Gender Representation in American Urological Association Guidelines
To study patterns and factors associated with female representation in the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines. We gathered publicly available information about the panelists, including the AUA section, practice setting, academic rank, fellowship training, years in practice, and H-index...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2021-10, Vol.156, p.47-51 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 51 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 47 |
| container_title | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) |
| container_volume | 156 |
| creator | Hougen, Helen Y. Goodstein, Francesca R. Bassale, Solange Chen, Yiyi Seideman, Casey A. Isharwal, Sudhir |
| description | To study patterns and factors associated with female representation in the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines.
We gathered publicly available information about the panelists, including the AUA section, practice setting, academic rank, fellowship training, years in practice, and H-index. The factors associated with the proportion of female panelists and trends were investigated. We also examined the proportion of female panelists in the European Association of Urology (EAU) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) urology guidelines.
There were 483 non-unique panelists in AUA guidelines, and 17% are female. Non-urologist female panelists in AUA guidelines represented a higher proportion than female urologists (30% vs 13%, P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.027 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2498997911</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429521002193</els_id><sourcerecordid>2498997911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e9bdd42075f1408dbd5087efffd41cb4b04441c503e30a16539604fff9f4e2bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMotlY_grJHL1sn2STbnKQUrUJBEHsOu8mspOyfmuwKfntTt3oVBmZgfm8e8wi5pjCnQOXdbj74ru7ev-YMGJ0Di5WfkCkVLE-VUuKUTAEUpJwpMSEXIewAQEqZn5NJlslcKpFNyWqNrUWfvOLeY8C2L3rXtYlrk2WD3pmiTbY_PnGsk2UInXEjsh6cxdq1GC7JWVXUAa-OfUa2jw9vq6d087J-Xi03qcmk6FNUpbWcQS4qymFhSytgkWNVVZZTU_ISOI-DgAwzKKgUmZLA41pVHFlpshm5He_uffcxYOh144LBui5a7IagGVcLpXJFaUTFiBrfheCx0nvvmsJ_aQr6kJ_e6WN--pCfBhYrj7qbo8VQNmj_VL-BReB-BDA--unQ62Actgat82h6bTv3j8U3V8GE2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2498997911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender Representation in American Urological Association Guidelines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hougen, Helen Y. ; Goodstein, Francesca R. ; Bassale, Solange ; Chen, Yiyi ; Seideman, Casey A. ; Isharwal, Sudhir</creator><creatorcontrib>Hougen, Helen Y. ; Goodstein, Francesca R. ; Bassale, Solange ; Chen, Yiyi ; Seideman, Casey A. ; Isharwal, Sudhir</creatorcontrib><description>To study patterns and factors associated with female representation in the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines.
We gathered publicly available information about the panelists, including the AUA section, practice setting, academic rank, fellowship training, years in practice, and H-index. The factors associated with the proportion of female panelists and trends were investigated. We also examined the proportion of female panelists in the European Association of Urology (EAU) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) urology guidelines.
There were 483 non-unique panelists in AUA guidelines, and 17% are female. Non-urologist female panelists in AUA guidelines represented a higher proportion than female urologists (30% vs 13%, P<0.0001). Compared with male panelists, females had lower H-indices (median 23 vs 35, P<0.001), and fewer were fellowship-trained (77.2% vs 86.8%; P=0.042). On multivariate analysis, non-urologists and panelists with lower H-indices were more likely to be female but there was no association between guideline specialties, academic ranking, geographic section, years in practice, and fellowship training with increased female authorship. Overtime, the proportion of female participation in guidelines remained stable. In the EAU and NCCN guideline panels, 12.2% and 10.7% were female, respectively.
Female representation among major urologic guidelines members is low and unchanged overtime. Female urologist participation was proportional to their representation in the urology workforce. Being a non-urologist and lower H-indices were associated with female membership in guideline panels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33676953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Female ; Humans ; Male ; Physicians, Women - statistics & numerical data ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Sex Distribution ; Societies, Medical - statistics & numerical data ; United States ; Urologists - statistics & numerical data ; Urology - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2021-10, Vol.156, p.47-51</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e9bdd42075f1408dbd5087efffd41cb4b04441c503e30a16539604fff9f4e2bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e9bdd42075f1408dbd5087efffd41cb4b04441c503e30a16539604fff9f4e2bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33676953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hougen, Helen Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodstein, Francesca R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassale, Solange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seideman, Casey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isharwal, Sudhir</creatorcontrib><title>Gender Representation in American Urological Association Guidelines</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>To study patterns and factors associated with female representation in the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines.
We gathered publicly available information about the panelists, including the AUA section, practice setting, academic rank, fellowship training, years in practice, and H-index. The factors associated with the proportion of female panelists and trends were investigated. We also examined the proportion of female panelists in the European Association of Urology (EAU) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) urology guidelines.
