A computerized decision support system did not improve personalization of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation according to latest recommendations

A computerized decision support system did not improve personalization of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation according to latest recommendations

Recent studies showed that exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ECR) programmes are often not personalized to individual patient characteristics according to latest recommendations. This study investigates whether a computerized decision support (CDS) system based on latest recommendations and gui...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of preventive cardiology 2021-05, Vol.28 (5), p.572-580
Hauptverfasser: Vromen, Tom, Peek, Niels B, Abu-Hanna, Ameen, Kornaat, Marion, Kemps, Hareld M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 580
container_issue 5
container_start_page 572
container_title European journal of preventive cardiology
container_volume 28
creator Vromen, Tom
Peek, Niels B
Abu-Hanna, Ameen
Kornaat, Marion
Kemps, Hareld M
description Recent studies showed that exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ECR) programmes are often not personalized to individual patient characteristics according to latest recommendations. This study investigates whether a computerized decision support (CDS) system based on latest recommendations and guidelines can improve personalization of ECR prescriptions. Pseudo-randomized intervention study. Among participating Dutch cardiac rehabilitation centres, ECR programme characteristics of consecutive patients were recorded during 1 year. CDS was used during a randomly assigned 4-month period within this year. Primary outcome was concordance to latest recommendations in three phases (before, during, and after CDS) for 12 ECR programme characteristics. Secondary outcome was variation in training characteristics. We recruited ten Dutch CR centres and enrolled 2258 patients to the study. Overall concordance of ECR prescriptions was 59.9% in Phase 1, 62.1% in Phase 2 (P = 0.82), and 59.9% in Phase 3 (P = 0.56). Concordance varied from 0.0% to 99.9% for the 12 ECR characteristics. There was significant between-centre variation for most training characteristics in Phases 1 and 2. In Phase 3, there was only a significant variation for aerobic and resistance training intensity (P = 0.01), aerobic training volume (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa066
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2493006020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2493006020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-8416b16b462b17d36529029ab96fcf4e664031395bf45622d835c635f98714fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kV9PwyAUxYnRuGXu1UfDoy_dKFDWPi6L_5IlvuhzQ-FWWdpSgarb1_ALy9wcIeEm_O7JufcgdJ2SWUoKNofBbXo1331JSYQ4Q2NK-CLheZ6en-oFG6Gp9xsSjyCU5vklGjEmKCecj9HPEivb9kMAZ3agsQZlvLEd9kPfWxew3_oALdZG484GbNre2U_APThvO9mYnQx73NYYvsHFZkgq6aOSkk4bqbCDd1mZxoQDKJWy8aN7w8HiRgbwISLRQwud_kP8FbqoZeNhenwn6PX-7mX1mKyfH55Wy3WiaJGFJOepqOLlglbpQjOR0YLQQlaFqFXNQQhOWMqKrKp5JijVOcuUYFld5IuU18Am6PagG0f6GKKRsjVeQdPIDuzgS8oL9rc0EtHZAVXOeu-gLntnWum2ZUrKfRblIYvymEVsuDlqD1UL-oT_b579AlG4iuY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493006020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A computerized decision support system did not improve personalization of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation according to latest recommendations</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Vromen, Tom ; Peek, Niels B ; Abu-Hanna, Ameen ; Kornaat, Marion ; Kemps, Hareld M</creator><creatorcontrib>Vromen, Tom ; Peek, Niels B ; Abu-Hanna, Ameen ; Kornaat, Marion ; Kemps, Hareld M</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies showed that exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ECR) programmes are often not personalized to individual patient characteristics according to latest recommendations. This study investigates whether a computerized decision support (CDS) system based on latest recommendations and guidelines can improve personalization of ECR prescriptions. Pseudo-randomized intervention study. Among participating Dutch cardiac rehabilitation centres, ECR programme characteristics of consecutive patients were recorded during 1 year. CDS was used during a randomly assigned 4-month period within this year. Primary outcome was concordance to latest recommendations in three phases (before, during, and after CDS) for 12 ECR programme characteristics. Secondary outcome was variation in training characteristics. We recruited ten Dutch CR centres and enrolled 2258 patients to the study. Overall concordance of ECR prescriptions was 59.9% in Phase 1, 62.1% in Phase 2 (P = 0.82), and 59.9% in Phase 3 (P = 0.56). Concordance varied from 0.0% to 99.9% for the 12 ECR characteristics. There was significant between-centre variation for most training characteristics in Phases 1 and 2. In Phase 3, there was only a significant variation for aerobic and resistance training intensity (P = 0.01), aerobic training volume (P &lt; 0.01), and the number of strengthening exercises but no longer for the other characteristics. Aerobic training volume was often below recommended (28.2%) and declined during the study. CDS did not substantially improve concordance with ECR prescriptions. As aerobic training volume was often lower than recommended and reduced during the study, a lack of institutional resources might be an important barrier in personalizing ECR prescriptions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-4873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-4881</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa066</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33624044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>European journal of preventive cardiology, 2021-05, Vol.28 (5), p.572-580</ispartof><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-8416b16b462b17d36529029ab96fcf4e664031395bf45622d835c635f98714fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-8416b16b462b17d36529029ab96fcf4e664031395bf45622d835c635f98714fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33624044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vromen, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peek, Niels B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu-Hanna, Ameen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kornaat, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemps, Hareld M</creatorcontrib><title>A computerized decision support system did not improve personalization of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation according to latest recommendations</title><title>European journal of preventive cardiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Prev Cardiol</addtitle><description>Recent studies showed that exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ECR) programmes are often not personalized