Scale for the Environment Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice: Construct validation
Aim Testing the validity and reliability of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE‐Nursing Practice). Background The environment of professional nursing practice is key to achieve better results for clients, nurses and institutions. Therefore, instruments ena...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of nursing management 2021-09, Vol.29 (6), p.1809-1818 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1818 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1809 |
container_title | Journal of nursing management |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito Sousa, Clemente Neves Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral Trindade, Letícia de Lima Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira |
description | Aim
Testing the validity and reliability of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE‐Nursing Practice).
Background
The environment of professional nursing practice is key to achieve better results for clients, nurses and institutions. Therefore, instruments enabling the assessment of all its attributes are required.
Method
Cross‐sectional methodological study. The SEE‐Nursing Practice, based on a previous qualitative study and literature review, was applied as a questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess construct validity.
Results
A total of 752 nurses participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis of the SEE‐Nursing Practice led to a factor solution with 93 items and three subscales. The Structure, Process and Outcome subscales, respectively, have 43, 37 and 13 items, loaded in 6 factors, 6 factors and 2 factors and explaining 62.6%, 59.2% and 67.4% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha of the overall scale and of the 3 subscales was greater than 0.90. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit.
Conclusion
SEE‐Nursing Practice is a good valid and reliable instrument.
Implications for nursing management
The SEE‐Nursing Practice enables assessing practice environments and is a tool for nursing managers in the definition of strategies ensuring favourable environments for nursing care quality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jonm.13290 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2491947705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491947705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2850-d699846628352a5f928bcd974ca73aaef1422ef2122cd0472856bfbd3d8ef4553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1PwyAcBnBiNHFOL34CEi_GpBMo0OLNLPMtczNRTx4Io6AsXVFoZ_btZasnD3IhkN_zDzwAnGI0wmldLn2zGuGcCLQHBjjnLCNlTvfBAAnOM0SJOARHMS4RSihnA_D2rFVtoPUBth8GTpq1C2mGaVo4Wau6U63zDfQWPgVvTYzppGo460J0zXu6VLp12lzBsW9iGzrdwpRy1S52DA6sqqM5-d2H4PVm8jK-y6bz2_vx9TTTpGQoq7gQJeU8vZQRxawg5UJXoqBaFblSxmJKiLEEE6IrRIsU4gu7qPKqNJYylg_BeT_3M_ivzsRWrlzUpq5VY3wXJaECC1oUaEvP_tCl70L6UlKs4IwyIXBSF73SwccYjJWfwa1U2EiM5LZnue1Z7npOGPf429Vm84-UD_PZY5_5Adh0gBc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576545991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scale for the Environment Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice: Construct validation</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes ; Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito ; Sousa, Clemente Neves ; Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral ; Trindade, Letícia de Lima ; Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva ; Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</creator><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes ; Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito ; Sousa, Clemente Neves ; Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral ; Trindade, Letícia de Lima ; Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva ; Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Testing the validity and reliability of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE‐Nursing Practice).
Background
The environment of professional nursing practice is key to achieve better results for clients, nurses and institutions. Therefore, instruments enabling the assessment of all its attributes are required.
Method
Cross‐sectional methodological study. The SEE‐Nursing Practice, based on a previous qualitative study and literature review, was applied as a questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess construct validity.
Results
A total of 752 nurses participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis of the SEE‐Nursing Practice led to a factor solution with 93 items and three subscales. The Structure, Process and Outcome subscales, respectively, have 43, 37 and 13 items, loaded in 6 factors, 6 factors and 2 factors and explaining 62.6%, 59.2% and 67.4% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha of the overall scale and of the 3 subscales was greater than 0.90. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit.
Conclusion
SEE‐Nursing Practice is a good valid and reliable instrument.
Implications for nursing management
The SEE‐Nursing Practice enables assessing practice environments and is a tool for nursing managers in the definition of strategies ensuring favourable environments for nursing care quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis ; Cronbach's alpha ; Exploratory factor analysis ; factor analysis ; Nursing ; Nursing administration ; Nursing care ; Professional practice ; Quality of care ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; statistical ; validation study ; Validity ; Work environment ; working environment</subject><ispartof>Journal of nursing management, 2021-09, Vol.29 (6), p.1809-1818</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2850-d699846628352a5f928bcd974ca73aaef1422ef2122cd0472856bfbd3d8ef4553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2850-d699846628352a5f928bcd974ca73aaef1422ef2122cd0472856bfbd3d8ef4553</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9982-9537 ; 0000-0001-7969-1403 ; 0000-0002-2082-4483 ; 0000-0002-7119-0230 ; 0000-0003-1527-9940 ; 0000-0001-5758-2310 ; 0000-0003-2654-0497</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjonm.13290$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjonm.13290$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Clemente Neves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trindade, Letícia de Lima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</creatorcontrib><title>Scale for the Environment Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice: Construct validation</title><title>Journal of nursing management</title><description>Aim
Testing the validity and reliability of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE‐Nursing Practice).
Background
The environment of professional nursing practice is key to achieve better results for clients, nurses and institutions. Therefore, instruments enabling the assessment of all its attributes are required.
Method
Cross‐sectional methodological study. The SEE‐Nursing Practice, based on a previous qualitative study and literature review, was applied as a questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess construct validity.
