Calibrated uncertainty estimation for interpretable proton computed tomography image correction using Bayesian deep learning

Integrated-type proton computed tomography (pCT) measures proton stopping power ratio (SPR) images for proton therapy treatment planning, but its image quality is degraded due to noise and scatter. Although several correction methods have been proposed, techniques that include estimation of uncertai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2021-03, Vol.66 (6), p.065029-065029
Hauptverfasser: Nomura, Yusuke, Tanaka, Sodai, Wang, Jeff, Shirato, Hiroki, Shimizu, Shinichi, Xing, Lei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 065029
container_issue 6
container_start_page 065029
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 66
creator Nomura, Yusuke
Tanaka, Sodai
Wang, Jeff
Shirato, Hiroki
Shimizu, Shinichi
Xing, Lei
description Integrated-type proton computed tomography (pCT) measures proton stopping power ratio (SPR) images for proton therapy treatment planning, but its image quality is degraded due to noise and scatter. Although several correction methods have been proposed, techniques that include estimation of uncertainty are limited. This study proposes a novel uncertainty-aware pCT image correction method using a Bayesian convolutional neural network (BCNN). A DenseNet-based BCNN was constructed to predict both a corrected SPR image and its uncertainty from a noisy SPR image. A total 432 noisy SPR images of 6 non-anthropomorphic and 3 head phantoms were collected with Monte Carlo simulations, while true noise-free images were calculated with known geometric and chemical components. Heteroscedastic loss and deep ensemble techniques were performed to estimate aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties by training 25 unique BCNN models. 200-epoch end-to-end training was performed for each model independently. Feasibility of the predicted uncertainty was demonstrated after applying two post-hoc calibrations and calculating spot-specific path length uncertainty distribution. For evaluation, accuracy of head SPR images and water-equivalent thickness (WET) corrected by the trained BCNN models was compared with a conventional method and non-Bayesian CNN model. BCNN-corrected SPR images represent noise-free images with high accuracy. Mean absolute error in test data was improved from 0.263 for uncorrected images to 0.0538 for BCNN-corrected images. Moreover, the calibrated uncertainty represents accurate confidence levels, and the BCNN-corrected calibrated WET was more accurate than non-Bayesian CNN with high statistical significance. Computation time for calculating one image and its uncertainties with 25 BCNN models is 0.7 s with a consumer grade GPU. Our model is able to predict accurate pCT images as well as two types of uncertainty. These uncertainties will be useful to identify potential cause of SPR errors and develop a spot-specific range margin criterion, toward elaboration of uncertainty-guided proton therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6560/abe956
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2493453089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2493453089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-25a0a96ba82e2eadf3f5ae86d797139c28cd62dbf5bd76508f87e797b2672a263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAURi0EoqWwMyGPLKF-1I4zQsVLqsQCs3WT3JSgvLCdIRI_HpeWTpa-754r30PINWd3nBmz5FLzRCvNlpBjpvQJmR-jUzJnTPIk40rNyIX3X4xxbsTqnMyk1EIrLufkZw1NnTsIWNKxK9AFqLswUfShbiHUfUer3tGYoRscBsgbpIPrQyyKvh3GHRj6tt86GD4nGqEtxsY5LP7o0dfdlj7AhL6GjpaIA20QXBfjS3JWQePx6vAuyMfT4_v6Jdm8Pb-u7zdJIbUKiVDAINM5GIECoaxkpQCNLtMs5TIrhClKLcq8UnmZasVMZVKMXS50KkBouSC3-73x499jPM22tS-waaDDfvRWrDK5UpKZLI6y_Wjheu8dVnZw8SY3Wc7szrndCbY7wXbvPCI3h-1j3mJ5BP4ly18uh4DU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493453089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calibrated uncertainty estimation for interpretable proton computed tomography image correction using Bayesian deep learning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Nomura, Yusuke ; Tanaka, Sodai ; Wang, Jeff ; Shirato, Hiroki ; Shimizu, Shinichi ; Xing, Lei</creator><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Yusuke ; Tanaka, Sodai ; Wang, Jeff ; Shirato, Hiroki ; Shimizu, Shinichi ; Xing, Lei</creatorcontrib><description>Integrated-type proton computed tomography (pCT) measures proton stopping power ratio (SPR) images for proton therapy treatment planning, but its image quality is degraded due to noise and scatter. Although several correction methods have been proposed, techniques that include estimation of uncertainty are limited. This study proposes a novel uncertainty-aware pCT image correction method using a Bayesian convolutional neural network (BCNN). A DenseNet-based BCNN was constructed to predict both a corrected SPR image and its uncertainty from a noisy SPR image. A total 432 noisy SPR images of 6 non-anthropomorphic and 3 head phantoms were collected with Monte Carlo simulations, while true noise-free images were calculated with known geometric and chemical components. Heteroscedastic loss and deep ensemble techniques were performed to estimate aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties by training 25 unique BCNN models. 