Plant Resistance in Some Modern Soybean Varieties May Favor Population Growth and Modify the Stylet Penetration of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)
Complaints of severe damage by whiteflies in soybean fields containing genetically engineered (GE) varieties led us to investigate the role of transgenic soybean varieties expressing resistance to some insects (Cry1Ac Bt toxin) and to herbicide (glyphosate) on the population growth and feeding behav...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic entomology 2021-04, Vol.114 (2), p.970-978 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 978 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 970 |
container_title | Journal of economic entomology |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Almeida, Mauricélia F. Tavares, Clébson S. Araújo, Euires O. Picanço, Marcelo C. Oliveira, Eugênio E. Pereira, Eliseu José G. |
description | Complaints of severe damage by whiteflies in soybean fields containing genetically engineered (GE) varieties led us to investigate the role of transgenic soybean varieties expressing resistance to some insects (Cry1Ac Bt toxin) and to herbicide (glyphosate) on the population growth and feeding behavior of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) MEAM1 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). In the laboratory, the whiteflies reared on the GE Bt soybeans had a net reproductive rate (R0) 100% higher and intrinsic rate of population increase (rm) 15% higher than those reared on non-GE soybeans. The increased demographic performance was associated with a higher lifetime fecundity. In electrical penetration graphs, the whiteflies reared on the GE soybeans had fewer probes and spent 50% less time before reaching the phloem phase from the beginning of the first successful probe, indicating a higher risk of transmission of whitefly-borne viruses. Data from Neotropical fields showed a higher population density of B. tabaci on two soybean varieties expressing glyphosate resistance and Cry1Ac Bt toxin. These results indicate that some GE soybean varieties expressing insect and herbicide resistances can be more susceptible to whiteflies than non-GE ones or those only expressing herbicide resistance. Most likely, these differences are related to varietal features that increase host-plant susceptibility to whiteflies. Appropriate pest management may be needed to deal with whiteflies in soybean fields, especially in warm regions, and breeders may want to consider the issue when developing new soybean varieties. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jee/toab008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2493001992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A698308920</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/jee/toab008</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A698308920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b421t-53aa09728b17554c4b7fd1d2f31f98cd9fa9154cf81f264438fb4c69c6eba4283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSMEokvhxB1ZQkKt0Lb-t1m7t6WiLVIrVhQQt2icjKlX2TjYTqt8FT4tXmXhwAHkg-3R743ezCuKl4yeMKrF6QbxNHkwlKpHxYxpoeZcs2-PixmlnM-p1OKgeBbjhlJWckafFgdClHwhNZsVP9ctdIl8wuhigq5G4jpy67dIbnyDYfceDUJHvkJwmBxGcgMjuYB7H8ja90MLyfmOXAb_kO4IdM1O6OxI0h2S2zS2mMgaO0xhAr0l73DrogOSwEDtyNFV_vcJA5yRVYtjyPoG8Ph58cRCG_HF_j4svly8_3x-Nb_-ePnhfHU9N5KzNF8IAKqXXBm2XCxkLc3SNqzhVjCrVd1oC5rlulXM8lJKoayRdanrEg1IrsRhcTT17YP_MWBMVbZXY5sXg36IFc8LzKvTmmf09V_oxg-hy-4qrrhQUquSZepkor5Di5XrrM_D1_k0edDad2hdrq9KrQRVmtMseDsJ6uBjDGirPrgthLFitNplXOWMq33GmX61NzGYLTZ_2N-hZuDNBPih_0-n4wk0zmdb_2R_AbGivrc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2823849861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plant Resistance in Some Modern Soybean Varieties May Favor Population Growth and Modify the Stylet Penetration of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Almeida, Mauricélia F. ; Tavares, Clébson S. ; Araújo, Euires O. ; Picanço, Marcelo C. ; Oliveira, Eugênio E. ; Pereira, Eliseu José G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Mauricélia F. ; Tavares, Clébson S. ; Araújo, Euires O. ; Picanço, Marcelo C. ; Oliveira, Eugênio E. ; Pereira, Eliseu José G.</creatorcontrib><description>Complaints of severe damage by whiteflies in soybean fields containing genetically engineered (GE) varieties led us to investigate the role of transgenic soybean varieties expressing resistance to some insects (Cry1Ac Bt toxin) and to herbicide (glyphosate) on the population growth and feeding behavior of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) MEAM1 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). In the laboratory, the whiteflies reared on the GE Bt soybeans had a net reproductive rate (R0) 100% higher and intrinsic rate of population increase (rm) 15% higher than those reared on non-GE soybeans. The increased demographic performance was associated with a higher lifetime fecundity. In electrical penetration graphs, the whiteflies reared on the GE soybeans had fewer probes and spent 50% less time before reaching the phloem phase from the beginning of the first successful probe, indicating a higher risk of transmission of whitefly-borne viruses. Data from Neotropical fields showed a higher population density of B. tabaci on two soybean varieties expressing glyphosate resistance and Cry1Ac Bt toxin. These results indicate that some GE soybean varieties expressing insect and herbicide resistances can be more susceptible to whiteflies than non-GE ones or those only expressing herbicide resistance. Most likely, these differences are related to varietal features that increase host-plant susceptibility to whiteflies. Appropriate pest management may be needed to deal with whiteflies in