The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Different lung ultrasound (LUS) scanning protocols have been used, and the results in terms of diagnostic accuracy are heterogeneous. What is the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score to predict moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD)? Does scanning of posterior lung fields improve the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 2021-09, Vol.160 (3), p.1006-1016
Hauptverfasser: Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena, Serna-Guerediaga, Iker, Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria, Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca, Alonso-Quintela, Paula, Concheiro-Guisán, Ana, Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia, de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica, Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena, Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1016
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1006
container_title Chest
container_volume 160
creator Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena
Serna-Guerediaga, Iker
Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria
Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca
Alonso-Quintela, Paula
Concheiro-Guisán, Ana
Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia
de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica
Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena
Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio
description Different lung ultrasound (LUS) scanning protocols have been used, and the results in terms of diagnostic accuracy are heterogeneous. What is the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score to predict moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD)? Does scanning of posterior lung fields improve the diagnostic accuracy? This was a multicenter prospective, observational study in six centers. Two LUS aeration scores, one involving only anterolateral lung fields and the other adding the posterior fields were obtained at birth, on the third day of life (DOL), on the seventh DOL, on the 14th DOL, and on the 21st DOL. The diagnostic accuracy of both scores to predict msBPD was assessed at each time point. Eight hundred thirty-two LUS examinations in 298 infants were included. Both LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields and LUS score using only anterolateral fields showed a similar moderate diagnostic accuracy to predict msBPD on the third DOL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 95% CI, 0.68-0.85 vs 0.68-0.85; P = .97), seventh DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.74-0.85 vs 0.74-0.84; P = .26), and 21st DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.72-0.86 vs 0.74-0.88; P = .17). The LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields was slightly more accurate at 14th DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.69-0.83 vs 0.66-0.80; P = .01). A cutoff of 8 points in the LUS score using only anterolateral fields on the seventh DOL provided a sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 70%, 79%, 3.3, and 0.38, respectively, to predict msBPD. Adding gestational age (GA) and sex improved the discriminative value without significant differences compared with a predictive model based on multiple clinical variables: AUC 95% CI, 0.77-0.88 vs 0.80-0.91 (P = .52). The LUS score is able to predict msBPD from the third DOL with a moderate diagnostic accuracy. Scanning posterior lung fields slightly improved diagnostic accuracy only at the 14th DOL. Adding GA and sex improves the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS scores. The LUS score is useful to stratify BPD risk early after birth.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.066
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2500384312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2500384312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-25864c648d437a8636b8c1a941aa79edb3d5add895367c13dee5475ce265c7073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kN1KwzAcxYMgbk6fQJBcetOajzZtvZvOL5gobPO2ZMl_W0bW1KQZ7B18aAubV4fDOfzgHIRuKEkpoeJ-m6oNhC5lhNGUsJQIcYaGtOI04XnGB-gyhC0hhNJKXKAB56KsipIN0e98A_jLgzaqM3vA39JGwG6Fp7FZ44XtvAwuNhrPlPMQsGnwBPZgXWv6_NG7Rm1cG-3ONdIf8OQQWiuDkQ943GNdaOHI_Yi2MwqaDjyeGLluXOg9HisVvVQHPOuiPlyh85W0Aa5POkKLl-f501sy_Xx9fxpPk5ZR2iUsL0WmRFbqjBeyFFwsS0VllVEpiwr0kutcal1WOReFolwD5FmRK2AiVwUp-AjdHbmtdz-x_63emaDAWtmAi6FmOSG8zDhlffX2VI3LHei69WbXD63_H-R_Kud03w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2500384312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena ; Serna-Guerediaga, Iker ; Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria ; Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca ; Alonso-Quintela, Paula ; Concheiro-Guisán, Ana ; Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia ; de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica ; Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena ; Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</creator><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena ; Serna-Guerediaga, Iker ; Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria ; Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca ; Alonso-Quintela, Paula ; Concheiro-Guisán, Ana ; Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia ; de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica ; Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena ; Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><description>Different lung ultrasound (LUS) scanning protocols have been used, and the results in terms of diagnostic accuracy are heterogeneous. What is