The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies

Purpose To analyze the risk for clinically significant microarray aberrations in pregnancies with polyhydramnios. Methods Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) performed due to polyhydramnios between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the Ministry of Heal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2021-09, Vol.304 (3), p.649-656
Hauptverfasser: Sagi-Dain, Lena, Singer, Amihood, Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora, Peleg, Amir, Bar-Shira, Anat, Feingold-Zadok, Michal, Ben Shachar, Shay, Maya, Idit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 656
container_issue 3
container_start_page 649
container_title Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
container_volume 304
creator Sagi-Dain, Lena
Singer, Amihood
Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora
Peleg, Amir
Bar-Shira, Anat
Feingold-Zadok, Michal
Ben Shachar, Shay
Maya, Idit
description Purpose To analyze the risk for clinically significant microarray aberrations in pregnancies with polyhydramnios. Methods Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) performed due to polyhydramnios between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the Ministry of Health Database. The rate of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) CMA findings in isolated and non-isolated polyhydramnios cohorts was compared to a local control group of 5541 fetuses with normal ultrasound, in which 78 (1.4%) abnormal results were demonstrated. Subgroup analyses were performed by the degree of polyhydramnios, week of diagnosis, maternal age, and the presence of additional sonographic anomalies. Results In the isolated polyhydramnios cohort, 19/623 (3.1%) clinically significant CMA aberrations were noted, a significantly higher rate compared to the control population. However, the risk for abnormal CMA results in the 158 cases with mild polyhydramnios (AFI 25–29.9, or maximal vertical pocket 8–11.9 cm) did not significantly differ from pregnancies with normal ultrasound. Of 119 cases of non-isolated polyhydramnios (most frequently associated with cardiovascular (26.1%) and brain (15.1%) anomalies), 8 (6.7%) abnormal CMA findings were noted, mainly karyotype-detectable. Conclusion Mild polyhydramnios was not associated with an increased rate of clinically significant microarray results, compared to pregnancies with normal ultrasound. An extensive anatomical sonographic survey should be performed in pregnancies with polyhydramnios, with consideration of fetal echocardiography.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00404-021-05995-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2490126177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2556905136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a1917ace190bbd648603ae4e03abb13ce86b1f3bea17be344cd7f14be75c0f923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EokvLC3BAlrj0EhjHThxzQxWllSpxac-W7Ux2UyVx8CRIOfPieNkCEgcu9kj-5ht5fsbeCHgvAPQHAlCgCihFAZUxVbE9YzuhZFmAFuI524E51lDrM_aK6BFAlE1Tv2RnUlZGyKbcsR_3B-TYdRgWHjs-x2E7bG1y49RH4i3uEyKPEw-HFMdIcXQDH_uQokvJbTwhrcNCH7nL5ZIizVnUf0ce4iGmhbvJDRv1dHRrVXLqp_2ASxbOCfeTm0KPdMFedG4gfP10n7OH68_3VzfF3dcvt1ef7oogdbUUThihXUBhwPu2Vk0N0qHCfHovZMCm9qKTHp3QHqVSodWdUB51FaAzpTxnlyfvnOK3FWmxY08Bh8FNGFeypTJ5Q7XQOqPv_kEf45ryZzJVVbWBSsg6U-WJyvsgStjZOfWjS5sVYI8R2VNENkdkf0Vkt9z09km9-hHbPy2_M8mAPAGUn6Y9pr-z_6P9CV4kn4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556905136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sagi-Dain, Lena ; Singer, Amihood ; Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora ; Peleg, Amir ; Bar-Shira, Anat ; Feingold-Zadok, Michal ; Ben Shachar, Shay ; Maya, Idit</creator><creatorcontrib>Sagi-Dain, Lena ; Singer, Amihood ; Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora ; Peleg, Amir ; Bar-Shira, Anat ; Feingold-Zadok, Michal ; Ben Shachar, Shay ; Maya, Idit</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To analyze the risk for clinically significant microarray aberrations in pregnancies with polyhydramnios. Methods Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) performed due to polyhydramnios between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the Ministry of Health Database. The rate of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) CMA findings in isolated and non-isolated polyhydramnios cohorts was compared to a local control group of 5541 fetuses with normal ultrasound, in which 78 (1.4%) abnormal results were demonstrated. Subgroup analyses were performed by the degree of polyhydramnios, week of diagnosis, maternal age, and the presence of additional sonographic anomalies. Results In the isolated polyhydramnios cohort, 19/623 (3.1%) clinically significant CMA aberrations were noted, a significantly higher rate compared to the control population. However, the risk for abnormal CMA results in the 158 cases with mild polyhydramnios (AFI 25–29.9, or maximal vertical pocket 8–11.9 cm) did not significantly differ from pregnancies with normal ultrasound. Of 119 cases of non-isolated polyhydramnios (most frequently associated with cardiovascular (26.1%) and brain (15.1%) anomalies), 8 (6.7%) abnormal CMA findings were noted, mainly karyotype-detectable. Conclusion Mild polyhydramnios was not associated with an increased rate of clinically significant microarray results, compared to pregnancies with normal ultrasound. An extensive anatomical sonographic survey should be performed in pregnancies with polyhydramnios, with consideration of fetal echocardiography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-05995-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33591382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Amniocentesis ; Amniotic fluid ; Cohort analysis ; Confidence intervals ; Endocrinology ; Genetic counseling ; Genetics ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Maternal-Fetal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Obstetrics ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Pregnancy ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021-09, Vol.304 (3), p.649-656</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a1917ace190bbd648603ae4e03abb13ce86b1f3bea17be344cd7f14be75c0f923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a1917ace190bbd648603ae4e03abb13ce86b1f3bea17be344cd7f14be75c0f923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0883-2130</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-021-05995-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-021-05995-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33591382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sagi-Dain, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Amihood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peleg, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bar-Shira, Anat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feingold-Zadok, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Shachar, Shay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maya, Idit</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies</title><title>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Purpose To analyze the risk for clinically significant microarray aberrations in pregnancies with polyhydramnios. Methods Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) performed due to polyhydramnios between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the Ministry of Health Database. The rate of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) CMA findings in isolated and non-isolated polyhydramnios cohorts was compared to a local control group of 5541 fetuses with normal ultrasound, in which 78 (1.4%) abnormal results were demonstrated. Subgroup analyses were performed by the degree of polyhydramnios, week of diagnosis, maternal age, and the presence of additional sonographic anomalies. Results In the isolated polyhydramnios cohort, 19/623 (3.1%) clinically significant CMA aberrations were noted, a significantly higher rate compared to the control population. However, the risk for abnormal CMA results in the 158 cases with mild polyhydramnios (AFI 25–29.9, or maximal vertical pocket 8–11.9 cm) did not significantly differ from pregnancies with normal ultrasound. Of 119 cases of non-isolated polyhydramnios (most frequently associated with cardiovascular (26.1%) and brain (15.1%) anomalies), 8 (6.7%) abnormal CMA findings were noted, mainly karyotype-detectable. Conclusion Mild polyhydramnios was not associated with an increased rate of clinically significant microarray results, compared to pregnancies with normal ultrasound. An extensive anatomical sonographic survey should be performed in pregnancies with polyhydramnios, with consideration of fetal echocardiography.</description><subject>Amniocentesis</subject><subject>Amniotic fluid</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Genetic counseling</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Maternal-Fetal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>0932-0067</issn><issn>1432-0711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EokvLC3BAlrj0EhjHThxzQxWllSpxac-W7Ux2UyVx8CRIOfPieNkCEgcu9kj-5ht5fsbeCHgvAPQHAlCgCihFAZUxVbE9YzuhZFmAFuI524E51lDrM_aK6BFAlE1Tv2RnUlZGyKbcsR_3B-TYdRgWHjs-x2E7bG1y49RH4i3uEyKPEw-HFMdIcXQDH_uQokvJbTwhrcNCH7nL5ZIizVnUf0ce4iGmhbvJDRv1dHRrVXLqp_2ASxbOCfeTm0KPdMFedG4gfP10n7OH68_3VzfF3dcvt1ef7oogdbUUThihXUBhwPu2Vk0N0qHCfHovZMCm9qKTHp3QHqVSodWdUB51FaAzpTxnlyfvnOK3FWmxY08Bh8FNGFeypTJ5Q7XQOqPv_kEf45ryZzJVVbWBSsg6U-WJyvsgStjZOfWjS5sVYI8R2VNENkdkf0Vkt9z09km9-hHbPy2_M8mAPAGUn6Y9pr-z_6P9CV4kn4E</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Sagi-Dain, Lena</creator><creator>Singer, Amihood</creator><creator>Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora</creator><creator>Peleg, Amir</creator><creator>Bar-Shira, Anat</creator><creator>Feingold-Zadok, Michal</creator><creator>Ben