Stratification of Patients With Sjögren’s Syndrome and Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus According to Two Shared Immune Cell Signatures, With Potential Therapeutic Implications
Objective Similarities in the clinical and laboratory features of primary Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have led to attempts to treat patients with primary SS or SLE with similar biologic therapeutics. However, the results of many clinical trials are disappointing, a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) N.J.), 2021-09, Vol.73 (9), p.1626-1637 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1637 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1626 |
container_title | Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Martin‐Gutierrez, Lucia Peng, Junjie Thompson, Nicolyn L. Robinson, George A. Naja, Meena Peckham, Hannah Wu, WingHan J’bari, Hajar Ahwireng, Nyarko Waddington, Kirsty E. Bradford, Claire M. Varnier, Giulia Gandhi, Akash Radmore, Rebecca Gupta, Vivek Isenberg, David A. Jury, Elizabeth C. Ciurtin, Coziana |
description | Objective
Similarities in the clinical and laboratory features of primary Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have led to attempts to treat patients with primary SS or SLE with similar biologic therapeutics. However, the results of many clinical trials are disappointing, and no biologic treatments are licensed for use in primary SS, while only a few biologic agents are available to treat SLE patients whose disease has remained refractory to other treatments. With the aim of improving treatment selections, this study was undertaken to identify distinct immunologic signatures in patients with primary SS and patients with SLE, using a stratification approach based on immune cell endotypes.
Methods
Immunophentyping of 29 immune cell subsets was performed using flow cytometry in peripheral blood from patients with primary SS (n = 45), patients with SLE (n = 29), and patients with secondary SS associated with SLE (SLE/SS) (n = 14), all of whom were considered to have low disease activity or be in clinical remission, and sex‐matched healthy controls (n = 31). Data were analyzed using supervised machine learning (balanced random forest, sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis), logistic regression, and multiple t‐tests. Patients were stratified by K‐means clustering and clinical trajectory analysis.
Results
Patients with primary SS and patients with SLE had a similar immunologic architecture despite having different clinical presentations and prognoses. Stratification of the combined primary SS, SLE, and SLE/SS patient cohorts by K‐means cluster analysis revealed 2 endotypes, characterized by distinct immune cell profiles spanning the diagnoses. A signature of 8 T cell subsets that distinctly differentiated the 2 endotypes with high accuracy (area under the curve 0.9979) was identified in logistic regression and machine learning models. In clinical trajectory analyses, the change in damage scores and disease activity levels from baseline to 5 years differed between the 2 endotypes.
Conclusion
These findings identify an immune cell toolkit that may be useful for differentiating, with high accuracy, the immunologic profiles of patients with primary SS and patients with SLE as a way to achieve targeted therapeutic approaches. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/art.41708 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2494884228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2494884228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-3332a38f990043072c702121d8c9923b935a47a44e711fca094b2f895322ae413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctq3DAUhk1JoSHNIm8gyCaBTKKbL1oOQ9IODDTUU7IUinw8o8GWHEkmeNfX6It01V3fpE9StU43gZ7FucB3fn74s-yM4GuCMb1RPl5zUuLqTXZMGS0WOcX50b-dCPIuOw3hgFOJEhc4P85-1NGraFqjU3cWuRbdpw1sDOjBxD2qDz-_7zzYX1-_BVRPtvGuB6Rs85qbQoTeaLQZhzGgWz_FPfQqupCupdbON8buUHRo--xQvVceGrTu-9ECWkHXodrsrIqjh3A1K967mOSN6tB2D14NMMYkv-6H7sVseJ-9bVUX4PRlnmRf7m63q4-LzacP69Vys9CsyKsFY4wqVrVCYMwZLqkuMSWUNJUWgrJHwXLFS8U5lIS0WmHBH2lbiZxRqoATdpJdzLqDd08jhCh7E3QyrSy4MUjKBa8qTmmV0PNX6MGN3iZ3kuZFTgpalkWiLmdKexeCh1YO3vTKT5Jg-SdKmaKUf6NM7M3MPpsOpv-Dcvl5O3_8Bvmno34</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2565162776</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stratification of Patients With Sjögren’s Syndrome and Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus According to Two Shared Immune Cell Signatures, With Potential Therapeutic Implications</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Martin‐Gutierrez, Lucia ; Peng, Junjie ; Thompson, Nicolyn L. ; Robinson, George A. ; Naja, Meena ; Peckham, Hannah ; Wu, WingHan ; J’bari, Hajar ; Ahwireng, Nyarko ; Waddington, Kirsty E. ; Bradford, Claire M. ; Varnier, Giulia ; Gandhi, Akash ; Radmore, Rebecca ; Gupta, Vivek ; Isenberg, David A. ; Jury, Elizabeth C. ; Ciurtin, Coziana</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin‐Gutierrez, Lucia ; Peng, Junjie ; Thompson, Nicolyn L. ; Robinson, George A. ; Naja, Meena ; Peckham, Hannah ; Wu, WingHan ; J’bari, Hajar ; Ahwireng, Nyarko ; Waddington, Kirsty E. ; Bradford, Claire M. ; Varnier, Giulia ; Gandhi, Akash ; Radmore, Rebecca ; Gupta, Vivek ; Isenberg, David A. ; Jury, Elizabeth C. ; Ciurtin, Coziana</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Similarities in the clinical and laboratory features of primary Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have led to attempts to treat patients with primary SS or SLE with similar biologic therapeutics. However, the results of many clinical trials are disappointing, and no biologic treatments are licensed for use in primary SS, while only a few biologic agents are available to treat SLE patients whose disease has remained refractory to other treatments. With the aim of improving treatment selections, this study was undertaken to identify distinct immunologic signatures in patients with primary SS and patients with SLE, using a stratification approach based on immune cell endotypes.