the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score to predict moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD)? Does scanning of posterior lung fields improve the diagnostic accuracy? This was a multicenter prospective, observational study in six centers. Two LUS aeration scores, one involving only anterolateral lung fields and the other adding the posterior fields were obtained at birth, on the third day of life (DOL), on the seventh DOL, on the 14th DOL, and on the 21st DOL. The diagnostic accuracy of both scores to predict msBPD was assessed at each time point. Eight hundred thirty-two LUS examinations in 298 infants were included. Both LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields and LUS score using only anterolateral fields showed a similar moderate diagnostic accuracy to predict msBPD on the third DOL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 95% CI, 0.68-0.85 vs 0.68-0.85; P = .97), seventh DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.74-0.85 vs 0.74-0.84; P = .26), and 21st DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.72-0.86 vs 0.74-0.88; P = .17). The LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields was slightly more accurate at 14th DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.69-0.83 vs 0.66-0.80; P = .01). A cutoff of 8 points in the LUS score using only anterolateral fields on the seventh DOL provided a sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 70%, 79%, 3.3, and 0.38, respectively, to predict msBPD. Adding gestational age (GA) and sex improved the discriminative value without significant differences compared with a predictive model based on multiple clinical variables: AUC 95% CI, 0.77-0.88 vs 0.80-0.91 (P = .52). The LUS score is able to predict msBPD from the third DOL with a moderate diagnostic accuracy. Scanning posterior lung fields slightly improved diagnostic accuracy only at the 14th DOL. Adding GA and sex improves the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS scores. The LUS score is useful to stratify BPD risk early after birth.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.066</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33689782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - diagnosis ; Data Accuracy ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Quality Improvement ; Risk Assessment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sex Factors ; Ultrasonography - methods ; Ultrasonography - standards</subject><ispartof>Chest, 2021-09, Vol.160 (3), p.1006-1016</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33689782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serna-Guerediaga, Iker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Quintela, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Concheiro-Guisán, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><title>The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description>Different lung ultrasound (LUS) scanning protocols have been used, and the results in terms of diagnostic accuracy are heterogeneous. What is the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score to predict moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD)? Does scanning of posterior lung fields improve the diagnostic accuracy? This was a multicenter prospective, observational study in six centers. Two LUS aeration scores, one involving only anterolateral lung fields and the other adding the posterior fields were obtained at birth, on the third day of life (DOL), on the seventh DOL, on the 14th DOL, and on the 21st DOL. The diagnostic accuracy of both scores to predict msBPD was assessed at each time point. Eight hundred thirty-two LUS examinations in 298 infants were included. Both LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields and LUS score using only anterolateral fields showed a similar moderate diagnostic accuracy to predict msBPD on the third DOL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 95% CI, 0.68-0.85 vs 0.68-0.85; P = .97), seventh DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.74-0.85 vs 0.74-0.84; P = .26), and 21st DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.72-0.86 vs 0.74-0.88; P = .17). The LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields was slightly more accurate at 14th DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.69-0.83 vs 0.66-0.80; P = .01). A cutoff of 8 points in the LUS score using only anterolateral fields on the seventh DOL provided a sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 70%, 79%, 3.3, and 0.38, respectively, to predict msBPD. Adding gestational age (GA) and sex improved the discriminative value without significant differences compared with a predictive model based on multiple clinical variables: AUC 95% CI, 0.77-0.88 vs 0.80-0.91 (P = .52). The LUS score is able to predict msBPD from the third DOL with a moderate diagnostic accuracy. Scanning posterior lung fields slightly improved diagnostic accuracy only at the 14th DOL. Adding GA and sex improves the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS scores. The LUS score is useful to stratify BPD risk early after birth.