Surgical treatment of intracranial blister aneurysms: A systematic review
•Blister aneurysms (BAs) are relatively rare vascular malformations-.•BAs treatment is challenging using either surgical or endovascular approaches.•Surgery is frequently associated with controversial results.•This study aims to investigate clinical-radiological outcomes and complications of surgery...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical neurology and neurosurgery 2021-03, Vol.202, p.106550-106550, Article 106550 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 106550 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 106550 |
| container_title | Clinical neurology and neurosurgery |
| container_volume | 202 |
| creator | Ricciardi, Luca Trungu, Sokol Scerrati, Alba Mongardi, Lorenzo Flacco, Maria Elena Raco, Antonino Miscusi, Massimo De Bonis, Pasquale Sturiale, Carmelo Lucio |
| description | •Blister aneurysms (BAs) are relatively rare vascular malformations-.•BAs treatment is challenging using either surgical or endovascular approaches.•Surgery is frequently associated with controversial results.•This study aims to investigate clinical-radiological outcomes and complications of surgery for BAs.
Intracranial blister aneurysms (BAs) are challenging vascular lesions related to high morbidity and mortality rates. Different surgical and endovascular techniques have been proposed to treat BAs; however, there is no consensus on a preferred treatment.
To systematically review the pertinent literature on clinical and radiological outcomes of different surgical treatments for BAs management, to meta-analyze their clinical and radiological outcomes, and compare these results with those from recent meta-analyses on endovascular treatments for BAs.
The present study was consistently conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Five different online medical databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web-of-Science) were screened from 2010 through 2020. Papers reporting clinical and radiological outcomes of different surgical treatments for BAs were considered. Event rates were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis.
A total of 35 studies reporting on 514 patients (534 aneurysms) were included. Aneurysm clipping in 223 patients (45.4%; 95% CI 21.9−53.8), bypass and trapping in 87 (17.7%; 95% CI 1.89−21.6), clipping and wrapping in 82 (16.7%; 95% CI 3.71−19.0), and wrapping in 33 (6.7%; 95% CI 0.0−4.87) were the mostly common performed treatments. Complete occlusion rate was reported in 90.7% of patients. The complication rate was as high as 61.1%, the mortality rate was 7.4%, and the mean mRS at follow-up was 2.5.
Our meta-analysis suggests that surgical treatments for BAs are related to higher occlusion, complications and mortality rate than endovascular strategies. However, there is a high-heterogeneity among the included studies and data are poorly reported; so comparing the two type of treatments is unreliable in order to establish which one is better. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106550 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2490119756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0303846721000779</els_id><sourcerecordid>2490119756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-2ab3ca3ecc039ca4170e812df524117b96d94718ebfa9dfd2c1dd6a01d6350583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxF5aCFy9dJ0mbpp4U8QsED-o5pMlUsvRDk1TZf2-WVQ9ePA3MPDPz8hCyoLCkQMXZamk6N-DkxyUDRlNTlCXskDmVFctFLeQumQMHnstCVDNyEMIKADgXcp_MOC-l5ALm5P5p8q_O6C6LHnXscYjZ2GZuiF4brweXJk3nQkSf6c2_dejDeXaZhXXq9To6k3n8cPh5RPZa3QU8_q6H5OXm-vnqLn94vL2_unzIDa9FzJluuNEcjQFeG13QClBSZtuSFZRWTS1sXVRUYtPq2raWGWqt0ECt4CWUkh-S0-3dNz--Txii6l0w2HUp3jgFxYoaKK2rUiT05A-6Gic_pHQbSjCQrCgTJbaU8WMIHlv15l2v_VpRUBvZaqV-ZKuNbLWVnRYX3-enpkf7u_ZjNwEXWwCTj-TIq2AcDgat82iisqP778cX52eTqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2496208245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical treatment of intracranial blister aneurysms: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Ricciardi, Luca ; Trungu, Sokol ; Scerrati, Alba ; Mongardi, Lorenzo ; Flacco, Maria Elena ; Raco, Antonino ; Miscusi, Massimo ; De Bonis, Pasquale ; Sturiale, Carmelo Lucio</creator><creatorcontrib>Ricciardi, Luca ; Trungu, Sokol ; Scerrati, Alba ; Mongardi, Lorenzo ; Flacco, Maria Elena ; Raco, Antonino ; Miscusi, Massimo ; De Bonis, Pasquale ; Sturiale, Carmelo Lucio</creatorcontrib><description>•Blister aneurysms (BAs) are relatively rare vascular malformations-.•BAs treatment is challenging using either surgical or endovascular approaches.•Surgery is frequently associated with controversial results.•This study aims to investigate clinical-radiological outcomes and complications of surgery for BAs.
Intracranial blister aneurysms (BAs) are challenging vascular lesions related to high morbidity and mortality rates. Different surgical and endovascular techniques have been proposed to treat BAs; however, there is no consensus on a preferred treatment.
To systematically review the pertinent literature on clinical and radiological outcomes of different surgical treatments for BAs management, to meta-analyze their clinical and radiological outcomes, and compare these results with those from recent meta-analyses on endovascular treatments for BAs.
The present study was consistently conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Five different online medical databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web-of-Science) were screened from 2010 through 2020. Papers reporting clinical and radiological outcomes of different surgical treatments for BAs were considered. Event rates were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis.
A total of 35 studies reporting on 514 patients (534 aneurysms) were included. Aneurysm clipping in 223 patients (45.4%; 95% CI 21.9−53.8), bypass and trapping in 87 (17.7%; 95% CI 1.89−21.6), clipping and wrapping in 82 (16.7%; 95% CI 3.71−19.0), and wrapping in 33 (6.7%; 95% CI 0.0−4.87) were the mostly common performed treatments. Complete occlusion rate was reported in 90.7% of patients. The complication rate was as high as 61.1%, the mortality rate was 7.4%, and the mean mRS at follow-up was 2.5.
Our meta-analysis suggests that surgical treatments for BAs are related to higher occlusion, complications and mortality rate than endovascular strategies. However, there is a high-heterogeneity among the included studies and data are poorly reported; so comparing the two type of treatments is unreliable in order to establish which one is better.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106550</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33588360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aneurysm ; Aneurysms ; Blister aneurysms ; Cardiovascular system ; Clinical outcomes ; Demographics ; Humans ; Intracranial Aneurysm - surgery ; Meta-analysis ; Microsurgery - methods ; Microsurgical clipping ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Neurosurgical Procedures - methods ; Occlusion ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Statistical analysis ; Surgical treatment ; Sutures ; Systematic review ; Trapping ; Treatment Outcome ; Veins & arteries ; Wrapping</subject><ispartof>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2021-03, Vol.202, p.106550-106550, Article 106550</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-2ab3ca3ecc039ca4170e812df524117b96d94718ebfa9dfd2c1dd6a01d6350583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-2ab3ca3ecc039ca4170e812df524117b96d94718ebfa9dfd2c1dd6a01d6350583</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1374-5736 ; 0000-0002-9879-8940 ; 0000-0002-8607-5323 ; 0000-0002-4080-2492</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2496208245?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994,64384,64386,64388,72340</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33588360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ricciardi, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trungu, Sokol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scerrati, Alba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongardi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flacco, Maria Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raco, Antonino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miscusi, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bonis, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturiale, Carmelo Lucio</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical treatment of intracranial blister aneurysms: A systematic review</title><title>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery</title><addtitle>Clin Neurol Neurosurg</addtitle><description>•Blister aneurysms (BAs) are relatively rare vascular malformations-.•BAs treatment is challenging using either surgical or endovascular approaches.•Surgery is frequently associated with controversial results.•This study aims to investigate clinical-radiological outcomes and complications of surgery for BAs.
