Incidence of microscopic residual adenoma after complete wide-field endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions: evidence for a mechanism of recurrence
EMR of large (≥2 cm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) is associated with high rates of recurrent/residual adenoma, possibly because of microadenoma left at the margin of resection. Data supporting this mechanism are required. We aimed to determine the incidence of residual microadenoma at...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2021-08, Vol.94 (2), p.368-375 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 375 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 368 |
container_title | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Emmanuel, Andrew Williams, Sophie Gulati, Shraddha Ortenzi, Monica Gunasingam, Nishmi Burt, Margaret Ratcliff, Simbisai Hayee, Bu’Hussain Haji, Amyn |
description | EMR of large (≥2 cm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) is associated with high rates of recurrent/residual adenoma, possibly because of microadenoma left at the margin of resection. Data supporting this mechanism are required. We aimed to determine the incidence of residual microadenoma at the defect margin and base after EMR.
We performed a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing EMR of large LNPCPs with the lateral defect margin further resected using the EndoRotor device (Interscope Medical, Inc, Worcester, Mass, USA) after confirming no visible residual adenomatous tissue. Aspects of the defect base were also resected in selected patients. Patients underwent surveillance at 3 to 6 months.
Resection of the normal defect margin was performed in 41 patients and of aspects of the base in 21 patients. Mean lesion size was 43.0 mm (range, 20-130). Microscopic residual lesion was detected in the margin of apparently normal mucosa in 8 cases (19%). In 7 cases this was an adenoma, and in 1 case a serrated lesion was found at the margin of a resected tubular adenoma. Microscopic residual lesion was detected at the base in 5 of 21 cases. Residual/recurrent adenoma was detected in 2 patients. Neither had residual microadenoma at the lateral margin or base detected after the primary resection.
Microscopic residual adenoma after wide-field EMR was detected in 19% of cases at the apparently normal defect margin and at the resection base in 5 of 21 cases. This study confirms the presence of residual microadenoma after resection of LNPCPs, providing evidence for the mechanism of recurrence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gie.2021.02.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2490604937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510721001310</els_id><sourcerecordid>2490604937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b5144bb2575a20d9fd876f3477f1a569e00ed3b9c387018f205aeb333ab277473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcGO1SAUhonROHdGH8CNYemm9QBtuejKTNSZZBI3uiYUDiM3bblCO2bexYcVcq_GlSsSzv99hPMT8opBy4ANbw_tfcCWA2ct8BYYPCE7Bko2g5TqKdlBCTU9A3lBLnM-AMCeC_acXAjRK8652pFft4sNDheLNHo6B5titvEYLE2Yg9vMRE0Zx9lQ41dM1Mb5OOGK9GfBGh9wchQX9w-Fdg1xqbrJpHssxBRTuSyqqTjjkt9RfDg_6mOihs5ov5sl5LlSJbulVKcvyDNvpowvz-cV-fbp49frm-buy-fb6w93jRW9WJuxZ103jryXveHglHd7OXjRSemZ6QeFAOjEqKzYS2B7z6E3OAohzMil7KS4Im9O3mOKPzbMq55DtjhNZsG4Zc07BQN0StQoO0XronJCr48pzCY9aga6lqIPupSiaykauC6lFOb1Wb-NM7q_xJ8WSuD9KYDlkw8Bk8421AW4UBenXQz_0f8G6HGfhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2490604937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence of microscopic residual adenoma after complete wide-field endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions: evidence for a mechanism of recurrence</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Emmanuel, Andrew ; Williams, Sophie ; Gulati, Shraddha ; Ortenzi, Monica ; Gunasingam, Nishmi ; Burt, Margaret ; Ratcliff, Simbisai ; Hayee, Bu’Hussain ; Haji, Amyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Emmanuel, Andrew ; Williams, Sophie ; Gulati, Shraddha ; Ortenzi, Monica ; Gunasingam, Nishmi ; Burt, Margaret ; Ratcliff, Simbisai ; Hayee, Bu’Hussain ; Haji, Amyn</creatorcontrib><description>EMR of large (≥2 cm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) is associated with high rates of recurrent/residual adenoma, possibly because of microadenoma left at the margin of resection. Data supporting this mechanism are required. We aimed to determine the incidence of residual microadenoma at the defect margin and base after EMR.
