The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Different lung ultrasound (LUS) scanning protocols have been used, and the results in terms of diagnostic accuracy are heterogeneous. What is the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score to predict moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD)? Does scanning of posterior lung fields improve the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chest 2021-09, Vol.160 (3), p.1006-1016 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1016 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1006 |
container_title | Chest |
container_volume | 160 |
creator | Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena Serna-Guerediaga, Iker Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca Alonso-Quintela, Paula Concheiro-Guisán, Ana Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio |
description | Different lung ultrasound (LUS) scanning protocols have been used, and the results in terms of diagnostic accuracy are heterogeneous.
What is the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score to predict moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD)? Does scanning of posterior lung fields improve the diagnostic accuracy?
This was a multicenter prospective, observational study in six centers. Two LUS aeration scores, one involving only anterolateral lung fields and the other adding the posterior fields were obtained at birth, on the third day of life (DOL), on the seventh DOL, on the 14th DOL, and on the 21st DOL. The diagnostic accuracy of both scores to predict msBPD was assessed at each time point.
Eight hundred thirty-two LUS examinations in 298 infants were included. Both LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields and LUS score using only anterolateral fields showed a similar moderate diagnostic accuracy to predict msBPD on the third DOL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 95% CI, 0.68-0.85 vs 0.68-0.85; P = .97), seventh DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.74-0.85 vs 0.74-0.84; P = .26), and 21st DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.72-0.86 vs 0.74-0.88; P = .17). The LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields was slightly more accurate at 14th DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.69-0.83 vs 0.66-0.80; P = .01). A cutoff of 8 points in the LUS score using only anterolateral fields on the seventh DOL provided a sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 70%, 79%, 3.3, and 0.38, respectively, to predict msBPD. Adding gestational age (GA) and sex improved the discriminative value without significant differences compared with a predictive model based on multiple clinical variables: AUC 95% CI, 0.77-0.88 vs 0.80-0.91 (P = .52).
The LUS score is able to predict msBPD from the third DOL with a moderate diagnostic accuracy. Scanning posterior lung fields slightly improved diagnostic accuracy only at the 14th DOL. Adding GA and sex improves the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS scores. The LUS score is useful to stratify BPD risk early after birth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.066 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2500384312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2500384312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-25864c648d437a8636b8c1a941aa79edb3d5add895367c13dee5475ce265c7073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kN1KwzAcxYMgbk6fQJBcetOajzZtvZvOL5gobPO2ZMl_W0bW1KQZ7B18aAubV4fDOfzgHIRuKEkpoeJ-m6oNhC5lhNGUsJQIcYaGtOI04XnGB-gyhC0hhNJKXKAB56KsipIN0e98A_jLgzaqM3vA39JGwG6Fp7FZ44XtvAwuNhrPlPMQsGnwBPZgXWv6_NG7Rm1cG-3ONdIf8OQQWiuDkQ943GNdaOHI_Yi2MwqaDjyeGLluXOg9HisVvVQHPOuiPlyh85W0Aa5POkKLl-f501sy_Xx9fxpPk5ZR2iUsL0WmRFbqjBeyFFwsS0VllVEpiwr0kutcal1WOReFolwD5FmRK2AiVwUp-AjdHbmtdz-x_63emaDAWtmAi6FmOSG8zDhlffX2VI3LHei69WbXD63_H-R_Kud03w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2500384312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena ; Serna-Guerediaga, Iker ; Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria ; Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca ; Alonso-Quintela, Paula ; Concheiro-Guisán, Ana ; Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia ; de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica ; Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena ; Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</creator><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena ; Serna-Guerediaga, Iker ; Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria ; Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca ; Alonso-Quintela, Paula ; Concheiro-Guisán, Ana ; Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia ; de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica ; Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena ; Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><description>Different lung ultrasound (LUS) scanning protocols have been used, and the results in terms of diagnostic accuracy are heterogeneous.
What is the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score to predict moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD)? Does scanning of posterior lung fields improve the diagnostic accuracy?
