Donor Site Wound Healing in Radial Forearm Flap: A Comparative Study Between Dermal Substitute and Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Full-Thickness Skin Graft Primary Coverage

Radial forearm flap (RFF) is one of the most used flaps in reconstructive surgery. Despite its versatility and effectiveness, the donor site is affected by aesthetic and functional issues. In the group of techniques described to improve the donor site morbidity, dermal substitutes offer a valid appr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2021-06, Vol.86 (6), p.655-660
Hauptverfasser: Di Giuli, Riccardo, Dicorato, Paolo, Kaciulyte, Juste, Marinari, Niccolò, Conversi, Francesco, Mazzocchi, Marco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 660
container_issue 6
container_start_page 655
container_title Annals of plastic surgery
container_volume 86
creator Di Giuli, Riccardo
Dicorato, Paolo
Kaciulyte, Juste
Marinari, Niccolò
Conversi, Francesco
Mazzocchi, Marco
description Radial forearm flap (RFF) is one of the most used flaps in reconstructive surgery. Despite its versatility and effectiveness, the donor site is affected by aesthetic and functional issues. In the group of techniques described to improve the donor site morbidity, dermal substitutes offer a valid approach in the wound management. A bilayered bioresorbable dermal substitute (Hyalomatrix) was used to provide the primary coverage of the RFF harvest site followed after 3 weeks by a split-thickness skin graft placement. In this study, 37 patients underwent RFF donor site reconstruction and subjected to a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The dermal substitute was applied on 15 patients, and their outcomes were compared with the data achieved by 22 patients submitted to immediate reconstruction with autologous full-thickness skin graft. Results were documented by digital photographs, the visual analog scale, the Vancouver Scar Scale, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Data were analyzed and compared through statistical analysis. Total wound coverage was achieved in 4 to 6 weeks, and no tendon impairments were reported in the dermal substitute group. In our experience, the use of the dermal substitute is a valuable mean to minimize RFF donor site morbidity with excellent functional and aesthetic outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002777
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2497103038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2497103038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3012-8ace9cfe1e0f7d6198fefadf8633bfe5d0535f884a87bfd8966709badb2d40a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkVtvFCEYhonR2LX6D4zh0ptpYZgFxrt167YmTWycqpcTZvjo4jIHOXTTX-VfLM3WQ4zcEJL3fT7gQeg1JSeU1OK0WV2dkL9WKYR4ghZ0yXjBBJFP0YLQShaCVOwIvQjhOyG0lBV_jo4Y45yWZb1AP8-mcfK4sRHwtymNGl-Acna8wXbEn5W2yuHN5EH5AW-cmt_hFV5Pw6y8ivYWcBOTvsPvIe4BRnwGfsiFJnUh2pgyU2ViMzsbi-ut7XcjhICbXWafe2Ui_go-pIA3ybn_B668HZS_yzNvwasbeImeGeUCvHrcj9GXzYfr9UVx-en843p1WfQsv7KQqoe6N0CBGKE5raUBo7SRnLHOwFKTJVsaKSslRWe0rDkXpO6U7kpdEVWzY_T2wJ399CNBiO1gQw_OqRGmFNqyqgUljDCZo9Uh2vspBA-mnQ-XbilpH1S1WVX7r6pce_M4IXUD6N-lX27-cPeTi_mfdi7twbfb7CduDzzORFGSkhKeDwV5EMzuAWudoSc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2497103038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Donor Site Wound Healing in Radial Forearm Flap: A Comparative Study Between Dermal Substitute and Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Full-Thickness Skin Graft Primary Coverage</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Di Giuli, Riccardo ; Dicorato, Paolo ; Kaciulyte, Juste ; Marinari, Niccolò ; Conversi, Francesco ; Mazzocchi, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Giuli, Riccardo ; Dicorato, Paolo ; Kaciulyte, Juste ; Marinari, Niccolò ; Conversi, Francesco ; Mazzocchi, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>Radial forearm flap (RFF) is one of the most used flaps in reconstructive surgery. Despite its versatility and effectiveness, the donor site is affected by aesthetic and functional issues. In the group of techniques described to improve the donor site morbidity, dermal substitutes offer a valid approach in the wound management. A bilayered bioresorbable dermal substitute (Hyalomatrix) was used to provide the primary coverage of the RFF harvest site followed after 3 weeks by a split-thickness skin graft placement. In this study, 37 patients underwent RFF donor site reconstruction and subjected to a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The dermal substitute was applied on 15 patients, and their outcomes were compared with the data achieved by 22 patients submitted to immediate reconstruction with autologous full-thickness skin graft. Results were documented by digital photographs, the visual analog scale, the Vancouver Scar Scale, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Data were analyzed and compared through statistical analysis. Total wound coverage was achieved in 4 to 6 weeks, and no tendon impairments were reported in the dermal substitute group. In our experience, the use of the dermal substitute is a valuable mean to minimize RFF donor site morbidity with excellent functional and aesthetic outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002777</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33661229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2021-06, Vol.86 (6), p.655-660</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3012-8ace9cfe1e0f7d6198fefadf8633bfe5d0535f884a87bfd8966709badb2d40a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Giuli, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dicorato, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaciulyte, Juste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinari, Niccolò</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conversi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzocchi, Marco</creatorcontrib><title>Donor Site Wound Healing in Radial Forearm Flap: A Comparative Study Between Dermal Substitute and Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Full-Thickness Skin Graft Primary Coverage</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Radial forearm flap (RFF) is one