Intracranial blister aneurysms (BAs) are challenging vascular lesions related to high morbidity and mortality rates. Different surgical and endovascular techniques have been proposed to treat BAs; however, there is no consensus on a preferred treatment.
To systematically review the pertinent literature on clinical and radiological outcomes of different surgical treatments for BAs management, to meta-analyze their clinical and radiological outcomes, and compare these results with those from recent meta-analyses on endovascular treatments for BAs.
The present study was consistently conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Five different online medical databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web-of-Science) were screened from 2010 through 2020. Papers reporting clinical and radiological outcomes of different surgical treatments for BAs were considered. Event rates were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis.
A total of 35 studies reporting on 514 patients (534 aneurysms) were included. Aneurysm clipping in 223 patients (45.4%; 95% CI 21.9−53.8), bypass and trapping in 87 (17.7%; 95% CI 1.89−21.6), clipping and wrapping in 82 (16.7%; 95% CI 3.71−19.0), and wrapping in 33 (6.7%; 95% CI 0.0−4.87) were the mostly common performed treatments. Complete occlusion rate was reported in 90.7% of patients. The complication rate was as high as 61.1%, the mortality rate was 7.4%, and the mean mRS at follow-up was 2.5.
Our meta-analysis suggests that surgical treatments for BAs are related to higher occlusion, complications and mortality rate than endovascular strategies. However, there is a high-heterogeneity among the included studies and data are poorly reported; so comparing the two type of treatments is unreliable in order to establish which one is better.</description><subject>Aneurysm</subject><subject>Aneurysms</subject><subject>Blister aneurysms</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intracranial Aneurysm - surgery</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Microsurgery - methods</subject><subject>Microsurgical clipping</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Occlusion</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgical treatment</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Trapping</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><subject>Wrapping</subject><issn>0303-8467</issn><issn>1872-6968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxF5aCFy9dJ0mbpp4U8QsED-o5pMlUsvRDk1TZf2-WVQ9ePA3MPDPz8hCyoLCkQMXZamk6N-DkxyUDRlNTlCXskDmVFctFLeQumQMHnstCVDNyEMIKADgXcp_MOC-l5ALm5P5p8q_O6C6LHnXscYjZ2GZuiF4brweXJk3nQkSf6c2_dejDeXaZhXXq9To6k3n8cPh5RPZa3QU8_q6H5OXm-vnqLn94vL2_unzIDa9FzJluuNEcjQFeG13QClBSZtuSFZRWTS1sXVRUYtPq2raWGWqt0ECt4CWUkh-S0-3dNz--Txii6l0w2HUp3jgFxYoaKK2rUiT05A-6Gic_pHQbSjCQrCgTJbaU8WMIHlv15l2v_VpRUBvZaqV-ZKuNbLWVnRYX3-enpkf7u_ZjNwEXWwCTj-TIq2AcDgat82iisqP778cX52eTqw</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Ricciardi, Luca</creator><creator>Trungu, Sokol</creator><creator>Scerrati, Alba</creator><creator>Mongardi, Lorenzo</creator><creator>Flacco, Maria Elena</creator><creator>Raco, Antonino</creator><creator>Miscusi, Massimo</creator><creator>De Bonis, Pasquale</creator><creator>Sturiale, Carmelo Lucio</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1374-5736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9879-8940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8607-5323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-2492</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Surgical treatment of intracranial blister aneurysms: A systematic review</title><author>Ricciardi, Luca ; Trungu, Sokol ; Scerrati, Alba ; Mongardi, Lorenzo ; Flacco, Maria Elena ; Raco, Antonino ; Miscusi, Massimo ; De Bonis, Pasquale ; Sturiale, Carmelo Lucio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-2ab3ca3ecc039ca4170e812df524117b96d94718ebfa9dfd2c1dd6a01d6350583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aneurysm</topic><topic>Aneurysms</topic><topic>Blister aneurysms</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intracranial Aneurysm - surgery</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Microsurgery - methods</topic><topic>Microsurgical clipping</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Occlusion</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgical treatment</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Trapping</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><topic>Wrapping</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ricciardi, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trungu, Sokol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scerrati, Alba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongardi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flacco, Maria Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raco, Antonino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miscusi, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bonis, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturiale, Carmelo