Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review
Background Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has gained wide popularity for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. However, it remains unclear whether LCBDE is a better alternative option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. Thus, the aim of the present study was to explore...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2022, Vol.36 (1), p.718-727 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 727 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 718 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Ma, Zhilong Zhou, Jia Yao, Le Dai, Yuxiang Xie, Wangcheng Song, Guodong Meng, Hongbo Xu, Bin Zhang, Ti Zhou, Bo Yang, Tingsong Song, Zhenshun |
description | Background
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has gained wide popularity for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. However, it remains unclear whether LCBDE is a better alternative option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. Thus, the aim of the present study was to explore the safety and efficacy of LCBDE for these patients by retrospectively analyzing our data and combing with literature review.
Methods
Between September 2011 and February 2019, 1064 consecutive patients who underwent LCBDE at Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital were reviewed. The clinical data of patients with difficult biliary stones were selected and retrospectively analyzed.
Results
Of these patients, 334 cases were confirmed with difficult biliary stones, and the overall complete stone clearance rate was 98.8% (330/334). 34 cases (10.2%) were performed with laser lithotripsy. A total of 296 patients (88.6%) underwent primary closure of common bile duct, and T-tube drainage was indwelled in 38 patients (11.4%). No bile duct injury, bleeding, perforation and surgery-related deaths were observed. The overall morbidity rate was 6.6%. 16 cases (4.8%) occurred in bile leakage with primary closure procedure, and all of them were managed successfully with conservative therapy. The median follow-up period was 9 months with stone recurrence occurring in 9 patients (2.7%). There was no evidence of bile duct stricture in all cases.
Conclusions
The current study suggests that LCBED is a considerable safe and effective option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. A randomized clinical trial is needed to further evaluate the benefit of LCBDE in this subgroup. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-021-08340-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2492661573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2617592568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-3a03161287a20e4f42eae3370cd0fd466f3d46541a4673a13f0b1dee66fe96313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCC7BAI7FhE_BfnIQdqviTKrEA1pavM25dJXawHcp9G56CB-DJcHoLSCzY2LLnm3NGcwh5zOhzRmn3IlMqlWwoZw3thaQNu0N2TArecM76u2RHB0Eb3g3yhDzI-YpWfmDtfXIihGJDO7Q78uOjcVgOYMII6Jy3xh4gOpjMYlLMNi7ego3zHAPs_YQwrrYAflummEzx9dfFBOUSYalPDCXDtS-XMPpNbJ3K1uVNOkAuMWB-Cf3P7wc0KW8uVQdT7bKYwRQwkH24qCY-5OLLeqO_TTb5gtVuTQgJv3q8fkjuOTNlfHR7n5LPb15_OnvXnH94-_7s1XljRdeWRhgqmGK87wynKJ3kaFCIjtqRulEq5UQ9W8mMVJ0wTDi6ZyNiLeCgBBOn5NlRd0nxy4q56Nlni9NkAsY1ay4HrhRrO1HRp_-gV3FNoU6nuWJdO_BW9ZXiR8rW7eaETi_Jz3U_mlG9paqPqeqaqr5JVW9TPLmVXvczjn9afsdYAXEEci2FC0x_vf8j-wtcfrFG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2617592568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Ma, Zhilong ; Zhou, Jia ; Yao, Le ; Dai, Yuxiang ; Xie, Wangcheng ; Song, Guodong ; Meng, Hongbo ; Xu, Bin ; Zhang, Ti ; Zhou, Bo ; Yang, Tingsong ; Song, Zhenshun</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Zhilong ; Zhou, Jia ; Yao, Le ; Dai, Yuxiang ; Xie, Wangcheng ; Song, Guodong ; Meng, Hongbo ; Xu, Bin ; Zhang, Ti ; Zhou, Bo ; Yang, Tingsong ; Song, Zhenshun</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has gained wide popularity for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. However, it remains unclear whether LCBDE is a better alternative option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. Thus, the aim of the present study was to explore the safety and efficacy of LCBDE for these patients by retrospectively analyzing our data and combing with literature review.