to individual patient characteristics according to latest recommendations. This study investigates whether a computerized decision support (CDS) system based on latest recommendations and guidelines can improve personalization of ECR prescriptions. Pseudo-randomized intervention study. Among participating Dutch cardiac rehabilitation centres, ECR programme characteristics of consecutive patients were recorded during 1 year. CDS was used during a randomly assigned 4-month period within this year. Primary outcome was concordance to latest recommendations in three phases (before, during, and after CDS) for 12 ECR programme characteristics. Secondary outcome was variation in training characteristics. We recruited ten Dutch CR centres and enrolled 2258 patients to the study. Overall concordance of ECR prescriptions was 59.9% in Phase 1, 62.1% in Phase 2 (P = 0.82), and 59.9% in Phase 3 (P = 0.56). Concordance varied from 0.0% to 99.9% for the 12 ECR characteristics. There was significant between-centre variation for most training characteristics in Phases 1 and 2. In Phase 3, there was only a significant variation for aerobic and resistance training intensity (P = 0.01), aerobic training volume (P &lt; 0.01), and the number of strengthening exercises but no longer for the other characteristics. Aerobic training volume was often below recommended (28.2%) and declined during the study. CDS did not substantially improve concordance with ECR prescriptions. As aerobic training volume was often lower than recommended and reduced during the study, a lack of institutional resources might be an important barrier in personalizing ECR prescriptions.</description><issn>2047-4873</issn><issn>2047-4881</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kV9PwyAUxYnRuGXu1UfDoy_dKFDWPi6L_5IlvuhzQ-FWWdpSgarb1_ALy9wcIeEm_O7JufcgdJ2SWUoKNofBbXo1331JSYQ4Q2NK-CLheZ6en-oFG6Gp9xsSjyCU5vklGjEmKCecj9HPEivb9kMAZ3agsQZlvLEd9kPfWxew3_oALdZG484GbNre2U_APThvO9mYnQx73NYYvsHFZkgq6aOSkk4bqbCDd1mZxoQDKJWy8aN7w8HiRgbwISLRQwud_kP8FbqoZeNhenwn6PX-7mX1mKyfH55Wy3WiaJGFJOepqOLlglbpQjOR0YLQQlaFqFXNQQhOWMqKrKp5JijVOcuUYFld5IuU18Am6PagG0f6GKKRsjVeQdPIDuzgS8oL9rc0EtHZAVXOeu-gLntnWum2ZUrKfRblIYvymEVsuDlqD1UL-oT_b579AlG4iuY</recordid><startdate>20210514</startdate><enddate>20210514</enddate><creator>Vromen, Tom</creator><creator>Peek, Niels B</creator><creator>Abu-Hanna, Ameen</creator><creator>Kornaat, Marion</creator><creator>Kemps, Hareld M</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210514</creationdate><title>A computerized decision support system did not improve personalization of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation according to latest recommendations</title><author>Vromen, Tom ; Peek, Niels B ; Abu-Hanna, Ameen ; Kornaat, Marion ; Kemps, Hareld M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-8416b16b462b17d36529029ab96fcf4e664031395bf45622d835c635f98714fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vromen, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peek, Niels B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu-Hanna, Ameen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kornaat, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemps, Hareld M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of preventive cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vromen, Tom</au><au>Peek, Niels B</au><au>Abu-Hanna, Ameen</au><au>Kornaat, Marion</au><au>Kemps, Hareld M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A computerized decision support system did not improve personalization of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation according to latest recommendations</atitle><jtitle>European journal of preventive cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Prev Cardiol</addtitle><date>2021-05-14</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>572</spage><epage>580</epage><pages>572-580</pages><issn>2047-4873</issn><eissn>2047-4881</eissn><abstract>Recent studies showed that exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ECR) programmes are often not personalized to individual patient characteristics according to latest recommendations. This study investigates whether a computerized decision support (CDS) system based on latest recommendations and guidelines can improve personalization of ECR prescriptions. Pseudo-randomized intervention study. Among participating Dutch cardiac rehabilitation centres, ECR programme characteristics of consecutive patients were recorded during 1 year. CDS was used during a randomly assigned 4-month period within this year. Primary outcome was concordance to latest recommendations in three phases (before, during, and after CDS) for 12 ECR programme characteristics. Secondary outcome was variation in training characteristics. We recruited ten Dutch CR centres and enrolled 2258 patients to the study. Overall concordance of ECR prescriptions was 59.9% in Phase 1, 62.1% in Phase 2 (P = 0.82), and 59.9% in Phase 3 (P = 0.56). Concordance varied from 0.0% to 99.9% for the 12 ECR characteristics. There was significant between-centre variation for most training characteristics in Phases 1 and 2. In Phase 3, there was only a significant variation for aerobic and resistance training intensity (P = 0.01), aerobic training volume (P &lt; 0.01), and the number of strengthening exercises but no longer for the other characteristics. Aerobic training volume was often below recommended (28.2%) and declined during the study. CDS did not substantially improve concordance with ECR prescriptions. As aerobic training volume was often lower than recommended and reduced during the study, a lack of institutional resources might be an important barrier in personalizing ECR prescriptions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>33624044</pmid><doi>10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa066</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2047-4873
ispartof European journal of preventive cardiology, 2021-05, Vol.28 (5), p.572-580
issn 2047-4873
2047-4881
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2493006020
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title A computerized decision support system did not improve personalization of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation according to latest recommendations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T01%3A33%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20computerized%20decision%20support%20system%20did%20not%20improve%20personalization%20of%20exercise-based%20cardiac%20rehabilitation%20according%20to%20latest%20recommendations&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20preventive%20cardiology&rft.au=Vromen,%20Tom&rft.date=2021-05-14&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=572&rft.epage=580&rft.pages=572-580&rft.issn=2047-4873&rft.eissn=2047-4881&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2493006020%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493006020&rft_id=info:pmid/33624044&rfr_iscdi=true