Viscoelastic and failure properties of two configurations of triple-folded hamstring tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction
Hamstring autografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Different folding techniques exist in tripling the semitendinosus. Few anatomical studies exist in evaluating their viscoelastic properties. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the visco...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The knee 2021-03, Vol.29, p.174-182 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 182 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 174 |
container_title | The knee |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Orr, Jeffrey Sephien, Andrew Diaz, Miguel A. Stoops, T. Kyle Hamzavi, Brian Nofsinger, Charles |
description | Hamstring autografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Different folding techniques exist in tripling the semitendinosus. Few anatomical studies exist in evaluating their viscoelastic properties. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the viscoelastic and failure properties of two hamstring graft configurations, the “Z” construct and “2” construct.
Ten matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric semitendinosus hamstring grafts were used to create the “2” configuration or “Z” configuration. The biomechanical testing consisted of four phases: preconditioning, where graft dimensions (mm) were measured; stress relaxation, where load, displacement and time data were collected and equilibrium relaxation (%) was calculated; dynamic creep, where the total construct elongation was calculated; and ramp-to-failure, where maximum failure load was recorded.
The “2” configuration demonstrated recorded forces (N) significantly greater at each time point when compared to the “Z” configuration during stress relaxation (p = 0.003). The “2” configuration exhibited significantly less construct elongation (mm) during dynamic creep at 10 cycles (p = 0.008) and 2000 cycles (p = 0.0001). The maximum measured load at failure was significantly greater in the “2” configuration constructs than “Z” configuration (p = 0.013). Moreover, the axial loads at 2, 3 and 4 mm of displacement were, on average, greater in the “2” configuration than “Z” configuration (p = 0.152; p = 0.080; p = 0.012), respectively.
The results of this study provide support for folding techniques for tripled grafts to provide higher viscoelastic and failure properties for techniques with less suture interfaces. Future studies can potentially evaluate the clinical significance of these findings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.knee.2021.01.029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2494290020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0968016021000302</els_id><sourcerecordid>2494290020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f685b4a4dcf68df2025c155d00d349b8bf70479eb0d02c4a91c94c231f278ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcGKFDEUDKK44-oPeJAc10OPL-l0Twe8LIO6woAX9RrSycuYsTsZk7Tih_i_ppl1j8KD9yiqCl4VIS8ZbBmw_s1p-z0gbjlwtoU6XD4iGzbs2qYbAB6TDch-aCoTrsiznE8A0EvRPSVXbdu3suthQ_589dlEnHQu3lAdLHXaT0tCek7xjKl4zDQ6Wn5FamJw_rgkXXwMFzT584SNi5NFS7_pOVckHGnBYFfKkivsYqrGBZOvh0mL8bognfxRzxgKvbndH17ThNW9qhezmj8nT5yeMr6439fky_t3n_d3zeHTh4_720Nj2q4vjXT90I1CC2vqZV1NojOs6yyAbYUch9HtQOwkjmCBG6ElM1IY3jLHd4PR7TW5ufjWZ38smIuaaxw4TTpgXLLiQgouAThUKr9QTYo5J3TqnPys02_FQK11qJNa61BrHQrqcFlFr-79l3FG-yD5l38lvL0QsH7502NS2XgMBq2viRRlo_-f_19rZ59J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2494290020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Viscoelastic and failure properties of two configurations of triple-folded hamstring tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Orr, Jeffrey ; Sephien, Andrew ; Diaz, Miguel A. ; Stoops, T. Kyle ; Hamzavi, Brian ; Nofsinger, Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Orr, Jeffrey ; Sephien, Andrew ; Diaz, Miguel A. ; Stoops, T. Kyle ; Hamzavi, Brian ; Nofsinger, Charles</creatorcontrib><description>Hamstring autografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Different folding techniques exist in tripling the semitendinosus. Few anatomical studies exist in evaluating their viscoelastic properties. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the viscoelastic and failure properties of two hamstring graft configurations, the “Z” construct and “2” construct.
