The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters
The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and host-derived parameters. Studies comparing zirconia and titanium surfaces were selected up to September 1, 2019. The outcome measures were surface roughness, contact angle, bacterial count, bac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2021-10, Vol.50 (10), p.1361-1374 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1374 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1361 |
container_title | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Kniha, K. Heussen, N. Modabber, A. Hölzle, F. Möhlhenrich, S.C. |
description | The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and host-derived parameters. Studies comparing zirconia and titanium surfaces were selected up to September 1, 2019. The outcome measures were surface roughness, contact angle, bacterial count, bacterial adherence, biofilm thickness, bacterial distribution, and specifically investigated biofilm and specific host-derived immunological parameters. Random-effects meta-analyses of in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted. A total of 39 studies were included for data extraction. In the systematic review data, 10 studies stated that zirconia accumulated less initial oral biofilm parameters, 16 investigations showed negligible inter-material differences, and only one study showed that zirconia attracted the most biofilm. However, in the meta-analysis, the bacterial coverage was found to be significantly superior for zirconia surfaces (P< 0.00001); the other outcome measures did not show any statistically significant differences between zirconia and titanium for the remaining parameters and the studies presented a substantial degree of heterogeneity. Overall, on the basis of the meta-analysis, the current data situation does not allow a clear preference for the use of zirconia or titanium. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2492661855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0901502721000400</els_id><sourcerecordid>2492661855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9d726bee86140e204748d756f000c092383b85f020ec908145ce841a62d85af13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVJaDZJX6CHomMv3oxkW5aglxLaJhDIJTkLrTRqtFjWVrIDzdNHZtMeAwMDwzc__B8hnxlsGTBxtd-GfYpbDpxtoQ5nH8iGtUo1ABxOyAYUsKYHPpyR81L2AKBaOXwkZ20rmFRi2JDp4Qkpeo92psnTl5BtmoKhZnJ0DrOZwhJpWbI3FgtNE92F5MMYqU85mjnUy4rW9ZTK3DjM4RkdDTEuUxrT72DNSA8mm4gz5nJJTr0ZC3562xfk8eePh-ub5u7-1-3197vGtr2YG-UGLnaIUrAOkEM3dNINvfC1ggXFW9nuZO9rS7QKJOt6i7JjRnAne-NZe0G-HnMPOf1ZsMw6hmJxHM2EaSmad4qL6qDvK8qPqM2plIxeH3KIJv_VDPTqWe_16lmvnjXU4Wv-l7f8ZRfR_X_5J7YC344A1pbPAbMuNuBk0YVcXWuXwnv5r-d9jz0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492661855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kniha, K. ; Heussen, N. ; Modabber, A. ; Hölzle, F. ; Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kniha, K. ; Heussen, N. ; Modabber, A. ; Hölzle, F. ; Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and host-derived parameters. Studies comparing zirconia and titanium surfaces were selected up to September 1, 2019. The outcome measures were surface roughness, contact angle, bacterial count, bacterial adherence, biofilm thickness, bacterial distribution, and specifically investigated biofilm and specific host-derived immunological parameters. Random-effects meta-analyses of in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted. A total of 39 studies were included for data extraction. In the systematic review data, 10 studies stated that zirconia accumulated less initial oral biofilm parameters, 16 investigations showed negligible inter-material differences, and only one study showed that zirconia attracted the most biofilm. However, in the meta-analysis, the bacterial coverage was found to be significantly superior for zirconia surfaces (P< 0.00001); the other outcome measures did not show any statistically significant differences between zirconia and titanium for the remaining parameters and the studies presented a substantial degree of heterogeneity. Overall, on the basis of the meta-analysis, the current data situation does not allow a clear preference for the use of zirconia or titanium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33618967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>bacterial load ; dental implants ; Dentistry ; immunology ; interleukins ; microbiology ; titanium ; zirconium</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2021-10, Vol.50 (10), p.1361-1374</ispartof><rights>2021 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9d726bee86140e204748d756f000c092383b85f020ec908145ce841a62d85af13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9d726bee86140e204748d756f000c092383b85f020ec908145ce841a62d85af13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33618967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kniha, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heussen, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modabber, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölzle, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and host-derived parameters. Studies comparing zirconia and titanium surfaces were selected up to September 1, 2019. The outcome measures were surface