The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies
Purpose To analyze the risk for clinically significant microarray aberrations in pregnancies with polyhydramnios. Methods Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) performed due to polyhydramnios between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the Ministry of Heal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2021-09, Vol.304 (3), p.649-656 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 656 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 649 |
container_title | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics |
container_volume | 304 |
creator | Sagi-Dain, Lena Singer, Amihood Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora Peleg, Amir Bar-Shira, Anat Feingold-Zadok, Michal Ben Shachar, Shay Maya, Idit |
description | Purpose
To analyze the risk for clinically significant microarray aberrations in pregnancies with polyhydramnios.
Methods
Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) performed due to polyhydramnios between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the Ministry of Health Database. The rate of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) CMA findings in isolated and non-isolated polyhydramnios cohorts was compared to a local control group of 5541 fetuses with normal ultrasound, in which 78 (1.4%) abnormal results were demonstrated. Subgroup analyses were performed by the degree of polyhydramnios, week of diagnosis, maternal age, and the presence of additional sonographic anomalies.
Results
In the isolated polyhydramnios cohort, 19/623 (3.1%) clinically significant CMA aberrations were noted, a significantly higher rate compared to the control population. However, the risk for abnormal CMA results in the 158 cases with mild polyhydramnios (AFI 25–29.9, or maximal vertical pocket 8–11.9 cm) did not significantly differ from pregnancies with normal ultrasound. Of 119 cases of non-isolated polyhydramnios (most frequently associated with cardiovascular (26.1%) and brain (15.1%) anomalies), 8 (6.7%) abnormal CMA findings were noted, mainly karyotype-detectable.
Conclusion
Mild polyhydramnios was not associated with an increased rate of clinically significant microarray results, compared to pregnancies with normal ultrasound. An extensive anatomical sonographic survey should be performed in pregnancies with polyhydramnios, with consideration of fetal echocardiography. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00404-021-05995-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2490126177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2556905136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a1917ace190bbd648603ae4e03abb13ce86b1f3bea17be344cd7f14be75c0f923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EokvLC3BAlrj0EhjHThxzQxWllSpxac-W7Ux2UyVx8CRIOfPieNkCEgcu9kj-5ht5fsbeCHgvAPQHAlCgCihFAZUxVbE9YzuhZFmAFuI524E51lDrM_aK6BFAlE1Tv2RnUlZGyKbcsR_3B-TYdRgWHjs-x2E7bG1y49RH4i3uEyKPEw-HFMdIcXQDH_uQokvJbTwhrcNCH7nL5ZIizVnUf0ce4iGmhbvJDRv1dHRrVXLqp_2ASxbOCfeTm0KPdMFedG4gfP10n7OH68_3VzfF3dcvt1ef7oogdbUUThihXUBhwPu2Vk0N0qHCfHovZMCm9qKTHp3QHqVSodWdUB51FaAzpTxnlyfvnOK3FWmxY08Bh8FNGFeypTJ5Q7XQOqPv_kEf45ryZzJVVbWBSsg6U-WJyvsgStjZOfWjS5sVYI8R2VNENkdkf0Vkt9z09km9-hHbPy2_M8mAPAGUn6Y9pr-z_6P9CV4kn4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556905136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sagi-Dain, Lena ; Singer, Amihood ; Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora ; Peleg, Amir ; Bar-Shira, Anat ; Feingold-Zadok, Michal ; Ben Shachar, Shay ; Maya, Idit</creator><creatorcontrib>Sagi-Dain, Lena ; Singer, Amihood ; Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora ; Peleg, Amir ; Bar-Shira, Anat ; Feingold-Zadok, Michal ; Ben Shachar, Shay ; Maya, Idit</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To analyze the risk for clinically significant microarray aberrations in pregnancies with polyhydramnios.
Methods
Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) performed due to polyhydramnios between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the Ministry of Health Database. The rate of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) CMA findings in isolated and non-isolated polyhydramnios cohorts was compared to a local control group of 5541 fetuses with normal ultrasound, in which 78 (1.4%) abnormal results were demonstrated. Subgroup analyses were performed by the degree of polyhydramnios, week of diagnosis, maternal age, and the presence of additional sonographic anomalies.
