Empirical evidence for cognitive subgroups in body dysmorphic disorder

Objective: Current understanding of cognitive functioning in body dysmorphic disorder is limited, owing to few studies, small sample sizes and assessment across only limited cognitive domains. Existing research has also shown inconsistent findings, with both intact and impaired cognition reported in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry 2021-04, Vol.55 (4), p.381-390
Hauptverfasser: Malcolm, Amy, Brennan, Sarah N, Grace, Sally A, Pikoos, Toni D, Toh, Wei Lin, Labuschagne, Izelle, Buchanan, Ben, Kaplan, Ryan A, Castle, David J, Rossell, Susan L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 390
container_issue 4
container_start_page 381
container_title Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
container_volume 55
creator Malcolm, Amy
Brennan, Sarah N
Grace, Sally A
Pikoos, Toni D
Toh, Wei Lin
Labuschagne, Izelle
Buchanan, Ben
Kaplan, Ryan A
Castle, David J
Rossell, Susan L
description Objective: Current understanding of cognitive functioning in body dysmorphic disorder is limited, owing to few studies, small sample sizes and assessment across only limited cognitive domains. Existing research has also shown inconsistent findings, with both intact and impaired cognition reported in body dysmorphic disorder, which might point towards cognitive heterogeneity in the disorder. This study aimed to examine the cognitive profile of body dysmorphic disorder in a large sample across eight cognitive domains, and to explore whether cognitive subgroups might be identified within body dysmorphic disorder. Method: Cognitive domains of inhibition/flexibility, working memory, speed of processing, reasoning and problem-solving, visual and verbal learning, attention/vigilance and social cognition were assessed and compared between 65 body dysmorphic disorder patients and 70 healthy controls. Then, hierarchical clustering analysis was conducted on the body dysmorphic disorder group’s cognitive data. Results: Group-average comparisons demonstrated significantly poorer cognitive functioning in body dysmorphic disorder than healthy controls in all domains except for attention/vigilance and social cognition. Cluster analysis identified two divergent cognitive subgroups within our body dysmorphic disorder cohort characterised by (1) broadly intact cognitive function with mild selective impairments (72.3%), and (2) broadly impaired cognitive function (27.7%). However, the clusters did not significantly differ on clinical parameters or most sociodemographic characteristics. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate considerable cognitive heterogeneity among persons with body dysmorphic disorder, rather than uniform deficits. Poor performances in the broadly impaired subgroup may have driven group-level differences. However, our findings also suggest a dissociation between cognitive functioning and clinical characteristics in body dysmorphic disorder that has implications for current aetiological models. Additional research is needed to clarify why some people with body dysmorphic disorder demonstrate cognitive deficits while others do not.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0004867421998762
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2494305168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0004867421998762</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2494305168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-243e80b3db977d9876c54b63fa74e7477ac4a8a578ce61dc8a9f65f79101d10c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EoqWwMyGPLIH3YsdORlS1gFSJBebIsZ3iqomD3VTqvydRCwMS0xvuu9O9I-QW4QFRykcA4LmQPMWiyKVIz8gUOYcEBfJzMh3lZNQn5CrGDQAyzOQlmTAmmARgU7JcNJ0LTqsttXtnbKstrX2g2q9bt3N7S2NfrYPvu0hdSytvDtQcYuND9-k0NS76YGy4Jhe12kZ7c7oz8rFcvM9fktXb8-v8aZVoJotdknJmc6iYqQopzVhZZ7wSrFaSW8mlVJqrXGUy11ag0bkqapHVskBAg6DZjNwfc7vgv3obd2XjorbbrWqt72OZ8oIzyFDkAwpHVAcfY7B12QXXqHAoEcpxvfLveoPl7pTeV401v4afuQYgOQJRrW258X1oh2__D_wG7AR22A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2494305168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirical evidence for cognitive subgroups in body dysmorphic disorder</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Malcolm, Amy ; Brennan, Sarah N ; Grace, Sally A ; Pikoos, Toni D ; Toh, Wei Lin ; Labuschagne, Izelle ; Buchanan, Ben ; Kaplan, Ryan A ; Castle, David J ; Rossell, Susan L</creator><creatorcontrib>Malcolm, Amy ; Brennan, Sarah N ; Grace, Sally A ; Pikoos, Toni D ; Toh, Wei Lin ; Labuschagne, Izelle ; Buchanan, Ben ; Kaplan, Ryan A ; Castle, David J ; Rossell, Susan L</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Current understanding of cognitive functioning in body dysmorphic disorder is limited, owing to few studies, small sample sizes and assessment across only limited cognitive domains. Existing research has also shown inconsistent findings, with both intact and impaired cognition reported in body dysmorphic disorder, which might point towards cognitive heterogeneity in the disorder. This study aimed to examine the cognitive profile of body dysmorphic disorder in a large sample across eight cognitive domains, and to explore whether cognitive subgroups might be identified within body dysmorphic disorder. Method: Cognitive domains of inhibition/flexibility, working memory, speed of processing, reasoning and problem-solving, visual and verbal learning, attention/vigilance and social cognition were assessed and compared between 65 body dysmorphic disorder patients and 70 healthy controls. Then, hierarchical clustering analysis was conducted on the body dysmorphic disorder group’s cognitive data. Results: Group-average comparisons demonstrated significantly poorer cognitive functioning in body dysmorphic disorder than healthy controls in all domains except for attention/vigilance and social cognition. Cluster analysis identified two divergent cognitive subgroups within our body dysmorphic disorder cohort characterised by (1) broadly intact cognitive function with mild selective impairments (72.3%), and (2) broadly impaired cognitive function (27.7%). However, the clusters did not significantly differ on clinical parameters or most sociodemographic characteristics. