Prior authorizations in dermatology and impact on patient care: An updated survey of US dermatology providers and staff by the American Academy of Dermatology
Completing prior authorizations (PAs) can be a lengthy process, which can delay access to appropriate care. A 2017 American Academy of Dermatology survey highlighted that PAs are common across many dermatologic medication classes. However, little is known regarding the impact of PAs on patient care...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dermatology online journal 2021, Vol.27 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Dermatology online journal |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Petitt, Claire E Kiracofe, Elizabeth Adamson, Adewole Barbieri, John S |
description | Completing prior authorizations (PAs) can be a lengthy process, which can delay access to appropriate care. A 2017 American Academy of Dermatology survey highlighted that PAs are common across many dermatologic medication classes. However, little is known regarding the impact of PAs on patient care and resource use.
To better characterize the burden of PAs on dermatology practices and their effects on patient care, a survey was conducted in February 2020 among U.S.-based dermatologists (N=3,000) and the Association of Dermatology Administrators/Managers (ADAM) members (N=718).
Respondents reported 24% of patients require PAs. Dermatologists and staff spend a mean of 3.3 hours/day on PAs. Sixty percent of dermatologists reported interrupting patient visits for PAs. Sixty-five percent respondents reported PAs were required for clobetasol, 76% for tretinoin, and 42% for 5-fluorouracil. Respondents noted 45% of PA determinations took beyond one week and 17% took beyond two weeks. Respondents reported 12% of PAs resulted in delaying or abandoning treatment and 17% resulted in less appropriate treatment.
Prior authorization burden remains high and consumes substantial clinical resources, which may negatively impact patient care. Additionally, they result in prolonged treatment delays and are associated with delaying treatment, abandoning treatment, or using lesser treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5070/D3271052021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2488190976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2488127906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2691-e9b916dcb4b8985dc6ad67c8e04a3aef94fdd53e005f2eb1c930269d2d7cabbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLHUEQhRtJUGOych8KsgnIjf2YmZ7O7qJGBSFC4nroR4223OmedPcINz8mv9XRq8ZkU1UU3zkcOITsM_qlppIeHgsuGa055WyL7DLaygWf55tX9w55l_MtpZxWtdgmO0LUDZWt3CV_LpOPCfRUbmLyv3XxMWTwARymQZe4itdr0MGBH0ZtC8QA4wxhKGB1wq-wDDCNThd0kKd0h2uIPVz9-Ec_pnjn50d-dMpF9z2YNZQbhOWAyVsdYGm1w-FRffxX-p687fUq44envUeuvp38PDpbXHw_PT9aXiwsbxRboDKKNc6ayrSqrZ1ttGukbZFWWmjsVdU7VwuktO45GmaVoLPQcSetNsaIPfJ54ztH_TVhLt3gs8XVSgeMU-541bZMUSWbGf30H3obpxTmdBuKS0UfqIMNZVPMOWHfjckPOq07RruH2rpXtc30xyfPyQzoXtjnnsQ9sCOUqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2488127906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prior authorizations in dermatology and impact on patient care: An updated survey of US dermatology providers and staff by the American Academy of Dermatology</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Petitt, Claire E ; Kiracofe, Elizabeth ; Adamson, Adewole ; Barbieri, John S</creator><creatorcontrib>Petitt, Claire E ; Kiracofe, Elizabeth ; Adamson, Adewole ; Barbieri, John S</creatorcontrib><description>Completing prior authorizations (PAs) can be a lengthy process, which can delay access to appropriate care. A 2017 American Academy of Dermatology survey highlighted that PAs are common across many dermatologic medication classes. However, little is known regarding the impact of PAs on patient care and resource use.
To better characterize the burden of PAs on dermatology practices and their effects on patient care, a survey was conducted in February 2020 among U.S.-based dermatologists (N=3,000) and the Association of Dermatology Administrators/Managers (ADAM) members (N=718).
Respondents reported 24% of patients require PAs. Dermatologists and staff spend a mean of 3.3 hours/day on PAs. Sixty percent of dermatologists reported interrupting patient visits for PAs. Sixty-five percent respondents reported PAs were required for clobetasol, 76% for tretinoin, and 42% for 5-fluorouracil. Respondents noted 45% of PA determinations took beyond one week and 17% took beyond two weeks. Respondents reported 12% of PAs resulted in delaying or abandoning treatment and 17% resulted in less appropriate treatment.
Prior authorization burden remains high and consumes substantial clinical resources, which may negatively impact patient care. Additionally, they result in prolonged treatment delays and are associated with delaying treatment, abandoning treatment, or using lesser treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-2108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1087-2108</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5070/D3271052021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33560787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of California Digital Library - eScholarship</publisher><subject>Authorizations ; Dermatology ; Medical referrals</subject><ispartof>Dermatology online journal, 2021, Vol.27 (1)</ispartof><rights>2021. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2691-e9b916dcb4b8985dc6ad67c8e04a3aef94fdd53e005f2eb1c930269d2d7cabbb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33560787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petitt, Claire E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiracofe, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Adewole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbieri, John S</creatorcontrib><title>Prior authorizations in dermatology and impact on patient care: An updated survey of US dermatology providers and staff by the American Academy of Dermatology</title><title>Dermatology online journal</title><addtitle>Dermatol Online J</addtitle><description>Completing prior authorizations (PAs) can be a lengthy process, which can delay access to appropriate care. A 2017 American Academy of Dermatology survey highlighted that PAs are common across many dermatologic medication classes. However, little is known regarding the impact of PAs on patient care and resource use.
