Integrated Psychosocial Group Treatment: A Randomized Pilot Trial of a Harm Reduction and Preventive Approach for Patients with Chronic Pain at Risk of Opioid Misuse
Abstract Objective To examine the benefits of an integrated psychosocial group treatment (IPGT) model for patients with chronic pain at risk of opioid misuse. Design This study was a small-scale, single-blinded, two-group randomized controlled trial. Setting Outpatient. Subjects Adults with chronic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) Mass.), 2021-09, Vol.22 (9), p.2007-2018 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2018 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2007 |
container_title | Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Hruschak, Valerie Rosen, Daniel Tierney, Megan Eack, Shaun M Wasan, Ajay D Cochran, Gerald |
description | Abstract
Objective
To examine the benefits of an integrated psychosocial group treatment (IPGT) model for patients with chronic pain at risk of opioid misuse.
Design
This study was a small-scale, single-blinded, two-group randomized controlled trial.
Setting
Outpatient.
Subjects
Adults with chronic pain of >3 months’ duration who were currently prescribed opioid medication and were at risk of opioid misuse.
Methods
Patients with chronic pain who were at risk of opioid misuse (n = 30) were randomly assigned to IPGT or treatment as usual. IPGT consists of six group sessions of psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and peer support. Participants were assessed at baseline, first follow-up at 6 weeks, and a posttreatment follow-up at 9 weeks. Outcomes included feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. Data were analyzed with descriptive and multivariate analyses.
Results
All intervention components were delivered to 87% of the participants, and IPGT recipients reported a high level of satisfaction. Results of the multivariate analyses demonstrated nonsignificant improvements in pain severity (β = 0.22, 95% CI: –0.24 to 0.66, P = 0.35). However, we observed significant treatment × time interactions on pain interference (β = 3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 to 6.65, P = 0.05) and pain catastrophizing (β = 2.74, 95% CI: 0.49 to 4.99, P = 0.02). Lastly, we detected no significant differences in opioid misuse (adjusted odds ratio = 0.69, 95% CI: –0.26 to 1.64, P = 0.16).
Conclusion
This study provides support for the IPGT intervention being acceptable and feasible for delivery in patients with chronic pain at risk of opioid misuse. Efficacy was achieved in pain interference and pain catastrophizing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/pm/pnaa461 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2489252289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A700843103</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/pm/pnaa461</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A700843103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-5f20b29b752be8522a742708bf3f7e9c89227e5f0e0fb93d65a54a7574a1f5ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1rFDEUhgdR7Ife-AMkIEIRts3HZDLj3bJoW6h0Wep1yGROuqkzyTTJVOr_8X-aYVdFEclFwsnzPjmQUxSvCD4luGFn43A2OqXKijwpDgmn1aKsmHi6P1Mm-EFxFOMdxqQqa_a8OGCMi6ok_LD4fukS3AaVoEPr-Ki3PnptVY_Og59GdBNApQFceo-WaKNc5wf7bUZt71O-nUlvkEIXKgxoA92kk_UOZRKtAzzkpH0AtBzH4JXeIuMDWqtkcz2irzZt0WobvLM6V22OJbSx8cusvB6ttx36ZOMU4UXxzKg-wsv9flx8_vjhZnWxuLo-v1wtrxa6JDQtuKG4pU0rOG2h5pQqUVKB69YwI6DRdUOpAG4wYNM2rKu44qUSXJSKGN4qdlyc7Ly53fsJYpKDjRr6XjnwU5S0zIrsrZuMvvkLvfNTcLk7SbNQ1Cw__Zu6VT1I64xPQelZKpcC47pkBLNMnf6DyquDwWrvwNhc_yPwbhfQwccYwMgx2EGFR0mwnGdCjoPcz0SGX-87ndoBul_ozyHIwNsdkH_8f6IfLgS-oQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2574783427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrated Psychosocial Group Treatment: A Randomized Pilot Trial of a Harm Reduction and Preventive Approach for Patients with Chronic Pain at Risk of Opioid Misuse</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hruschak, Valerie ; Rosen, Daniel ; Tierney, Megan ; Eack, Shaun M ; Wasan, Ajay D ; Cochran, Gerald</creator><creatorcontrib>Hruschak, Valerie ; Rosen, Daniel ; Tierney, Megan ; Eack, Shaun M ; Wasan, Ajay D ; Cochran, Gerald</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Objective
To examine the benefits of an integrated psychosocial group treatment (IPGT) model for patients with chronic pain at risk of opioid misuse.
Design
This study was a small-scale, single-blinded, two-group randomized controlled trial.
Setting
Outpatient.
Subjects
Adults with chronic pain of >3 months’ duration who were currently prescribed opioid medication and were at risk of opioid misuse.