There were 483 non-unique panelists in AUA guidelines, and 17% are female. Non-urologist female panelists in AUA guidelines represented a higher proportion than female urologists (30% vs 13%, P<0.0001). Compared with male panelists, females had lower H-indices (median 23 vs 35, P<0.001), and fewer were fellowship-trained (77.2% vs 86.8%; P=0.042). On multivariate analysis, non-urologists and panelists with lower H-indices were more likely to be female but there was no association between guideline specialties, academic ranking, geographic section, years in practice, and fellowship training with increased female authorship. Overtime, the proportion of female participation in guidelines remained stable. In the EAU and NCCN guideline panels, 12.2% and 10.7% were female, respectively.
Female representation among major urologic guidelines members is low and unchanged overtime. Female urologist participation was proportional to their representation in the urology workforce. Being a non-urologist and lower H-indices were associated with female membership in guideline panels.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Physicians, Women - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Sex Distribution</subject><subject>Societies, Medical - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urologists - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Urology - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMotlY_grJHL1sn2STbnKQUrUJBEHsOu8mspOyfmuwKfntTt3oVBmZgfm8e8wi5pjCnQOXdbj74ru7ev-YMGJ0Di5WfkCkVLE-VUuKUTAEUpJwpMSEXIewAQEqZn5NJlslcKpFNyWqNrUWfvOLeY8C2L3rXtYlrk2WD3pmiTbY_PnGsk2UInXEjsh6cxdq1GC7JWVXUAa-OfUa2jw9vq6d087J-Xi03qcmk6FNUpbWcQS4qymFhSytgkWNVVZZTU_ISOI-DgAwzKKgUmZLA41pVHFlpshm5He_uffcxYOh144LBui5a7IagGVcLpXJFaUTFiBrfheCx0nvvmsJ_aQr6kJ_e6WN--pCfBhYrj7qbo8VQNmj_VL-BReB-BDA--unQ62Actgat82h6bTv3j8U3V8GE2w</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Hougen, Helen Y.</creator><creator>Goodstein, Francesca R.</creator><creator>Bassale, Solange</creator><creator>Chen, Yiyi</creator><creator>Seideman, Casey A.</creator><creator>Isharwal, Sudhir</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Gender Representation in American Urological Association Guidelines</title><author>Hougen, Helen Y. ; Goodstein, Francesca R. ; Bassale, Solange ; Chen, Yiyi ; Seideman, Casey A. ; Isharwal, Sudhir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e9bdd42075f1408dbd5087efffd41cb4b04441c503e30a16539604fff9f4e2bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Physicians, Women - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Sex Distribution</topic><topic>Societies, Medical - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urologists - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Urology - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hougen, Helen Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodstein, Francesca R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassale, Solange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seideman, Casey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isharwal, Sudhir</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hougen, Helen Y.</au><au>Goodstein, Francesca R.</au><au>Bassale, Solange</au><au>Chen, Yiyi</au><au>Seideman, Casey A.</au><au>Isharwal, Sudhir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender Representation in American Urological Association Guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>156</volume><spage>47</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>47-51</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><abstract>To study patterns and factors associated with female representation in the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines.
We gathered publicly available information about the panelists, including the AUA section, practice setting, academic rank, fellowship training, years in practice, and H-index. The factors associated with the proportion of female panelists and trends were investigated. We also examined the proportion of female panelists in the European Association of Urology (EAU) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) urology guidelines.
There were 483 non-unique panelists in AUA guidelines, and 17% are female. Non-urologist female panelists in AUA guidelines represented a higher proportion than female urologists (30% vs 13%, P<0.0001). Compared with male panelists, females had lower H-indices (median 23 vs 35, P<0.001), and fewer were fellowship-trained (77.2% vs 86.8%; P=0.042). On multivariate analysis, non-urologists and panelists with lower H-indices were more likely to be female but there was no association between guideline specialties, academic ranking, geographic section, years in practice, and fellowship training with increased female authorship. Overtime, the proportion of female participation in guidelines remained stable. In the EAU and NCCN guideline panels, 12.2% and 10.7% were female, respectively.
Female representation among major urologic guidelines members is low and unchanged overtime. Female urologist participation was proportional to their representation in the urology workforce. Being a non-urologist and lower H-indices were associated with female membership in guideline panels.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33676953</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.027</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-4295 |
| ispartof | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2021-10, Vol.156, p.47-51 |
| issn | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2498997911 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Female Humans Male Physicians, Women - statistics & numerical data Practice Guidelines as Topic Sex Distribution Societies, Medical - statistics & numerical data United States Urologists - statistics & numerical data Urology - statistics & numerical data |
| title | Gender Representation in American Urological Association Guidelines |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20Representation%20in%20American%20Urological%20Association%20Guidelines&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Hougen,%20Helen%20Y.&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=156&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=47-51&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2498997911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2498997911&rft_id=info:pmid/33676953&rft_els_id=S0090429521002193&rfr_iscdi=true |