To better characterize the burden of PAs on dermatology practices and their effects on patient care, a survey was conducted in February 2020 among U.S.-based dermatologists (N=3,000) and the Association of Dermatology Administrators/Managers (ADAM) members (N=718).
Respondents reported 24% of patients require PAs. Dermatologists and staff spend a mean of 3.3 hours/day on PAs. Sixty percent of dermatologists reported interrupting patient visits for PAs. Sixty-five percent respondents reported PAs were required for clobetasol, 76% for tretinoin, and 42% for 5-fluorouracil. Respondents noted 45% of PA determinations took beyond one week and 17% took beyond two weeks. Respondents reported 12% of PAs resulted in delaying or abandoning treatment and 17% resulted in less appropriate treatment.
Prior authorization burden remains high and consumes substantial clinical resources, which may negatively impact patient care. Additionally, they result in prolonged treatment delays and are associated with delaying treatment, abandoning treatment, or using lesser treatment.</description><subject>Authorizations</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Medical referrals</subject><issn>1087-2108</issn><issn>1087-2108</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtLHUEQhRtJUGOych8KsgnIjf2YmZ7O7qJGBSFC4nroR4223OmedPcINz8mv9XRq8ZkU1UU3zkcOITsM_qlppIeHgsuGa055WyL7DLaygWf55tX9w55l_MtpZxWtdgmO0LUDZWt3CV_LpOPCfRUbmLyv3XxMWTwARymQZe4itdr0MGBH0ZtC8QA4wxhKGB1wq-wDDCNThd0kKd0h2uIPVz9-Ec_pnjn50d-dMpF9z2YNZQbhOWAyVsdYGm1w-FRffxX-p687fUq44envUeuvp38PDpbXHw_PT9aXiwsbxRboDKKNc6ayrSqrZ1ttGukbZFWWmjsVdU7VwuktO45GmaVoLPQcSetNsaIPfJ54ztH_TVhLt3gs8XVSgeMU-541bZMUSWbGf30H3obpxTmdBuKS0UfqIMNZVPMOWHfjckPOq07RruH2rpXtc30xyfPyQzoXtjnnsQ9sCOUqA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Petitt, Claire E</creator><creator>Kiracofe, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Adamson, Adewole</creator><creator>Barbieri, John S</creator><general>University of California Digital Library - eScholarship</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Prior authorizations in dermatology and impact on patient care: An updated survey of US dermatology providers and staff by the American Academy of Dermatology</title><author>Petitt, Claire E ; Kiracofe, Elizabeth ; Adamson, Adewole ; Barbieri, John S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2691-e9b916dcb4b8985dc6ad67c8e04a3aef94fdd53e005f2eb1c930269d2d7cabbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Authorizations</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Medical referrals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petitt, Claire E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiracofe, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Adewole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbieri, John S</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dermatology online journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petitt, Claire E</au><au>Kiracofe, Elizabeth</au><au>Adamson, Adewole</au><au>Barbieri, John S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prior authorizations in dermatology and impact on patient care: An updated survey of US dermatology providers and staff by the American Academy of Dermatology</atitle><jtitle>Dermatology online journal</jtitle><addtitle>Dermatol Online J</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1087-2108</issn><eissn>1087-2108</eissn><abstract>Completing prior authorizations (PAs) can be a lengthy process, which can delay access to appropriate care. A 2017 American Academy of Dermatology survey highlighted that PAs are common across many dermatologic medication classes. However, little is known regarding the impact of PAs on patient care and resource use.
To better characterize the burden of PAs on dermatology practices and their effects on patient care, a survey was conducted in February 2020 among U.S.-based dermatologists (N=3,000) and the Association of Dermatology Administrators/Managers (ADAM) members (N=718).
Respondents reported 24% of patients require PAs. Dermatologists and staff spend a mean of 3.3 hours/day on PAs. Sixty percent of dermatologists reported interrupting patient visits for PAs. Sixty-five percent respondents reported PAs were required for clobetasol, 76% for tretinoin, and 42% for 5-fluorouracil. Respondents noted 45% of PA determinations took beyond one week and 17% took beyond two weeks. Respondents reported 12% of PAs resulted in delaying or abandoning treatment and 17% resulted in less appropriate treatment.
Prior authorization burden remains high and consumes substantial clinical resources, which may negatively impact patient care. Additionally, they result in prolonged treatment delays and are associated with delaying treatment, abandoning treatment, or using lesser treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of California Digital Library - eScholarship</pub><pmid>33560787</pmid><doi>10.5070/D3271052021</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1087-2108 |
ispartof | Dermatology online journal, 2021, Vol.27 (1) |
issn | 1087-2108 1087-2108 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2488190976 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Authorizations Dermatology Medical referrals |
title | Prior authorizations in dermatology and impact on patient care: An updated survey of US dermatology providers and staff by the American Academy of Dermatology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A24%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prior%20authorizations%20in%20dermatology%20and%20impact%20on%20patient%20care:%20An%20updated%20survey%20of%20US%20dermatology%20providers%20and%20staff%20by%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology&rft.jtitle=Dermatology%20online%20journal&rft.au=Petitt,%20Claire%20E&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1087-2108&rft.eissn=1087-2108&rft_id=info:doi/10.5070/D3271052021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2488127906%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2488127906&rft_id=info:pmid/33560787&rfr_iscdi=true |