The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters

The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and host-derived parameters. Studies comparing zirconia and titanium surfaces were selected up to September 1, 2019. The outcome measures were surface roughness, contact angle, bacterial count, bac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2021-10, Vol.50 (10), p.1361-1374
Hauptverfasser: Kniha, K., Heussen, N., Modabber, A., Hölzle, F., Möhlhenrich, S.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1374
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1361
container_title International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 50
creator Kniha, K.
Heussen, N.
Modabber, A.
Hölzle, F.
Möhlhenrich, S.C.
description The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and host-derived parameters. Studies comparing zirconia and titanium surfaces were selected up to September 1, 2019. The outcome measures were surface roughness, contact angle, bacterial count, bacterial adherence, biofilm thickness, bacterial distribution, and specifically investigated biofilm and specific host-derived immunological parameters. Random-effects meta-analyses of in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted. A total of 39 studies were included for data extraction. In the systematic review data, 10 studies stated that zirconia accumulated less initial oral biofilm parameters, 16 investigations showed negligible inter-material differences, and only one study showed that zirconia attracted the most biofilm. However, in the meta-analysis, the bacterial coverage was found to be significantly superior for zirconia surfaces (P< 0.00001); the other outcome measures did not show any statistically significant differences between zirconia and titanium for the remaining parameters and the studies presented a substantial degree of heterogeneity. Overall, on the basis of the meta-analysis, the current data situation does not allow a clear preference for the use of zirconia or titanium.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2492661855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0901502721000400</els_id><sourcerecordid>2492661855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9d726bee86140e204748d756f000c092383b85f020ec908145ce841a62d85af13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVJaDZJX6CHomMv3oxkW5aglxLaJhDIJTkLrTRqtFjWVrIDzdNHZtMeAwMDwzc__B8hnxlsGTBxtd-GfYpbDpxtoQ5nH8iGtUo1ABxOyAYUsKYHPpyR81L2AKBaOXwkZ20rmFRi2JDp4Qkpeo92psnTl5BtmoKhZnJ0DrOZwhJpWbI3FgtNE92F5MMYqU85mjnUy4rW9ZTK3DjM4RkdDTEuUxrT72DNSA8mm4gz5nJJTr0ZC3562xfk8eePh-ub5u7-1-3197vGtr2YG-UGLnaIUrAOkEM3dNINvfC1ggXFW9nuZO9rS7QKJOt6i7JjRnAne-NZe0G-HnMPOf1ZsMw6hmJxHM2EaSmad4qL6qDvK8qPqM2plIxeH3KIJv_VDPTqWe_16lmvnjXU4Wv-l7f8ZRfR_X_5J7YC344A1pbPAbMuNuBk0YVcXWuXwnv5r-d9jz0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492661855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kniha, K. ; Heussen, N. ; Modabber, A. ; Hölzle, F. ; Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kniha, K. ; Heussen, N. ; Modabber, A. ; Hölzle, F. ; Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and host-derived parameters. Studies comparing zirconia and titanium surfaces were selected up to September 1, 2019. The outcome measures were surface roughness, contact angle, bacterial count, bacterial adherence, biofilm thickness, bacterial distribution, and specifically investigated biofilm and specific host-derived immunological parameters. Random-effects meta-analyses of in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted. A total of 39 studies were included for data extraction. In the systematic review data, 10 studies stated that zirconia accumulated less initial oral biofilm parameters, 16 investigations showed negligible inter-material differences, and only one study showed that zirconia attracted the most biofilm. However, in the meta-analysis, the bacterial coverage was found to be significantly superior for zirconia surfaces (P&lt; 0.00001); the other outcome measures did not show any statistically significant differences between zirconia and titanium for the remaining parameters and the studies presented a substantial degree of heterogeneity. Overall, on the basis of the meta-analysis, the current data situation does not allow a clear preference for the use of zirconia or titanium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33618967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>bacterial load ; dental implants ; Dentistry ; immunology ; interleukins ; microbiology ; titanium ; zirconium</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2021-10, Vol.50 (10), p.1361-1374</ispartof><rights>2021 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9d726bee86140e204748d756f000c092383b85f020ec908145ce841a62d85af13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9d726bee86140e204748d756f000c092383b85f020ec908145ce841a62d85af13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33618967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kniha, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heussen, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modabber, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölzle, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and host-derived parameters. Studies comparing zirconia and titanium surfaces were selected up to September 