Performance evaluation of a digital holographic camera under variable source power and exposure time
In this work, quality evaluation of a reconstructed amplitude image in digital holography is presented. The digital holograms are recorded using three different digital holographic experimental configurations, namely, conventional off-axis digital holography, concave-lens-based digital holography, a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied optics (2004) 2021-02, Vol.60 (4), p.A120-A130 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | A130 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | A120 |
| container_title | Applied optics (2004) |
| container_volume | 60 |
| creator | Dwivedi, Gaurav Pensia, Lavlesh Debnath, Sanjit K Kumar, Raj |
| description | In this work, quality evaluation of a reconstructed amplitude image in digital holography is presented. The digital holograms are recorded using three different digital holographic experimental configurations, namely, conventional off-axis digital holography, concave-lens-based digital holography, and the digital holographic camera developed for non-destructive testing applications [Opt. Lasers Eng.137, 106359 (2021)OLENDN0143-816610.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106359]. The quality of reconstructed images is measured by calculating the quality evaluation parameters such as speckle index, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and structural similarity index measure for these experimental configurations. Optimization of the power of the light source and exposure time of the recording sensor is performed for the three configurations based on the quality evaluation of reconstructed images. A comparison of the quality of reconstructed images is made for the three experimental configurations to analyze their performance for different source power and exposure time of the recording image sensor. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1364/AO.404256 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2500373154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2500373154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f8f9b3564ff4fd266b465b6cd267415599aa1c06cec08b2aa1e3debabfc665d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtKw0AUhgdRbK0ufAEZcKOL1Ezm0mZZijco1IWCu3AyOdOmJJk4k1R9e6e0unB1Lnz8nPMRcsniMeNK3M2WYxGLRKojMkyYlBFnSh6TYWjTiCXT9wE5834Tx1yKdHJKBpyrNOaKDUnxgs5YV0OjkeIWqh660jbUGgq0KFdlBxVd28quHLTrUlMNNTqgfVOgo1twJeQVUm97FwJa-xm20BQUv1rre4e0K2s8JycGKo8Xhzoibw_3r_OnaLF8fJ7PFpHmkneRmZo051IJY4QpEqVyoWSudGgnYvdLCsB0rDTqeJonYUBeYA650UrJIuUjcrPPbZ396NF3WV16jVUFDdreZ4kMCiacSRHQ63_oJrzQhOuyRKTBUpKyaaBu95R21nuHJmtdWYP7zlic7dRns2W2Vx_Yq0Nin9dY_JG_rvkP7WR_Qg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2494972918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance evaluation of a digital holographic camera under variable source power and exposure time</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Optica Publishing Group Journals</source><creator>Dwivedi, Gaurav ; Pensia, Lavlesh ; Debnath, Sanjit K ; Kumar, Raj</creator><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Gaurav ; Pensia, Lavlesh ; Debnath, Sanjit K ; Kumar, Raj</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, quality evaluation of a reconstructed amplitude image in digital holography is presented. The digital holograms are recorded using three different digital holographic experimental configurations, namely, conventional off-axis digital holography, concave-lens-based digital holography, and the digital holographic camera developed for non-destructive testing applications [Opt. Lasers Eng.137, 106359 (2021)OLENDN0143-816610.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106359]. The quality of reconstructed images is measured by calculating the quality evaluation parameters such as speckle index, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and structural similarity index measure for these experimental configurations. Optimization of the power of the light source and exposure time of the recording sensor is performed for the three configurations based on the quality evaluation of reconstructed images. A comparison of the quality of reconstructed images is made for the three experimental configurations to analyze their performance for different source power and exposure time of the recording image sensor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-128X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-3165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-4522</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1364/AO.404256</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33690361</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Optical Society of America</publisher><subject>Cameras ; Configuration management ; Digital imaging ; Exposure ; Holography ; Image quality ; Image reconstruction ; Light sources ; Mathematical analysis ; Nondestructive testing ; Optimization ; Performance evaluation ; Quality assessment ; Recording ; Signal to noise ratio</subject><ispartof>Applied optics (2004), 2021-02, Vol.60 (4), p.A120-A130</ispartof><rights>Copyright Optical Society of America Feb 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f8f9b3564ff4fd266b465b6cd267415599aa1c06cec08b2aa1e3debabfc665d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f8f9b3564ff4fd266b465b6cd267415599aa1c06cec08b2aa1e3debabfc665d93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0710-8933 ; 0000-0002-2382-1325 ; 0000-0002-6130-0790</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3245,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33690361$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Gaurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pensia, Lavlesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debnath, Sanjit K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Raj</creatorcontrib><title>Performance evaluation of a digital holographic camera under variable source power and exposure time</title><title>Applied optics (2004)</title><addtitle>Appl Opt</addtitle><description>In this work, quality evaluation of a reconstructed amplitude image in digital holography is presented. The digital holograms are recorded using three different digital holographic experimental configurations, namely, conventional off-axis digital holography, concave-lens-based digital holography, and the digital holographic camera developed for non-destructive testing applications [Opt. Lasers Eng.137, 106359 (2021)OLENDN0143-816610.