We performed a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing EMR of large LNPCPs with the lateral defect margin further resected using the EndoRotor device (Interscope Medical, Inc, Worcester, Mass, USA) after confirming no visible residual adenomatous tissue. Aspects of the defect base were also resected in selected patients. Patients underwent surveillance at 3 to 6 months.
Resection of the normal defect margin was performed in 41 patients and of aspects of the base in 21 patients. Mean lesion size was 43.0 mm (range, 20-130). Microscopic residual lesion was detected in the margin of apparently normal mucosa in 8 cases (19%). In 7 cases this was an adenoma, and in 1 case a serrated lesion was found at the margin of a resected tubular adenoma. Microscopic residual lesion was detected at the base in 5 of 21 cases. Residual/recurrent adenoma was detected in 2 patients. Neither had residual microadenoma at the lateral margin or base detected after the primary resection.
Microscopic residual adenoma after wide-field EMR was detected in 19% of cases at the apparently normal defect margin and at the resection base in 5 of 21 cases. This study confirms the presence of residual microadenoma after resection of LNPCPs, providing evidence for the mechanism of recurrence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.02.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33592229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2021-08, Vol.94 (2), p.368-375</ispartof><rights>2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b5144bb2575a20d9fd876f3477f1a569e00ed3b9c387018f205aeb333ab277473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b5144bb2575a20d9fd876f3477f1a569e00ed3b9c387018f205aeb333ab277473</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1159-0937</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510721001310$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33592229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Emmanuel, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Shraddha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortenzi, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunasingam, Nishmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burt, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratcliff, Simbisai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayee, Bu’Hussain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haji, Amyn</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence of microscopic residual adenoma after complete wide-field endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions: evidence for a mechanism of recurrence</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>EMR of large (≥2 cm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) is associated with high rates of recurrent/residual adenoma, possibly because of microadenoma left at the margin of resection. Data supporting this mechanism are required. We aimed to determine the incidence of residual microadenoma at the defect margin and base after EMR.
We performed a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing EMR of large LNPCPs with the lateral defect margin further resected using the EndoRotor device (Interscope Medical, Inc, Worcester, Mass, USA) after confirming no visible residual adenomatous tissue. Aspects of the defect base were also resected in selected patients. Patients underwent surveillance at 3 to 6 months.
Resection of the normal defect margin was performed in 41 patients and of aspects of the base in 21 patients. Mean lesion size was 43.0 mm (range, 20-130). Microscopic residual lesion was detected in the margin of apparently normal mucosa in 8 cases (19%). In 7 cases this was an adenoma, and in 1 case a serrated lesion was found at the margin of a resected tubular adenoma. Microscopic residual lesion was detected at the base in 5 of 21 cases. Residual/recurrent adenoma was detected in 2 patients. Neither had residual microadenoma at the lateral margin or base detected after the primary resection.
