Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review

Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review

Purpose One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is now an established bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure with good outcomes. Despite two recent consensus statements around OAGB/MGB, there are some issues which are not accepted as consensus and need more long-term data and research. Ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity surgery 2021-06, Vol.31 (6), p.2453-2463
Hauptverfasser: Kermansaravi, Mohammad, DavarpanahJazi, Amir Hossein, ShahabiShahmiri, Shahab, Carbajo, Miguel, Vitiello, Antonio, Parmar, Chetan D., Musella, Mario
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Gastrointestinal surgery
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metabolism
Original Contributions
Surgery
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2463
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2453
container_title Obesity surgery
container_volume 31
creator Kermansaravi, Mohammad
DavarpanahJazi, Amir Hossein
ShahabiShahmiri, Shahab
Carbajo, Miguel
Vitiello, Antonio
Parmar, Chetan D.
Musella, Mario
description Purpose One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is now an established bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure with good outcomes. Despite two recent consensus statements around OAGB/MGB, there are some issues which are not accepted as consensus and need more long-term data and research. Material and Methods After identifying the topic of non-consensus from the two recent OAGB/MGB consensuses, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched for articles published by November 2020. Results In this study, we evaluated these non-consensus topics around OAGB/MGB and all related articles on these topics were assessed by authors to have an argument on these items. Conclusion There is enough evidence to include OAGB/MGB as an accepted standard bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure. However, long-term data and more research are needed to have a consensus in all aspects including these non-consensus topics.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2491079457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2525232738</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9d7db0a7093334ecffdc3dd010fd5c8c97cb0b34882c81e38e19fa7668a4ac233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOGzEURa2qqATKD3RRWeoGFibP9szY7m4StSkSEAnB2nU8nmpQYqd-GSr-HrehrcQCeWFZPve-p0PIBw7nHEBNkfPG1AwEZ1AL1TDxhky4As2gEvotmYBpgGkj5CE5QryHQjZCvCOHUtZG66qekO9tDg5p6ul1imyeIoaII9I2pzF2dBkDbaPDXdokHHB6NcSBLso7D57OHrcOkZ4u28VserWYnX2mLb12Obvd8BDoTXgYwq_35KB3awwnz_cxufv65Xb-jV0uFxfz9pJ5qeodM53qVuAUGCllFXzfd152HXDou9prb5RfwUpWWguveZA6cNM71TTaVc4LKY_J6b53m9PPMeDObgb0Yb12MaQRragMB2WqWhX00wv0Po05lu2sqMuRQkldKLGnfE6IOfR2m4eNy4-Wg_3t3-7922LV_vFvRQl9fK4eV5vQ_Yv8FV4AuQewfMUfIf-f_UrtE6dzjko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2525232738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kermansaravi, Mohammad ; DavarpanahJazi, Amir Hossein ; ShahabiShahmiri, Shahab ; Carbajo, Miguel ; Vitiello, Antonio ; Parmar, Chetan D. ; Musella, Mario</creator><creatorcontrib>Kermansaravi, Mohammad ; DavarpanahJazi, Amir Hossein ; ShahabiShahmiri, Shahab ; Carbajo, Miguel ; Vitiello, Antonio ; Parmar, Chetan D. ; Musella, Mario</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is now an established bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure with good outcomes. Despite two recent consensus statements around OAGB/MGB, there are some issues which are not accepted as consensus and need more long-term data and research. Material and Methods After identifying the topic of non-consensus from the two recent OAGB/MGB consensuses, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched for articles published by November 2020. Results In this study, we evaluated these non-consensus topics around OAGB/MGB and all related articles on these topics were assessed by authors to have an argument on these items. Conclusion There is enough evidence to include OAGB/MGB as an accepted standard bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure. However, long-term data and more research are needed to have a consensus in all aspects including these non-consensus topics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33598845</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metabolism ; Original Contributions ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Obesity surgery, 2021-06, Vol.31 (6), p.2453-2463</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9d7db0a7093334ecffdc3dd010fd5c8c97cb0b34882c81e38e19fa7668a4ac233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9d7db0a7093334ecffdc3dd010fd5c8c97cb0b34882c81e38e19fa7668a4ac233</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1238-6524</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598845$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kermansaravi, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DavarpanahJazi, Amir Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ShahabiShahmiri, Shahab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbajo, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitiello, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Chetan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musella, Mario</creatorcontrib><title>Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review</title><title>Obesity