Survival and success rates of soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: a 2- to 7-year follow-up retrospective study
Objectives To retrospectively assess implant and prosthesis survival and success and patient satisfaction in edentulous patients treated with soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses (SCCSIPs) over a mean clinical follow-up period of 4 years. Material...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral investigations 2021-09, Vol.25 (9), p.5341-5350 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 5350 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 5341 |
| container_title | Clinical oral investigations |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Levartovsky, S. Arieli, A. Fridenberg, N. Matalon, S. Pilo, R. |
| description | Objectives
To retrospectively assess implant and prosthesis survival and success and patient satisfaction in edentulous patients treated with soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses (SCCSIPs) over a mean clinical follow-up period of 4 years.
Materials and methods
Twenty-one edentulous patients, aged 47–80 years, underwent restoration with 27 SCCSIPs (210 implants, 349 crown units). After definitive prosthesis insertion, patients participated in a yearly dental check-up recall program, including clinical and radiographic examinations. All supporting implants were examined for biological and technical complications, and the restorations were evaluated using modified California Dental Association (CDA) criteria. Life table and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed. Patient satisfaction regarding chewing, esthetics, comfort, and phonetics was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS).
Results
After a mean of 4 years, two implants (3.8%) failed, with no effect on prosthesis survival. The cumulative survival rate was 98.6% and 100% for implants and prostheses, respectively. The most frequent minor biological complication was soft tissue recession (11%). Porcelain fracture was the only major technical complication (0.6% of crown units), while the only minor technical complication was porcelain chipping (4% of crown units), which required only polishing. Overall, 66.7% of the prostheses were free of technical complications. Patient satisfaction was high to very high. Less satisfaction was noted with comfort due to soft tissue recession and food impaction.
Conclusions
Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that the survival and success rates of SCCSIPs in edentulous patients were excellent.
Clinical relevance
SCCSIPs should be considered when planning metal-ceramic implant-supported restorations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00784-021-03842-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2492280017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2562073713</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b119302deeebcbbda26ab440c5f9db9427ef1d72309db4de83de75c1a1fe57283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsDP5J4oQdqgqtVIkFsLYce8J15cTBY9_qPhDvidtbQGLBxr_fOZ7xaZqXnL3ljKl3WIehpUxwyuTQCqoeNae8lT2VSvHH92tB-3HgJ80zxBvGeNsr-bQ5kbLn_cD60-bnl5L2fm8CMasjWKwFRJJMBiRxJhjnTBcfAjhi42RCpnaX4uLLQi0ks3hL5hICNcnuCNoEtzRBNn6tAr9swayZYtm2mHI92VLEvAMEfE8MEZTkSBQ9gElkjiHEW1o2UvUV28BmvweCubjD8-bJbALCi4f5rPn28eLr-SW9_vzp6vzDNbVSdZlOnI-SCQcAk50mZ0RvprZltptHN42tUDBzp4Rkdds6GKQD1Vlu-AydEoM8a94cfWuhPwpg1otHC6G2AbGgFu0oxFD_UVX09T_oTSxprdVp0fWCKam4rJQ4Ura2hAlmvSW_mHTQnOm7EPUxRF1D1Pch6jvrVw_WZVrA_ZH8Tq0C8ghgvVq_Q_r79n9sfwEsp6to</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2562073713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival and success rates of soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: a 2- to 7-year follow-up retrospective study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Levartovsky, S. ; Arieli, A. ; Fridenberg, N. ; Matalon, S. ; Pilo, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Levartovsky, S. ; Arieli, A. ; Fridenberg, N. ; Matalon, S. ; Pilo, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To retrospectively assess implant and prosthesis survival and success and patient satisfaction in edentulous patients treated with soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses (SCCSIPs) over a mean clinical follow-up period of 4 years.
Materials and methods
Twenty-one edentulous patients, aged 47–80 years, underwent restoration with 27 SCCSIPs (210 implants, 349 crown units). After definitive prosthesis insertion, patients participated in a yearly dental check-up recall program, including clinical and radiographic examinations. All supporting implants were examined for biological and technical complications, and the restorations were evaluated using modified California Dental Association (CDA) criteria. Life table and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed. Patient satisfaction regarding chewing, esthetics, comfort, and phonetics was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS).
Results
After a mean of 4 years, two implants (3.8%) failed, with no effect on prosthesis survival. The cumulative survival rate was 98.6% and 100% for implants and prostheses, respectively. The most frequent minor biological complication was soft tissue recession (11%). Porcelain fracture was the only major technical complication (0.6% of crown units), while the only minor technical complication was porcelain chipping (4% of crown units), which required only polishing. Overall, 66.7% of the prostheses were free of technical complications. Patient satisfaction was high to very high. Less satisfaction was noted with comfort due to soft tissue recession and food impaction.
Conclusions
Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that the survival and success rates of SCCSIPs in edentulous patients were excellent.
Clinical relevance
SCCSIPs should be considered when planning metal-ceramic implant-supported restorations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03842-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33616806</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Chewing ; Chromium ; Cobalt ; Dental prosthetics ; Dental restorative materials ; Dentistry ; Edentulous ; Medicine ; Original Article ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Prostheses ; Success ; Survival ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2021-09, Vol.25 (9), p.5341-5350</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b119302deeebcbbda26ab440c5f9db9427ef1d72309db4de83de75c1a1fe57283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b119302deeebcbbda26ab440c5f9db9427ef1d72309db4de83de75c1a1fe57283</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0241-9342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-021-03842-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-021-03842-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33616806$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levartovsky, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arieli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fridenberg, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matalon, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilo, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Survival and success rates of soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: a 2- to 7-year follow-up retrospective study</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>Objectives
To retrospectively assess implant and prosthesis survival and success and patient satisfaction in edentulous patients treated with soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses (SCCSIPs) over a mean clinical follow-up period of 4 years.