soybean fields, especially in warm regions, and breeders may want to consider the issue when developing new soybean varieties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/toab008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33625491</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Agricultural pests ; Aleyrodidae ; Animals ; Bemisia tabaci ; Chemical pest control ; Cry1Ac toxin ; electrical penetration graph technique ; Fecundity ; Feeding Behavior ; Genetic engineering ; genetically modified crop ; Genetically modified crops ; Glycine max - genetics ; Glyphosate ; Growth ; Hemiptera ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; Host plants ; Insects ; New varieties ; Pest Control ; phytosuccivorous insect ; PLANT RESISTANCE ; Population biology ; Population density ; population dynamics ; Population Growth ; Soybean ; Soybeans ; Toxins ; whitefly</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2021-04, Vol.114 (2), p.970-978</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Oxford University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b421t-53aa09728b17554c4b7fd1d2f31f98cd9fa9154cf81f264438fb4c69c6eba4283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b421t-53aa09728b17554c4b7fd1d2f31f98cd9fa9154cf81f264438fb4c69c6eba4283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8957-6465</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33625491$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Mauricélia F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares, Clébson S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araújo, Euires O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picanço, Marcelo C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Eugênio E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Eliseu José G.</creatorcontrib><title>Plant Resistance in Some Modern Soybean Varieties May Favor Population Growth and Modify the Stylet Penetration of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>Complaints of severe damage by whiteflies in soybean fields containing genetically engineered (GE) varieties led us to investigate the role of transgenic soybean varieties expressing resistance to some insects (Cry1Ac Bt toxin) and to herbicide (glyphosate) on the population growth and feeding behavior of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) MEAM1 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). In the laboratory, the whiteflies reared on the GE Bt soybeans had a net reproductive rate (R0) 100% higher and intrinsic rate of population increase (rm) 15% higher than those reared on non-GE soybeans. The increased demographic performance was associated with a higher lifetime fecundity. In electrical penetration graphs, the whiteflies reared on the GE soybeans had fewer probes and spent 50% less time before reaching the phloem phase from the beginning of the first successful probe, indicating a higher risk of transmission of whitefly-borne viruses. Data from Neotropical fields showed a higher population density of B. tabaci on two soybean varieties expressing glyphosate resistance and Cry1Ac Bt toxin. These results indicate that some GE soybean varieties expressing insect and herbicide resistances can be more susceptible to whiteflies than non-GE ones or those only expressing herbicide resistance. Most likely, these differences are related to varietal features that increase host-plant susceptibility to whiteflies. Appropriate pest management may be needed to deal with whiteflies in soybean fields, especially in warm regions, and breeders may want to consider the issue when developing new soybean varieties.</description><subject>Agricultural pests</subject><subject>Aleyrodidae</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bemisia tabaci</subject><subject>Chemical pest control</subject><subject>Cry1Ac toxin</subject><subject>electrical penetration graph technique</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Genetic engineering</subject><subject>genetically modified crop</subject><subject>Genetically modified crops</subject><subject>Glycine max - genetics</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Hemiptera</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>New varieties</subject><subject>Pest Control</subject><subject>phytosuccivorous insect</subject><subject>PLANT RESISTANCE</subject><subject>Population biology</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>population dynamics</subject><subject>Population Growth</subject><subject>Soybean</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>whitefly</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSMEokvhxB1ZQkKt0Lb-t1m7t6WiLVIrVhQQt2icjKlX2TjYTqt8FT4tXmXhwAHkg-3R743ezCuKl4yeMKrF6QbxNHkwlKpHxYxpoeZcs2-PixmlnM-p1OKgeBbjhlJWckafFgdClHwhNZsVP9ctdIl8wuhigq5G4jpy67dIbnyDYfceDUJHvkJwmBxGcgMjuYB7H8ja90MLyfmOXAb_kO4IdM1O6OxI0h2S2zS2mMgaO0xhAr0l73DrogOSwEDtyNFV_vcJA5yRVYtjyPoG8Ph58cRCG_HF_j4svly8_3x-Nb_-ePnhfHU9N5KzNF8IAKqXXBm2XCxkLc3SNqzhVjCrVd1oC5rlulXM8lJKoayRdanrEg1IrsRhcTT17YP_MWBMVbZXY5sXg36IFc8LzKvTmmf09V_oxg-hy-4qrrhQUquSZepkor5Di5XrrM_D1_k0edDad2hdrq9KrQRVmtMseDsJ6uBjDGirPrgthLFitNplXOWMq33GmX61NzGYLTZ_2N-hZuDNBPih_0-n4wk0zmdb_2R_AbGivrc</recordid><startdate>20210413</startdate><enddate>20210413</enddate><creator>Almeida, Mauricélia F.</creator><creator>Tavares, Clébson S.</creator><creator>Araújo, Euires O.</creator><creator>Picanço, Marcelo C.</creator><creator>Oliveira, Eugênio E.</creator><creator>Pereira, Eliseu José G.