Lucio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ricciardi, Luca</au><au>Trungu, Sokol</au><au>Scerrati, Alba</au><au>Mongardi, Lorenzo</au><au>Flacco, Maria Elena</au><au>Raco, Antonino</au><au>Miscusi, Massimo</au><au>De Bonis, Pasquale</au><au>Sturiale, Carmelo Lucio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical treatment of intracranial blister aneurysms: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neurol Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>202</volume><spage>106550</spage><epage>106550</epage><pages>106550-106550</pages><artnum>106550</artnum><issn>0303-8467</issn><eissn>1872-6968</eissn><abstract>•Blister aneurysms (BAs) are relatively rare vascular malformations-.•BAs treatment is challenging using either surgical or endovascular approaches.•Surgery is frequently associated with controversial results.•This study aims to investigate clinical-radiological outcomes and complications of surgery for BAs.
Intracranial blister aneurysms (BAs) are challenging vascular lesions related to high morbidity and mortality rates. Different surgical and endovascular techniques have been proposed to treat BAs; however, there is no consensus on a preferred treatment.
To systematically review the pertinent literature on clinical and radiological outcomes of different surgical treatments for BAs management, to meta-analyze their clinical and radiological outcomes, and compare these results with those from recent meta-analyses on endovascular treatments for BAs.
The present study was consistently conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Five different online medical databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web-of-Science) were screened from 2010 through 2020. Papers reporting clinical and radiological outcomes of different surgical treatments for BAs were considered. Event rates were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis.
A total of 35 studies reporting on 514 patients (534 aneurysms) were included. Aneurysm clipping in 223 patients (45.4%; 95% CI 21.9−53.8), bypass and trapping in 87 (17.7%; 95% CI 1.89−21.6), clipping and wrapping in 82 (16.7%; 95% CI 3.71−19.0), and wrapping in 33 (6.7%; 95% CI 0.0−4.87) were the mostly common performed treatments. Complete occlusion rate was reported in 90.7% of patients. The complication rate was as high as 61.1%, the mortality rate was 7.4%, and the mean mRS at follow-up was 2.5.
Our meta-analysis suggests that surgical treatments for BAs are related to higher occlusion, complications and mortality rate than endovascular strategies. However, there is a high-heterogeneity among the included studies and data are poorly reported; so comparing the two type of treatments is unreliable in order to establish which one is better.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33588360</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106550</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1374-5736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9879-8940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8607-5323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-2492</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0303-8467 |
| ispartof | Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2021-03, Vol.202, p.106550-106550, Article 106550 |
| issn | 0303-8467 1872-6968 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2490119756 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Aneurysm Aneurysms Blister aneurysms Cardiovascular system Clinical outcomes Demographics Humans Intracranial Aneurysm - surgery Meta-analysis Microsurgery - methods Microsurgical clipping Morbidity Mortality Neurosurgical Procedures - methods Occlusion Patients Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Statistical analysis Surgical treatment Sutures Systematic review Trapping Treatment Outcome Veins & arteries Wrapping |
| title | Surgical treatment of intracranial blister aneurysms: A systematic review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20treatment%20of%20intracranial%20blister%20aneurysms:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neurology%20and%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Ricciardi,%20Luca&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=202&rft.spage=106550&rft.epage=106550&rft.pages=106550-106550&rft.artnum=106550&rft.issn=0303-8467&rft.eissn=1872-6968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106550&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2490119756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2496208245&rft_id=info:pmid/33588360&rft_els_id=S0303846721000779&rfr_iscdi=true |