Materials and methods
Twenty-one edentulous patients, aged 47–80 years, underwent restoration with 27 SCCSIPs (210 implants, 349 crown units). After definitive prosthesis insertion, patients participated in a yearly dental check-up recall program, including clinical and radiographic examinations. All supporting implants were examined for biological and technical complications, and the restorations were evaluated using modified California Dental Association (CDA) criteria. Life table and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed. Patient satisfaction regarding chewing, esthetics, comfort, and phonetics was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS).
Results
After a mean of 4 years, two implants (3.8%) failed, with no effect on prosthesis survival. The cumulative survival rate was 98.6% and 100% for implants and prostheses, respectively. The most frequent minor biological complication was soft tissue recession (11%). Porcelain fracture was the only major technical complication (0.6% of crown units), while the only minor technical complication was porcelain chipping (4% of crown units), which required only polishing. Overall, 66.7% of the prostheses were free of technical complications. Patient satisfaction was high to very high. Less satisfaction was noted with comfort due to soft tissue recession and food impaction.
Conclusions
Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that the survival and success rates of SCCSIPs in edentulous patients were excellent.
Clinical relevance
SCCSIPs should be considered when planning metal-ceramic implant-supported restorations.</description><subject>Chewing</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Cobalt</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Edentulous</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsDP5J4oQdqgqtVIkFsLYce8J15cTBY9_qPhDvidtbQGLBxr_fOZ7xaZqXnL3ljKl3WIehpUxwyuTQCqoeNae8lT2VSvHH92tB-3HgJ80zxBvGeNsr-bQ5kbLn_cD60-bnl5L2fm8CMasjWKwFRJJMBiRxJhjnTBcfAjhi42RCpnaX4uLLQi0ks3hL5hICNcnuCNoEtzRBNn6tAr9swayZYtm2mHI92VLEvAMEfE8MEZTkSBQ9gElkjiHEW1o2UvUV28BmvweCubjD8-bJbALCi4f5rPn28eLr-SW9_vzp6vzDNbVSdZlOnI-SCQcAk50mZ0RvprZltptHN42tUDBzp4Rkdds6GKQD1Vlu-AydEoM8a94cfWuhPwpg1otHC6G2AbGgFu0oxFD_UVX09T_oTSxprdVp0fWCKam4rJQ4Ura2hAlmvSW_mHTQnOm7EPUxRF1D1Pch6jvrVw_WZVrA_ZH8Tq0C8ghgvVq_Q_r79n9sfwEsp6to</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Levartovsky, S.</creator><creator>Arieli, A.</creator><creator>Fridenberg, N.</creator><creator>Matalon, S.</creator><creator>Pilo, R.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-9342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Survival and success rates of soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: a 2- to 7-year follow-up retrospective study</title><author>Levartovsky, S. ; Arieli, A. ; Fridenberg, N. ; Matalon, S. ; Pilo, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b119302deeebcbbda26ab440c5f9db9427ef1d72309db4de83de75c1a1fe57283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Chewing</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Cobalt</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Edentulous</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levartovsky, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arieli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fridenberg, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matalon, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilo, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levartovsky, S.</au><au>Arieli, A.</au><au>Fridenberg, N.</au><au>Matalon, S.</au><au>Pilo, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival and success rates of soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: a 2- to 7-year follow-up retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>5341</spage><epage>5350</epage><pages>5341-5350</pages><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To retrospectively assess implant and prosthesis survival and success and patient satisfaction in edentulous patients treated with soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses (SCCSIPs) over a mean clinical follow-up period of 4 years.
Materials and methods
Twenty-one edentulous patients, aged 47–80 years, underwent restoration with 27 SCCSIPs (210 implants, 349 crown units). After definitive prosthesis insertion, patients participated in a yearly dental check-up recall program, including clinical and radiographic examinations. All supporting implants were examined for biological and technical complications, and the restorations were evaluated using modified California Dental Association (CDA) criteria. Life table and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed. Patient satisfaction regarding chewing, esthetics, comfort, and phonetics was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS).
Results
After a mean of 4 years, two implants (3.8%) failed, with no effect on prosthesis survival. The cumulative survival rate was 98.6% and 100% for implants and prostheses, respectively. The most frequent minor biological complication was soft tissue recession (11%). Porcelain fracture was the only major technical complication (0.6% of crown units), while the only minor technical complication was porcelain chipping (4% of crown units), which required only polishing. Overall, 66.7% of the prostheses were free of technical complications. Patient satisfaction was high to very high. Less satisfaction was noted with comfort due to soft tissue recession and food impaction.
Conclusions
Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that the survival and success rates of SCCSIPs in edentulous patients were excellent.
Clinical relevance
SCCSIPs should be considered when planning metal-ceramic implant-supported restorations.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33616806</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-021-03842-7</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-9342</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1432-6981 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral investigations, 2021-09, Vol.25 (9), p.5341-5350 |
| issn | 1432-6981 1436-3771 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2492280017 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Chewing Chromium Cobalt Dental prosthetics Dental restorative materials Dentistry Edentulous Medicine Original Article Patient satisfaction Patients Prostheses Success Survival Transplants & implants |
| title | Survival and success rates of soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: a 2- to 7-year follow-up retrospective study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T02%3A29%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20and%20success%20rates%20of%20soft-milled%20cobalt-chromium-ceramic%20full-arch%20screw-retained%20implant-supported%20prostheses:%20a%202-%20to%207-year%20follow-up%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=Levartovsky,%20S.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=5341&rft.epage=5350&rft.pages=5341-5350&rft.issn=1432-6981&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-021-03842-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2562073713%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2562073713&rft_id=info:pmid/33616806&rfr_iscdi=true |