Impact of biological and artificial seminal fluids on sperm parameters and DNA status in asthenozoospermic ejaculates

The chemical composition and physiological properties of seminal fluid (SF) affect sperm quality. The objective was to investigate the effects of in vitro exposure of artificial seminal fluid (ASF) and biological seminal fluid (SF) on sperm quality. Asthenozoospermic ejaculates (n = 20) were divided...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Andrologia 2021-06, Vol.53 (5), p.e14018-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Gholizadeh, Lida, Agha‐Rahimi, Azam, Ghasemi‐Esmailabad, Saeed, Maleki, Behnam, Ahamed, Abdul Munaf Sultan, Khalili, Mohammad Ali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 5
container_start_page e14018
container_title Andrologia
container_volume 53
creator Gholizadeh, Lida
Agha‐Rahimi, Azam
Ghasemi‐Esmailabad, Saeed
Maleki, Behnam
Ahamed, Abdul Munaf Sultan
Khalili, Mohammad Ali
description The chemical composition and physiological properties of seminal fluid (SF) affect sperm quality. The objective was to investigate the effects of in vitro exposure of artificial seminal fluid (ASF) and biological seminal fluid (SF) on sperm quality. Asthenozoospermic ejaculates (n = 20) were divided into two aliquots. The first aliquot was centrifuged for obtaining asthenozoospermic SF. The second aliquot was processed with density gradient centrifugation (DGC), and the pellet was diluted separately with following media: (a) ASF; (b) Ham's F10; (c) normozoospermic SF; and (d) asthenozoospermic SF. Sperm parameters and DNA status were assessed after DGC, as well as 2 and 24 hr after incubation. The data showed that sperm progressive motility, viability and DNA integrity were significantly higher in ASF than Ham's F10 medium immediately after DGC. At 2 and 24 hr, the progressive motility was significantly decreased in biological SF compared with ASF and Ham's F10. DNA fragmentation index (DFI) was significantly lower in normozoospermic SF than asthenozoospermic SF and Ham's F10 at time 2 hr. In conclusion, normal SF showed the protective role on sperm DNA structure. Moreover, ASF preserved sperm motility better than biological SF during 24 hr, despite being similar to normal SF regarding DNA integrity preservation in short time.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/and.14018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2497096380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2497096380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-52745afb6a13325dfc415256ab119beb8bf42056d4d54169b9df401f7a2f29983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1P3DAQBmALtWJXlEP_QGWJSzlk8WdiH1dQYKUVvbTnaOLY1KskDnYiRH89Zhc4IDGXkaXHr-UZhL5TsqK5LmBoV1QQqo7QkgquC8Iq9gUtCSe8ELLUC3Sa0o7kErKqhDhGC87LMjO-RPOmH8FMODjc-NCFe2-gwzkTQ5y888bnY7K9H3J33ezbhMOA02hjj0eI0NvJxrS_cXW3xmmCaU7YDxjS9M8O4X8Ie-wNtjswcweTTd_QVwddsqev_QT9vf715_K22P6-2Vyut4XhSqlCskpIcE0JlHMmW2cElUyW0FCqG9uoxglGZNmKVgpa6ka3Lk_CVcAc01rxE_TzkDvG8DDbNNW9T8Z2HQw2zKlmQldEl1yRTM8-0F2YY_51Vi9vKiWkyOr8oEwMKUXr6jH6HuJTTUn9so46D6LeryPbH6-Jc9Pb9l2-DT-DiwN49J19-jypXt9dHSKfAY6Jk7c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2525688454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of biological and artificial seminal fluids on sperm parameters and DNA status in asthenozoospermic ejaculates</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Gholizadeh, Lida ; Agha‐Rahimi, Azam ; Ghasemi‐Esmailabad, Saeed ; Maleki, Behnam ; Ahamed, Abdul Munaf Sultan ; Khalili, Mohammad Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Gholizadeh, Lida ; Agha‐Rahimi, Azam ; Ghasemi‐Esmailabad, Saeed ; Maleki, Behnam ; Ahamed, Abdul Munaf Sultan ; Khalili, Mohammad Ali</creatorcontrib><description>The chemical composition and physiological properties of seminal fluid (SF) affect sperm quality. The objective was to investigate the effects of in vitro exposure of artificial seminal fluid (ASF) and biological seminal fluid (SF) on sperm quality. Asthenozoospermic ejaculates (n = 20) were divided into two aliquots. The first aliquot was centrifuged for obtaining asthenozoospermic SF. The second aliquot was processed with density gradient centrifugation (DGC), and the pellet was diluted separately with following media: (a) ASF; (b) Ham's F10; (c) normozoospermic SF; and (d) asthenozoospermic SF. Sperm parameters and DNA status were assessed after DGC, as well as 2 and 24 hr after incubation. The data showed that sperm progressive motility, viability and DNA integrity were significantly higher in ASF than Ham's F10 medium immediately after DGC. At 2 and 24 hr, the progressive motility was significantly decreased in biological SF compared with ASF and Ham's F10. DNA fragmentation index (DFI) was significantly lower in normozoospermic SF than asthenozoospermic SF and Ham's F10 at time 2 hr. In conclusion, normal SF showed