Methods
Patients with chronic pain who were at risk of opioid misuse (n = 30) were randomly assigned to IPGT or treatment as usual. IPGT consists of six group sessions of psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and peer support. Participants were assessed at baseline, first follow-up at 6 weeks, and a posttreatment follow-up at 9 weeks. Outcomes included feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. Data were analyzed with descriptive and multivariate analyses.
Results
All intervention components were delivered to 87% of the participants, and IPGT recipients reported a high level of satisfaction. Results of the multivariate analyses demonstrated nonsignificant improvements in pain severity (β = 0.22, 95% CI: –0.24 to 0.66, P = 0.35). However, we observed significant treatment × time interactions on pain interference (β = 3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 to 6.65, P = 0.05) and pain catastrophizing (β = 2.74, 95% CI: 0.49 to 4.99, P = 0.02). Lastly, we detected no significant differences in opioid misuse (adjusted odds ratio = 0.69, 95% CI: –0.26 to 1.64, P = 0.16).
Conclusion
This study provides support for the IPGT intervention being acceptable and feasible for delivery in patients with chronic pain at risk of opioid misuse. Efficacy was achieved in pain interference and pain catastrophizing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-2375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4637</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa461</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33576415</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Chronic pain ; Clinical trials ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive behavioral therapy ; Disease prevention ; Drug addiction ; Group counseling ; Group therapy ; Harm reduction ; Health risks ; Narcotics ; Opioids ; Pain ; Pain management ; Patients ; Psychotherapy ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2021-09, Vol.22 (9), p.2007-2018</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2021</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-5f20b29b752be8522a742708bf3f7e9c89227e5f0e0fb93d65a54a7574a1f5ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-5f20b29b752be8522a742708bf3f7e9c89227e5f0e0fb93d65a54a7574a1f5ba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0791-6970</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33576415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hruschak, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eack, Shaun M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasan, Ajay D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Gerald</creatorcontrib><title>Integrated Psychosocial Group Treatment: A Randomized Pilot Trial of a Harm Reduction and Preventive Approach for Patients with Chronic Pain at Risk of Opioid Misuse</title><title>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Pain Med</addtitle><description>Abstract
Objective
To examine the benefits of an integrated psychosocial group treatment (IPGT) model for patients with chronic pain at risk of opioid misuse.
Design
This study was a small-scale, single-blinded, two-group randomized controlled trial.
Setting
Outpatient.
Subjects
Adults with chronic pain of >3 months’ duration who were currently prescribed opioid medication and were at risk of opioid misuse.
Methods
Patients with chronic pain who were at risk of opioid misuse (n = 30) were randomly assigned to IPGT or treatment as usual. IPGT consists of six group sessions of psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and peer support. Participants were assessed at baseline, first follow-up at 6 weeks, and a posttreatment follow-up at 9 weeks. Outcomes included feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. Data were analyzed with descriptive and multivariate analyses.
Results
All intervention components were delivered to 87% of the participants, and IPGT recipients reported a high level of satisfaction. Results of the multivariate analyses demonstrated nonsignificant improvements in pain severity (β = 0.22, 95% CI: –0.24 to 0.66, P = 0.35). However, we observed significant treatment × time interactions on pain interference (β = 3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 to 6.65, P = 0.05) and pain catastrophizing (β = 2.74, 95% CI: 0.49 to 4.99, P = 0.02). Lastly, we detected no significant differences in opioid misuse (adjusted odds ratio = 0.69, 95% CI: –0.26 to 1.64, P = 0.16).