1, 2019. The outcome measures were surface roughness, contact angle, bacterial count, bacterial adherence, biofilm thickness, bacterial distribution, and specifically investigated biofilm and specific host-derived immunological parameters. Random-effects meta-analyses of in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted. A total of 39 studies were included for data extraction. In the systematic review data, 10 studies stated that zirconia accumulated less initial oral biofilm parameters, 16 investigations showed negligible inter-material differences, and only one study showed that zirconia attracted the most biofilm. However, in the meta-analysis, the bacterial coverage was found to be significantly superior for zirconia surfaces (P&lt; 0.00001); the other outcome measures did not show any statistically significant differences between zirconia and titanium for the remaining parameters and the studies presented a substantial degree of heterogeneity. Overall, on the basis of the meta-analysis, the current data situation does not allow a clear preference for the use of zirconia or titanium.</description><subject>bacterial load</subject><subject>dental implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>immunology</subject><subject>interleukins</subject><subject>microbiology</subject><subject>titanium</subject><subject>zirconium</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVJaDZJX6CHomMv3oxkW5aglxLaJhDIJTkLrTRqtFjWVrIDzdNHZtMeAwMDwzc__B8hnxlsGTBxtd-GfYpbDpxtoQ5nH8iGtUo1ABxOyAYUsKYHPpyR81L2AKBaOXwkZ20rmFRi2JDp4Qkpeo92psnTl5BtmoKhZnJ0DrOZwhJpWbI3FgtNE92F5MMYqU85mjnUy4rW9ZTK3DjM4RkdDTEuUxrT72DNSA8mm4gz5nJJTr0ZC3562xfk8eePh-ub5u7-1-3197vGtr2YG-UGLnaIUrAOkEM3dNINvfC1ggXFW9nuZO9rS7QKJOt6i7JjRnAne-NZe0G-HnMPOf1ZsMw6hmJxHM2EaSmad4qL6qDvK8qPqM2plIxeH3KIJv_VDPTqWe_16lmvnjXU4Wv-l7f8ZRfR_X_5J7YC344A1pbPAbMuNuBk0YVcXWuXwnv5r-d9jz0</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Kniha, K.</creator><creator>Heussen, N.</creator><creator>Modabber, A.</creator><creator>Hölzle, F.</creator><creator>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters</title><author>Kniha, K. ; Heussen, N. ; Modabber, A. ; Hölzle, F. ; Möhlhenrich, S.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9d726bee86140e204748d756f000c092383b85f020ec908145ce841a62d85af13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>bacterial load</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>immunology</topic><topic>interleukins</topic><topic>microbiology</topic><topic>titanium</topic><topic>zirconium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kniha, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heussen, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modabber, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölzle, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kniha, K.</au><au>Heussen, N.</au><au>Modabber, A.</au><au>Hölzle, F.</au><au>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1361</spage><epage>1374</epage><pages>1361-1374</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and host-derived parameters. Studies comparing zirconia and titanium surfaces were selected up to September 1, 2019. The outcome measures were surface roughness, contact angle, bacterial count, bacterial adherence, biofilm thickness, bacterial distribution, and specifically investigated biofilm and specific host-derived immunological parameters. Random-effects meta-analyses of in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted. A total of 39 studies were included for data extraction. In the systematic review data, 10 studies stated that zirconia accumulated less initial oral biofilm parameters, 16 investigations showed negligible inter-material differences, and only one study showed that zirconia attracted the most biofilm. However, in the meta-analysis, the bacterial coverage was found to be significantly superior for zirconia surfaces (P&lt; 0.00001); the other outcome measures did not show any statistically significant differences between zirconia and titanium for the remaining parameters and the studies presented a substantial degree of heterogeneity. Overall, on the basis of the meta-analysis, the current data situation does not allow a clear preference for the use of zirconia or titanium.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33618967</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.021</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0901-5027
ispartof International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2021-10, Vol.50 (10), p.1361-1374
issn 0901-5027
1399-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2492661855
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects bacterial load
dental implants
Dentistry
immunology
interleukins
microbiology
titanium
zirconium
title The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T07%3A18%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20zirconia%20and%20titanium%20surfaces%20on%20biofilm%20formation%20and%20on%20host-derived%20immunological%20parameters&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Kniha,%20K.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1361&rft.epage=1374&rft.pages=1361-1374&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2492661855%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492661855&rft_id=info:pmid/33618967&rft_els_id=S0901502721000400&rfr_iscdi=true