</description><subject>Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Data Accuracy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - standards</subject><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kN1KwzAcxYMgbk6fQJBcetOajzZtvZvOL5gobPO2ZMl_W0bW1KQZ7B18aAubV4fDOfzgHIRuKEkpoeJ-m6oNhC5lhNGUsJQIcYaGtOI04XnGB-gyhC0hhNJKXKAB56KsipIN0e98A_jLgzaqM3vA39JGwG6Fp7FZ44XtvAwuNhrPlPMQsGnwBPZgXWv6_NG7Rm1cG-3ONdIf8OQQWiuDkQ943GNdaOHI_Yi2MwqaDjyeGLluXOg9HisVvVQHPOuiPlyh85W0Aa5POkKLl-f501sy_Xx9fxpPk5ZR2iUsL0WmRFbqjBeyFFwsS0VllVEpiwr0kutcal1WOReFolwD5FmRK2AiVwUp-AjdHbmtdz-x_63emaDAWtmAi6FmOSG8zDhlffX2VI3LHei69WbXD63_H-R_Kud03w</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena</creator><creator>Serna-Guerediaga, Iker</creator><creator>Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria</creator><creator>Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca</creator><creator>Alonso-Quintela, Paula</creator><creator>Concheiro-Guisán, Ana</creator><creator>Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia</creator><creator>de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica</creator><creator>Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena</creator><creator>Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study</title><author>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena ; Serna-Guerediaga, Iker ; Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria ; Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca ; Alonso-Quintela, Paula ; Concheiro-Guisán, Ana ; Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia ; de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica ; Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena ; Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-25864c648d437a8636b8c1a941aa79edb3d5add895367c13dee5475ce265c7073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Data Accuracy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serna-Guerediaga, Iker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Quintela, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Concheiro-Guisán, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alonso-Ojembarrena, Almudena</au><au>Serna-Guerediaga, Iker</au><au>Aldecoa-Bilbao, Victoria</au><au>Gregorio-Hernández, Rebeca</au><au>Alonso-Quintela, Paula</au><au>Concheiro-Guisán, Ana</au><au>Ramos-Rodríguez, Alicia</au><au>de Las Heras-Martín, Mónica</au><au>Rodeño-Fernández, Lorena</au><au>Oulego-Erroz, Ignacio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>160</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1006</spage><epage>1016</epage><pages>1006-1016</pages><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><abstract>Different lung ultrasound (LUS) scanning protocols have been used, and the results in terms of diagnostic accuracy are heterogeneous. What is the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score to predict moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD)? Does scanning of posterior lung fields improve the diagnostic accuracy? This was a multicenter prospective, observational study in six centers. Two LUS aeration scores, one involving only anterolateral lung fields and the other adding the posterior fields were obtained at birth, on the third day of life (DOL), on the seventh DOL, on the 14th DOL, and on the 21st DOL. The diagnostic accuracy of both scores to predict msBPD was assessed at each time point. Eight hundred thirty-two LUS examinations in 298 infants were included. Both LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields and LUS score using only anterolateral fields showed a similar moderate diagnostic accuracy to predict msBPD on the third DOL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 95% CI, 0.68-0.85 vs 0.68-0.85; P = .97), seventh DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.74-0.85 vs 0.74-0.84; P = .26), and 21st DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.72-0.86 vs 0.74-0.88; P = .17). The LUS score using anterolateral and posterior fields was slightly more accurate at 14th DOL (AUC 95% CI, 0.69-0.83 vs 0.66-0.80; P = .01). A cutoff of 8 points in the LUS score using only anterolateral fields on the seventh DOL provided a sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 70%, 79%, 3.3, and 0.38, respectively, to predict msBPD. Adding gestational age (GA) and sex improved the discriminative value without significant differences compared with a predictive model based on multiple clinical variables: AUC 95% CI, 0.77-0.88 vs 0.80-0.91 (P = .52). The LUS score is able to predict msBPD from the third DOL with a moderate diagnostic accuracy. Scanning posterior lung fields slightly improved diagnostic accuracy only at the 14th DOL. Adding GA and sex improves the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS scores. The LUS score is useful to stratify BPD risk early after birth.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33689782</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.066</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1931-3543
ispartof Chest, 2021-09, Vol.160 (3), p.1006-1016
issn 1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2500384312
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - diagnosis
Data Accuracy
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Lung - diagnostic imaging
Male
Predictive Value of Tests
Quality Improvement
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Sex Factors
Ultrasonography - methods
Ultrasonography - standards
title The Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Scores in Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A24%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Predictive%20Value%20of%20Lung%20Ultrasound%20Scores%20in%20Developing%20Bronchopulmonary%20Dysplasia:%20A%20Prospective%20Multicenter%20Diagnostic%20Accuracy%20Study&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Alonso-Ojembarrena,%20Almudena&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=160&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1006&rft.epage=1016&rft.pages=1006-1016&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2500384312%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2500384312&rft_id=info:pmid/33689782&rfr_iscdi=true