Increased Articular Exposure of the Lateral Tibial Plateau with a Midline Lateral Parapatellar Arthrotomy Compared to an Anterolateral Submeniscal Arthrotomy: a Cadaveric Study

•Quantitative comparison of articular exposure with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy and submeniscal arthrotomy.•Average articular surface area exposed was 2.2 times greater through midline approach compared with lateral parapatellar arthrotomy.•Improved exposure with midline approach may allow bet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2021-08, Vol.52 (8), p.2111-2115
Hauptverfasser: Rinehart, Dustin, Starr, Adam, Sanders, Drew, Cutler, Holt, Gross, Bruno, Hull, Brandon, Sathy, Ashoke
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2115
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2111
container_title Injury
container_volume 52
creator Rinehart, Dustin
Starr, Adam
Sanders, Drew
Cutler, Holt
Gross, Bruno
Hull, Brandon
Sathy, Ashoke
description •Quantitative comparison of articular exposure with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy and submeniscal arthrotomy.•Average articular surface area exposed was 2.2 times greater through midline approach compared with lateral parapatellar arthrotomy.•Improved exposure with midline approach may allow better visualization of the lateral plateau posteromedial quadrant. To quantitatively compare the articular exposure of the proximal tibia with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy through a straight midline incision (ML) versus a lateral submeniscal arthrotomy through a curvilinear anterolateral incision (AL). Eight surgical approaches (4 ML and 4 AL) were performed on 4 fresh cadavers. Access to key articular landmarks was assessed, including divisions of the lateral meniscus, lateral tibial spine, and anterior cruciate ligament. The boundary of the exposed articular surface of the tibia was marked, and the proximal tibias were then stripped of soft tissues. A calibrated digital image was taken of each proximal tibia, and exposed articular surface area was calculated with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD). Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample t-test. Average articular surface area exposed was 2.2 times greater through the midline approach compared with the anterolateral approach (11.2 vs 5.1 cm2, p = 0.010). All key anatomic landmarks were directly visualized through the midline approach in each specimen. Complete visualization of the lateral meniscus posterior horn, lateral tibial spine, and anterior cruciate ligament was not accomplished through the anterolateral approach in any specimen. The midline approach provides more extensive articular exposure of the lateral tibial plateau compared with the anterolateral approach. This improved exposure may offer an advantage when treating fractures not amenable to arthroscopic or minimally invasive techniques. It may be of most use when treating fractures with extension into the posteromedial quadrant of the lateral plateau, fractures with extensive comminution of the lateral plateau, or fractures with complex lateral meniscus tears and fractures with tibial spine involvement.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2492285877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020138321001285</els_id><sourcerecordid>2492285877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-a9b45166ea085b2c9d78b7552071fd955b386b83f5b98007a38872f77cf9e93f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1r2zAUFWNjzdr9gzH0uBdn-ogseQ-DELqukLJC22chy9dEwbY8SW6Xf7WfWJlk61vhwr2C86HDQegTJUtKaPl1v3TDfgqHJSOMLgnLI96gBVWyKggr5Vu0IISRgnLFz9CHGPeEUEk4f4_OOC8pY2K1QH-vBxvARGjwOiRnp84EfPln9HEKgH2L0w7w1iQIpsP3rnZ53Xb5bSb85NIOG3zjms4NL6hbE8yY726WyqK74JPvD3jj-9GEbJQ8NgNeDxnuuxPpbqp7GFy0-X7hfMvyG9OYRwjO4rs0NYcL9K41XYSPp32OHn5c3m9-FttfV9eb9bawnNJUmKpeCVqWYIgSNbNVI1UthWBE0raphKi5KmvFW1FXihBpuFKStVLatoKKt_wcfTnqjsH_niAm3effzaEG8FPUbFUxpoSSMkNXR6gNPsYArR6D6004aEr03JXe62NXeu5KE5ZHZNrnk8OcvflP-ldOBnw_AiDnfHQQdLQOBguNC2CTbrx73eEZKuiqVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492285877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased Articular Exposure of the Lateral Tibial Plateau with a Midline Lateral Parapatellar Arthrotomy Compared to an Anterolateral Submeniscal Arthrotomy: a Cadaveric Study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Rinehart, Dustin ; Starr, Adam ; Sanders, Drew ; Cutler, Holt ; Gross, Bruno ; Hull, Brandon ; Sathy, Ashoke</creator><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Dustin ; Starr, Adam ; Sanders, Drew ; Cutler, Holt ; Gross, Bruno ; Hull, Brandon ; Sathy, Ashoke</creatorcontrib><description>•Quantitative comparison of articular exposure with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy and submeniscal arthrotomy.•Average articular surface area exposed was 2.2 times greater through midline approach compared with lateral parapatellar arthrotomy.