Conclusion
This study provides support for the IPGT intervention being acceptable and feasible for delivery in patients with chronic pain at risk of opioid misuse. Efficacy was achieved in pain interference and pain catastrophizing.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive behavioral therapy</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Drug addiction</subject><subject>Group counseling</subject><subject>Group therapy</subject><subject>Harm reduction</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>1526-2375</issn><issn>1526-4637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1rFDEUhgdR7Ife-AMkIEIRts3HZDLj3bJoW6h0Wep1yGROuqkzyTTJVOr_8X-aYVdFEclFwsnzPjmQUxSvCD4luGFn43A2OqXKijwpDgmn1aKsmHi6P1Mm-EFxFOMdxqQqa_a8OGCMi6ok_LD4fukS3AaVoEPr-Ki3PnptVY_Og59GdBNApQFceo-WaKNc5wf7bUZt71O-nUlvkEIXKgxoA92kk_UOZRKtAzzkpH0AtBzH4JXeIuMDWqtkcz2irzZt0WobvLM6V22OJbSx8cusvB6ttx36ZOMU4UXxzKg-wsv9flx8_vjhZnWxuLo-v1wtrxa6JDQtuKG4pU0rOG2h5pQqUVKB69YwI6DRdUOpAG4wYNM2rKu44qUSXJSKGN4qdlyc7Ly53fsJYpKDjRr6XjnwU5S0zIrsrZuMvvkLvfNTcLk7SbNQ1Cw__Zu6VT1I64xPQelZKpcC47pkBLNMnf6DyquDwWrvwNhc_yPwbhfQwccYwMgx2EGFR0mwnGdCjoPcz0SGX-87ndoBul_ozyHIwNsdkH_8f6IfLgS-oQ</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Hruschak, Valerie</creator><creator>Rosen, Daniel</creator><creator>Tierney, Megan</creator><creator>Eack, Shaun M</creator><creator>Wasan, Ajay D</creator><creator>Cochran, Gerald</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0791-6970</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Integrated Psychosocial Group Treatment: A Randomized Pilot Trial of a Harm Reduction and Preventive Approach for Patients with Chronic Pain at Risk of Opioid Misuse</title><author>Hruschak, Valerie ; Rosen, Daniel ; Tierney, Megan ; Eack, Shaun M ; Wasan, Ajay D ; Cochran, Gerald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-5f20b29b752be8522a742708bf3f7e9c89227e5f0e0fb93d65a54a7574a1f5ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive behavioral therapy</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Drug addiction</topic><topic>Group counseling</topic><topic>Group therapy</topic><topic>Harm reduction</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hruschak, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eack, Shaun M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasan, Ajay D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Gerald</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hruschak, Valerie</au><au>Rosen, Daniel</au><au>Tierney, Megan</au><au>Eack, Shaun M</au><au>Wasan, Ajay D</au><au>Cochran, Gerald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrated Psychosocial Group Treatment: A Randomized Pilot Trial of a Harm Reduction and Preventive Approach for Patients with Chronic Pain at Risk of Opioid Misuse</atitle><jtitle>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Med</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2007</spage><epage>2018</epage><pages>2007-2018</pages><issn>1526-2375</issn><eissn>1526-4637</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Objective
To examine the benefits of an integrated psychosocial group treatment (IPGT) model for patients with chronic pain at risk of opioid misuse.
Design
This study was a small-scale, single-blinded, two-group randomized controlled trial.
Setting
Outpatient.
Subjects
Adults with chronic pain of >3 months’ duration who were currently prescribed opioid medication and were at risk of opioid misuse.
Methods
Patients with chronic pain who were at risk of opioid misuse (n = 30) were randomly assigned to IPGT or treatment as usual. IPGT consists of six group sessions of psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and peer support. Participants were assessed at baseline, first follow-up at 6 weeks, and a posttreatment follow-up at 9 weeks. Outcomes included feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. Data were analyzed with descriptive and multivariate analyses.
Results
All intervention components were delivered to 87% of the participants, and IPGT recipients reported a high level of satisfaction. Results of the multivariate analyses demonstrated nonsignificant improvements in pain severity (β = 0.22, 95% CI: –0.24 to 0.66, P = 0.35). However, we observed significant treatment × time interactions on pain interference (β = 3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 to 6.65, P = 0.05) and pain catastrophizing (β = 2.74, 95% CI: 0.49 to 4.99, P = 0.02). Lastly, we detected no significant differences in opioid misuse (adjusted odds ratio = 0.69, 95% CI: –0.26 to 1.64, P = 0.16).
Conclusion
This study provides support for the IPGT intervention being acceptable and feasible for delivery in patients with chronic pain at risk of opioid misuse. Efficacy was achieved in pain interference and pain catastrophizing.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>33576415</pmid><doi>10.1093/pm/pnaa461</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0791-6970</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-2375 |
ispartof | Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2021-09, Vol.22 (9), p.2007-2018 |
issn | 1526-2375 1526-4637 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2489252289 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Care and treatment Chronic pain Clinical trials Cognitive ability Cognitive behavioral therapy Disease prevention Drug addiction Group counseling Group therapy Harm reduction Health risks Narcotics Opioids Pain Pain management Patients Psychotherapy Testing |
title | Integrated Psychosocial Group Treatment: A Randomized Pilot Trial of a Harm Reduction and Preventive Approach for Patients with Chronic Pain at Risk of Opioid Misuse |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A56%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrated%20Psychosocial%20Group%20Treatment:%20A%20Randomized%20Pilot%20Trial%20of%20a%20Harm%20Reduction%20and%20Preventive%20Approach%20for%20Patients%20with%20Chronic%20Pain%20at%20Risk%20of%20Opioid%20Misuse&rft.jtitle=Pain%20medicine%20(Malden,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Hruschak,%20Valerie&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2007&rft.epage=2018&rft.pages=2007-2018&rft.issn=1526-2375&rft.eissn=1526-4637&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/pm/pnaa461&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA700843103%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2574783427&rft_id=info:pmid/33576415&rft_galeid=A700843103&rft_oup_id=10.1093/pm/pnaa461&rfr_iscdi=true |