the protective role on sperm DNA structure. Moreover, ASF preserved sperm motility better than biological SF during 24 hr, despite being similar to normal SF regarding DNA integrity preservation in short time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-4569</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0272</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/and.14018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33660273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>artificial seminal fluid ; asthenozoospermia ; Centrifugation ; density gradient centrifugation ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA fragmentation ; DNA fragmentation index ; DNA structure ; Motility ; Seminal fluid ; Sperm ; sperm parameters</subject><ispartof>Andrologia, 2021-06, Vol.53 (5), p.e14018-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><rights>2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-52745afb6a13325dfc415256ab119beb8bf42056d4d54169b9df401f7a2f29983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-52745afb6a13325dfc415256ab119beb8bf42056d4d54169b9df401f7a2f29983</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0567-5595 ; 0000-0002-7579-6192 ; 0000-0002-8932-0224</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fand.14018$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fand.14018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33660273$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gholizadeh, Lida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agha‐Rahimi, Azam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi‐Esmailabad, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maleki, Behnam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahamed, Abdul Munaf Sultan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalili, Mohammad Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of biological and artificial seminal fluids on sperm parameters and DNA status in asthenozoospermic ejaculates</title><title>Andrologia</title><addtitle>Andrologia</addtitle><description>The chemical composition and physiological properties of seminal fluid (SF) affect sperm quality. The objective was to investigate the effects of in vitro exposure of artificial seminal fluid (ASF) and biological seminal fluid (SF) on sperm quality. Asthenozoospermic ejaculates (n = 20) were divided into two aliquots. The first aliquot was centrifuged for obtaining asthenozoospermic SF. The second aliquot was processed with density gradient centrifugation (DGC), and the pellet was diluted separately with following media: (a) ASF; (b) Ham's F10; (c) normozoospermic SF; and (d) asthenozoospermic SF. Sperm parameters and DNA status were assessed after DGC, as well as 2 and 24 hr after incubation. The data showed that sperm progressive motility, viability and DNA integrity were significantly higher in ASF than Ham's F10 medium immediately after DGC. At 2 and 24 hr, the progressive motility was significantly decreased in biological SF compared with ASF and Ham's F10. DNA fragmentation index (DFI) was significantly lower in normozoospermic SF than asthenozoospermic SF and Ham's F10 at time 2 hr. In conclusion, normal SF showed the protective role on sperm DNA structure. Moreover, ASF preserved sperm motility better than biological SF during 24 hr, despite being similar to normal SF regarding DNA integrity preservation in short time.</description><subject>artificial seminal fluid</subject><subject>asthenozoospermia</subject><subject>Centrifugation</subject><subject>density gradient centrifugation</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA fragmentation</subject><subject>DNA fragmentation index</subject><subject>DNA structure</subject><subject>Motility</subject><subject>Seminal fluid</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>sperm parameters</subject><issn>0303-4569</issn><issn>1439-0272</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10U1P3DAQBmALtWJXlEP_QGWJSzlk8WdiH1dQYKUVvbTnaOLY1KskDnYiRH89Zhc4IDGXkaXHr-UZhL5TsqK5LmBoV1QQqo7QkgquC8Iq9gUtCSe8ELLUC3Sa0o7kErKqhDhGC87LMjO-RPOmH8FMODjc-NCFe2-gwzkTQ5y888bnY7K9H3J33ezbhMOA02hjj0eI0NvJxrS_cXW3xmmCaU7YDxjS9M8O4X8Ie-wNtjswcweTTd_QVwddsqev_QT9vf715_K22P6-2Vyut4XhSqlCskpIcE0JlHMmW2cElUyW0FCqG9uoxglGZNmKVgpa6ka3Lk_CVcAc01rxE_TzkDvG8DDbNNW9T8Z2HQw2zKlmQldEl1yRTM8-0F2YY_51Vi9vKiWkyOr8oEwMKUXr6jH6HuJTTUn9so46D6LeryPbH6-Jc9Pb9l2-DT-DiwN49J19-jypXt9dHSKfAY6Jk7c</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Gholizadeh, Lida</creator><creator>Agha‐Rahimi, Azam</creator><creator>Ghasemi‐Esmailabad, Saeed</creator><creator>Maleki, Behnam</creator><creator>Ahamed, Abdul Munaf Sultan</creator><creator>Khalili, Mohammad Ali</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-5595</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7579-6192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8932-0224</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Impact