200-epoch end-to-end training was performed for each model independently. Feasibility of the predicted uncertainty was demonstrated after applying two post-hoc calibrations and calculating spot-specific path length uncertainty distribution. For evaluation, accuracy of head SPR images and water-equivalent thickness (WET) corrected by the trained BCNN models was compared with a conventional method and non-Bayesian CNN model. BCNN-corrected SPR images represent noise-free images with high accuracy. Mean absolute error in test data was improved from 0.263 for uncorrected images to 0.0538 for BCNN-corrected images. Moreover, the calibrated uncertainty represents accurate confidence levels, and the BCNN-corrected calibrated WET was more accurate than non-Bayesian CNN with high statistical significance. Computation time for calculating one image and its uncertainties with 25 BCNN models is 0.7 s with a consumer grade GPU. Our model is able to predict accurate pCT images as well as two types of uncertainty. These uncertainties will be useful to identify potential cause of SPR errors and develop a spot-specific range margin criterion, toward elaboration of uncertainty-guided proton therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abe956</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33626513</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Bayes Theorem ; Calibration ; Deep Learning ; Head - diagnostic imaging ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Monte Carlo Method ; Neural Networks, Computer ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Proton Therapy ; Protons ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2021-03, Vol.66 (6), p.065029-065029</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-25a0a96ba82e2eadf3f5ae86d797139c28cd62dbf5bd76508f87e797b2672a263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-25a0a96ba82e2eadf3f5ae86d797139c28cd62dbf5bd76508f87e797b2672a263</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2180-568X ; 0000-0002-9625-4675</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626513$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Sodai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirato, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Lei</creatorcontrib><title>Calibrated uncertainty estimation for interpretable proton computed tomography image correction using Bayesian deep learning</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><description>Integrated-type proton computed tomography (pCT) measures proton stopping power ratio (SPR) images for proton therapy treatment planning, but its image quality is degraded due to noise and scatter. Although several correction methods have been proposed, techniques that include estimation of uncertainty are limited. This study proposes a novel uncertainty-aware pCT image correction method using a Bayesian convolutional neural network (BCNN). A DenseNet-based BCNN was constructed to predict both a corrected SPR image and its uncertainty from a noisy SPR image. A total 432 noisy SPR images of 6 non-anthropomorphic and 3 head phantoms were collected with Monte Carlo simulations, while true noise-free images were calculated with known geometric and chemical components. Heteroscedastic loss and deep ensemble techniques were performed to estimate aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties by training 25 unique BCNN models. 200-epoch end-to-end training was performed for each model independently. Feasibility of the predicted uncertainty was demonstrated after applying two post-hoc calibrations and calculating spot-specific path length uncertainty distribution. For evaluation, accuracy of head SPR images and water-equivalent thickness (WET) corrected by the trained BCNN models was compared with a conventional method and non-Bayesian CNN model. BCNN-corrected SPR images represent noise-free images with high accuracy. Mean absolute error in test data was improved from 0.263 for uncorrected images to 0.0538 for BCNN-corrected images. Moreover, the calibrated uncertainty represents accurate confidence levels, and the BCNN-corrected calibrated WET was more accurate than non-Bayesian CNN with high statistical significance. Computation time for calculating one image and its uncertainties with 25 BCNN models is 0.7 s with a consumer grade GPU. Our model is able to predict accurate pCT images as well as two types of uncertainty. These uncertainties will be useful to identify potential cause of SPR errors and develop a spot-specific range margin criterion, toward elaboration of uncertainty-guided proton therapy.