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106359]. The quality of reconstructed images is measured by calculating the quality evaluation parameters such as speckle index, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and structural similarity index measure for these experimental configurations. Optimization of the power of the light source and exposure time of the recording sensor is performed for the three configurations based on the quality evaluation of reconstructed images. A comparison of the quality of reconstructed images is made for the three experimental configurations to analyze their performance for different source power and exposure time of the recording image sensor.</description><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Configuration management</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Holography</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Image reconstruction</subject><subject>Light sources</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Nondestructive testing</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Recording</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><issn>1559-128X</issn><issn>2155-3165</issn><issn>1539-4522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMtKw0AUhgdRbK0ufAEZcKOL1Ezm0mZZijco1IWCu3AyOdOmJJk4k1R9e6e0unB1Lnz8nPMRcsniMeNK3M2WYxGLRKojMkyYlBFnSh6TYWjTiCXT9wE5834Tx1yKdHJKBpyrNOaKDUnxgs5YV0OjkeIWqh660jbUGgq0KFdlBxVd28quHLTrUlMNNTqgfVOgo1twJeQVUm97FwJa-xm20BQUv1rre4e0K2s8JycGKo8Xhzoibw_3r_OnaLF8fJ7PFpHmkneRmZo051IJY4QpEqVyoWSudGgnYvdLCsB0rDTqeJonYUBeYA650UrJIuUjcrPPbZ396NF3WV16jVUFDdreZ4kMCiacSRHQ63_oJrzQhOuyRKTBUpKyaaBu95R21nuHJmtdWYP7zlic7dRns2W2Vx_Yq0Nin9dY_JG_rvkP7WR_Qg</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Dwivedi, Gaurav</creator><creator>Pensia, Lavlesh</creator><creator>Debnath, Sanjit K</creator><creator>Kumar, Raj</creator><general>Optical Society of America</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0710-8933</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2382-1325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6130-0790</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Performance evaluation of a digital holographic camera under variable source power and exposure time</title><author>Dwivedi, Gaurav ; Pensia, Lavlesh ; Debnath, Sanjit K ; Kumar, Raj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f8f9b3564ff4fd266b465b6cd267415599aa1c06cec08b2aa1e3debabfc665d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Configuration management</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Holography</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Image reconstruction</topic><topic>Light sources</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Nondestructive testing</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Recording</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Gaurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pensia, Lavlesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debnath, Sanjit K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Raj</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied optics (2004)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dwivedi, Gaurav</au><au>Pensia, Lavlesh</au><au>Debnath, Sanjit K</au><au>Kumar, Raj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance evaluation of a digital holographic camera under variable source power and exposure time</atitle><jtitle>Applied optics (2004)</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Opt</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>A120</spage><epage>A130</epage><pages>A120-A130</pages><issn>1559-128X</issn><eissn>2155-3165</eissn><eissn>1539-4522</eissn><abstract>In this work, quality evaluation of a reconstructed amplitude image in digital holography is presented. The digital holograms are recorded using three different digital holographic experimental configurations, namely, conventional off-axis digital holography, concave-lens-based digital holography, and the digital holographic camera developed for non-destructive testing applications [Opt. Lasers Eng.137, 106359 (2021)OLENDN0143-816610.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106359]. The quality of reconstructed images is measured by calculating the quality evaluation parameters such as speckle index, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and structural similarity index measure for these experimental configurations. Optimization of the power of the light source and exposure time of the recording sensor is performed for the three configurations based on the quality evaluation of reconstructed images. A comparison of the quality of reconstructed images is made for the three experimental configurations to analyze their performance for different source power and exposure time of the recording image sensor.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Optical Society of America</pub><pmid>33690361</pmid><doi>10.1364/AO.404256</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0710-8933</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2382-1325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6130-0790</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1559-128X |
| ispartof | Applied optics (2004), 2021-02, Vol.60 (4), p.A120-A130 |
| issn | 1559-128X 2155-3165 1539-4522 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2500373154 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; Optica Publishing Group Journals |
| subjects | Cameras Configuration management Digital imaging Exposure Holography Image quality Image reconstruction Light sources Mathematical analysis Nondestructive testing Optimization Performance evaluation Quality assessment Recording Signal to noise ratio |
| title | Performance evaluation of a digital holographic camera under variable source power and exposure time |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T20%3A15%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20evaluation%20of%20a%20digital%20holographic%20camera%20under%20variable%20source%20power%20and%20exposure%20time&rft.jtitle=Applied%20optics%20(2004)&rft.au=Dwivedi,%20Gaurav&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=A120&rft.epage=A130&rft.pages=A120-A130&rft.issn=1559-128X&rft.eissn=2155-3165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1364/AO.404256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2500373154%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2494972918&rft_id=info:pmid/33690361&rfr_iscdi=true |