Comparison of Different Techniques in Latissimus Dorsi Breast Reconstruction: Plain, Immediately Lipofilled, and Implant Enhanced

The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is still a popular choice for breast reconstruction. Plain LD provides a good option for women with small breasts, but with bigger breasts, the problem is insufficient volume. Traditionally, implants have been inserted to improve the volume, but because of problems ass...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2022-01, Vol.88 (1), p.20-24
Hauptverfasser: Palve, Johanna, Luukkaala, Tiina, Kääriäinen, Minna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Annals of plastic surgery
container_volume 88
creator Palve, Johanna
Luukkaala, Tiina
Kääriäinen, Minna
description The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is still a popular choice for breast reconstruction. Plain LD provides a good option for women with small breasts, but with bigger breasts, the problem is insufficient volume. Traditionally, implants have been inserted to improve the volume, but because of problems associated with them, the use of fat grafting has gained popularity. Increased numbers of reports considering also immediate lipofilling have been published. This study aimed to evaluate and compare different techniques in LD reconstruction in association with complications, number of further operations, and duration of reconstructive process. A retrospective review of patients who had undergone LD reconstruction between 2008 and 2019 was performed. Demographic and operative features, complications, and the duration of reconstruction process were analyzed. A total of 291 LD flaps were performed in 283 women, including 161 (55%) implant enhanced, 73 (25%) immediate lipofilled, and 57 (20%) plain flaps. Of these, 84% were delayed reconstructions. The median volume of immediately injected fat was 155 mL (range, 50-296 mL) and inserted implant 185 mL (range, 80-420 mL). Of plain LDs, 75% did not need further operations compared with 63% of implant and 49% of lipofilling groups (P < 0.001). The median duration of reconstructive process was 10 months (range, 4-86 months) in plain, 13 months (range, 5-58 months) in implant, and 18 months (range, 5-80 months) in lipofilling group (P < 0.002). No significant differences were observed in overall complication rates between groups (P = 0.228). Most of the complications were minor, seroma being the most common. Of major complications, plain flaps were most commonly associated with donor site problems, lipofilling group with partial flap necrosis, and implant enhanced with deep infections in the breast. Shoulder problem was observed in 21 patients (7%) with no significant difference between groups (P = 0.395). Latissimus dorsi flap is a versatile and safe breast reconstruction method, because it is associated most commonly only with minor complications. Careful patient selection is important when choosing between different techniques. This can have an impact on the number of further operations needed and the duration of reconstruction process. Immediate lipofilling is a safe technique to avoid the use of implant and allow fully autologous reconstruction.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002798
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2497104399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2497104399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-fdea16800637f2afdfae80fead55de67f56bf9e1a2ff7b176a7dbe34c26df2de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9P3DAQxS1EBQvtN0CVjxwI9Z_ETnqjC22RVgJReo688VhrcOzUdoQ49pvj1UJb1RfL45n35v0QOqHknJJOfvpxcXtO_jlMdu0eWtCGi4pL0u6jBaF1W0lS80N0lNIDIZS1tThAh5wLQRnlC_R7GcZJRZuCx8HgS2sMRPAZ38Ow8fbXDAlbj1cq25TsOCd8GWKy-EsElTK-gyH4lOM8ZBv8Z3zrlPVn-HocQVuVwT3jlZ2Csc6BPsPK6_I3OVUMrvxG-QH0e_TOKJfgw-t9jH5-vbpffq9WN9-ulxerauCENpXRoKhoCRFcGqaMNgpaYkDpptEgpGnE2nRAFTNGrqkUSuo18HpgQhumgR-j053uFMM2Vu5HmwZwZRkIc-pZ3UlaWHVdaa13rUMMKUUw_RTtqOJzT0m_hd8X-P3_8MvYx1eHeV3y_xl6o_1X9ym4DDE9uvkJYr8B5fJmp1fSVYwwRmh5VNtKw18AGDaSHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2497104399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Different Techniques in Latissimus Dorsi Breast Reconstruction: Plain, Immediately Lipofilled, and Implant Enhanced</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Palve, Johanna ; Luukkaala, Tiina ; Kääriäinen, Minna</creator><creatorcontrib>Palve, Johanna ; Luukkaala, Tiina ; Kääriäinen, Minna</creatorcontrib><description>The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is still a popular choice for breast reconstruction. Plain LD provides a good option for women with small breasts, but with bigger breasts, the problem is insufficient volume. Traditionally, implants have been inserted to improve the volume, but because of problems associated with them, the use of fat grafting has gained popularity. Increased numbers of reports considering also immediate lipofilling have been published. This study aimed to evaluate and compare different techniques in LD reconstruction in association with complications, number of further operations, and duration of reconstructive process. A retrospective review of patients who had undergone LD reconstruction between 