roughness, contact angle, bacterial count, bacterial adherence, biofilm thickness, bacterial distribution, and specifically investigated biofilm and specific host-derived immunological parameters. Random-effects meta-analyses of in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted. A total of 39 studies were included for data extraction. In the systematic review data, 10 studies stated that zirconia accumulated less initial oral biofilm parameters, 16 investigations showed negligible inter-material differences, and only one study showed that zirconia attracted the most biofilm. However, in the meta-analysis, the bacterial coverage was found to be significantly superior for zirconia surfaces (P< 0.00001); the other outcome measures did not show any statistically significant differences between zirconia and titanium for the remaining parameters and the studies presented a substantial degree of heterogeneity. Overall, on the basis of the meta-analysis, the current data situation does not allow a clear preference for the use of zirconia or titanium.</description><subject>bacterial load</subject><subject>dental implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>immunology</subject><subject>interleukins</subject><subject>microbiology</subject><subject>titanium</subject><subject>zirconium</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVJaDZJX6CHomMv3oxkW5aglxLaJhDIJTkLrTRqtFjWVrIDzdNHZtMeAwMDwzc__B8hnxlsGTBxtd-GfYpbDpxtoQ5nH8iGtUo1ABxOyAYUsKYHPpyR81L2AKBaOXwkZ20rmFRi2JDp4Qkpeo92psnTl5BtmoKhZnJ0DrOZwhJpWbI3FgtNE92F5MMYqU85mjnUy4rW9ZTK3DjM4RkdDTEuUxrT72DNSA8mm4gz5nJJTr0ZC3562xfk8eePh-ub5u7-1-3197vGtr2YG-UGLnaIUrAOkEM3dNINvfC1ggXFW9nuZO9rS7QKJOt6i7JjRnAne-NZe0G-HnMPOf1ZsMw6hmJxHM2EaSmad4qL6qDvK8qPqM2plIxeH3KIJv_VDPTqWe_16lmvnjXU4Wv-l7f8ZRfR_X_5J7YC344A1pbPAbMuNuBk0YVcXWuXwnv5r-d9jz0</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Kniha, K.</creator><creator>Heussen, N.</creator><creator>Modabber, A.</creator><creator>Hölzle, F.</creator><creator>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters</title><author>Kniha, K. ; Heussen, N. ; Modabber, A. ; Hölzle, F. ; Möhlhenrich, S.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9d726bee86140e204748d756f000c092383b85f020ec908145ce841a62d85af13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>bacterial load</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>immunology</topic><topic>interleukins</topic><topic>microbiology</topic><topic>titanium</topic><topic>zirconium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kniha, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heussen, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modabber, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölzle, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kniha, K.</au><au>Heussen, N.</au><au>Modabber, A.</au><au>Hölzle, F.</au><au>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1361</spage><epage>1374</epage><pages>1361-1374</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and host-derived parameters. Studies comparing zirconia and titanium surfaces were selected up to September 1, 2019. The outcome measures were surface roughness, contact angle, bacterial count, bacterial adherence, biofilm thickness, bacterial distribution, and specifically investigated biofilm and specific host-derived immunological parameters. Random-effects meta-analyses of in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted. A total of 39 studies were included for data extraction. In the systematic review data, 10 studies stated that zirconia accumulated less initial oral biofilm parameters, 16 investigations showed negligible inter-material differences, and only one study showed that zirconia attracted the most biofilm. However, in the meta-analysis, the bacterial coverage was found to be significantly superior for zirconia surfaces (P< 0.00001); the other outcome measures did not show any statistically significant differences between zirconia and titanium for the remaining parameters and the studies presented a substantial degree of heterogeneity. Overall, on the basis of the meta-analysis, the current data situation does not allow a clear preference for the use of zirconia or titanium.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33618967</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.021</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0901-5027 |
ispartof | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2021-10, Vol.50 (10), p.1361-1374 |
issn | 0901-5027 1399-0020 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2492661855 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | bacterial load dental implants Dentistry immunology interleukins microbiology titanium zirconium |
title | The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T07%3A18%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20zirconia%20and%20titanium%20surfaces%20on%20biofilm%20formation%20and%20on%20host-derived%20immunological%20parameters&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Kniha,%20K.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1361&rft.epage=1374&rft.pages=1361-1374&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2492661855%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492661855&rft_id=info:pmid/33618967&rft_els_id=S0901502721000400&rfr_iscdi=true |