Results
A total of 752 nurses participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis of the SEE‐Nursing Practice led to a factor solution with 93 items and three subscales. The Structure, Process and Outcome subscales, respectively, have 43, 37 and 13 items, loaded in 6 factors, 6 factors and 2 factors and explaining 62.6%, 59.2% and 67.4% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha of the overall scale and of the 3 subscales was greater than 0.90. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit.
Conclusion
SEE‐Nursing Practice is a good valid and reliable instrument.
Implications for nursing management
The SEE‐Nursing Practice enables assessing practice environments and is a tool for nursing managers in the definition of strategies ensuring favourable environments for nursing care quality.</description><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Cronbach's alpha</subject><subject>Exploratory factor analysis</subject><subject>factor analysis</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing administration</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>statistical</subject><subject>validation study</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>working environment</subject><issn>0966-0429</issn><issn>1365-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1PwyAcBnBiNHFOL34CEi_GpBMo0OLNLPMtczNRTx4Io6AsXVFoZ_btZasnD3IhkN_zDzwAnGI0wmldLn2zGuGcCLQHBjjnLCNlTvfBAAnOM0SJOARHMS4RSihnA_D2rFVtoPUBth8GTpq1C2mGaVo4Wau6U63zDfQWPgVvTYzppGo460J0zXu6VLp12lzBsW9iGzrdwpRy1S52DA6sqqM5-d2H4PVm8jK-y6bz2_vx9TTTpGQoq7gQJeU8vZQRxawg5UJXoqBaFblSxmJKiLEEE6IrRIsU4gu7qPKqNJYylg_BeT_3M_ivzsRWrlzUpq5VY3wXJaECC1oUaEvP_tCl70L6UlKs4IwyIXBSF73SwccYjJWfwa1U2EiM5LZnue1Z7npOGPf429Vm84-UD_PZY5_5Adh0gBc</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes</creator><creator>Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito</creator><creator>Sousa, Clemente Neves</creator><creator>Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral</creator><creator>Trindade, Letícia de Lima</creator><creator>Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva</creator><creator>Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9982-9537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7969-1403</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-4483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7119-0230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-9940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5758-2310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2654-0497</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Scale for the Environment Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice: Construct validation</title><author>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes ; Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito ; Sousa, Clemente Neves ; Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral ; Trindade, Letícia de Lima ; Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva ; Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2850-d699846628352a5f928bcd974ca73aaef1422ef2122cd0472856bfbd3d8ef4553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Cronbach's alpha</topic><topic>Exploratory factor analysis</topic><topic>factor analysis</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing administration</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>statistical</topic><topic>validation study</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>working environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Clemente Neves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trindade, Letícia de Lima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of nursing management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ribeiro, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes</au><au>Vicente, Corália Maria Fortuna de Brito</au><au>Sousa, Clemente Neves</au><au>Teles, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral</au><au>Trindade, Letícia de Lima</au><au>Martins, Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva</au><au>Cardoso, Maria Filomena Passos Teixeira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scale for the Environment Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice: Construct validation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nursing management</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1809</spage><epage>1818</epage><pages>1809-1818</pages><issn>0966-0429</issn><eissn>1365-2834</eissn><abstract>Aim
Testing the validity and reliability of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE‐Nursing Practice).
Background
The environment of professional nursing practice is key to achieve better results for clients, nurses and institutions. Therefore, instruments enabling the assessment of all its attributes are required.
Method
Cross‐sectional methodological study. The SEE‐Nursing Practice, based on a previous qualitative study and literature review, was applied as a questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess construct validity.
Results
A total of 752 nurses participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis of the SEE‐Nursing Practice led to a factor solution with 93 items and three subscales. The Structure, Process and Outcome subscales, respectively, have 43, 37 and 13 items, loaded in 6 factors, 6 factors and 2 factors and explaining 62.6%, 59.2% and 67.4% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha of the overall scale and of the 3 subscales was greater than 0.90. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit.
Conclusion
SEE‐Nursing Practice is a good valid and reliable instrument.
Implications for nursing management
The SEE‐Nursing Practice enables assessing practice environments and is a tool for nursing managers in the definition of strategies ensuring favourable environments for nursing care quality.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1111/jonm.13290</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9982-9537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7969-1403</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-4483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7119-0230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-9940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5758-2310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2654-0497</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0966-0429 |
ispartof | Journal of nursing management, 2021-09, Vol.29 (6), p.1809-1818 |
issn | 0966-0429 1365-2834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2491947705 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Confirmatory factor analysis Cronbach's alpha Exploratory factor analysis factor analysis Nursing Nursing administration Nursing care Professional practice Quality of care Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Reliability statistical validation study Validity Work environment working environment |
title | Scale for the Environment Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice: Construct validation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A31%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scale%20for%20the%20Environment%20Evaluation%20of%20Professional%20Nursing%20Practice:%20Construct%20validation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nursing%20management&rft.au=Ribeiro,%20Olga%20Maria%20Pimenta%20Lopes&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1809&rft.epage=1818&rft.pages=1809-1818&rft.issn=0966-0429&rft.eissn=1365-2834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jonm.13290&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2491947705%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576545991&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |