Viscoelastic and failure properties of two configurations of triple-folded hamstring tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction

Hamstring autografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Different folding techniques exist in tripling the semitendinosus. Few anatomical studies exist in evaluating their viscoelastic properties. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the visco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The knee 2021-03, Vol.29, p.174-182
Hauptverfasser: Orr, Jeffrey, Sephien, Andrew, Diaz, Miguel A., Stoops, T. Kyle, Hamzavi, Brian, Nofsinger, Charles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 182
container_issue
container_start_page 174
container_title The knee
container_volume 29
creator Orr, Jeffrey
Sephien, Andrew
Diaz, Miguel A.
Stoops, T. Kyle
Hamzavi, Brian
Nofsinger, Charles
description Hamstring autografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Different folding techniques exist in tripling the semitendinosus. Few anatomical studies exist in evaluating their viscoelastic properties. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the viscoelastic and failure properties of two hamstring graft configurations, the “Z” construct and “2” construct. Ten matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric semitendinosus hamstring grafts were used to create the “2” configuration or “Z” configuration. The biomechanical testing consisted of four phases: preconditioning, where graft dimensions (mm) were measured; stress relaxation, where load, displacement and time data were collected and equilibrium relaxation (%) was calculated; dynamic creep, where the total construct elongation was calculated; and ramp-to-failure, where maximum failure load was recorded. The “2” configuration demonstrated recorded forces (N) significantly greater at each time point when compared to the “Z” configuration during stress relaxation (p = 0.003). The “2” configuration exhibited significantly less construct elongation (mm) during dynamic creep at 10 cycles (p = 0.008) and 2000 cycles (p = 0.0001). The maximum measured load at failure was significantly greater in the “2” configuration constructs than “Z” configuration (p = 0.013). Moreover, the axial loads at 2, 3 and 4 mm of displacement were, on average, greater in the “2” configuration than “Z” configuration (p = 0.152; p = 0.080; p = 0.012), respectively. The results of this study provide support for folding techniques for tripled grafts to provide higher viscoelastic and failure properties for techniques with less suture interfaces. Future studies can potentially evaluate the clinical significance of these findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.knee.2021.01.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2494290020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0968016021000302</els_id><sourcerecordid>2494290020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f685b4a4dcf68df2025c155d00d349b8bf70479eb0d02c4a91c94c231f278ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcGKFDEUDKK44-oPeJAc10OPL-l0Twe8LIO6woAX9RrSycuYsTsZk7Tih_i_ppl1j8KD9yiqCl4VIS8ZbBmw_s1p-z0gbjlwtoU6XD4iGzbs2qYbAB6TDch-aCoTrsiznE8A0EvRPSVXbdu3suthQ_589dlEnHQu3lAdLHXaT0tCek7xjKl4zDQ6Wn5FamJw_rgkXXwMFzT584SNi5NFS7_pOVckHGnBYFfKkivsYqrGBZOvh0mL8bognfxRzxgKvbndH17ThNW9qhezmj8nT5yeMr6439fky_t3n_d3zeHTh4_720Nj2q4vjXT90I1CC2vqZV1NojOs6yyAbYUch9HtQOwkjmCBG6ElM1IY3jLHd4PR7TW5ufjWZ38smIuaaxw4TTpgXLLiQgouAThUKr9QTYo5J3TqnPys02_FQK11qJNa61BrHQrqcFlFr-79l3FG-yD5l38lvL0QsH7502NS2XgMBq2viRRlo_-f_19rZ59J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2494290020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Viscoelastic and failure properties of two configurations of triple-folded hamstring tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Orr, Jeffrey ; Sephien, Andrew ; Diaz, Miguel A. ; Stoops, T. Kyle ; Hamzavi, Brian ; Nofsinger, Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Orr, Jeffrey ; Sephien, Andrew ; Diaz, Miguel A. ; Stoops, T. Kyle ; Hamzavi, Brian ; Nofsinger, Charles</creatorcontrib><description>Hamstring autografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Different folding techniques exist in tripling the semitendinosus. Few anatomical studies exist in evaluating their viscoelastic properties. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the viscoelastic and failure properties of two hamstring graft configurations, the “Z” construct and “2” construct. Ten matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric semitendinosus hamstring grafts were used to create the “2” configuration or “Z” configuration. The biomechanical testing consisted of four phases: preconditioning, where graft dimensions (mm) were measured; stress relaxation, where load, displacement and time data were collected and equilibrium relaxation (%) was calculated; dynamic creep, where the total construct elongation was calculated; and ramp-to-failure, where maximum failure load was recorded. The “2” configuration demonstrated recorded forces (N) significantly greater at each time point when compared to the “Z” configuration during stress relaxation (p = 0.003). The “2” configuration exhibited significantly less construct elongation (mm) during dynamic creep at 10 cycles (p = 0.008) and 2000 cycles (p = 0.0001). The maximum measured load at failure was significantly greater in the “2” configuration constructs than “Z” configuration (p = 0.013). Moreover, the axial loads at 2, 3 and 4 mm of displacement were, on average, greater in the “2” configuration than “Z” configuration (p = 0.152; p = 0.080; p = 0.012), respectively. The results of this study provide support for folding techniques for tripled grafts to provide higher viscoelastic and failure properties for techniques with less suture interfaces. Future studies can potentially evaluate the clinical significance of these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.01.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33639560</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>ACL reconstruction ; Autografts ; Hamstring ; Semitendinosus</subject><ispartof>The knee, 2021-03, Vol.29, p.174-182</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f685b4a4dcf68df2025c155d00d349b8bf70479eb0d02c4a91c94c231f278ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f685b4a4dcf68df2025c155d00d349b8bf70479eb0d02c4a91c94c231f278ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4532-6624 ; 0000-0002-9945-3549</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2021.01.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33639560$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orr, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sephien, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoops, T. Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamzavi, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nofsinger, Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Viscoelastic and failure properties of two configurations of triple-folded hamstring tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction</title><title>The knee</title><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><description>Hamstring autografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Different folding techniques exist in tripling the semitendinosus. Few anatomical studies exist in evaluating their viscoelastic properties. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the viscoelastic and failure properties of two hamstring graft configurations, the “Z” construct and “2” construct. Ten matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric semitendinosus hamstring grafts were used to create the “2” configuration or “Z” configuration. The biomechanical testing consisted of four phases: preconditioning, where graft dimensions (mm) were measured; stress relaxation, where load, displacement and time data were collected and equilibrium relaxation (%) was calculated; dynamic creep, where the total construct elongation was calculated; and ramp-to-failure, where maximum failure load was recorded. The “2” configuration demonstrated recorded forces (N) significantly greater at each time point when compared to the “Z” configuration during stress relaxation (p = 0.003). The “2” configuration exhibited significantly less construct elongation (mm) during dynamic creep at 10 cycles (p = 0.008) and 2000 cycles (p = 0.0001). The maximum measured load at failure was significantly greater in the “2” configuration constructs than “Z” configuration (p = 0.013). Moreover, the axial loads at 2, 3 and 4 mm of displacement were, on average, greater in the “2” configuration than “Z” configuration (p = 0.152; p = 0.080; p = 0.012), respectively. The results of this study provide support for folding techniques for tripled grafts to provide higher viscoelastic and failure properties for techniques with less suture interfaces. Future studies can potentially evaluate the clinical significance of these findings.</description><subject>ACL reconstruction</subject><subject>Autografts</subject><subject>Hamstring</subject><subject>Semitendinosus</subject><issn>0968-0160</issn><issn>1873-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcGKFDEUDKK44-oPeJAc10OPL-l0Twe8LIO6woAX9RrSycuYsTsZk7Tih_i_ppl1j8KD9yiqCl4VIS8ZbBmw_s1p-z0gbjlwtoU6XD4iGzbs2qYbAB6TDch-aCoTrsiznE8A0EvRPSVXbdu3suthQ_589dlEnHQu3lAdLHXaT0tCek7xjKl4zDQ6Wn5FamJw_rgkXXwMFzT584SNi5NFS7_pOVckHGnBYFfKkivsYqrGBZOvh0mL8bognfxRzxgKvbndH17ThNW9qhezmj8nT5yeMr6439fky_t3n_d3zeHTh4_720Nj2q4vjXT90I1CC2vqZV1NojOs6yyAbYUch9HtQOwkjmCBG6ElM1IY3jLHd4PR7TW5ufjWZ38smIuaaxw4TTpgXLLiQgouAThUKr9QTYo5J3TqnPys02_FQK11qJNa61BrHQrqcFlFr-79l3FG-yD5l38lvL0QsH7502NS2XgMBq2viRRlo_-f_19rZ59J</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Orr, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Sephien, Andrew</creator><creator>Diaz, Miguel A.