This was a multicenter prospective, observational study in six centers. Two LUS aeration scores, one involving only anterolateral lung fields and the other adding the posterior fields were obtained at birth, on the third day of life (DOL), on the seventh DOL, on the 14th DOL, and on the 21st DOL. The diagnostic accuracy of both scores to predict msBPD was assessed at each time point.
Eight hundred thirty-two LUS examinations in 298 infants were included. Both LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields and LUS score using only anterolateral fields showed a similar moderate diagnostic accuracy to predict msBPD on the third DOL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 95% CI, 0.68-0.85 vs 0.68-0.85; P = .97), seventh DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.74-0.85 vs 0.74-0.84; P = .26), and 21st DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.72-0.86 vs 0.74-0.88; P = .17). The LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields was slightly more accurate at 14th DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.69-0.83 vs 0.66-0.80; P = .01). A cutoff of 8 points in the LUS score using only anterolateral fields on the seventh DOL provided a sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 70%, 79%, 3.3, and 0.38, respectively, to predict msBPD. Adding gestational age (GA) and sex improved the discriminative value without significant differences compared with a predictive model based on multiple clinical variables: AUC 95% CI, 0.77-0.88 vs 0.80-0.91 (P = .52).
The LUS score is able to predict msBPD from the third DOL with a moderate diagnostic accuracy. Scanning posterior lung fields slightly improved diagnostic accuracy only at the 14th DOL. Adding GA and sex improves the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS scores. The LUS score is useful to stratify BPD risk early after birth.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.066</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33689782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - diagnosis ; Data Accuracy ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Quality Improvement ; Risk Assessment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sex Factors ; Ultrasonography - methods ; Ultrasonography - standards</subject><ispartof>Chest, 2021-09, Vol.160 (3), p.1006-1016</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33689782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serna-Guerediaga, Iker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Quintela, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Concheiro-Guisán, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><title>The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description>Different lung ultrasound (LUS) scanning protocols have been used, and the results in terms of diagnostic accuracy are heterogeneous.
What is the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score to predict moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD)? Does scanning of posterior lung fields improve the diagnostic accuracy?
This was a multicenter prospective, observational study in six centers. Two LUS aeration scores, one involving only anterolateral lung fields and the other adding the posterior fields were obtained at birth, on the third day of life (DOL), on the seventh DOL, on the 14th DOL, and on the 21st DOL. The diagnostic accuracy of both scores to predict msBPD was assessed at each time point.
Eight hundred thirty-two LUS examinations in 298 infants were included. Both LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields and LUS score using only anterolateral fields showed a similar moderate diagnostic accuracy to predict msBPD on the third DOL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 95% CI, 0.68-0.85 vs 0.68-0.85; P = .97), seventh DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.74-0.85 vs 0.74-0.84; P = .26), and 21st DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.72-0.86 vs 0.74-0.88; P = .17). The LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields was slightly more accurate at 14th DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.69-0.83 vs 0.66-0.80; P = .01). A cutoff of 8 points in the LUS score using only anterolateral fields on the seventh DOL provided a sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 70%, 79%, 3.3, and 0.38, respectively, to predict msBPD. Adding gestational age (GA) and sex improved the discriminative value without significant differences compared with a predictive model based on multiple clinical variables: AUC 95% CI, 0.77-0.88 vs 0.80-0.91 (P = .52).
