of cirrus based on differences in transmission between channels 3 and 4. Six cases were analyzed and the total cloud cover was verified against a total of 110 surface observations in the standard categories of clear, scattered, broken and overcast. One of the cases is presented in detail to illustrate the algorithm procedures and results. Analysis of cloud cover from the satellite algorithm matched surface observations at 55% of the stations and was one category different at 33% of the stations. The algorithm differed from the surface observations by two categories at 9% of the stations and by three categories at 4% of the stations. A major remaining problem is discrimination between ice clouds and snow cover.</description><subject>Artificial satellites</subject><subject>Cirrus clouds</subject><subject>Cloud cover</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models</subject><subject>Ice clouds</subject><subject>Infrared reflection</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Signal reflection</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snow cover</subject><issn>0894-8763</issn><issn>1520-0450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMFKw0AQhhdRsFYfQchBRA9pZ3ezSVZFkFSr0NJDFY_LdLPBlDSpuxuKb29CS09zmI9__vkIGVMYUZqIMRUMQogE3FEp4R6YfAIpo4fl5Hu-nD-zEYyyxSM7IYMjeUoGkMooTJOYn5ML59YAQHmUDEi2rJvdOKuaNg8mpdO23JQ1-rKpg13pf4J5W_nSbY32Fqtgid5UVelNMDfoWms2pvbukpwVWDlzdZhD8vX2-pm9h7PF9CN7mYWax5EPuTYc01SKqDAJ5WzFuE4B8xXkdJXCSgDjMce4KBhFITlSjlqAyFGbRPKcD8ntPndrm9_WOK82XeOuENamaZ1iAiBKBO3A6R7UtnHOmkJtu7_Q_ikKqpeoejWqV6N6iaqTqHqJai9RMQUqWyjWJd0cTqLTWBUWa126Y1wkBac86bDrPbZ2vrHHNYtpKpJU8H9MGn-E</recordid><startdate>19901001</startdate><enddate>19901001</enddate><creator>Allen, Robert C.</creator><creator>Durkee, Philip A.</creator><creator>Wash, Carlyle H.</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901001</creationdate><title>Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements</title><author>Allen, Robert C. ; Durkee, Philip A. ; Wash, Carlyle H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3ce3a88954fe7132b23c80adb0d1b80b502363a6ff21a593a13ac505dace793d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Artificial satellites</topic><topic>Cirrus clouds</topic><topic>Cloud cover</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models</topic><topic>Ice clouds</topic><topic>Infrared reflection</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Signal reflection</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snow cover</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durkee, Philip A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wash, Carlyle H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied meteorology (1988)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Robert C.</au><au>Durkee, Philip A.</au><au>Wash, Carlyle H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied meteorology (1988)</jtitle><date>1990-10-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>994</spage><epage>1004</epage><pages>994-1004</pages><issn>0894-8763</issn><eissn>1520-0450</eissn><coden>JOAMEZ</coden><abstract>An algorithm is developed and evaluated for discriminating between clouds, snow-covered land and snowfree land in satellite image data. The multispectral technique uses daytime images of NOAA AVHRR channels 1 (0.63 μm), 3 (3.7 μm), and 4 11.0 (μm). eflectance is derived for channel 3 by using the channel 4 emission temperature to estimate and remove the channel 3 thermal emission. Separation of clouds from snow and land is based primarily on the derived channel 3 reflectance. Observed reflectance in channel 3 is 0.02 to 0.04 for snow, 0.03 to 0.10 for land, 0.02 to 0.27 for ice clouds and 0.08 to 0.36 for liquid clouds. These ranges overlap for thin cirrus and snow, so the routine attempts analysis of cirrus based on differences in transmission between channels 3 and 4. Six cases were analyzed and the total cloud cover was verified against a total of 110 surface observations in the standard categories of clear, scattered, broken and overcast. One of the cases is presented in detail to illustrate the algorithm procedures and results. Analysis of cloud cover from the satellite algorithm matched surface observations at 55% of the stations and was one category different at 33% of the stations. The algorithm differed from the surface observations by two categories at 9% of the stations and by three categories at 4% of the stations. A major remaining problem is discrimination between ice clouds and snow cover.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0994:SDWMSM>2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-8763 |
ispartof | Journal of applied meteorology (1988), 1990-10, Vol.29 (10), p.994-1004 |
issn | 0894-8763 1520-0450 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25004751 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Artificial satellites Cirrus clouds Cloud cover Clouds Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models Ice clouds Infrared reflection Reflectance Signal reflection Snow Snow cover |
title | Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T11%3A20%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Snow/Cloud%20Discrimination%20with%20Multispectral%20Satellite%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20meteorology%20(1988)&rft.au=Allen,%20Robert%20C.&rft.date=1990-10-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=994&rft.epage=1004&rft.pages=994-1004&rft.issn=0894-8763&rft.eissn=1520-0450&rft.coden=JOAMEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029%3C0994:SDWMSM%3E2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26185785%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=25004751&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26185785&rfr_iscdi=true |