Ten matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric semitendinosus hamstring grafts were used to create the “2” configuration or “Z” configuration. The biomechanical testing consisted of four phases: preconditioning, where graft dimensions (mm) were measured; stress relaxation, where load, displacement and time data were collected and equilibrium relaxation (%) was calculated; dynamic creep, where the total construct elongation was calculated; and ramp-to-failure, where maximum failure load was recorded.
The “2” configuration demonstrated recorded forces (N) significantly greater at each time point when compared to the “Z” configuration during stress relaxation (p = 0.003). The “2” configuration exhibited significantly less construct elongation (mm) during dynamic creep at 10 cycles (p = 0.008) and 2000 cycles (p = 0.0001). The maximum measured load at failure was significantly greater in the “2” configuration constructs than “Z” configuration (p = 0.013). Moreover, the axial loads at 2, 3 and 4 mm of displacement were, on average, greater in the “2” configuration than “Z” configuration (p = 0.152; p = 0.080; p = 0.012), respectively.
The results of this study provide support for folding techniques for tripled grafts to provide higher viscoelastic and failure properties for techniques with less suture interfaces. Future studies can potentially evaluate the clinical significance of these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.01.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33639560</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>ACL reconstruction ; Autografts ; Hamstring ; Semitendinosus</subject><ispartof>The knee, 2021-03, Vol.29, p.174-182</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f685b4a4dcf68df2025c155d00d349b8bf70479eb0d02c4a91c94c231f278ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f685b4a4dcf68df2025c155d00d349b8bf70479eb0d02c4a91c94c231f278ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4532-6624 ; 0000-0002-9945-3549</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2021.01.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33639560$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orr, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sephien, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoops, T. Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamzavi, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nofsinger, Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Viscoelastic and failure properties of two configurations of triple-folded hamstring tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction</title><title>The knee</title><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><description>Hamstring autografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Different folding techniques exist in tripling the semitendinosus. Few anatomical studies exist in evaluating their viscoelastic properties. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the viscoelastic and failure properties of two hamstring graft configurations, the “Z” construct and “2” construct.
Ten matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric semitendinosus hamstring grafts were used to create the “2” configuration or “Z” configuration. The biomechanical testing consisted of four phases: preconditioning, where graft dimensions (mm) were measured; stress relaxation, where load, displacement and time data were collected and equilibrium relaxation (%) was calculated; dynamic creep, where the total construct elongation was calculated; and ramp-to-failure, where maximum failure load was recorded.
The “2” configuration demonstrated recorded forces (N) significantly greater at each time point when compared to the “Z” configuration during stress relaxation (p = 0.003). The “2” configuration exhibited significantly less construct elongation (mm) during dynamic creep at 10 cycles (p = 0.008) and 2000 cycles (p = 0.0001). The maximum measured load at failure was significantly greater in the “2” configuration constructs than “Z” configuration (p = 0.013). Moreover, the axial loads at 2, 3 and 4 mm of displacement were, on average, greater in the “2” configuration than “Z” configuration (p = 0.152; p = 0.080; p = 0.012), respectively.