2008 and 2019 was performed. Demographic and operative features, complications, and the duration of reconstruction process were analyzed. A total of 291 LD flaps were performed in 283 women, including 161 (55%) implant enhanced, 73 (25%) immediate lipofilled, and 57 (20%) plain flaps. Of these, 84% were delayed reconstructions. The median volume of immediately injected fat was 155 mL (range, 50-296 mL) and inserted implant 185 mL (range, 80-420 mL). Of plain LDs, 75% did not need further operations compared with 63% of implant and 49% of lipofilling groups (P &lt; 0.001). The median duration of reconstructive process was 10 months (range, 4-86 months) in plain, 13 months (range, 5-58 months) in implant, and 18 months (range, 5-80 months) in lipofilling group (P &lt; 0.002). No significant differences were observed in overall complication rates between groups (P = 0.228). Most of the complications were minor, seroma being the most common. Of major complications, plain flaps were most commonly associated with donor site problems, lipofilling group with partial flap necrosis, and implant enhanced with deep infections in the breast. Shoulder problem was observed in 21 patients (7%) with no significant difference between groups (P = 0.395). Latissimus dorsi flap is a versatile and safe breast reconstruction method, because it is associated most commonly only with minor complications. Careful patient selection is important when choosing between different techniques. This can have an impact on the number of further operations needed and the duration of reconstruction process. Immediate lipofilling is a safe technique to avoid the use of implant and allow fully autologous reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002798</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33661213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty ; Mastectomy ; Retrospective Studies ; Superficial Back Muscles - transplantation ; Surgical Flaps</subject><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2022-01, Vol.88 (1), p.20-24</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-fdea16800637f2afdfae80fead55de67f56bf9e1a2ff7b176a7dbe34c26df2de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661213$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palve, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luukkaala, Tiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kääriäinen, Minna</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Different Techniques in Latissimus Dorsi Breast Reconstruction: Plain, Immediately Lipofilled, and Implant Enhanced</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is still a popular choice for breast reconstruction. Plain LD provides a good option for women with small breasts, but with bigger breasts, the problem is insufficient volume. Traditionally, implants have been inserted to improve the volume, but because of problems associated with them, the use of fat grafting has gained popularity. Increased numbers of reports considering also immediate lipofilling have been published. This study aimed to evaluate and compare different techniques in LD reconstruction in association with complications, number of further operations, and duration of reconstructive process. A retrospective review of patients who had undergone LD reconstruction between 2008 and 2019 was performed. Demographic and operative features, complications, and the duration of reconstruction process were analyzed. A total of 291 LD flaps were performed in 283 women, including 161 (55%) implant enhanced, 73 (25%) immediate lipofilled, and 57 (20%) plain flaps. Of these, 84% were delayed reconstructions. The median volume of immediately injected fat was 155 mL (range, 50-296 mL) and inserted implant 185 mL (range, 80-420 mL). Of plain LDs, 75% did not need further operations compared with 63% of implant and 49% of lipofilling groups (P &lt; 0.001). The median duration of reconstructive process was 10 months (range, 4-86 months) in plain, 13 months (range, 5-58 months) in implant, and 18 months (range, 5-80 months) in lipofilling group (P &lt; 0.002). No significant differences were observed in overall complication rates between groups (P = 0.228). Most of the complications were minor, seroma being the most common. Of major complications, plain flaps were most commonly associated with donor site problems, lipofilling group with partial flap necrosis, and implant enhanced with deep infections in the breast. Shoulder problem was observed in 21 patients (7%) with no significant difference between groups (P = 0.395). Latissimus dorsi flap is a versatile and safe breast reconstruction method, because it is associated most commonly only with minor complications. Careful patient selection is important when choosing between different techniques. This can have an impact on the number of further operations needed and the duration of reconstruction process. Immediate lipofilling is a safe technique to avoid the use of implant and allow fully autologous reconstruction.