Methods
Between September 2011 and February 2019, 1064 consecutive patients who underwent LCBDE at Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital were reviewed. The clinical data of patients with difficult biliary stones were selected and retrospectively analyzed.
Results
Of these patients, 334 cases were confirmed with difficult biliary stones, and the overall complete stone clearance rate was 98.8% (330/334). 34 cases (10.2%) were performed with laser lithotripsy. A total of 296 patients (88.6%) underwent primary closure of common bile duct, and T-tube drainage was indwelled in 38 patients (11.4%). No bile duct injury, bleeding, perforation and surgery-related deaths were observed. The overall morbidity rate was 6.6%. 16 cases (4.8%) occurred in bile leakage with primary closure procedure, and all of them were managed successfully with conservative therapy. The median follow-up period was 9 months with stone recurrence occurring in 9 patients (2.7%). There was no evidence of bile duct stricture in all cases.
Conclusions
The current study suggests that LCBED is a considerable safe and effective option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. A randomized clinical trial is needed to further evaluate the benefit of LCBDE in this subgroup.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08340-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33619595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Bile ducts ; China ; Choledocholithiasis - surgery ; Cholestasis - surgery ; Common Bile Duct - surgery ; Gallstones ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Literature reviews ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Proctology ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2022, Vol.36 (1), p.718-727</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-3a03161287a20e4f42eae3370cd0fd466f3d46541a4673a13f0b1dee66fe96313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-3a03161287a20e4f42eae3370cd0fd466f3d46541a4673a13f0b1dee66fe96313</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7124-1579</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-021-08340-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-021-08340-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Zhilong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Le</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Yuxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Wangcheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Guodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Hongbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Tingsong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Zhenshun</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has gained wide popularity for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. However, it remains unclear whether LCBDE is a better alternative option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. Thus, the aim of the present study was to explore the safety and efficacy of LCBDE for these patients by retrospectively analyzing our data and combing with literature review.
Methods
Between September 2011 and February 2019, 1064 consecutive patients who underwent LCBDE at Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital were reviewed. The clinical data of patients with difficult biliary stones were selected and retrospectively analyzed.
Results
Of these patients, 334 cases were confirmed with difficult biliary stones, and the overall complete stone clearance rate was 98.8% (330/334). 34 cases (10.2%) were performed with laser lithotripsy. A total of 296 patients (88.6%) underwent primary closure of common bile duct, and T-tube drainage was indwelled in 38 patients (11.4%). No bile duct injury, bleeding, perforation and surgery-related deaths were observed. The overall morbidity rate was 6.6%. 16 cases (4.8%) occurred in bile leakage with primary closure procedure, and all of them were managed successfully with conservative therapy. The median follow-up period was 9 months with stone recurrence occurring in 9 patients (2.7%). There was no evidence of bile duct stricture in all cases.
Conclusions
The current study suggests that LCBED is a considerable safe and effective option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. A randomized clinical trial is needed to further evaluate the benefit of LCBDE in this subgroup.