Results
In the isolated polyhydramnios cohort, 19/623 (3.1%) clinically significant CMA aberrations were noted, a significantly higher rate compared to the control population. However, the risk for abnormal CMA results in the 158 cases with mild polyhydramnios (AFI 25–29.9, or maximal vertical pocket 8–11.9 cm) did not significantly differ from pregnancies with normal ultrasound. Of 119 cases of non-isolated polyhydramnios (most frequently associated with cardiovascular (26.1%) and brain (15.1%) anomalies), 8 (6.7%) abnormal CMA findings were noted, mainly karyotype-detectable.
Conclusion
Mild polyhydramnios was not associated with an increased rate of clinically significant microarray results, compared to pregnancies with normal ultrasound. An extensive anatomical sonographic survey should be performed in pregnancies with polyhydramnios, with consideration of fetal echocardiography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-05995-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33591382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Amniocentesis ; Amniotic fluid ; Cohort analysis ; Confidence intervals ; Endocrinology ; Genetic counseling ; Genetics ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Maternal-Fetal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Obstetrics ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Pregnancy ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021-09, Vol.304 (3), p.649-656</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a1917ace190bbd648603ae4e03abb13ce86b1f3bea17be344cd7f14be75c0f923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a1917ace190bbd648603ae4e03abb13ce86b1f3bea17be344cd7f14be75c0f923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0883-2130</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-021-05995-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-021-05995-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33591382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sagi-Dain, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Amihood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peleg, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bar-Shira, Anat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feingold-Zadok, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Shachar, Shay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maya, Idit</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies</title><title>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Purpose
To analyze the risk for clinically significant microarray aberrations in pregnancies with polyhydramnios.
Methods
Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) performed due to polyhydramnios between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the Ministry of Health Database. The rate of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) CMA findings in isolated and non-isolated polyhydramnios cohorts was compared to a local control group of 5541 fetuses with normal ultrasound, in which 78 (1.4%) abnormal results were demonstrated. Subgroup analyses were performed by the degree of polyhydramnios, week of diagnosis, maternal age, and the presence of additional sonographic anomalies.
Results
In the isolated polyhydramnios cohort, 19/623 (3.1%) clinically significant CMA aberrations were noted, a significantly higher rate compared to the control population. However, the risk for abnormal CMA results in the 158 cases with mild polyhydramnios (AFI 25–29.9, or maximal vertical pocket 8–11.9 cm) did not significantly differ from pregnancies with normal ultrasound. Of 119 cases of non-isolated polyhydramnios (most frequently associated with cardiovascular (26.1%) and brain (15.1%) anomalies), 8 (6.7%) abnormal CMA findings were noted, mainly karyotype-detectable.