The results of this study provide support for folding techniques for tripled grafts to provide higher viscoelastic and failure properties for techniques with less suture interfaces. Future studies can potentially evaluate the clinical significance of these findings.</description><subject>ACL reconstruction</subject><subject>Autografts</subject><subject>Hamstring</subject><subject>Semitendinosus</subject><issn>0968-0160</issn><issn>1873-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcGKFDEUDKK44-oPeJAc10OPL-l0Twe8LIO6woAX9RrSycuYsTsZk7Tih_i_ppl1j8KD9yiqCl4VIS8ZbBmw_s1p-z0gbjlwtoU6XD4iGzbs2qYbAB6TDch-aCoTrsiznE8A0EvRPSVXbdu3suthQ_589dlEnHQu3lAdLHXaT0tCek7xjKl4zDQ6Wn5FamJw_rgkXXwMFzT584SNi5NFS7_pOVckHGnBYFfKkivsYqrGBZOvh0mL8bognfxRzxgKvbndH17ThNW9qhezmj8nT5yeMr6439fky_t3n_d3zeHTh4_720Nj2q4vjXT90I1CC2vqZV1NojOs6yyAbYUch9HtQOwkjmCBG6ElM1IY3jLHd4PR7TW5ufjWZ38smIuaaxw4TTpgXLLiQgouAThUKr9QTYo5J3TqnPys02_FQK11qJNa61BrHQrqcFlFr-79l3FG-yD5l38lvL0QsH7502NS2XgMBq2viRRlo_-f_19rZ59J</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Orr, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Sephien, Andrew</creator><creator>Diaz, Miguel A.</creator><creator>Stoops, T. Kyle</creator><creator>Hamzavi, Brian</creator><creator>Nofsinger, Charles</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4532-6624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9945-3549</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Viscoelastic and failure properties of two configurations of triple-folded hamstring tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction</title><author>Orr, Jeffrey ; Sephien, Andrew ; Diaz, Miguel A. ; Stoops, T. Kyle ; Hamzavi, Brian ; Nofsinger, Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f685b4a4dcf68df2025c155d00d349b8bf70479eb0d02c4a91c94c231f278ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>ACL reconstruction</topic><topic>Autografts</topic><topic>Hamstring</topic><topic>Semitendinosus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orr, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sephien, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoops, T. Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamzavi, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nofsinger, Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The knee</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orr, Jeffrey</au><au>Sephien, Andrew</au><au>Diaz, Miguel A.</au><au>Stoops, T. Kyle</au><au>Hamzavi, Brian</au><au>Nofsinger, Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Viscoelastic and failure properties of two configurations of triple-folded hamstring tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>The knee</jtitle><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><spage>174</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>174-182</pages><issn>0968-0160</issn><eissn>1873-5800</eissn><abstract>Hamstring autografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Different folding techniques exist in tripling the semitendinosus. Few anatomical studies exist in evaluating their viscoelastic properties. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the viscoelastic and failure properties of two hamstring graft configurations, the “Z” construct and “2” construct.
Ten matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric semitendinosus hamstring grafts were used to create the “2” configuration or “Z” configuration. The biomechanical testing consisted of four phases: preconditioning, where graft dimensions (mm) were measured; stress relaxation, where load, displacement and time data were collected and equilibrium relaxation (%) was calculated; dynamic creep, where the total construct elongation was calculated; and ramp-to-failure, where maximum failure load was recorded.
The “2” configuration demonstrated recorded forces (N) significantly greater at each time point when compared to the “Z” configuration during stress relaxation (p = 0.003). The “2” configuration exhibited significantly less construct elongation (mm) during dynamic creep at 10 cycles (p = 0.008) and 2000 cycles (p = 0.0001). The maximum measured load at failure was significantly greater in the “2” configuration constructs than “Z” configuration (p = 0.013). Moreover, the axial loads at 2, 3 and 4 mm of displacement were, on average, greater in the “2” configuration than “Z” configuration (p = 0.152; p = 0.080; p = 0.012), respectively.
The results of this study provide support for folding techniques for tripled grafts to provide higher viscoelastic and failure properties for techniques with less suture interfaces. Future studies can potentially evaluate the clinical significance of these findings.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33639560</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.knee.2021.01.029</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4532-6624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9945-3549</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0968-0160 |
ispartof | The knee, 2021-03, Vol.29, p.174-182 |
issn | 0968-0160 1873-5800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2494290020 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | ACL reconstruction Autografts Hamstring Semitendinosus |
title | Viscoelastic and failure properties of two configurations of triple-folded hamstring tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A52%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Viscoelastic%20and%20failure%20properties%20of%20two%20configurations%20of%20triple-folded%20hamstring%20tendons%20used%20for%20anterior%20cruciate%20ligament%20(ACL)%20reconstruction&rft.jtitle=The%20knee&rft.au=Orr,%20Jeffrey&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=29&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=174-182&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knee.2021.01.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2494290020%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2494290020&rft_id=info:pmid/33639560&rft_els_id=S0968016021000302&rfr_iscdi=true |