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Bile ducts</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Choledocholithiasis - surgery</subject><subject>Cholestasis - surgery</subject><subject>Common Bile Duct - surgery</subject><subject>Gallstones</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCC7BAI7FhE_BfnIQdqviTKrEA1pavM25dJXawHcp9G56CB-DJcHoLSCzY2LLnm3NGcwh5zOhzRmn3IlMqlWwoZw3thaQNu0N2TArecM76u2RHB0Eb3g3yhDzI-YpWfmDtfXIihGJDO7Q78uOjcVgOYMII6Jy3xh4gOpjMYlLMNi7ego3zHAPs_YQwrrYAflummEzx9dfFBOUSYalPDCXDtS-XMPpNbJ3K1uVNOkAuMWB-Cf3P7wc0KW8uVQdT7bKYwRQwkH24qCY-5OLLeqO_TTb5gtVuTQgJv3q8fkjuOTNlfHR7n5LPb15_OnvXnH94-_7s1XljRdeWRhgqmGK87wynKJ3kaFCIjtqRulEq5UQ9W8mMVJ0wTDi6ZyNiLeCgBBOn5NlRd0nxy4q56Nlni9NkAsY1ay4HrhRrO1HRp_-gV3FNoU6nuWJdO_BW9ZXiR8rW7eaETi_Jz3U_mlG9paqPqeqaqr5JVW9TPLmVXvczjn9afsdYAXEEci2FC0x_vf8j-wtcfrFG</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Ma, Zhilong</creator><creator>Zhou, Jia</creator><creator>Yao, Le</creator><creator>Dai, Yuxiang</creator><creator>Xie, Wangcheng</creator><creator>Song, Guodong</creator><creator>Meng, Hongbo</creator><creator>Xu, Bin</creator><creator>Zhang, Ti</creator><creator>Zhou, Bo</creator><creator>Yang, Tingsong</creator><creator>Song, Zhenshun</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7124-1579</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review</title><author>Ma, Zhilong ; Zhou, Jia ; Yao, Le ; Dai, Yuxiang ; Xie, Wangcheng ; Song, Guodong ; Meng, Hongbo ; Xu, Bin ; Zhang, Ti ; Zhou, Bo ; Yang, Tingsong ; Song, Zhenshun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-3a03161287a20e4f42eae3370cd0fd466f3d46541a4673a13f0b1dee66fe96313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Bile ducts</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Choledocholithiasis - surgery</topic><topic>Cholestasis - surgery</topic><topic>Common Bile Duct - surgery</topic><topic>Gallstones</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Zhilong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Le</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Yuxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Wangcheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Guodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Hongbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Tingsong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Zhenshun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Zhilong</au><au>Zhou, Jia</au><au>Yao, Le</au><au>Dai, Yuxiang</au><au>Xie, Wangcheng</au><au>Song, Guodong</au><au>Meng, Hongbo</au><au>Xu, Bin</au><au>Zhang, Ti</au><au>Zhou, Bo</au><au>Yang, Tingsong</au><au>Song, Zhenshun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>718</spage><epage>727</epage><pages>718-727</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has gained wide popularity for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. However, it remains unclear whether LCBDE is a better alternative option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. Thus, the aim of the present study was to explore the safety and efficacy of LCBDE for these patients by retrospectively analyzing our data and combing with literature review.
Methods
Between September 2011 and February 2019, 1064 consecutive patients who underwent LCBDE at Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital were reviewed. The clinical data of patients with difficult biliary stones were selected and retrospectively analyzed.
Results
Of these patients, 334 cases were confirmed with difficult biliary stones, and the overall complete stone clearance rate was 98.8% (330/334). 34 cases (10.2%) were performed with laser lithotripsy. A total of 296 patients (88.6%) underwent primary closure of common bile duct, and T-tube drainage was indwelled in 38 patients (11.4%). No bile duct injury, bleeding, perforation and surgery-related deaths were observed. The overall morbidity rate was 6.6%. 16 cases (4.8%) occurred in bile leakage with primary closure procedure, and all of them were managed successfully with conservative therapy. The median follow-up period was 9 months with stone recurrence occurring in 9 patients (2.7%). There was no evidence of bile duct stricture in all cases.
Conclusions
The current study suggests that LCBED is a considerable safe and effective option for the patients with difficult biliary stones. A randomized clinical trial is needed to further evaluate the benefit of LCBDE in this subgroup.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33619595</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-021-08340-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7124-1579</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2022, Vol.36 (1), p.718-727 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2492661573 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Bile ducts China Choledocholithiasis - surgery Cholestasis - surgery Common Bile Duct - surgery Gallstones Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - methods Literature reviews Medicine Medicine & Public Health Proctology Retrospective Studies Surgery |
title | Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A44%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20efficacy%20of%20laparoscopic%20common%20bile%20duct%20exploration%20for%20the%20patients%20with%20difficult%20biliary%20stones:%208%C2%A0years%20of%20experiences%20at%20a%20single%20institution%20and%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Ma,%20Zhilong&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=718&rft.epage=727&rft.pages=718-727&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-021-08340-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2617592568%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2617592568&rft_id=info:pmid/33619595&rfr_iscdi=true |