Microscopic residual adenoma after wide-field EMR was detected in 19% of cases at the apparently normal defect margin and at the resection base in 5 of 21 cases. This study confirms the presence of residual microadenoma after resection of LNPCPs, providing evidence for the mechanism of recurrence.</description><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcGO1SAUhonROHdGH8CNYemm9QBtuejKTNSZZBI3uiYUDiM3bblCO2bexYcVcq_GlSsSzv99hPMT8opBy4ANbw_tfcCWA2ct8BYYPCE7Bko2g5TqKdlBCTU9A3lBLnM-AMCeC_acXAjRK8652pFft4sNDheLNHo6B5titvEYLE2Yg9vMRE0Zx9lQ41dM1Mb5OOGK9GfBGh9wchQX9w-Fdg1xqbrJpHssxBRTuSyqqTjjkt9RfDg_6mOihs5ov5sl5LlSJbulVKcvyDNvpowvz-cV-fbp49frm-buy-fb6w93jRW9WJuxZ103jryXveHglHd7OXjRSemZ6QeFAOjEqKzYS2B7z6E3OAohzMil7KS4Im9O3mOKPzbMq55DtjhNZsG4Zc07BQN0StQoO0XronJCr48pzCY9aga6lqIPupSiaykauC6lFOb1Wb-NM7q_xJ8WSuD9KYDlkw8Bk8421AW4UBenXQz_0f8G6HGfhA</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Emmanuel, Andrew</creator><creator>Williams, Sophie</creator><creator>Gulati, Shraddha</creator><creator>Ortenzi, Monica</creator><creator>Gunasingam, Nishmi</creator><creator>Burt, Margaret</creator><creator>Ratcliff, Simbisai</creator><creator>Hayee, Bu’Hussain</creator><creator>Haji, Amyn</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1159-0937</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Incidence of microscopic residual adenoma after complete wide-field endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions: evidence for a mechanism of recurrence</title><author>Emmanuel, Andrew ; Williams, Sophie ; Gulati, Shraddha ; Ortenzi, Monica ; Gunasingam, Nishmi ; Burt, Margaret ; Ratcliff, Simbisai ; Hayee, Bu’Hussain ; Haji, Amyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b5144bb2575a20d9fd876f3477f1a569e00ed3b9c387018f205aeb333ab277473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Emmanuel, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Shraddha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortenzi, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunasingam, Nishmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burt, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratcliff, Simbisai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayee, Bu’Hussain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haji, Amyn</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Emmanuel, Andrew</au><au>Williams, Sophie</au><au>Gulati, Shraddha</au><au>Ortenzi, Monica</au><au>Gunasingam, Nishmi</au><au>Burt, Margaret</au><au>Ratcliff, Simbisai</au><au>Hayee, Bu’Hussain</au><au>Haji, Amyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence of microscopic residual adenoma after complete wide-field endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions: evidence for a mechanism of recurrence</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>368-375</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>EMR of large (≥2 cm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) is associated with high rates of recurrent/residual adenoma, possibly because of microadenoma left at the margin of resection. Data supporting this mechanism are required. We aimed to determine the incidence of residual microadenoma at the defect margin and base after EMR.
We performed a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing EMR of large LNPCPs with the lateral defect margin further resected using the EndoRotor device (Interscope Medical, Inc, Worcester, Mass, USA) after confirming no visible residual adenomatous tissue. Aspects of the defect base were also resected in selected patients. Patients underwent surveillance at 3 to 6 months.
Resection of the normal defect margin was performed in 41 patients and of aspects of the base in 21 patients. Mean lesion size was 43.0 mm (range, 20-130). Microscopic residual lesion was detected in the margin of apparently normal mucosa in 8 cases (19%). In 7 cases this was an adenoma, and in 1 case a serrated lesion was found at the margin of a resected tubular adenoma. Microscopic residual lesion was detected at the base in 5 of 21 cases. Residual/recurrent adenoma was detected in 2 patients. Neither had residual microadenoma at the lateral margin or base detected after the primary resection.
Microscopic residual adenoma after wide-field EMR was detected in 19% of cases at the apparently normal defect margin and at the resection base in 5 of 21 cases. This study confirms the presence of residual microadenoma after resection of LNPCPs, providing evidence for the mechanism of recurrence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33592229</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2021.02.010</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1159-0937</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5107 |
ispartof | Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2021-08, Vol.94 (2), p.368-375 |
issn | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2490604937 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
title | Incidence of microscopic residual adenoma after complete wide-field endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions: evidence for a mechanism of recurrence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T22%3A00%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence%20of%20microscopic%20residual%20adenoma%20after%20complete%20wide-field%20endoscopic%20resection%20of%20large%20colorectal%20lesions:%20evidence%20for%20a%20mechanism%20of%20recurrence&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Emmanuel,%20Andrew&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=368-375&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2021.02.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2490604937%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2490604937&rft_id=info:pmid/33592229&rft_els_id=S0016510721001310&rfr_iscdi=true |