Conclusion
Mild polyhydramnios was not associated with an increased rate of clinically significant microarray results, compared to pregnancies with normal ultrasound. An extensive anatomical sonographic survey should be performed in pregnancies with polyhydramnios, with consideration of fetal echocardiography.</description><subject>Amniocentesis</subject><subject>Amniotic fluid</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Genetic counseling</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Maternal-Fetal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>0932-0067</issn><issn>1432-0711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EokvLC3BAlrj0EhjHThxzQxWllSpxac-W7Ux2UyVx8CRIOfPieNkCEgcu9kj-5ht5fsbeCHgvAPQHAlCgCihFAZUxVbE9YzuhZFmAFuI524E51lDrM_aK6BFAlE1Tv2RnUlZGyKbcsR_3B-TYdRgWHjs-x2E7bG1y49RH4i3uEyKPEw-HFMdIcXQDH_uQokvJbTwhrcNCH7nL5ZIizVnUf0ce4iGmhbvJDRv1dHRrVXLqp_2ASxbOCfeTm0KPdMFedG4gfP10n7OH68_3VzfF3dcvt1ef7oogdbUUThihXUBhwPu2Vk0N0qHCfHovZMCm9qKTHp3QHqVSodWdUB51FaAzpTxnlyfvnOK3FWmxY08Bh8FNGFeypTJ5Q7XQOqPv_kEf45ryZzJVVbWBSsg6U-WJyvsgStjZOfWjS5sVYI8R2VNENkdkf0Vkt9z09km9-hHbPy2_M8mAPAGUn6Y9pr-z_6P9CV4kn4E</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Sagi-Dain, Lena</creator><creator>Singer, Amihood</creator><creator>Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora</creator><creator>Peleg, Amir</creator><creator>Bar-Shira, Anat</creator><creator>Feingold-Zadok, Michal</creator><creator>Ben Shachar, Shay</creator><creator>Maya, Idit</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0883-2130</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies</title><author>Sagi-Dain, Lena ; Singer, Amihood ; Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora ; Peleg, Amir ; Bar-Shira, Anat ; Feingold-Zadok, Michal ; Ben Shachar, Shay ; Maya, Idit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a1917ace190bbd648603ae4e03abb13ce86b1f3bea17be344cd7f14be75c0f923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amniocentesis</topic><topic>Amniotic fluid</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Genetic counseling</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Maternal-Fetal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sagi-Dain, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Amihood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peleg, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bar-Shira, Anat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feingold-Zadok, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Shachar, Shay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maya, Idit</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sagi-Dain, Lena</au><au>Singer, Amihood</au><au>Falik-Zaccai, Tzipora</au><au>Peleg, Amir</au><au>Bar-Shira, Anat</au><au>Feingold-Zadok, Michal</au><au>Ben Shachar, Shay</au><au>Maya, Idit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies</atitle><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><stitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</stitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>304</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>656</epage><pages>649-656</pages><issn>0932-0067</issn><eissn>1432-0711</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To analyze the risk for clinically significant microarray aberrations in pregnancies with polyhydramnios.
Methods
Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) performed due to polyhydramnios between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the Ministry of Health Database. The rate of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) CMA findings in isolated and non-isolated polyhydramnios cohorts was compared to a local control group of 5541 fetuses with normal ultrasound, in which 78 (1.4%) abnormal results were demonstrated. Subgroup analyses were performed by the degree of polyhydramnios, week of diagnosis, maternal age, and the presence of additional sonographic anomalies.
Results
In the isolated polyhydramnios cohort, 19/623 (3.1%) clinically significant CMA aberrations were noted, a significantly higher rate compared to the control population. However, the risk for abnormal CMA results in the 158 cases with mild polyhydramnios (AFI 25–29.9, or maximal vertical pocket 8–11.9 cm) did not significantly differ from pregnancies with normal ultrasound. Of 119 cases of non-isolated polyhydramnios (most frequently associated with cardiovascular (26.1%) and brain (15.1%) anomalies), 8 (6.7%) abnormal CMA findings were noted, mainly karyotype-detectable.
Conclusion
Mild polyhydramnios was not associated with an increased rate of clinically significant microarray results, compared to pregnancies with normal ultrasound. An extensive anatomical sonographic survey should be performed in pregnancies with polyhydramnios, with consideration of fetal echocardiography.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33591382</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00404-021-05995-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0883-2130</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0932-0067 |
ispartof | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021-09, Vol.304 (3), p.649-656 |
issn | 0932-0067 1432-0711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2490126177 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Amniocentesis Amniotic fluid Cohort analysis Confidence intervals Endocrinology Genetic counseling Genetics Gynecology Human Genetics Maternal-Fetal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Obstetrics Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery Pregnancy Ultrasonic imaging |
title | The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A23%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20polyhydramnios%20degree%20on%20chromosomal%20microarray%20results:%20a%20retrospective%20cohort%20analysis%20of%20742%20singleton%20pregnancies&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Sagi-Dain,%20Lena&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=304&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=656&rft.pages=649-656&rft.issn=0932-0067&rft.eissn=1432-0711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00404-021-05995-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2556905136%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556905136&rft_id=info:pmid/33591382&rfr_iscdi=true |