Shachar, Shay</creator><creator>Maya, Idit</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0883-2130</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies</title><author>Sagi-Dain, Lena ; Singer, Amihood ; Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora ; Peleg, Amir ; Bar-Shira, Anat ; Feingold-Zadok, Michal ; Ben Shachar, Shay ; Maya, Idit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a1917ace190bbd648603ae4e03abb13ce86b1f3bea17be344cd7f14be75c0f923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amniocentesis</topic><topic>Amniotic fluid</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Genetic counseling</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Maternal-Fetal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sagi-Dain, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Amihood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peleg, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bar-Shira, Anat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feingold-Zadok, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Shachar, Shay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maya, Idit</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sagi-Dain, Lena</au><au>Singer, Amihood</au><au>Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora</au><au>Peleg, Amir</au><au>Bar-Shira, Anat</au><au>Feingold-Zadok, Michal</au><au>Ben Shachar, Shay</au><au>Maya, Idit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies</atitle><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><stitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</stitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>304</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>656</epage><pages>649-656</pages><issn>0932-0067</issn><eissn>1432-0711</eissn><abstract>Purpose To analyze the risk for clinically significant microarray aberrations in pregnancies with polyhydramnios. Methods Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) performed due to polyhydramnios between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the Ministry of Health Database. The rate of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) CMA findings in isolated and non-isolated polyhydramnios cohorts was compared to a local control group of 5541 fetuses with normal ultrasound, in which 78 (1.4%) abnormal results were demonstrated. Subgroup analyses were performed by the degree of polyhydramnios, week of diagnosis, maternal age, and the presence of additional sonographic anomalies. Results In the isolated polyhydramnios cohort, 19/623 (3.1%) clinically significant CMA aberrations were noted, a significantly higher rate compared to the control population. However, the risk for abnormal CMA results in the 158 cases with mild polyhydramnios (AFI 25–29.9, or maximal vertical pocket 8–11.9 cm) did not significantly differ from pregnancies with normal ultrasound. Of 119 cases of non-isolated polyhydramnios (most frequently associated with cardiovascular (26.1%) and brain (15.1%) anomalies), 8 (6.7%) abnormal CMA findings were noted, mainly karyotype-detectable. Conclusion Mild polyhydramnios was not associated with an increased rate of clinically significant microarray results, compared to pregnancies with normal ultrasound. An extensive anatomical sonographic survey should be performed in pregnancies with polyhydramnios, with consideration of fetal echocardiography.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33591382</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00404-021-05995-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0883-2130</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0932-0067
ispartof Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021-09, Vol.304 (3), p.649-656
issn 0932-0067
1432-0711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2490126177
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Amniocentesis
Amniotic fluid
Cohort analysis
Confidence intervals
Endocrinology
Genetic counseling
Genetics
Gynecology
Human Genetics
Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Obstetrics
Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery
Pregnancy
Ultrasonic imaging
title The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A23%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20polyhydramnios%20degree%20on%20chromosomal%20microarray%20results:%20a%20retrospective%20cohort%20analysis%20of%20742%20singleton%20pregnancies&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Sagi-Dain,%20Lena&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=304&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=656&rft.pages=649-656&rft.issn=0932-0067&rft.eissn=1432-0711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00404-021-05995-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2556905136%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556905136&rft_id=info:pmid/33591382&rfr_iscdi=true