Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements

An algorithm is developed and evaluated for discriminating between clouds, snow-covered land and snowfree land in satellite image data. The multispectral technique uses daytime images of NOAA AVHRR channels 1 (0.63 μm), 3 (3.7 μm), and 4 11.0 (μm). eflectance is derived for channel 3 by using the ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied meteorology (1988) 1990-10, Vol.29 (10), p.994-1004
Hauptverfasser: Allen, Robert C., Durkee, Philip A., Wash, Carlyle H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1004
container_issue 10
container_start_page 994
container_title Journal of applied meteorology (1988)
container_volume 29
creator Allen, Robert C.
Durkee, Philip A.
Wash, Carlyle H.
description An algorithm is developed and evaluated for discriminating between clouds, snow-covered land and snowfree land in satellite image data. The multispectral technique uses daytime images of NOAA AVHRR channels 1 (0.63 μm), 3 (3.7 μm), and 4 11.0 (μm). eflectance is derived for channel 3 by using the channel 4 emission temperature to estimate and remove the channel 3 thermal emission. Separation of clouds from snow and land is based primarily on the derived channel 3 reflectance. Observed reflectance in channel 3 is 0.02 to 0.04 for snow, 0.03 to 0.10 for land, 0.02 to 0.27 for ice clouds and 0.08 to 0.36 for liquid clouds. These ranges overlap for thin cirrus and snow, so the routine attempts analysis of cirrus based on differences in transmission between channels 3 and 4. Six cases were analyzed and the total cloud cover was verified against a total of 110 surface observations in the standard categories of clear, scattered, broken and overcast. One of the cases is presented in detail to illustrate the algorithm procedures and results. Analysis of cloud cover from the satellite algorithm matched surface observations at 55% of the stations and was one category different at 33% of the stations. The algorithm differed from the surface observations by two categories at 9% of the stations and by three categories at 4% of the stations. A major remaining problem is discrimination between ice clouds and snow cover.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0994:SDWMSM>2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25004751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26185785</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26185785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3ce3a88954fe7132b23c80adb0d1b80b502363a6ff21a593a13ac505dace793d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFKw0AQhhdRsFYfQchBRA9pZ3ezSVZFkFSr0NJDFY_LdLPBlDSpuxuKb29CS09zmI9__vkIGVMYUZqIMRUMQogE3FEp4R6YfAIpo4fl5Hu-nD-zEYyyxSM7IYMjeUoGkMooTJOYn5ML59YAQHmUDEi2rJvdOKuaNg8mpdO23JQ1-rKpg13pf4J5W_nSbY32Fqtgid5UVelNMDfoWms2pvbukpwVWDlzdZhD8vX2-pm9h7PF9CN7mYWax5EPuTYc01SKqDAJ5WzFuE4B8xXkdJXCSgDjMce4KBhFITlSjlqAyFGbRPKcD8ntPndrm9_WOK82XeOuENamaZ1iAiBKBO3A6R7UtnHOmkJtu7_Q_ikKqpeoejWqV6N6iaqTqHqJai9RMQUqWyjWJd0cTqLTWBUWa126Y1wkBac86bDrPbZ2vrHHNYtpKpJU8H9MGn-E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>25004751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Allen, Robert C. ; Durkee, Philip A. ; Wash, Carlyle H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, Robert C. ; Durkee, Philip A. ; Wash, Carlyle H.</creatorcontrib><description>An algorithm is developed and evaluated for discriminating between clouds, snow-covered land and snowfree land in satellite image data. The multispectral technique uses daytime images of NOAA AVHRR channels 1 (0.63 μm), 3 (3.7 μm), and 4 11.0 (μm). eflectance is derived for channel 3 by using the channel 4 emission temperature to estimate and remove the channel 3 thermal emission. Separation of clouds from snow and land is based primarily on the derived channel 3 reflectance. Observed reflectance in channel 3 is 0.02 to 0.04 for snow, 0.03 to 0.10 for land, 0.02 to 0.27 for ice clouds and 0.08 to 0.36 for liquid clouds. These ranges overlap for thin cirrus and snow, so the routine attempts analysis of cirrus based on differences in transmission between channels 3 and 4. Six cases were analyzed and the total cloud cover was verified against a total of 110 surface observations in the standard categories of clear, scattered, broken and overcast. One of the cases is presented in detail to illustrate the algorithm procedures and results. Analysis of cloud cover from the satellite algorithm matched surface observations at 55% of the stations and was one category different at 33% of the stations. The algorithm differed from the surface observations by two categories at 9% of the stations and by three categories at 4% of the stations. A major remaining problem is discrimination between ice clouds and snow cover.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8763</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029&lt;0994:SDWMSM&gt;2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOAMEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Artificial satellites ; Cirrus clouds ; Cloud cover ; Clouds ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models ; Ice clouds ; Infrared reflection ; Reflectance ; Signal reflection ; Snow ; Snow cover</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied meteorology (1988), 1990-10, Vol.29 (10), p.994-1004</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990, American Meteorological Society (AMS)</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26185785$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26185785$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4953137$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durkee, Philip A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wash, Carlyle H.