The LUS score is able to predict msBPD from the third DOL with a moderate diagnostic accuracy. Scanning posterior lung fields slightly improved diagnostic accuracy only at the 14th DOL. Adding GA and sex improves the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS scores. The LUS score is useful to stratify BPD risk early after birth.</description><subject>Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Data Accuracy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - standards</subject><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kN1KwzAcxYMgbk6fQJBcetOajzZtvZvOL5gobPO2ZMl_W0bW1KQZ7B18aAubV4fDOfzgHIRuKEkpoeJ-m6oNhC5lhNGUsJQIcYaGtOI04XnGB-gyhC0hhNJKXKAB56KsipIN0e98A_jLgzaqM3vA39JGwG6Fp7FZ44XtvAwuNhrPlPMQsGnwBPZgXWv6_NG7Rm1cG-3ONdIf8OQQWiuDkQ943GNdaOHI_Yi2MwqaDjyeGLluXOg9HisVvVQHPOuiPlyh85W0Aa5POkKLl-f501sy_Xx9fxpPk5ZR2iUsL0WmRFbqjBeyFFwsS0VllVEpiwr0kutcal1WOReFolwD5FmRK2AiVwUp-AjdHbmtdz-x_63emaDAWtmAi6FmOSG8zDhlffX2VI3LHei69WbXD63_H-R_Kud03w</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena</creator><creator>Serna-Guerediaga, Iker</creator><creator>Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria</creator><creator>Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca</creator><creator>Alonso-Quintela, Paula</creator><creator>Concheiro-Guisán, Ana</creator><creator>Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia</creator><creator>de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica</creator><creator>Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena</creator><creator>Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study</title><author>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena ; Serna-Guerediaga, Iker ; Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria ; Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca ; Alonso-Quintela, Paula ; Concheiro-Guisán, Ana ; Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia ; de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica ; Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena ; Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-25864c648d437a8636b8c1a941aa79edb3d5add895367c13dee5475ce265c7073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Data Accuracy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serna-Guerediaga, Iker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Quintela, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Concheiro-Guisán, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena</au><au>Serna-Guerediaga, Iker</au><au>Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria</au><au>Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca</au><au>Alonso-Quintela, Paula</au><au>Concheiro-Guisán, Ana</au><au>Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia</au><au>de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica</au><au>Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena</au><au>Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>160</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1006</spage><epage>1016</epage><pages>1006-1016</pages><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><abstract>Different lung ultrasound (LUS) scanning protocols have been used, and the results in terms of diagnostic accuracy are heterogeneous.
What is the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score to predict moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD)? Does scanning of posterior lung fields improve the diagnostic accuracy?
This was a multicenter prospective, observational study in six centers. Two LUS aeration scores, one involving only anterolateral lung fields and the other adding the posterior fields were obtained at birth, on the third day of life (DOL), on the seventh DOL, on the 14th DOL, and on the 21st DOL. The diagnostic accuracy of both scores to predict msBPD was assessed at each time point.
Eight hundred thirty-two LUS examinations in 298 infants were included. Both LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields and LUS score using only anterolateral fields showed a similar moderate diagnostic accuracy to predict msBPD on the third DOL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 95% CI, 0.68-0.85 vs 0.68-0.85; P = .97), seventh DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.74-0.85 vs 0.74-0.84; P = .26), and 21st DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.72-0.86 vs 0.74-0.88; P = .17). The LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields was slightly more accurate at 14th DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.69-0.83 vs 0.66-0.80; P = .01). A cutoff of 8 points in the LUS score using only anterolateral fields on the seventh DOL provided a sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 70%, 79%, 3.3, and 0.38, respectively, to predict msBPD. Adding gestational age (GA) and sex improved the discriminative value without significant differences compared with a predictive model based on multiple clinical variables: AUC 95% CI, 0.77-0.88 vs 0.80-0.91 (P = .52).
The LUS score is able to predict msBPD from the third DOL with a moderate diagnostic accuracy. Scanning posterior lung fields slightly improved diagnostic accuracy only at the 14th DOL. Adding GA and sex improves the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS scores. The LUS score is useful to stratify BPD risk early after birth.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33689782</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.066</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1931-3543 |
ispartof | Chest, 2021-09, Vol.160 (3), p.1006-1016 |
issn | 1931-3543 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2500384312 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - diagnosis Data Accuracy Female Gestational Age Humans Infant, Newborn Lung - diagnostic imaging Male Predictive Value of Tests Quality Improvement Risk Assessment Severity of Illness Index Sex Factors Ultrasonography - methods Ultrasonography - standards |
title | The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A24%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Predictive%20Value%20of%20Lung%20Ultrasound%20Scores%20in%20Developing%20Bronchopulmonary%20Dysplasia:%20A%20Prospective%20Multicenter%20Diagnostic%20Accuracy%20Study&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Alonso-Ojembarrena,%20Almudena&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=160&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1006&rft.epage=1016&rft.pages=1006-1016&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2500384312%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2500384312&rft_id=info:pmid/33689782&rfr_iscdi=true |