</creator><creator>Stoops, T. Kyle</creator><creator>Hamzavi, Brian</creator><creator>Nofsinger, Charles</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4532-6624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9945-3549</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Viscoelastic and failure properties of two configurations of triple-folded hamstring tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction</title><author>Orr, Jeffrey ; Sephien, Andrew ; Diaz, Miguel A. ; Stoops, T. Kyle ; Hamzavi, Brian ; Nofsinger, Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f685b4a4dcf68df2025c155d00d349b8bf70479eb0d02c4a91c94c231f278ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>ACL reconstruction</topic><topic>Autografts</topic><topic>Hamstring</topic><topic>Semitendinosus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orr, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sephien, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoops, T. Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamzavi, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nofsinger, Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The knee</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orr, Jeffrey</au><au>Sephien, Andrew</au><au>Diaz, Miguel A.</au><au>Stoops, T. Kyle</au><au>Hamzavi, Brian</au><au>Nofsinger, Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Viscoelastic and failure properties of two configurations of triple-folded hamstring tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>The knee</jtitle><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><spage>174</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>174-182</pages><issn>0968-0160</issn><eissn>1873-5800</eissn><abstract>Hamstring autografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Different folding techniques exist in tripling the semitendinosus. Few anatomical studies exist in evaluating their viscoelastic properties. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the viscoelastic and failure properties of two hamstring graft configurations, the “Z” construct and “2” construct. Ten matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric semitendinosus hamstring grafts were used to create the “2” configuration or “Z” configuration. The biomechanical testing consisted of four phases: preconditioning, where graft dimensions (mm) were measured; stress relaxation, where load, displacement and time data were collected and equilibrium relaxation (%) was calculated; dynamic creep, where the total construct elongation was calculated; and ramp-to-failure, where maximum failure load was recorded. The “2” configuration demonstrated recorded forces (N) significantly greater at each time point when compared to the “Z” configuration during stress relaxation (p = 0.003). The “2” configuration exhibited significantly less construct elongation (mm) during dynamic creep at 10 cycles (p = 0.008) and 2000 cycles (p = 0.0001). The maximum measured load at failure was significantly greater in the “2” configuration constructs than “Z” configuration (p = 0.013). Moreover, the axial loads at 2, 3 and 4 mm of displacement were, on average, greater in the “2” configuration than “Z” configuration (p = 0.152; p = 0.080; p = 0.012), respectively. The results of this study provide support for folding techniques for tripled grafts to provide higher viscoelastic and failure properties for techniques with less suture interfaces. Future studies can potentially evaluate the clinical significance of these findings.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33639560</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.knee.2021.01.029</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4532-6624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9945-3549</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0968-0160
ispartof The knee, 2021-03, Vol.29, p.174-182
issn 0968-0160
1873-5800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2494290020
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects ACL reconstruction
Autografts
Hamstring
Semitendinosus
title Viscoelastic and failure properties of two configurations of triple-folded hamstring tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A52%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Viscoelastic%20and%20failure%20properties%20of%20two%20configurations%20of%20triple-folded%20hamstring%20tendons%20used%20for%20anterior%20cruciate%20ligament%20(ACL)%20reconstruction&rft.jtitle=The%20knee&rft.au=Orr,%20Jeffrey&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=29&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=174-182&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knee.2021.01.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2494290020%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2494290020&rft_id=info:pmid/33639560&rft_els_id=S0968016021000302&rfr_iscdi=true