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Neural Networks, Computer</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Proton Therapy</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAURi0EoqWwMyGPLKF-1I4zQsVLqsQCs3WT3JSgvLCdIRI_HpeWTpa-754r30PINWd3nBmz5FLzRCvNlpBjpvQJmR-jUzJnTPIk40rNyIX3X4xxbsTqnMyk1EIrLufkZw1NnTsIWNKxK9AFqLswUfShbiHUfUer3tGYoRscBsgbpIPrQyyKvh3GHRj6tt86GD4nGqEtxsY5LP7o0dfdlj7AhL6GjpaIA20QXBfjS3JWQePx6vAuyMfT4_v6Jdm8Pb-u7zdJIbUKiVDAINM5GIECoaxkpQCNLtMs5TIrhClKLcq8UnmZasVMZVKMXS50KkBouSC3-73x499jPM22tS-waaDDfvRWrDK5UpKZLI6y_Wjheu8dVnZw8SY3Wc7szrndCbY7wXbvPCI3h-1j3mJ5BP4ly18uh4DU</recordid><startdate>20210321</startdate><enddate>20210321</enddate><creator>Nomura, Yusuke</creator><creator>Tanaka, Sodai</creator><creator>Wang, Jeff</creator><creator>Shirato, Hiroki</creator><creator>Shimizu, Shinichi</creator><creator>Xing, Lei</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2180-568X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-4675</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210321</creationdate><title>Calibrated uncertainty estimation for interpretable proton computed tomography image correction using Bayesian deep learning</title><author>Nomura, Yusuke ; Tanaka, Sodai ; Wang, Jeff ; Shirato, Hiroki ; Shimizu, Shinichi ; Xing, Lei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-25a0a96ba82e2eadf3f5ae86d797139c28cd62dbf5bd76508f87e797b2672a263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Neural Networks, Computer</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Proton Therapy</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Sodai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirato, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Lei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nomura, Yusuke</au><au>Tanaka, Sodai</au><au>Wang, Jeff</au><au>Shirato, Hiroki</au><au>Shimizu, Shinichi</au><au>Xing, Lei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calibrated uncertainty estimation for interpretable proton computed tomography image correction using Bayesian deep learning</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><date>2021-03-21</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>065029</spage><epage>065029</epage><pages>065029-065029</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><abstract>Integrated-type proton computed tomography (pCT) measures proton stopping power ratio (SPR) images for proton therapy treatment planning, but its image quality is degraded due to noise and scatter. Although several correction methods have been proposed, techniques that include estimation of uncertainty are limited. This study proposes a novel uncertainty-aware pCT image correction method using a Bayesian convolutional neural network (BCNN). A DenseNet-based BCNN was constructed to predict both a corrected SPR image and its uncertainty from a noisy SPR image. A total 432 noisy SPR images of 6 non-anthropomorphic and 3 head phantoms were collected with Monte Carlo simulations, while true noise-free images were calculated with known geometric and chemical components. Heteroscedastic loss and deep ensemble techniques were performed to estimate aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties by training 25 unique BCNN models. 200-epoch end-to-end training was performed for each model independently. Feasibility of the predicted uncertainty was demonstrated after applying two post-hoc calibrations and calculating spot-specific path length uncertainty distribution. For evaluation, accuracy of head SPR images and water-equivalent thickness (WET) corrected by the trained BCNN models was compared with a conventional method and non-Bayesian CNN model. BCNN-corrected SPR images represent noise-free images with high accuracy. Mean absolute error in test data was improved from 0.263 for uncorrected images to 0.0538 for BCNN-corrected images. Moreover, the calibrated uncertainty represents accurate confidence levels, and the BCNN-corrected calibrated WET was more accurate than non-Bayesian CNN with high statistical significance. Computation time for calculating one image and its uncertainties with 25 BCNN models is 0.7 s with a consumer grade GPU. Our model is able to predict accurate pCT images as well as two types of uncertainty. These uncertainties will be useful to identify potential cause of SPR errors and develop a spot-specific range margin criterion, toward elaboration of uncertainty-guided proton therapy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>33626513</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6560/abe956</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2180-568X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-4675</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2021-03, Vol.66 (6), p.065029-065029
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2493453089
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Algorithms
Bayes Theorem
Calibration
Deep Learning
Head - diagnostic imaging
Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Monte Carlo Method
Neural Networks, Computer
Phantoms, Imaging
Proton Therapy
Protons
Reproducibility of Results
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Uncertainty
title Calibrated uncertainty estimation for interpretable proton computed tomography image correction using Bayesian deep learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A39%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calibrated%20uncertainty%20estimation%20for%20interpretable%20proton%20computed%20tomography%20image%20correction%20using%20Bayesian%20deep%20learning&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Nomura,%20Yusuke&rft.date=2021-03-21&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=065029&rft.epage=065029&rft.pages=065029-065029&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6560/abe956&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2493453089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493453089&rft_id=info:pmid/33626513&rfr_iscdi=true