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate considerable cognitive heterogeneity among persons with body dysmorphic disorder, rather than uniform deficits. Poor performances in the broadly impaired subgroup may have driven group-level differences. However, our findings also suggest a dissociation between cognitive functioning and clinical characteristics in body dysmorphic disorder that has implications for current aetiological models. Additional research is needed to clarify why some people with body dysmorphic disorder demonstrate cognitive deficits while others do not.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0004867421998762</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33637003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2021-04, Vol.55 (4), p.381-390</ispartof><rights>The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-243e80b3db977d9876c54b63fa74e7477ac4a8a578ce61dc8a9f65f79101d10c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-243e80b3db977d9876c54b63fa74e7477ac4a8a578ce61dc8a9f65f79101d10c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9746-8712 ; 0000-0002-4187-1182 ; 0000-0001-7953-9030 ; 0000-0002-3075-1580 ; 0000-0002-1590-0947</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0004867421998762$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0004867421998762$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malcolm, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Sarah N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grace, Sally A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pikoos, Toni D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toh, Wei Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labuschagne, Izelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Ryan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castle, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossell, Susan L</creatorcontrib><title>Empirical evidence for cognitive subgroups in body dysmorphic disorder</title><title>Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry</title><addtitle>Aust N Z J Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Objective: Current understanding of cognitive functioning in body dysmorphic disorder is limited, owing to few studies, small sample sizes and assessment across only limited cognitive domains. Existing research has also shown inconsistent findings, with both intact and impaired cognition reported in body dysmorphic disorder, which might point towards cognitive heterogeneity in the disorder. This study aimed to examine the cognitive profile of body dysmorphic disorder in a large sample across eight cognitive domains, and to explore whether cognitive subgroups might be identified within body dysmorphic disorder. Method: Cognitive domains of inhibition/flexibility, working memory, speed of processing, reasoning and problem-solving, visual and verbal learning, attention/vigilance and social cognition were assessed and compared between 65 body dysmorphic disorder patients and 70 healthy controls. Then, hierarchical clustering analysis was conducted on the body dysmorphic disorder group’s cognitive data. Results: Group-average comparisons demonstrated significantly poorer cognitive functioning in body dysmorphic disorder than healthy controls in all domains except for attention/vigilance and social cognition. Cluster analysis identified two divergent cognitive subgroups within our body dysmorphic disorder cohort characterised by (1) broadly intact cognitive function with mild selective impairments (72.3%), and (2) broadly impaired cognitive function (27.7%). However, the clusters did not significantly differ on clinical parameters or most sociodemographic characteristics. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate considerable cognitive heterogeneity among persons with body dysmorphic disorder, rather than uniform deficits. Poor performances in the broadly impaired subgroup may have driven group-level differences. However, our findings also suggest a dissociation between cognitive functioning and clinical characteristics in body dysmorphic disorder that has implications for current aetiological models. Additional research is needed to clarify why some people with body dysmorphic disorder demonstrate cognitive deficits while others do not.</description><issn>0004-8674</issn><issn>1440-1614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EoqWwMyGPLIH3YsdORlS1gFSJBebIsZ3iqomD3VTqvydRCwMS0xvuu9O9I-QW4QFRykcA4LmQPMWiyKVIz8gUOYcEBfJzMh3lZNQn5CrGDQAyzOQlmTAmmARgU7JcNJ0LTqsttXtnbKstrX2g2q9bt3N7S2NfrYPvu0hdSytvDtQcYuND9-k0NS76YGy4Jhe12kZ7c7oz8rFcvM9fktXb8-v8aZVoJotdknJmc6iYqQopzVhZZ7wSrFaSW8mlVJqrXGUy11ag0bkqapHVskBAg6DZjNwfc7vgv3obd2XjorbbrWqt72OZ8oIzyFDkAwpHVAcfY7B12QXXqHAoEcpxvfLveoPl7pTeV401v4afuQYgOQJRrW258X1oh2__D_wG7AR22A</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Malcolm, Amy</creator><creator>Brennan, Sarah N</creator><creator>Grace, Sally A</creator><creator>Pikoos, Toni D</creator><creator>Toh, Wei Lin</creator><creator>Labuschagne, Izelle</creator><creator>Buchanan, Ben</creator><creator>Kaplan, Ryan A</creator><creator>Castle, David J</creator><creator>Rossell, Susan L</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9746-8712</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4187-1182</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7953-9030</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3075-1580</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1590-0947</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Empirical evidence for cognitive subgroups in body dysmorphic disorder</title><author>Malcolm, Amy ; Brennan, Sarah N ; Grace, Sally A ; Pikoos, Toni D ; Toh, Wei Lin ; Labuschagne, Izelle ; Buchanan, Ben ; Kaplan, Ryan A ; Castle, David J ; Rossell, Susan L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-243e80b3db977d9876c54b63fa74e7477ac4a8a578ce61dc8a9f65f79101d10c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malcolm, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Sarah N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grace, Sally A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pikoos, Toni D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toh, Wei Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labuschagne, Izelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Ryan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castle, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossell, Susan L</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malcolm, Amy</au><au>Brennan, Sarah N</au><au>Grace, Sally A</au><au>Pikoos, Toni D</au><au>Toh, Wei Lin</au><au>Labuschagne, Izelle</au><au>Buchanan, Ben</au><au>Kaplan, Ryan A</au><au>Castle, David J</au><au>Rossell, Susan L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Empirical evidence for cognitive subgroups in body dysmorphic disorder</atitle><jtitle>Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Aust N Z J Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>390</epage><pages>381-390</pages><issn>0004-8674</issn><eissn>1440-1614</eissn><abstract>Objective: Current understanding of cognitive functioning in body dysmorphic disorder is limited, owing to few studies, small sample sizes and assessment across only limited cognitive domains. Existing research has also shown inconsistent findings, with both intact and impaired cognition reported in body dysmorphic disorder, which might point towards cognitive heterogeneity in the disorder. This study aimed to examine the cognitive profile of body dysmorphic disorder in a large sample across eight cognitive domains, and to explore whether cognitive subgroups might be identified within body dysmorphic disorder. Method: Cognitive domains of inhibition/flexibility, working memory, speed of processing, reasoning and problem-solving, visual and verbal learning, attention/vigilance and social cognition were assessed and compared between 65 body dysmorphic disorder patients and 70 healthy controls. Then, hierarchical clustering analysis was conducted on the body dysmorphic disorder group’s cognitive data. Results: Group-average comparisons demonstrated significantly poorer cognitive functioning in body dysmorphic disorder than healthy controls in all domains except for attention/vigilance and social cognition. Cluster analysis identified two divergent cognitive subgroups within our body dysmorphic disorder cohort characterised by (1) broadly intact cognitive function with mild selective impairments (72.3%), and (2) broadly impaired cognitive function (27.7%). However, the clusters did not significantly differ on clinical parameters or most sociodemographic characteristics. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate considerable cognitive heterogeneity among persons with body dysmorphic disorder, rather than uniform deficits. Poor performances in the broadly impaired subgroup may have driven group-level differences. However, our findings also suggest a dissociation between cognitive functioning and clinical characteristics in body dysmorphic disorder that has implications for current aetiological models. Additional research is needed to clarify why some people with body dysmorphic disorder demonstrate cognitive deficits while others do not.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33637003</pmid><doi>10.1177/0004867421998762</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9746-8712</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4187-1182</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7953-9030</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3075-1580</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1590-0947</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-8674
ispartof Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2021-04, Vol.55 (4), p.381-390
issn 0004-8674
1440-1614
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2494305168
source SAGE Complete
title Empirical evidence for cognitive subgroups in body dysmorphic disorder
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A58%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirical%20evidence%20for%20cognitive%20subgroups%20in%20body%20dysmorphic%20disorder&rft.jtitle=Australian%20and%20New%20Zealand%20journal%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=Malcolm,%20Amy&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=390&rft.pages=381-390&rft.issn=0004-8674&rft.eissn=1440-1614&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0004867421998762&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2494305168%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2494305168&rft_id=info:pmid/33637003&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0004867421998762&rfr_iscdi=true