Methods
Immunophentyping of 29 immune cell subsets was performed using flow cytometry in peripheral blood from patients with primary SS (n = 45), patients with SLE (n = 29), and patients with secondary SS associated with SLE (SLE/SS) (n = 14), all of whom were considered to have low disease activity or be in clinical remission, and sex‐matched healthy controls (n = 31). Data were analyzed using supervised machine learning (balanced random forest, sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis), logistic regression, and multiple t‐tests. Patients were stratified by K‐means clustering and clinical trajectory analysis.
Results
Patients with primary SS and patients with SLE had a similar immunologic architecture despite having different clinical presentations and prognoses. Stratification of the combined primary SS, SLE, and SLE/SS patient cohorts by K‐means cluster analysis revealed 2 endotypes, characterized by distinct immune cell profiles spanning the diagnoses. A signature of 8 T cell subsets that distinctly differentiated the 2 endotypes with high accuracy (area under the curve 0.9979) was identified in logistic regression and machine learning models. In clinical trajectory analyses, the change in damage scores and disease activity levels from baseline to 5 years differed between the 2 endotypes.
Conclusion
These findings identify an immune cell toolkit that may be useful for differentiating, with high accuracy, the immunologic profiles of patients with primary SS and patients with SLE as a way to achieve targeted therapeutic approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2326-5191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2326-5205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/art.41708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Autoimmune diseases ; Cell differentiation ; Chronic conditions ; Clinical trials ; Cluster analysis ; Clustering ; Discriminant analysis ; Flow cytometry ; Immune system ; Learning algorithms ; Lupus ; Lymphocytes ; Lymphocytes T ; Machine learning ; Patients ; Peripheral blood ; Regression analysis ; Remission ; Signatures ; Sjogren's syndrome ; Systemic lupus erythematosus ; Trajectory analysis</subject><ispartof>Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2021-09, Vol.73 (9), p.1626-1637</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-3332a38f990043072c702121d8c9923b935a47a44e711fca094b2f895322ae413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-3332a38f990043072c702121d8c9923b935a47a44e711fca094b2f895322ae413</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8911-4113 ; 0000-0001-9514-2455 ; 0000-0002-2389-3396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fart.41708$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fart.41708$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin‐Gutierrez, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Junjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Nicolyn L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, George A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naja, Meena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peckham, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, WingHan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J’bari, Hajar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahwireng, Nyarko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waddington, Kirsty E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Claire M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varnier, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Akash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radmore, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isenberg, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jury, Elizabeth C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciurtin, Coziana</creatorcontrib><title>Stratification of Patients With Sjögren’s Syndrome and Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus According to Two Shared Immune Cell Signatures, With Potential Therapeutic Implications</title><title>Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)</title><description>Objective
Similarities in the clinical and laboratory features of primary Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have led to attempts to treat patients with primary SS or SLE with similar biologic therapeutics. However, the results of many clinical trials are disappointing, and no biologic treatments are licensed for use in primary SS, while only a few biologic agents are available to treat SLE patients whose disease has remained refractory to other treatments. With the aim of improving treatment selections, this study was undertaken to identify distinct immunologic signatures in patients with primary SS and patients with SLE, using a stratification approach based on immune cell endotypes.