•Improved exposure with midline approach may allow better visualization of the lateral plateau posteromedial quadrant. To quantitatively compare the articular exposure of the proximal tibia with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy through a straight midline incision (ML) versus a lateral submeniscal arthrotomy through a curvilinear anterolateral incision (AL). Eight surgical approaches (4 ML and 4 AL) were performed on 4 fresh cadavers. Access to key articular landmarks was assessed, including divisions of the lateral meniscus, lateral tibial spine, and anterior cruciate ligament. The boundary of the exposed articular surface of the tibia was marked, and the proximal tibias were then stripped of soft tissues. A calibrated digital image was taken of each proximal tibia, and exposed articular surface area was calculated with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD). Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample t-test. Average articular surface area exposed was 2.2 times greater through the midline approach compared with the anterolateral approach (11.2 vs 5.1 cm2, p = 0.010). All key anatomic landmarks were directly visualized through the midline approach in each specimen. Complete visualization of the lateral meniscus posterior horn, lateral tibial spine, and anterior cruciate ligament was not accomplished through the anterolateral approach in any specimen. The midline approach provides more extensive articular exposure of the lateral tibial plateau compared with the anterolateral approach. This improved exposure may offer an advantage when treating fractures not amenable to arthroscopic or minimally invasive techniques. It may be of most use when treating fractures with extension into the posteromedial quadrant of the lateral plateau, fractures with extensive comminution of the lateral plateau, or fractures with complex lateral meniscus tears and fractures with tibial spine involvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33612254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anterolateral ; Lateral plateau ; Midline ; Surgical approach ; Tibial plateau</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2021-08, Vol.52 (8), p.2111-2115</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-a9b45166ea085b2c9d78b7552071fd955b386b83f5b98007a38872f77cf9e93f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.025$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33612254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Dustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starr, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Drew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutler, Holt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sathy, Ashoke</creatorcontrib><title>Increased Articular Exposure of the Lateral Tibial Plateau with a Midline Lateral Parapatellar Arthrotomy Compared to an Anterolateral Submeniscal Arthrotomy: a Cadaveric Study</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>•Quantitative comparison of articular exposure with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy and submeniscal arthrotomy.•Average articular surface area exposed was 2.2 times greater through midline approach compared with lateral parapatellar arthrotomy.•Improved exposure with midline approach may allow better visualization of the lateral plateau posteromedial quadrant. To quantitatively compare the articular exposure of the proximal tibia with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy through a straight midline incision (ML) versus a lateral submeniscal arthrotomy through a curvilinear anterolateral incision (AL). Eight surgical approaches (4 ML and 4 AL) were performed on 4 fresh cadavers. Access to key articular landmarks was assessed, including divisions of the lateral meniscus, lateral tibial spine, and anterior cruciate ligament. The boundary of the exposed articular surface of the tibia was marked, and the proximal tibias were then stripped of soft tissues. A calibrated digital image was taken of each proximal tibia, and exposed articular surface area was calculated with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD). Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample t-test. Average articular surface area exposed was 2.2 times greater through the midline approach compared with the anterolateral approach (11.2 vs 5.1 cm2, p = 0.010). All key anatomic landmarks were directly visualized through the midline approach in each specimen. Complete visualization of the lateral meniscus posterior horn, lateral tibial spine, and anterior cruciate ligament was not accomplished through the anterolateral approach in any specimen. The midline approach provides more extensive articular exposure of the lateral tibial plateau compared with the anterolateral approach. This improved exposure may offer an advantage when treating fractures not amenable to arthroscopic or minimally invasive techniques. It may be of most use when treating fractures with extension into the posteromedial quadrant of the lateral plateau, fractures with extensive comminution of the lateral plateau, or fractures with complex lateral meniscus tears and fractures with tibial spine involvement.