of biological and artificial seminal fluids on sperm parameters and DNA status in asthenozoospermic ejaculates</title><author>Gholizadeh, Lida ; Agha‐Rahimi, Azam ; Ghasemi‐Esmailabad, Saeed ; Maleki, Behnam ; Ahamed, Abdul Munaf Sultan ; Khalili, Mohammad Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-52745afb6a13325dfc415256ab119beb8bf42056d4d54169b9df401f7a2f29983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>artificial seminal fluid</topic><topic>asthenozoospermia</topic><topic>Centrifugation</topic><topic>density gradient centrifugation</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA fragmentation</topic><topic>DNA fragmentation index</topic><topic>DNA structure</topic><topic>Motility</topic><topic>Seminal fluid</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>sperm parameters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gholizadeh, Lida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agha‐Rahimi, Azam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi‐Esmailabad, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maleki, Behnam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahamed, Abdul Munaf Sultan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalili, Mohammad Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Andrologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gholizadeh, Lida</au><au>Agha‐Rahimi, Azam</au><au>Ghasemi‐Esmailabad, Saeed</au><au>Maleki, Behnam</au><au>Ahamed, Abdul Munaf Sultan</au><au>Khalili, Mohammad Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of biological and artificial seminal fluids on sperm parameters and DNA status in asthenozoospermic ejaculates</atitle><jtitle>Andrologia</jtitle><addtitle>Andrologia</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e14018</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14018-n/a</pages><issn>0303-4569</issn><eissn>1439-0272</eissn><abstract>The chemical composition and physiological properties of seminal fluid (SF) affect sperm quality. The objective was to investigate the effects of in vitro exposure of artificial seminal fluid (ASF) and biological seminal fluid (SF) on sperm quality. Asthenozoospermic ejaculates (n = 20) were divided into two aliquots. The first aliquot was centrifuged for obtaining asthenozoospermic SF. The second aliquot was processed with density gradient centrifugation (DGC), and the pellet was diluted separately with following media: (a) ASF; (b) Ham's F10; (c) normozoospermic SF; and (d) asthenozoospermic SF. Sperm parameters and DNA status were assessed after DGC, as well as 2 and 24 hr after incubation. The data showed that sperm progressive motility, viability and DNA integrity were significantly higher in ASF than Ham's F10 medium immediately after DGC. At 2 and 24 hr, the progressive motility was significantly decreased in biological SF compared with ASF and Ham's F10. DNA fragmentation index (DFI) was significantly lower in normozoospermic SF than asthenozoospermic SF and Ham's F10 at time 2 hr. In conclusion, normal SF showed the protective role on sperm DNA structure. Moreover, ASF preserved sperm motility better than biological SF during 24 hr, despite being similar to normal SF regarding DNA integrity preservation in short time.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33660273</pmid><doi>10.1111/and.14018</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-5595</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7579-6192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8932-0224</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0303-4569
ispartof Andrologia, 2021-06, Vol.53 (5), p.e14018-n/a
issn 0303-4569
1439-0272
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2497096380
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects artificial seminal fluid
asthenozoospermia
Centrifugation
density gradient centrifugation
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA fragmentation
DNA fragmentation index
DNA structure
Motility
Seminal fluid
Sperm
sperm parameters
title Impact of biological and artificial seminal fluids on sperm parameters and DNA status in asthenozoospermic ejaculates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T03%3A10%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20biological%20and%20artificial%20seminal%20fluids%20on%20sperm%20parameters%20and%20DNA%20status%20in%20asthenozoospermic%20ejaculates&rft.jtitle=Andrologia&rft.au=Gholizadeh,%20Lida&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e14018&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14018-n/a&rft.issn=0303-4569&rft.eissn=1439-0272&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/and.14018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2497096380%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2525688454&rft_id=info:pmid/33660273&rfr_iscdi=true