Scale for the Environment Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice: Construct validation

Aim Testing the validity and reliability of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE‐Nursing Practice). Background The environment of professional nursing practice is key to achieve better results for clients, nurses and institutions. Therefore, instruments ena...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nursing management 2021-09, Vol.29 (6), p.1809-1818
Hauptverfasser: Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes, Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito, Sousa, Clemente Neves, Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral, Trindade, Letícia de Lima, Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva, Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1818
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1809
container_title Journal of nursing management
container_volume 29
creator Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes
Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito
Sousa, Clemente Neves
Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral
Trindade, Letícia de Lima
Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva
Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira
description Aim Testing the validity and reliability of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE‐Nursing Practice). Background The environment of professional nursing practice is key to achieve better results for clients, nurses and institutions. Therefore, instruments enabling the assessment of all its attributes are required. Method Cross‐sectional methodological study. The SEE‐Nursing Practice, based on a previous qualitative study and literature review, was applied as a questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess construct validity. Results A total of 752 nurses participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis of the SEE‐Nursing Practice led to a factor solution with 93 items and three subscales. The Structure, Process and Outcome subscales, respectively, have 43, 37 and 13 items, loaded in 6 factors, 6 factors and 2 factors and explaining 62.6%, 59.2% and 67.4% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha of the overall scale and of the 3 subscales was greater than 0.90. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit. Conclusion SEE‐Nursing Practice is a good valid and reliable instrument. Implications for nursing management The SEE‐Nursing Practice enables assessing practice environments and is a tool for nursing managers in the definition of strategies ensuring favourable environments for nursing care quality.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jonm.13290
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2491947705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491947705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2850-d699846628352a5f928bcd974ca73aaef1422ef2122cd0472856bfbd3d8ef4553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1PwyAcBnBiNHFOL34CEi_GpBMo0OLNLPMtczNRTx4Io6AsXVFoZ_btZasnD3IhkN_zDzwAnGI0wmldLn2zGuGcCLQHBjjnLCNlTvfBAAnOM0SJOARHMS4RSihnA_D2rFVtoPUBth8GTpq1C2mGaVo4Wau6U63zDfQWPgVvTYzppGo460J0zXu6VLp12lzBsW9iGzrdwpRy1S52DA6sqqM5-d2H4PVm8jK-y6bz2_vx9TTTpGQoq7gQJeU8vZQRxawg5UJXoqBaFblSxmJKiLEEE6IrRIsU4gu7qPKqNJYylg_BeT_3M_ivzsRWrlzUpq5VY3wXJaECC1oUaEvP_tCl70L6UlKs4IwyIXBSF73SwccYjJWfwa1U2EiM5LZnue1Z7npOGPf429Vm84-UD_PZY5_5Adh0gBc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576545991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scale for the Environment Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice: Construct validation</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes ; Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito ; Sousa, Clemente Neves ; Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral ; Trindade, Letícia de Lima ; Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva ; Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</creator><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes ; Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito ; Sousa, Clemente Neves ; Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral ; Trindade, Letícia de Lima ; Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva ; Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Testing the validity and reliability of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE‐Nursing Practice). Background The environment of professional nursing practice is key to achieve better results for clients, nurses and institutions. Therefore, instruments enabling the assessment of all its attributes are required. Method Cross‐sectional methodological study. The SEE‐Nursing Practice, based on a previous qualitative study and literature review, was applied as a questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess construct validity. Results A total of 752 nurses participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis of the SEE‐Nursing Practice led to a factor solution with 93 items and three subscales. The Structure, Process and Outcome subscales, respectively, have 43, 37 and 13 items, loaded in 6 factors, 6 factors and 2 factors and explaining 62.6%, 59.2% and 67.4% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha of the overall scale and of the 3 subscales was greater than 0.90. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit. Conclusion SEE‐Nursing Practice is a good valid and reliable instrument. Implications for nursing management The SEE‐Nursing Practice enables assessing practice environments and is a tool for nursing managers in the definition of strategies ensuring favourable environments for nursing care quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis ; Cronbach's alpha ; Exploratory factor analysis ; factor analysis ; Nursing ; Nursing administration ; Nursing care ; Professional practice ; Quality of care ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; statistical ; validation study ; Validity ; Work environment ; working environment</subject><ispartof>Journal of nursing management, 2021-09, Vol.29 (6), p.1809-1818</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2850-d699846628352a5f928bcd974ca73aaef1422ef2122cd0472856bfbd3d8ef4553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2850-d699846628352a5f928bcd974ca73aaef1422ef2122cd0472856bfbd3d8ef4553</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9982-9537 ; 0000-0001-7969-1403 ; 0000-0002-2082-4483 ; 0000-0002-7119-0230 ; 0000-0003-1527-9940 ; 0000-0001-5758-2310 ; 0000-0003-2654-0497</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjonm.13290$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjonm.13290$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Clemente Neves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trindade, Letícia de Lima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</creatorcontrib><title>Scale for the Environment Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice: Construct validation</title><title>Journal of nursing management</title><description>Aim Testing the validity and reliability of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE‐Nursing Practice). Background The environment of professional nursing practice is key to achieve better results for clients, nurses and institutions. Therefore, instruments enabling the assessment of all its attributes are required. Method Cross‐sectional methodological study. The SEE‐Nursing Practice, based on a previous qualitative study and literature review, was applied as a questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess construct validity. Results A total of 752 nurses participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis of the SEE‐Nursing Practice led to a factor solution with 93 items and three subscales. The Structure, Process and Outcome subscales, respectively, have 43, 37 and 13 items, loaded in 6 factors, 6 factors and 2 factors and explaining 62.6%, 59.2% and 67.4% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha of the overall scale and of the 3 subscales was greater than 0.90. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit. Conclusion SEE‐Nursing Practice is a good valid and reliable instrument. Implications for nursing management The SEE‐Nursing Practice enables assessing practice environments and is a tool for nursing managers in the definition of strategies ensuring favourable environments for nursing care quality.</description><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Cronbach's alpha</subject><subject>Exploratory factor analysis</subject><subject>factor analysis</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing administration</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>statistical</subject><subject>validation study</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>working environment</subject><issn>0966-0429</issn><issn>1365-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1PwyAcBnBiNHFOL34CEi_GpBMo0OLNLPMtczNRTx4Io6AsXVFoZ_btZasnD3IhkN_zDzwAnGI0wmldLn2zGuGcCLQHBjjnLCNlTvfBAAnOM0SJOARHMS4RSihnA_D2rFVtoPUBth8GTpq1C2mGaVo4Wau6U63zDfQWPgVvTYzppGo460J0zXu6VLp12lzBsW9iGzrdwpRy1S52DA6sqqM5-d2H4PVm8jK-y6bz2_vx9TTTpGQoq7gQJeU8vZQRxawg5UJXoqBaFblSxmJKiLEEE6IrRIsU4gu7qPKqNJYylg_BeT_3M_ivzsRWrlzUpq5VY3wXJaECC1oUaEvP_tCl70L6UlKs4IwyIXBSF73SwccYjJWfwa1U2EiM5LZnue1Z7npOGPf429Vm84-UD_PZY5_5Adh0gBc</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes</creator><creator>Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito</creator><creator>Sousa, Clemente Neves</creator><creator>Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral</creator><creator>Trindade, Letícia de Lima</creator><creator>Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva</creator><creator>Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9982-9537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7969-1403</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-4483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7119-0230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-9940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5758-2310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2654-0497</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Scale for the Environment Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice: Construct validation</title><author>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes ; Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito ; Sousa, Clemente Neves ; Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral ; Trindade, Letícia de Lima ; Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva ; Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2850-d699846628352a5f928bcd974ca73aaef1422ef2122cd0472856bfbd3d8ef4553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Cronbach's alpha</topic><topic>Exploratory factor analysis</topic><topic>factor analysis</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing administration</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>statistical</topic><topic>validation study</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>working environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Clemente Neves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trindade, Letícia de Lima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of nursing management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes</au><au>Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito</au><au>Sousa, Clemente Neves</au><au>Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral</au><au>Trindade, Letícia de Lima</au><au>Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva</au><au>Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scale for the Environment Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice: Construct validation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nursing management</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1809</spage><epage>1818</epage><pages>1809-1818</pages><issn>0966-0429</issn><eissn>1365-2834</eissn><abstract>Aim Testing the validity and reliability of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE‐Nursing Practice). Background The environment of professional nursing practice is key to achieve better results for clients, nurses and institutions. Therefore, instruments enabling the assessment of all its attributes are required. Method Cross‐sectional methodological study. The SEE‐Nursing Practice, based on a previous qualitative study and literature review, was applied as a questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess construct validity. Results A total of 752 nurses participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis of the SEE‐Nursing Practice led to a factor solution with 93 items and three subscales. The Structure, Process and Outcome subscales, respectively, have 43, 37 and 13 items, loaded in 6 factors, 6 factors and 2 factors and explaining 62.6%, 59.2% and 67.4% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha of the overall scale and of the 3 subscales was greater than 0.90. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit. Conclusion SEE‐Nursing Practice is a good valid and reliable instrument. Implications for nursing management The SEE‐Nursing Practice enables assessing practice environments and is a tool for nursing managers in the definition of strategies ensuring favourable environments for nursing care quality.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1111/jonm.13290</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9982-9537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7969-1403</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-4483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7119-0230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-9940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5758-2310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2654-0497</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-0429
ispartof Journal of nursing management, 2021-09, Vol.29 (6), p.1809-1818
issn 0966-0429
1365-2834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2491947705
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Confirmatory factor analysis
Cronbach's alpha
Exploratory factor analysis
factor analysis
Nursing
Nursing administration
Nursing care
Professional practice
Quality of care
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Reliability
statistical
validation study
Validity
Work environment
working environment
title Scale for the Environment Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice: Construct validation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A31%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scale%20for%20the%20Environment%20Evaluation%20of%20Professional%20Nursing%20Practice:%20Construct%20validation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nursing%20management&rft.au=Ribeiro,%20Olga%20Maria%20Pimenta%20Lopes&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1809&rft.epage=1818&rft.pages=1809-1818&rft.issn=0966-0429&rft.eissn=1365-2834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jonm.13290&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2491947705%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576545991&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true