</description><subject>Anterolateral</subject><subject>Lateral plateau</subject><subject>Midline</subject><subject>Surgical approach</subject><subject>Tibial plateau</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UV1r2zAUFWNjzdr9gzH0uBdn-ogseQ-DELqukLJC22chy9dEwbY8SW6Xf7WfWJlk61vhwr2C86HDQegTJUtKaPl1v3TDfgqHJSOMLgnLI96gBVWyKggr5Vu0IISRgnLFz9CHGPeEUEk4f4_OOC8pY2K1QH-vBxvARGjwOiRnp84EfPln9HEKgH2L0w7w1iQIpsP3rnZ53Xb5bSb85NIOG3zjms4NL6hbE8yY726WyqK74JPvD3jj-9GEbJQ8NgNeDxnuuxPpbqp7GFy0-X7hfMvyG9OYRwjO4rs0NYcL9K41XYSPp32OHn5c3m9-FttfV9eb9bawnNJUmKpeCVqWYIgSNbNVI1UthWBE0raphKi5KmvFW1FXihBpuFKStVLatoKKt_wcfTnqjsH_niAm3effzaEG8FPUbFUxpoSSMkNXR6gNPsYArR6D6004aEr03JXe62NXeu5KE5ZHZNrnk8OcvflP-ldOBnw_AiDnfHQQdLQOBguNC2CTbrx73eEZKuiqVg</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Rinehart, Dustin</creator><creator>Starr, Adam</creator><creator>Sanders, Drew</creator><creator>Cutler, Holt</creator><creator>Gross, Bruno</creator><creator>Hull, Brandon</creator><creator>Sathy, Ashoke</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Increased Articular Exposure of the Lateral Tibial Plateau with a Midline Lateral Parapatellar Arthrotomy Compared to an Anterolateral Submeniscal Arthrotomy: a Cadaveric Study</title><author>Rinehart, Dustin ; Starr, Adam ; Sanders, Drew ; Cutler, Holt ; Gross, Bruno ; Hull, Brandon ; Sathy, Ashoke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-a9b45166ea085b2c9d78b7552071fd955b386b83f5b98007a38872f77cf9e93f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anterolateral</topic><topic>Lateral plateau</topic><topic>Midline</topic><topic>Surgical approach</topic><topic>Tibial plateau</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Dustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starr, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Drew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutler, Holt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sathy, Ashoke</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rinehart, Dustin</au><au>Starr, Adam</au><au>Sanders, Drew</au><au>Cutler, Holt</au><au>Gross, Bruno</au><au>Hull, Brandon</au><au>Sathy, Ashoke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increased Articular Exposure of the Lateral Tibial Plateau with a Midline Lateral Parapatellar Arthrotomy Compared to an Anterolateral Submeniscal Arthrotomy: a Cadaveric Study</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2111</spage><epage>2115</epage><pages>2111-2115</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>•Quantitative comparison of articular exposure with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy and submeniscal arthrotomy.•Average articular surface area exposed was 2.2 times greater through midline approach compared with lateral parapatellar arthrotomy.•Improved exposure with midline approach may allow better visualization of the lateral plateau posteromedial quadrant. To quantitatively compare the articular exposure of the proximal tibia with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy through a straight midline incision (ML) versus a lateral submeniscal arthrotomy through a curvilinear anterolateral incision (AL). Eight surgical approaches (4 ML and 4 AL) were performed on 4 fresh cadavers. Access to key articular landmarks was assessed, including divisions of the lateral meniscus, lateral tibial spine, and anterior cruciate ligament. The boundary of the exposed articular surface of the tibia was marked, and the proximal tibias were then stripped of soft tissues. A calibrated digital image was taken of each proximal tibia, and exposed articular surface area was calculated with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD). Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample t-test. Average articular surface area exposed was 2.2 times greater through the midline approach compared with the anterolateral approach (11.2 vs 5.1 cm2, p = 0.010). All key anatomic landmarks were directly visualized through the midline approach in each specimen. Complete visualization of the lateral meniscus posterior horn, lateral tibial spine, and anterior cruciate ligament was not accomplished through the anterolateral approach in any specimen. The midline approach provides more extensive articular exposure of the lateral tibial plateau compared with the anterolateral approach. This improved exposure may offer an advantage when treating fractures not amenable to arthroscopic or minimally invasive techniques. It may be of most use when treating fractures with extension into the posteromedial quadrant of the lateral plateau, fractures with extensive comminution of the lateral plateau, or fractures with complex lateral meniscus tears and fractures with tibial spine involvement.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33612254</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.025</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2021-08, Vol.52 (8), p.2111-2115
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2492285877
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Anterolateral
Lateral plateau
Midline
Surgical approach
Tibial plateau
title Increased Articular Exposure of the Lateral Tibial Plateau with a Midline Lateral Parapatellar Arthrotomy Compared to an Anterolateral Submeniscal Arthrotomy: a Cadaveric Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A26%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20Articular%20Exposure%20of%20the%20Lateral%20Tibial%20Plateau%20with%20a%20Midline%20Lateral%20Parapatellar%20Arthrotomy%20Compared%20to%20an%20Anterolateral%20Submeniscal%20Arthrotomy:%20a%20Cadaveric%20Study&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Rinehart,%20Dustin&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2111&rft.epage=2115&rft.pages=2111-2115&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2492285877%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492285877&rft_id=info:pmid/33612254&rft_els_id=S0020138321001285&rfr_iscdi=true