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8957-6465</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210413</creationdate><title>Plant Resistance in Some Modern Soybean Varieties May Favor Population Growth and Modify the Stylet Penetration of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)</title><author>Almeida, Mauricélia F. ; Tavares, Clébson S. ; Araújo, Euires O. ; Picanço, Marcelo C. ; Oliveira, Eugênio E. ; Pereira, Eliseu José G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b421t-53aa09728b17554c4b7fd1d2f31f98cd9fa9154cf81f264438fb4c69c6eba4283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural pests</topic><topic>Aleyrodidae</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bemisia tabaci</topic><topic>Chemical pest control</topic><topic>Cry1Ac toxin</topic><topic>electrical penetration graph technique</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Genetic engineering</topic><topic>genetically modified crop</topic><topic>Genetically modified crops</topic><topic>Glycine max - genetics</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Hemiptera</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>New varieties</topic><topic>Pest Control</topic><topic>phytosuccivorous insect</topic><topic>PLANT RESISTANCE</topic><topic>Population biology</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>population dynamics</topic><topic>Population Growth</topic><topic>Soybean</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>whitefly</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Mauricélia F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares, Clébson S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araújo, Euires O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picanço, Marcelo C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Eugênio E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Eliseu José G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Almeida, Mauricélia F.</au><au>Tavares, Clébson S.</au><au>Araújo, Euires O.</au><au>Picanço, Marcelo C.</au><au>Oliveira, Eugênio E.</au><au>Pereira, Eliseu José G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plant Resistance in Some Modern Soybean Varieties May Favor Population Growth and Modify the Stylet Penetration of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2021-04-13</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>970</spage><epage>978</epage><pages>970-978</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><abstract>Complaints of severe damage by whiteflies in soybean fields containing genetically engineered (GE) varieties led us to investigate the role of transgenic soybean varieties expressing resistance to some insects (Cry1Ac Bt toxin) and to herbicide (glyphosate) on the population growth and feeding behavior of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) MEAM1 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). In the laboratory, the whiteflies reared on the GE Bt soybeans had a net reproductive rate (R0) 100% higher and intrinsic rate of population increase (rm) 15% higher than those reared on non-GE soybeans. The increased demographic performance was associated with a higher lifetime fecundity. In electrical penetration graphs, the whiteflies reared on the GE soybeans had fewer probes and spent 50% less time before reaching the phloem phase from the beginning of the first successful probe, indicating a higher risk of transmission of whitefly-borne viruses. Data from Neotropical fields showed a higher population density of B. tabaci on two soybean varieties expressing glyphosate resistance and Cry1Ac Bt toxin. These results indicate that some GE soybean varieties expressing insect and herbicide resistances can be more susceptible to whiteflies than non-GE ones or those only expressing herbicide resistance. Most likely, these differences are related to varietal features that increase host-plant susceptibility to whiteflies. Appropriate pest management may be needed to deal with whiteflies in soybean fields, especially in warm regions, and breeders may want to consider the issue when developing new soybean varieties.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>33625491</pmid><doi>10.1093/jee/toab008</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8957-6465</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0493 |
ispartof | Journal of economic entomology, 2021-04, Vol.114 (2), p.970-978 |
issn | 0022-0493 1938-291X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2493001992 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agricultural pests Aleyrodidae Animals Bemisia tabaci Chemical pest control Cry1Ac toxin electrical penetration graph technique Fecundity Feeding Behavior Genetic engineering genetically modified crop Genetically modified crops Glycine max - genetics Glyphosate Growth Hemiptera Herbicide resistance Herbicides Host plants Insects New varieties Pest Control phytosuccivorous insect PLANT RESISTANCE Population biology Population density population dynamics Population Growth Soybean Soybeans Toxins whitefly |
title | Plant Resistance in Some Modern Soybean Varieties May Favor Population Growth and Modify the Stylet Penetration of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T03%3A05%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plant%20Resistance%20in%20Some%20Modern%20Soybean%20Varieties%20May%20Favor%20Population%20Growth%20and%20Modify%20the%20Stylet%20Penetration%20of%20Bemisia%20tabaci%20(Hemiptera:%20Aleyrodidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Almeida,%20Mauric%C3%A9lia%20F.&rft.date=2021-04-13&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=970&rft.epage=978&rft.pages=970-978&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/toab008&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA698308920%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2823849861&rft_id=info:pmid/33625491&rft_galeid=A698308920&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jee/toab008&rfr_iscdi=true |