The Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Quadriceps Maximal Voluntary Contraction, Corticospinal Excitability, and Voluntary Activation Levels

Kristiansen, M, Thomsen, MJ, Nørgaard, J, Aaes, J, Knudsen, D, and Voigt, M. The effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction, corticospinal excitability, and voluntary activation levels. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1540-1547, 2022-Anodal transc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2022-06, Vol.36 (6), p.1540-1547
Hauptverfasser: Kristiansen, Mathias, Thomsen, Mikkel Jacobi, Nørgaard, Jens, Aaes, Jon, Knudsen, Dennis, Voigt, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1547
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1540
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 36
creator Kristiansen, Mathias
Thomsen, Mikkel Jacobi
Nørgaard, Jens
Aaes, Jon
Knudsen, Dennis
Voigt, Michael
description Kristiansen, M, Thomsen, MJ, Nørgaard, J, Aaes, J, Knudsen, D, and Voigt, M. The effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction, corticospinal excitability, and voluntary activation levels. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1540-1547, 2022-Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) has previously been shown to improve maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MVIC), possibly through an upregulation of corticospinal excitability. Because muscle strength is an essential part of the performance of many sports, any ergogenic effect of a-tDCS on this parameter could potentially increase performance outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a-tDCS on MVIC, voluntary activation levels (VALs), and corticospinal excitability, assessed by eliciting motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), in untrained subjects. Thirteen subjects completed 2 test sessions in which they received either a-tDCS or sham stimulation for 3 consecutive intervals of 10 minutes, separated by 5-minute breaks. Before and after each stimulation session, transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to elicit MEPs, and femoral nerve stimulation was used to assess VAL by measuring twitch torque during an MVIC test and in a relaxed state. Two-way analyses of variance with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05 were used to test for differences. A significant main effect was identified, as the MVIC pre-test (271.2 ± 56.6 Nm) was on average 4.1% higher compared to the post-test (260.6 ± 61.4 Nm) (p = 0.05). No significant differences were found in MEP, MVIC, or VAL as a result of stimulation type or time. In healthy subjects, the potential for improvement in corticospinal excitability may be negligible, which may in turn explain the lack of improvements in MEP, MVIC, and VAL after a-tDCS. The small decrease in MVIC for both conditions and nonsignificant changes in MEP and VAL do not justify the use of a-tDCS in combination with sporting performance in which the intent is to increase maximal isometric strength performance in the quadriceps muscle of healthy subjects.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003710
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2498991948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2498991948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2959-274a277c2155c5e9041bd2a41aa97e29b039e8fdfb9e8b3d9d093f8e95eaa1f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwBghZYsOiaf0bx8tRGGjRVAh1YBs5zo3GxRMPttN2Hoj3xNEUqGpZvr7yOZ9ln6J4S_AZEUSdf7luzvCjwSTBz4pjIhgrOa3l87zHFS9rTMhR8SrGG4ypEIK9LI4Yq6TkFT4ufq83gJbDACYhP6DF6Hvt0DroMZq82Nx8tGE-baYQYEzoOtnt5HSyfkR5fpt0H6yBXURX-t5us-GHd9OYdNijxo8paDNrT3MTkjU-7uyYRct7Y5PurLNpf4r02D-yLbLj9nDDCm7BxdfFi0G7CG8e6knx_dNy3VyUq6-fL5vFqjRUCVVSyTWV0lAihBGgMCddTzUnWisJVHWYKaiHfuhy6ViveqzYUIMSoDUZBDspPhy4u-B_TRBTu7XRgHN6BD_FlnJVK0UUr7P0_RPpjZ9CfllWVRJjKRWfgfygMsHHGGBodyH_Udi3BLdzjG2OsX0aY7a9e4BP3Rb6f6a_uf3n3nmXIMSfbrqD0G5Au7TJPEI5lXVJMaW4ytRyRiv2B06eqoo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670077945</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Quadriceps Maximal Voluntary Contraction, Corticospinal Excitability, and Voluntary Activation Levels</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Kristiansen, Mathias ; Thomsen, Mikkel Jacobi ; Nørgaard, Jens ; Aaes, Jon ; Knudsen, Dennis ; Voigt, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Kristiansen, Mathias ; Thomsen, Mikkel Jacobi ; Nørgaard, Jens ; Aaes, Jon ; Knudsen, Dennis ; Voigt, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Kristiansen, M, Thomsen, MJ, Nørgaard, J, Aaes, J, Knudsen, D, and Voigt, M. The effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction, corticospinal excitability, and voluntary activation levels. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1540-1547, 2022-Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) has previously been shown to improve maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MVIC), possibly through an upregulation of corticospinal excitability. Because muscle strength is an essential part of the performance of many sports, any ergogenic effect of a-tDCS on this parameter could potentially increase performance outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a-tDCS on MVIC, voluntary activation levels (VALs), and corticospinal excitability, assessed by eliciting motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), in untrained subjects. Thirteen subjects completed 2 test sessions in which they received either a-tDCS or sham stimulation for 3 consecutive intervals of 10 minutes, separated by 5-minute breaks. Before and after each stimulation session, transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to elicit MEPs, and femoral nerve stimulation was used to assess VAL by measuring twitch torque during an MVIC test and in a relaxed state. Two-way analyses of variance with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05 were used to test for differences. A significant main effect was identified, as the MVIC pre-test (271.2 ± 56.6 Nm) was on average 4.1% higher compared to the post-test (260.6 ± 61.4 Nm) (p = 0.05). No significant differences were found in MEP, MVIC, or VAL as a result of stimulation type or time. In healthy subjects, the potential for improvement in corticospinal excitability may be negligible, which may in turn explain the lack of improvements in MEP, MVIC, and VAL after a-tDCS. The small decrease in MVIC for both conditions and nonsignificant changes in MEP and VAL do not justify the use of a-tDCS in combination with sporting performance in which the intent is to increase maximal isometric strength performance in the quadriceps muscle of healthy subjects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003710</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33677460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</publisher><subject>Excitability ; Magnetic fields ; Motor evoked potentials ; Muscle contraction ; Muscle strength ; Pyramidal tracts ; Quadriceps muscle ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2022-06, Vol.36 (6), p.1540-1547</ispartof><rights>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 National Strength and Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>2021 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2959-274a277c2155c5e9041bd2a41aa97e29b039e8fdfb9e8b3d9d093f8e95eaa1f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2959-274a277c2155c5e9041bd2a41aa97e29b039e8fdfb9e8b3d9d093f8e95eaa1f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33677460$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kristiansen, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Mikkel Jacobi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nørgaard, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aaes, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knudsen, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voigt, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Quadriceps Maximal Voluntary Contraction, Corticospinal Excitability, and Voluntary Activation Levels</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>Kristiansen, M, Thomsen, MJ, Nørgaard, J, Aaes, J, Knudsen, D, and Voigt, M. The effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction, corticospinal excitability, and voluntary activation levels. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1540-1547, 2022-Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) has previously been shown to improve maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MVIC), possibly through an upregulation of corticospinal excitability. Because muscle strength is an essential part of the performance of many sports, any ergogenic effect of a-tDCS on this parameter could potentially increase performance outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a-tDCS on MVIC, voluntary activation levels (VALs), and corticospinal excitability, assessed by eliciting motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), in untrained subjects. Thirteen subjects completed 2 test sessions in which they received either a-tDCS or sham stimulation for 3 consecutive intervals of 10 minutes, separated by 5-minute breaks. Before and after each stimulation session, transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to elicit MEPs, and femoral nerve stimulation was used to assess VAL by measuring twitch torque during an MVIC test and in a relaxed state. Two-way analyses of variance with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05 were used to test for differences. A significant main effect was identified, as the MVIC pre-test (271.2 ± 56.6 Nm) was on average 4.1% higher compared to the post-test (260.6 ± 61.4 Nm) (p = 0.05). No significant differences were found in MEP, MVIC, or VAL as a result of stimulation type or time. In healthy subjects, the potential for improvement in corticospinal excitability may be negligible, which may in turn explain the lack of improvements in MEP, MVIC, and VAL after a-tDCS. The small decrease in MVIC for both conditions and nonsignificant changes in MEP and VAL do not justify the use of a-tDCS in combination with sporting performance in which the intent is to increase maximal isometric strength performance in the quadriceps muscle of healthy subjects.</description><subject>Excitability</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Motor evoked potentials</subject><subject>Muscle contraction</subject><subject>Muscle strength</subject><subject>Pyramidal tracts</subject><subject>Quadriceps muscle</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwBghZYsOiaf0bx8tRGGjRVAh1YBs5zo3GxRMPttN2Hoj3xNEUqGpZvr7yOZ9ln6J4S_AZEUSdf7luzvCjwSTBz4pjIhgrOa3l87zHFS9rTMhR8SrGG4ypEIK9LI4Yq6TkFT4ufq83gJbDACYhP6DF6Hvt0DroMZq82Nx8tGE-baYQYEzoOtnt5HSyfkR5fpt0H6yBXURX-t5us-GHd9OYdNijxo8paDNrT3MTkjU-7uyYRct7Y5PurLNpf4r02D-yLbLj9nDDCm7BxdfFi0G7CG8e6knx_dNy3VyUq6-fL5vFqjRUCVVSyTWV0lAihBGgMCddTzUnWisJVHWYKaiHfuhy6ViveqzYUIMSoDUZBDspPhy4u-B_TRBTu7XRgHN6BD_FlnJVK0UUr7P0_RPpjZ9CfllWVRJjKRWfgfygMsHHGGBodyH_Udi3BLdzjG2OsX0aY7a9e4BP3Rb6f6a_uf3n3nmXIMSfbrqD0G5Au7TJPEI5lXVJMaW4ytRyRiv2B06eqoo</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Kristiansen, Mathias</creator><creator>Thomsen, Mikkel Jacobi</creator><creator>Nørgaard, Jens</creator><creator>Aaes, Jon</creator><creator>Knudsen, Dennis</creator><creator>Voigt, Michael</creator><general>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>The Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Quadriceps Maximal Voluntary Contraction, Corticospinal Excitability, and Voluntary Activation Levels</title><author>Kristiansen, Mathias ; Thomsen, Mikkel Jacobi ; Nørgaard, Jens ; Aaes, Jon ; Knudsen, Dennis ; Voigt, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2959-274a277c2155c5e9041bd2a41aa97e29b039e8fdfb9e8b3d9d093f8e95eaa1f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Excitability</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Motor evoked potentials</topic><topic>Muscle contraction</topic><topic>Muscle strength</topic><topic>Pyramidal tracts</topic><topic>Quadriceps muscle</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kristiansen, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Mikkel Jacobi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nørgaard, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aaes, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knudsen, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voigt, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kristiansen, Mathias</au><au>Thomsen, Mikkel Jacobi</au><au>Nørgaard, Jens</au><au>Aaes, Jon</au><au>Knudsen, Dennis</au><au>Voigt, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Quadriceps Maximal Voluntary Contraction, Corticospinal Excitability, and Voluntary Activation Levels</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1540</spage><epage>1547</epage><pages>1540-1547</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Kristiansen, M, Thomsen, MJ, Nørgaard, J, Aaes, J, Knudsen, D, and Voigt, M. The effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction, corticospinal excitability, and voluntary activation levels. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1540-1547, 2022-Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) has previously been shown to improve maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MVIC), possibly through an upregulation of corticospinal excitability. Because muscle strength is an essential part of the performance of many sports, any ergogenic effect of a-tDCS on this parameter could potentially increase performance outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a-tDCS on MVIC, voluntary activation levels (VALs), and corticospinal excitability, assessed by eliciting motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), in untrained subjects. Thirteen subjects completed 2 test sessions in which they received either a-tDCS or sham stimulation for 3 consecutive intervals of 10 minutes, separated by 5-minute breaks. Before and after each stimulation session, transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to elicit MEPs, and femoral nerve stimulation was used to assess VAL by measuring twitch torque during an MVIC test and in a relaxed state. Two-way analyses of variance with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05 were used to test for differences. A significant main effect was identified, as the MVIC pre-test (271.2 ± 56.6 Nm) was on average 4.1% higher compared to the post-test (260.6 ± 61.4 Nm) (p = 0.05). No significant differences were found in MEP, MVIC, or VAL as a result of stimulation type or time. In healthy subjects, the potential for improvement in corticospinal excitability may be negligible, which may in turn explain the lack of improvements in MEP, MVIC, and VAL after a-tDCS. The small decrease in MVIC for both conditions and nonsignificant changes in MEP and VAL do not justify the use of a-tDCS in combination with sporting performance in which the intent is to increase maximal isometric strength performance in the quadriceps muscle of healthy subjects.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</pub><pmid>33677460</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000003710</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2022-06, Vol.36 (6), p.1540-1547
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2498991948
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Excitability
Magnetic fields
Motor evoked potentials
Muscle contraction
Muscle strength
Pyramidal tracts
Quadriceps muscle
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
title The Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Quadriceps Maximal Voluntary Contraction, Corticospinal Excitability, and Voluntary Activation Levels
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A33%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Anodal%20Transcranial%20Direct%20Current%20Stimulation%20on%20Quadriceps%20Maximal%20Voluntary%20Contraction,%20Corticospinal%20Excitability,%20and%20Voluntary%20Activation%20Levels&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Kristiansen,%20Mathias&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1540&rft.epage=1547&rft.pages=1540-1547&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003710&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2498991948%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670077945&rft_id=info:pmid/33677460&rfr_iscdi=true