surgery</title><addtitle>OBES SURG</addtitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is now an established bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure with good outcomes. Despite two recent consensus statements around OAGB/MGB, there are some issues which are not accepted as consensus and need more long-term data and research. Material and Methods After identifying the topic of non-consensus from the two recent OAGB/MGB consensuses, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched for articles published by November 2020. Results In this study, we evaluated these non-consensus topics around OAGB/MGB and all related articles on these topics were assessed by authors to have an argument on these items. Conclusion There is enough evidence to include OAGB/MGB as an accepted standard bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure. However, long-term data and more research are needed to have a consensus in all aspects including these non-consensus topics.</description><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFOGzEURa2qqATKD3RRWeoGFibP9szY7m4StSkSEAnB2nU8nmpQYqd-GSr-HrehrcQCeWFZPve-p0PIBw7nHEBNkfPG1AwEZ1AL1TDxhky4As2gEvotmYBpgGkj5CE5QryHQjZCvCOHUtZG66qekO9tDg5p6ul1imyeIoaII9I2pzF2dBkDbaPDXdokHHB6NcSBLso7D57OHrcOkZ4u28VserWYnX2mLb12Obvd8BDoTXgYwq_35KB3awwnz_cxufv65Xb-jV0uFxfz9pJ5qeodM53qVuAUGCllFXzfd152HXDou9prb5RfwUpWWguveZA6cNM71TTaVc4LKY_J6b53m9PPMeDObgb0Yb12MaQRragMB2WqWhX00wv0Po05lu2sqMuRQkldKLGnfE6IOfR2m4eNy4-Wg_3t3-7922LV_vFvRQl9fK4eV5vQ_Yv8FV4AuQewfMUfIf-f_UrtE6dzjko</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Kermansaravi, Mohammad</creator><creator>DavarpanahJazi, Amir Hossein</creator><creator>ShahabiShahmiri, Shahab</creator><creator>Carbajo, Miguel</creator><creator>Vitiello, Antonio</creator><creator>Parmar, Chetan D.</creator><creator>Musella, Mario</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1238-6524</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review</title><author>Kermansaravi, Mohammad ; DavarpanahJazi, Amir Hossein ; ShahabiShahmiri, Shahab ; Carbajo, Miguel ; Vitiello, Antonio ; Parmar, Chetan D. ; Musella, Mario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9d7db0a7093334ecffdc3dd010fd5c8c97cb0b34882c81e38e19fa7668a4ac233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kermansaravi, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DavarpanahJazi, Amir Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ShahabiShahmiri, Shahab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbajo, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitiello, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Chetan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musella, Mario</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kermansaravi, Mohammad</au><au>DavarpanahJazi, Amir Hossein</au><au>ShahabiShahmiri, Shahab</au><au>Carbajo, Miguel</au><au>Vitiello, Antonio</au><au>Parmar, Chetan D.</au><au>Musella, Mario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review</atitle><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle><stitle>OBES SURG</stitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2453</spage><epage>2463</epage><pages>2453-2463</pages><issn>0960-8923</issn><eissn>1708-0428</eissn><abstract>Purpose One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is now an established bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure with good outcomes. Despite two recent consensus statements around OAGB/MGB, there are some issues which are not accepted as consensus and need more long-term data and research. Material and Methods After identifying the topic of non-consensus from the two recent OAGB/MGB consensuses, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched for articles published by November 2020. Results In this study, we evaluated these non-consensus topics around OAGB/MGB and all related articles on these topics were assessed by authors to have an argument on these items. Conclusion There is enough evidence to include OAGB/MGB as an accepted standard bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure. However, long-term data and more research are needed to have a consensus in all aspects including these non-consensus topics.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33598845</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1238-6524</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-8923
ispartof Obesity surgery, 2021-06, Vol.31 (6), p.2453-2463
issn 0960-8923
1708-0428
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2491079457
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Gastrointestinal surgery
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metabolism
Original Contributions
Surgery
title Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T10%3A32%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Areas%20of%20Non-Consensus%20Around%20One%20Anastomosis/Mini%20Gastric%20Bypass%20(OAGB/MGB):%20A%20Narrative%20Review&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20surgery&rft.au=Kermansaravi,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2453&rft.epage=2463&rft.pages=2453-2463&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2525232738%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2525232738&rft_id=info:pmid/33598845&rfr_iscdi=true