of the most used flaps in reconstructive surgery. Despite its versatility and effectiveness, the donor site is affected by aesthetic and functional issues. In the group of techniques described to improve the donor site morbidity, dermal substitutes offer a valid approach in the wound management. A bilayered bioresorbable dermal substitute (Hyalomatrix) was used to provide the primary coverage of the RFF harvest site followed after 3 weeks by a split-thickness skin graft placement. In this study, 37 patients underwent RFF donor site reconstruction and subjected to a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The dermal substitute was applied on 15 patients, and their outcomes were compared with the data achieved by 22 patients submitted to immediate reconstruction with autologous full-thickness skin graft. Results were documented by digital photographs, the visual analog scale, the Vancouver Scar Scale, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Data were analyzed and compared through statistical analysis. Total wound coverage was achieved in 4 to 6 weeks, and no tendon impairments were reported in the dermal substitute group. In our experience, the use of the dermal substitute is a valuable mean to minimize RFF donor site morbidity with excellent functional and aesthetic outcomes.</description><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkVtvFCEYhonR2LX6D4zh0ptpYZgFxrt167YmTWycqpcTZvjo4jIHOXTTX-VfLM3WQ4zcEJL3fT7gQeg1JSeU1OK0WV2dkL9WKYR4ghZ0yXjBBJFP0YLQShaCVOwIvQjhOyG0lBV_jo4Y45yWZb1AP8-mcfK4sRHwtymNGl-Acna8wXbEn5W2yuHN5EH5AW-cmt_hFV5Pw6y8ivYWcBOTvsPvIe4BRnwGfsiFJnUh2pgyU2ViMzsbi-ut7XcjhICbXWafe2Ui_go-pIA3ybn_B668HZS_yzNvwasbeImeGeUCvHrcj9GXzYfr9UVx-en843p1WfQsv7KQqoe6N0CBGKE5raUBo7SRnLHOwFKTJVsaKSslRWe0rDkXpO6U7kpdEVWzY_T2wJ399CNBiO1gQw_OqRGmFNqyqgUljDCZo9Uh2vspBA-mnQ-XbilpH1S1WVX7r6pce_M4IXUD6N-lX27-cPeTi_mfdi7twbfb7CduDzzORFGSkhKeDwV5EMzuAWudoSc</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Di Giuli, Riccardo</creator><creator>Dicorato, Paolo</creator><creator>Kaciulyte, Juste</creator><creator>Marinari, Niccolò</creator><creator>Conversi, Francesco</creator><creator>Mazzocchi, Marco</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Donor Site Wound Healing in Radial Forearm Flap: A Comparative Study Between Dermal Substitute and Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Full-Thickness Skin Graft Primary Coverage</title><author>Di Giuli, Riccardo ; Dicorato, Paolo ; Kaciulyte, Juste ; Marinari, Niccolò ; Conversi, Francesco ; Mazzocchi, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3012-8ace9cfe1e0f7d6198fefadf8633bfe5d0535f884a87bfd8966709badb2d40a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Giuli, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dicorato, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaciulyte, Juste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinari, Niccolò</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conversi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzocchi, Marco</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Giuli, Riccardo</au><au>Dicorato, Paolo</au><au>Kaciulyte, Juste</au><au>Marinari, Niccolò</au><au>Conversi, Francesco</au><au>Mazzocchi, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Donor Site Wound Healing in Radial Forearm Flap: A Comparative Study Between Dermal Substitute and Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Full-Thickness Skin Graft Primary Coverage</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>655</spage><epage>660</epage><pages>655-660</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>Radial forearm flap (RFF) is one of the most used flaps in reconstructive surgery. Despite its versatility and effectiveness, the donor site is affected by aesthetic and functional issues. In the group of techniques described to improve the donor site morbidity, dermal substitutes offer a valid approach in the wound management. A bilayered bioresorbable dermal substitute (Hyalomatrix) was used to provide the primary coverage of the RFF harvest site followed after 3 weeks by a split-thickness skin graft placement. In this study, 37 patients underwent RFF donor site reconstruction and subjected to a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The dermal substitute was applied on 15 patients, and their outcomes were compared with the data achieved by 22 patients submitted to immediate reconstruction with autologous full-thickness skin graft. Results were documented by digital photographs, the visual analog scale, the Vancouver Scar Scale, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Data were analyzed and compared through statistical analysis. Total wound coverage was achieved in 4 to 6 weeks, and no tendon impairments were reported in the dermal substitute group. In our experience, the use of the dermal substitute is a valuable mean to minimize RFF donor site morbidity with excellent functional and aesthetic outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>33661229</pmid><doi>10.1097/SAP.0000000000002777</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-7043
ispartof Annals of plastic surgery, 2021-06, Vol.86 (6), p.655-660
issn 0148-7043
1536-3708
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2497103038
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
title Donor Site Wound Healing in Radial Forearm Flap: A Comparative Study Between Dermal Substitute and Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Full-Thickness Skin Graft Primary Coverage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A39%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Donor%20Site%20Wound%20Healing%20in%20Radial%20Forearm%20Flap:%20A%20Comparative%20Study%20Between%20Dermal%20Substitute%20and%20Split-Thickness%20Skin%20Graft%20Versus%20Full-Thickness%20Skin%20Graft%20Primary%20Coverage&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Di%20Giuli,%20Riccardo&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=655&rft.epage=660&rft.pages=655-660&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002777&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2497103038%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2497103038&rft_id=info:pmid/33661229&rfr_iscdi=true