Methods
Immunophentyping of 29 immune cell subsets was performed using flow cytometry in peripheral blood from patients with primary SS (n = 45), patients with SLE (n = 29), and patients with secondary SS associated with SLE (SLE/SS) (n = 14), all of whom were considered to have low disease activity or be in clinical remission, and sex‐matched healthy controls (n = 31). Data were analyzed using supervised machine learning (balanced random forest, sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis), logistic regression, and multiple t‐tests. Patients were stratified by K‐means clustering and clinical trajectory analysis.
Results
Patients with primary SS and patients with SLE had a similar immunologic architecture despite having different clinical presentations and prognoses. Stratification of the combined primary SS, SLE, and SLE/SS patient cohorts by K‐means cluster analysis revealed 2 endotypes, characterized by distinct immune cell profiles spanning the diagnoses. A signature of 8 T cell subsets that distinctly differentiated the 2 endotypes with high accuracy (area under the curve 0.9979) was identified in logistic regression and machine learning models. In clinical trajectory analyses, the change in damage scores and disease activity levels from baseline to 5 years differed between the 2 endotypes.
Conclusion
These findings identify an immune cell toolkit that may be useful for differentiating, with high accuracy, the immunologic profiles of patients with primary SS and patients with SLE as a way to achieve targeted therapeutic approaches.</description><subject>Autoimmune diseases</subject><subject>Cell differentiation</subject><subject>Chronic conditions</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Flow cytometry</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Lupus</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Lymphocytes T</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Peripheral blood</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Signatures</subject><subject>Sjogren's syndrome</subject><subject>Systemic lupus erythematosus</subject><subject>Trajectory analysis</subject><issn>2326-5191</issn><issn>2326-5205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctq3DAUhk1JoSHNIm8gyCaBTKKbL1oOQ9IODDTUU7IUinw8o8GWHEkmeNfX6It01V3fpE9StU43gZ7FucB3fn74s-yM4GuCMb1RPl5zUuLqTXZMGS0WOcX50b-dCPIuOw3hgFOJEhc4P85-1NGraFqjU3cWuRbdpw1sDOjBxD2qDz-_7zzYX1-_BVRPtvGuB6Rs85qbQoTeaLQZhzGgWz_FPfQqupCupdbON8buUHRo--xQvVceGrTu-9ECWkHXodrsrIqjh3A1K967mOSN6tB2D14NMMYkv-6H7sVseJ-9bVUX4PRlnmRf7m63q4-LzacP69Vys9CsyKsFY4wqVrVCYMwZLqkuMSWUNJUWgrJHwXLFS8U5lIS0WmHBH2lbiZxRqoATdpJdzLqDd08jhCh7E3QyrSy4MUjKBa8qTmmV0PNX6MGN3iZ3kuZFTgpalkWiLmdKexeCh1YO3vTKT5Jg-SdKmaKUf6NM7M3MPpsOpv-Dcvl5O3_8Bvmno34</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Martin‐Gutierrez, Lucia</creator><creator>Peng, Junjie</creator><creator>Thompson, Nicolyn L.</creator><creator>Robinson, George A.</creator><creator>Naja, Meena</creator><creator>Peckham, Hannah</creator><creator>Wu, WingHan</creator><creator>J’bari, Hajar</creator><creator>Ahwireng, Nyarko</creator><creator>Waddington, Kirsty E.</creator><creator>Bradford, Claire M.</creator><creator>Varnier, Giulia</creator><creator>Gandhi, Akash</creator><creator>Radmore, Rebecca</creator><creator>Gupta, Vivek</creator><creator>Isenberg, David A.</creator><creator>Jury, Elizabeth C.</creator><creator>Ciurtin, Coziana</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8911-4113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9514-2455</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-3396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Stratification of Patients With Sjögren’s Syndrome and Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus According to Two Shared Immune Cell Signatures, With Potential Therapeutic Implications</title><author>Martin‐Gutierrez, Lucia ; Peng, Junjie ; Thompson, Nicolyn L. ; Robinson, George A. ; Naja, Meena ; Peckham, Hannah ; Wu, WingHan ; J’bari, Hajar ; Ahwireng, Nyarko ; Waddington, Kirsty E. ; Bradford, Claire M. ; Varnier, Giulia ; Gandhi, Akash ; Radmore, Rebecca ; Gupta, Vivek ; Isenberg, David A. ; Jury, Elizabeth C. ; Ciurtin, Coziana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-3332a38f990043072c702121d8c9923b935a47a44e711fca094b2f895322ae413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Autoimmune diseases</topic><topic>Cell differentiation</topic><topic>Chronic conditions</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Flow cytometry</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Lupus</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Lymphocytes T</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Peripheral blood</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Signatures</topic><topic>Sjogren's syndrome</topic><topic>Systemic lupus erythematosus</topic><topic>Trajectory analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin‐Gutierrez, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Junjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Nicolyn L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, George A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naja, Meena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peckham, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, WingHan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J’bari, Hajar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahwireng, Nyarko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waddington, Kirsty E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Claire M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varnier, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Akash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radmore, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isenberg, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jury, Elizabeth C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciurtin, Coziana</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin‐Gutierrez, Lucia</au><au>Peng, Junjie</au><au>Thompson, Nicolyn L.