</description><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Superficial Back Muscles - transplantation</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE9P3DAQxS1EBQvtN0CVjxwI9Z_ETnqjC22RVgJReo688VhrcOzUdoQ49pvj1UJb1RfL45n35v0QOqHknJJOfvpxcXtO_jlMdu0eWtCGi4pL0u6jBaF1W0lS80N0lNIDIZS1tThAh5wLQRnlC_R7GcZJRZuCx8HgS2sMRPAZ38Ow8fbXDAlbj1cq25TsOCd8GWKy-EsElTK-gyH4lOM8ZBv8Z3zrlPVn-HocQVuVwT3jlZ2Csc6BPsPK6_I3OVUMrvxG-QH0e_TOKJfgw-t9jH5-vbpffq9WN9-ulxerauCENpXRoKhoCRFcGqaMNgpaYkDpptEgpGnE2nRAFTNGrqkUSuo18HpgQhumgR-j053uFMM2Vu5HmwZwZRkIc-pZ3UlaWHVdaa13rUMMKUUw_RTtqOJzT0m_hd8X-P3_8MvYx1eHeV3y_xl6o_1X9ym4DDE9uvkJYr8B5fJmp1fSVYwwRmh5VNtKw18AGDaSHw</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Palve, Johanna</creator><creator>Luukkaala, Tiina</creator><creator>Kääriäinen, Minna</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Different Techniques in Latissimus Dorsi Breast Reconstruction: Plain, Immediately Lipofilled, and Implant Enhanced</title><author>Palve, Johanna ; Luukkaala, Tiina ; Kääriäinen, Minna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-fdea16800637f2afdfae80fead55de67f56bf9e1a2ff7b176a7dbe34c26df2de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Superficial Back Muscles - transplantation</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palve, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luukkaala, Tiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kääriäinen, Minna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palve, Johanna</au><au>Luukkaala, Tiina</au><au>Kääriäinen, Minna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Different Techniques in Latissimus Dorsi Breast Reconstruction: Plain, Immediately Lipofilled, and Implant Enhanced</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>20-24</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is still a popular choice for breast reconstruction. Plain LD provides a good option for women with small breasts, but with bigger breasts, the problem is insufficient volume. Traditionally, implants have been inserted to improve the volume, but because of problems associated with them, the use of fat grafting has gained popularity. Increased numbers of reports considering also immediate lipofilling have been published. This study aimed to evaluate and compare different techniques in LD reconstruction in association with complications, number of further operations, and duration of reconstructive process. A retrospective review of patients who had undergone LD reconstruction between 2008 and 2019 was performed. Demographic and operative features, complications, and the duration of reconstruction process were analyzed. A total of 291 LD flaps were performed in 283 women, including 161 (55%) implant enhanced, 73 (25%) immediate lipofilled, and 57 (20%) plain flaps. Of these, 84% were delayed reconstructions. The median volume of immediately injected fat was 155 mL (range, 50-296 mL) and inserted implant 185 mL (range, 80-420 mL). Of plain LDs, 75% did not need further operations compared with 63% of implant and 49% of lipofilling groups (P &lt; 0.001). The median duration of reconstructive process was 10 months (range, 4-86 months) in plain, 13 months (range, 5-58 months) in implant, and 18 months (range, 5-80 months) in lipofilling group (P &lt; 0.002). No significant differences were observed in overall complication rates between groups (P = 0.228). Most of the complications were minor, seroma being the most common. Of major complications, plain flaps were most commonly associated with donor site problems, lipofilling group with partial flap necrosis, and implant enhanced with deep infections in the breast. Shoulder problem was observed in 21 patients (7%) with no significant difference between groups (P = 0.395). Latissimus dorsi flap is a versatile and safe breast reconstruction method, because it is associated most commonly only with minor complications. Careful patient selection is important when choosing between different techniques. This can have an impact on the number of further operations needed and the duration of reconstruction process. Immediate lipofilling is a safe technique to avoid the use of implant and allow fully autologous reconstruction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>33661213</pmid><doi>10.1097/SAP.0000000000002798</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-7043
ispartof Annals of plastic surgery, 2022-01, Vol.88 (1), p.20-24
issn 0148-7043
1536-3708
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2497104399
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Humans
Mammaplasty
Mastectomy
Retrospective Studies
Superficial Back Muscles - transplantation
Surgical Flaps
title Comparison of Different Techniques in Latissimus Dorsi Breast Reconstruction: Plain, Immediately Lipofilled, and Implant Enhanced
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T16%3A09%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Different%20Techniques%20in%20Latissimus%20Dorsi%20Breast%20Reconstruction:%20Plain,%20Immediately%20Lipofilled,%20and%20Implant%20Enhanced&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Palve,%20Johanna&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=20-24&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002798&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2497104399%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2497104399&rft_id=info:pmid/33661213&rfr_iscdi=true