</creatorcontrib><title>Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements</title><title>Journal of applied meteorology (1988)</title><description>An algorithm is developed and evaluated for discriminating between clouds, snow-covered land and snowfree land in satellite image data. The multispectral technique uses daytime images of NOAA AVHRR channels 1 (0.63 μm), 3 (3.7 μm), and 4 11.0 (μm). eflectance is derived for channel 3 by using the channel 4 emission temperature to estimate and remove the channel 3 thermal emission. Separation of clouds from snow and land is based primarily on the derived channel 3 reflectance. Observed reflectance in channel 3 is 0.02 to 0.04 for snow, 0.03 to 0.10 for land, 0.02 to 0.27 for ice clouds and 0.08 to 0.36 for liquid clouds. These ranges overlap for thin cirrus and snow, so the routine attempts analysis of cirrus based on differences in transmission between channels 3 and 4. Six cases were analyzed and the total cloud cover was verified against a total of 110 surface observations in the standard categories of clear, scattered, broken and overcast. One of the cases is presented in detail to illustrate the algorithm procedures and results. Analysis of cloud cover from the satellite algorithm matched surface observations at 55% of the stations and was one category different at 33% of the stations. The algorithm differed from the surface observations by two categories at 9% of the stations and by three categories at 4% of the stations. A major remaining problem is discrimination between ice clouds and snow cover.</description><subject>Artificial satellites</subject><subject>Cirrus clouds</subject><subject>Cloud cover</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models</subject><subject>Ice clouds</subject><subject>Infrared reflection</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Signal reflection</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snow cover</subject><issn>0894-8763</issn><issn>1520-0450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMFKw0AQhhdRsFYfQchBRA9pZ3ezSVZFkFSr0NJDFY_LdLPBlDSpuxuKb29CS09zmI9__vkIGVMYUZqIMRUMQogE3FEp4R6YfAIpo4fl5Hu-nD-zEYyyxSM7IYMjeUoGkMooTJOYn5ML59YAQHmUDEi2rJvdOKuaNg8mpdO23JQ1-rKpg13pf4J5W_nSbY32Fqtgid5UVelNMDfoWms2pvbukpwVWDlzdZhD8vX2-pm9h7PF9CN7mYWax5EPuTYc01SKqDAJ5WzFuE4B8xXkdJXCSgDjMce4KBhFITlSjlqAyFGbRPKcD8ntPndrm9_WOK82XeOuENamaZ1iAiBKBO3A6R7UtnHOmkJtu7_Q_ikKqpeoejWqV6N6iaqTqHqJai9RMQUqWyjWJd0cTqLTWBUWa126Y1wkBac86bDrPbZ2vrHHNYtpKpJU8H9MGn-E</recordid><startdate>19901001</startdate><enddate>19901001</enddate><creator>Allen, Robert C.</creator><creator>Durkee, Philip A.</creator><creator>Wash, Carlyle H.</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901001</creationdate><title>Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements</title><author>Allen, Robert C. ; Durkee, Philip A. ; Wash, Carlyle H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3ce3a88954fe7132b23c80adb0d1b80b502363a6ff21a593a13ac505dace793d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Artificial satellites</topic><topic>Cirrus clouds</topic><topic>Cloud cover</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models</topic><topic>Ice clouds</topic><topic>Infrared reflection</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Signal reflection</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snow cover</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durkee, Philip A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wash, Carlyle H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied meteorology (1988)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Robert C.</au><au>Durkee, Philip A.</au><au>Wash, Carlyle H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied meteorology (1988)</jtitle><date>1990-10-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>994</spage><epage>1004</epage><pages>994-1004</pages><issn>0894-8763</issn><eissn>1520-0450</eissn><coden>JOAMEZ</coden><abstract>An algorithm is developed and evaluated for discriminating between clouds, snow-covered land and snowfree land in satellite image data. The multispectral technique uses daytime images of NOAA AVHRR channels 1 (0.63 μm), 3 (3.7 μm), and 4 11.0 (μm). eflectance is derived for channel 3 by using the channel 4 emission temperature to estimate and remove the channel 3 thermal emission. Separation of clouds from snow and land is based primarily on the derived channel 3 reflectance. Observed reflectance in channel 3 is 0.02 to 0.04 for snow, 0.03 to 0.10 for land, 0.02 to 0.27 for ice clouds and 0.08 to 0.36 for liquid clouds. These ranges overlap for thin cirrus and snow, so the routine attempts analysis of cirrus based on differences in transmission between channels 3 and 4. Six cases were analyzed and the total cloud cover was verified against a total of 110 surface observations in the standard categories of clear, scattered, broken and overcast. One of the cases is presented in detail to illustrate the algorithm procedures and results. Analysis of cloud cover from the satellite algorithm matched surface observations at 55% of the stations and was one category different at 33% of the stations. The algorithm differed from the surface observations by two categories at 9% of the stations and by three categories at 4% of the stations. A major remaining problem is discrimination between ice clouds and snow cover.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029&lt;0994:SDWMSM&gt;2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-8763
ispartof Journal of applied meteorology (1988), 1990-10, Vol.29 (10), p.994-1004
issn 0894-8763
1520-0450
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25004751
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Artificial satellites
Cirrus clouds
Cloud cover
Clouds
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models
Ice clouds
Infrared reflection
Reflectance
Signal reflection
Snow
Snow cover
title Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T11%3A20%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Snow/Cloud%20Discrimination%20with%20Multispectral%20Satellite%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20meteorology%20(1988)&rft.au=Allen,%20Robert%20C.&rft.date=1990-10-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=994&rft.epage=1004&rft.pages=994-1004&rft.issn=0894-8763&rft.eissn=1520-0450&rft.coden=JOAMEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029%3C0994:SDWMSM%3E2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26185785%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=25004751&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26185785&rfr_iscdi=true