</au><au>Robinson, George A.</au><au>Naja, Meena</au><au>Peckham, Hannah</au><au>Wu, WingHan</au><au>J’bari, Hajar</au><au>Ahwireng, Nyarko</au><au>Waddington, Kirsty E.</au><au>Bradford, Claire M.</au><au>Varnier, Giulia</au><au>Gandhi, Akash</au><au>Radmore, Rebecca</au><au>Gupta, Vivek</au><au>Isenberg, David A.</au><au>Jury, Elizabeth C.</au><au>Ciurtin, Coziana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stratification of Patients With Sjögren’s Syndrome and Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus According to Two Shared Immune Cell Signatures, With Potential Therapeutic Implications</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1626</spage><epage>1637</epage><pages>1626-1637</pages><issn>2326-5191</issn><eissn>2326-5205</eissn><abstract>Objective
Similarities in the clinical and laboratory features of primary Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have led to attempts to treat patients with primary SS or SLE with similar biologic therapeutics. However, the results of many clinical trials are disappointing, and no biologic treatments are licensed for use in primary SS, while only a few biologic agents are available to treat SLE patients whose disease has remained refractory to other treatments. With the aim of improving treatment selections, this study was undertaken to identify distinct immunologic signatures in patients with primary SS and patients with SLE, using a stratification approach based on immune cell endotypes.
Methods
Immunophentyping of 29 immune cell subsets was performed using flow cytometry in peripheral blood from patients with primary SS (n = 45), patients with SLE (n = 29), and patients with secondary SS associated with SLE (SLE/SS) (n = 14), all of whom were considered to have low disease activity or be in clinical remission, and sex‐matched healthy controls (n = 31). Data were analyzed using supervised machine learning (balanced random forest, sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis), logistic regression, and multiple t‐tests. Patients were stratified by K‐means clustering and clinical trajectory analysis.
Results
Patients with primary SS and patients with SLE had a similar immunologic architecture despite having different clinical presentations and prognoses. Stratification of the combined primary SS, SLE, and SLE/SS patient cohorts by K‐means cluster analysis revealed 2 endotypes, characterized by distinct immune cell profiles spanning the diagnoses. A signature of 8 T cell subsets that distinctly differentiated the 2 endotypes with high accuracy (area under the curve 0.9979) was identified in logistic regression and machine learning models. In clinical trajectory analyses, the change in damage scores and disease activity levels from baseline to 5 years differed between the 2 endotypes.
Conclusion
These findings identify an immune cell toolkit that may be useful for differentiating, with high accuracy, the immunologic profiles of patients with primary SS and patients with SLE as a way to achieve targeted therapeutic approaches.</abstract><cop>Atlanta</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/art.41708</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8911-4113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9514-2455</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-3396</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2326-5191 |
ispartof | Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2021-09, Vol.73 (9), p.1626-1637 |
issn | 2326-5191 2326-5205 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2494884228 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Autoimmune diseases Cell differentiation Chronic conditions Clinical trials Cluster analysis Clustering Discriminant analysis Flow cytometry Immune system Learning algorithms Lupus Lymphocytes Lymphocytes T Machine learning Patients Peripheral blood Regression analysis Remission Signatures Sjogren's syndrome Systemic lupus erythematosus Trajectory analysis |
title | Stratification of Patients With Sjögren’s Syndrome and Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus According to Two Shared Immune Cell Signatures, With Potential Therapeutic Implications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A59%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stratification%20of%20Patients%20With%20Sj%C3%B6gren%E2%80%99s%20Syndrome%20and%20Patients%20With%20Systemic%20Lupus%20Erythematosus%20According%20to%20Two%20Shared%20Immune%20Cell%20Signatures,%20With%20Potential%20Therapeutic%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20&%20rheumatology%20(Hoboken,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Martin%E2%80%90Gutierrez,%20Lucia&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1626&rft.epage=1637&rft.pages=1626-1637&rft.issn=2326-5191&rft.eissn=2326-5205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/art.41708&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2494884228%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2565162776&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |