Common Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Index Measuring Devices: A Validity and Reliability Analysis

Montalvo, S, Gonzalez, MP, Dietze-Hermosa, M, Eggleston, JD, and Dorgo, S. Common vertical jump and reactive strength index measuring devices: A validity and reliability analysis. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1234-1243, 2021-Several field-test devices exist to assess vertical jump, but they either lac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2021-05, Vol.35 (5), p.1234-1243
Hauptverfasser: Montalvo, Samuel, Gonzalez, Matthew P., Dietze-Hermosa, Martin S., Eggleston, Jeffrey D., Dorgo, Sandor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1243
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1234
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 35
creator Montalvo, Samuel
Gonzalez, Matthew P.
Dietze-Hermosa, Martin S.
Eggleston, Jeffrey D.
Dorgo, Sandor
description Montalvo, S, Gonzalez, MP, Dietze-Hermosa, M, Eggleston, JD, and Dorgo, S. Common vertical jump and reactive strength index measuring devices: A validity and reliability analysis. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1234-1243, 2021-Several field-test devices exist to assess vertical jump, but they either lack proper validation or have been validated for the countermovement jump (CMJ) only. This study aimed to quantify the validity and reliability of metrics, including jump height and the calculated reactive strength index (RSI), obtained using the flight-time method from 4 different assessment devices with 3 different vertical jump modalities in comparison to a force platform (criterion assessment). The Optojump, Push-Band 2.0, MyJump2 mobile application, and What'sMyVert mobile application were used synchronously and together with the force platforms. Thirty subjects (17 males and 13 females; age ± SD: 23.37 ± 1.87 years) performed 5 repetitions of CMJ, squat jump (SQJ), and drop jump (DJ) with a standardized 90° knee flexion for all jumps. Relative reliability was determined by intraclass correlation (ICC) and absolute reliability by coefficient of variation (CV) analyses. Excellent reliability was considered as ICC > 0.9 and CV < 10%. Validity was obtained through an ordinary least products regression, ICC, and CV. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Reliability was excellent on jump height for the CMJ (ICC ≥ 0.98; CV ≤ 8.14%) for all instruments. With the exception of the Optojump, all instruments also had excellent reliability for the SQJ (ICC ≥ 0.98; CV ≤ 6.62) and DJ (ICC ≥ 0.94; CV ≤ 8.19). For the RSI metric, all instruments had excellent relative reliability (ICC ≥ 0.92), but none had excellent absolute reliability (CV ≥ 12.5%). The MyJump2 and What'sMyVert apps showed excellent validity on all jump modalities and RSI. The Optojump and Push-Band 2.0 devices both showed system and proportional bias for several jump modalities and RSI. Overall, both mobile applications may provide coaches with a cost-effective and reliable measurement of various vertical jumps.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003988
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2493455858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2493455858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-2b11d974ad9d462e0a09bcdb4d1af3b89bda15edbeae8d1b18d6bbe459233c883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoNYbK3-A5GAN95Mm5OPncS7Zf1oS0Ww2tshmZzdTc3MbJOZ1v33ZulWpYGQBJ734ZCXkDfATkCBOb24Wpyw_5YwWj8jR6CEqCTX9fNyZzNZaQZwSF7mfMMYV0qJF-RQiBk3plZHZLUYum7o6TWmMbQ20oup21Dbe_odbTuGO6RXY8J-Na7pee_xN_2KNk8p9Cv6Ee9Ci_kDndNrG4MP43afjMG6EHfveW_jNof8ihwsbcz4en8ek5-fP_1YnFWX376cL-aXVSsFsIo7AG9qab3xcsaRWWZc6530YJfCaeO8BYXeoUXtwYH2M-dQKsOFaLUWx-T9g3eThtsJ89h0IbcYo-1xmHLDpRFSKa126Lsn6M0wpTJvoXQttamB8ULJB6pNQ84Jl80mhc6mbQOs2RXRlCKap0WU2Nu9fHId-r-hx5__570f4ogp_4rTPaZmjTaO6-IDLnmtK844MFWsVdnAxB9rF5Mg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2874897102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Common Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Index Measuring Devices: A Validity and Reliability Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Montalvo, Samuel ; Gonzalez, Matthew P. ; Dietze-Hermosa, Martin S. ; Eggleston, Jeffrey D. ; Dorgo, Sandor</creator><creatorcontrib>Montalvo, Samuel ; Gonzalez, Matthew P. ; Dietze-Hermosa, Martin S. ; Eggleston, Jeffrey D. ; Dorgo, Sandor</creatorcontrib><description>Montalvo, S, Gonzalez, MP, Dietze-Hermosa, M, Eggleston, JD, and Dorgo, S. Common vertical jump and reactive strength index measuring devices: A validity and reliability analysis. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1234-1243, 2021-Several field-test devices exist to assess vertical jump, but they either lack proper validation or have been validated for the countermovement jump (CMJ) only. This study aimed to quantify the validity and reliability of metrics, including jump height and the calculated reactive strength index (RSI), obtained using the flight-time method from 4 different assessment devices with 3 different vertical jump modalities in comparison to a force platform (criterion assessment). The Optojump, Push-Band 2.0, MyJump2 mobile application, and What'sMyVert mobile application were used synchronously and together with the force platforms. Thirty subjects (17 males and 13 females; age ± SD: 23.37 ± 1.87 years) performed 5 repetitions of CMJ, squat jump (SQJ), and drop jump (DJ) with a standardized 90° knee flexion for all jumps. Relative reliability was determined by intraclass correlation (ICC) and absolute reliability by coefficient of variation (CV) analyses. Excellent reliability was considered as ICC &gt; 0.9 and CV &lt; 10%. Validity was obtained through an ordinary least products regression, ICC, and CV. Significance was set at p &lt; 0.05. Reliability was excellent on jump height for the CMJ (ICC ≥ 0.98; CV ≤ 8.14%) for all instruments. With the exception of the Optojump, all instruments also had excellent reliability for the SQJ (ICC ≥ 0.98; CV ≤ 6.62) and DJ (ICC ≥ 0.94; CV ≤ 8.19). For the RSI metric, all instruments had excellent relative reliability (ICC ≥ 0.92), but none had excellent absolute reliability (CV ≥ 12.5%). The MyJump2 and What'sMyVert apps showed excellent validity on all jump modalities and RSI. The Optojump and Push-Band 2.0 devices both showed system and proportional bias for several jump modalities and RSI. Overall, both mobile applications may provide coaches with a cost-effective and reliable measurement of various vertical jumps.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003988</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33629975</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</publisher><subject>Correlation of Data ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Humans ; Jumping ; Male ; Mobile Applications ; Posture ; Reproducibility of Results ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2021-05, Vol.35 (5), p.1234-1243</ispartof><rights>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 National Strength and Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>2021 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-2b11d974ad9d462e0a09bcdb4d1af3b89bda15edbeae8d1b18d6bbe459233c883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-2b11d974ad9d462e0a09bcdb4d1af3b89bda15edbeae8d1b18d6bbe459233c883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33629975$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Montalvo, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Matthew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietze-Hermosa, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eggleston, Jeffrey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorgo, Sandor</creatorcontrib><title>Common Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Index Measuring Devices: A Validity and Reliability Analysis</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>Montalvo, S, Gonzalez, MP, Dietze-Hermosa, M, Eggleston, JD, and Dorgo, S. Common vertical jump and reactive strength index measuring devices: A validity and reliability analysis. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1234-1243, 2021-Several field-test devices exist to assess vertical jump, but they either lack proper validation or have been validated for the countermovement jump (CMJ) only. This study aimed to quantify the validity and reliability of metrics, including jump height and the calculated reactive strength index (RSI), obtained using the flight-time method from 4 different assessment devices with 3 different vertical jump modalities in comparison to a force platform (criterion assessment). The Optojump, Push-Band 2.0, MyJump2 mobile application, and What'sMyVert mobile application were used synchronously and together with the force platforms. Thirty subjects (17 males and 13 females; age ± SD: 23.37 ± 1.87 years) performed 5 repetitions of CMJ, squat jump (SQJ), and drop jump (DJ) with a standardized 90° knee flexion for all jumps. Relative reliability was determined by intraclass correlation (ICC) and absolute reliability by coefficient of variation (CV) analyses. Excellent reliability was considered as ICC &gt; 0.9 and CV &lt; 10%. Validity was obtained through an ordinary least products regression, ICC, and CV. Significance was set at p &lt; 0.05. Reliability was excellent on jump height for the CMJ (ICC ≥ 0.98; CV ≤ 8.14%) for all instruments. With the exception of the Optojump, all instruments also had excellent reliability for the SQJ (ICC ≥ 0.98; CV ≤ 6.62) and DJ (ICC ≥ 0.94; CV ≤ 8.19). For the RSI metric, all instruments had excellent relative reliability (ICC ≥ 0.92), but none had excellent absolute reliability (CV ≥ 12.5%). The MyJump2 and What'sMyVert apps showed excellent validity on all jump modalities and RSI. The Optojump and Push-Band 2.0 devices both showed system and proportional bias for several jump modalities and RSI. Overall, both mobile applications may provide coaches with a cost-effective and reliable measurement of various vertical jumps.</description><subject>Correlation of Data</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jumping</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mobile Applications</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoNYbK3-A5GAN95Mm5OPncS7Zf1oS0Ww2tshmZzdTc3MbJOZ1v33ZulWpYGQBJ734ZCXkDfATkCBOb24Wpyw_5YwWj8jR6CEqCTX9fNyZzNZaQZwSF7mfMMYV0qJF-RQiBk3plZHZLUYum7o6TWmMbQ20oup21Dbe_odbTuGO6RXY8J-Na7pee_xN_2KNk8p9Cv6Ee9Ci_kDndNrG4MP43afjMG6EHfveW_jNof8ihwsbcz4en8ek5-fP_1YnFWX376cL-aXVSsFsIo7AG9qab3xcsaRWWZc6530YJfCaeO8BYXeoUXtwYH2M-dQKsOFaLUWx-T9g3eThtsJ89h0IbcYo-1xmHLDpRFSKa126Lsn6M0wpTJvoXQttamB8ULJB6pNQ84Jl80mhc6mbQOs2RXRlCKap0WU2Nu9fHId-r-hx5__570f4ogp_4rTPaZmjTaO6-IDLnmtK844MFWsVdnAxB9rF5Mg</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Montalvo, Samuel</creator><creator>Gonzalez, Matthew P.</creator><creator>Dietze-Hermosa, Martin S.</creator><creator>Eggleston, Jeffrey D.</creator><creator>Dorgo, Sandor</creator><general>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Common Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Index Measuring Devices: A Validity and Reliability Analysis</title><author>Montalvo, Samuel ; Gonzalez, Matthew P. ; Dietze-Hermosa, Martin S. ; Eggleston, Jeffrey D. ; Dorgo, Sandor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-2b11d974ad9d462e0a09bcdb4d1af3b89bda15edbeae8d1b18d6bbe459233c883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Correlation of Data</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jumping</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mobile Applications</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Montalvo, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Matthew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietze-Hermosa, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eggleston, Jeffrey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorgo, Sandor</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Montalvo, Samuel</au><au>Gonzalez, Matthew P.</au><au>Dietze-Hermosa, Martin S.</au><au>Eggleston, Jeffrey D.</au><au>Dorgo, Sandor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Common Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Index Measuring Devices: A Validity and Reliability Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1234</spage><epage>1243</epage><pages>1234-1243</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Montalvo, S, Gonzalez, MP, Dietze-Hermosa, M, Eggleston, JD, and Dorgo, S. Common vertical jump and reactive strength index measuring devices: A validity and reliability analysis. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1234-1243, 2021-Several field-test devices exist to assess vertical jump, but they either lack proper validation or have been validated for the countermovement jump (CMJ) only. This study aimed to quantify the validity and reliability of metrics, including jump height and the calculated reactive strength index (RSI), obtained using the flight-time method from 4 different assessment devices with 3 different vertical jump modalities in comparison to a force platform (criterion assessment). The Optojump, Push-Band 2.0, MyJump2 mobile application, and What'sMyVert mobile application were used synchronously and together with the force platforms. Thirty subjects (17 males and 13 females; age ± SD: 23.37 ± 1.87 years) performed 5 repetitions of CMJ, squat jump (SQJ), and drop jump (DJ) with a standardized 90° knee flexion for all jumps. Relative reliability was determined by intraclass correlation (ICC) and absolute reliability by coefficient of variation (CV) analyses. Excellent reliability was considered as ICC &gt; 0.9 and CV &lt; 10%. Validity was obtained through an ordinary least products regression, ICC, and CV. Significance was set at p &lt; 0.05. Reliability was excellent on jump height for the CMJ (ICC ≥ 0.98; CV ≤ 8.14%) for all instruments. With the exception of the Optojump, all instruments also had excellent reliability for the SQJ (ICC ≥ 0.98; CV ≤ 6.62) and DJ (ICC ≥ 0.94; CV ≤ 8.19). For the RSI metric, all instruments had excellent relative reliability (ICC ≥ 0.92), but none had excellent absolute reliability (CV ≥ 12.5%). The MyJump2 and What'sMyVert apps showed excellent validity on all jump modalities and RSI. The Optojump and Push-Band 2.0 devices both showed system and proportional bias for several jump modalities and RSI. Overall, both mobile applications may provide coaches with a cost-effective and reliable measurement of various vertical jumps.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</pub><pmid>33629975</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000003988</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2021-05, Vol.35 (5), p.1234-1243
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2493455858
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Correlation of Data
Exercise Test
Female
Humans
Jumping
Male
Mobile Applications
Posture
Reproducibility of Results
Validity
title Common Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Index Measuring Devices: A Validity and Reliability Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A59%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Common%20Vertical%20Jump%20and%20Reactive%20Strength%20Index%20Measuring%20Devices:%20A%20Validity%20and%20Reliability%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Montalvo,%20Samuel&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1234&rft.epage=1243&rft.pages=1234-1243&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003988&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2493455858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2874897102&rft_id=info:pmid/33629975&rfr_iscdi=true