What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students

Using data from an undergraduate probability sample, we aimed to: (1) describe the prevalence and demographic characteristics of students who reported having engaged in rough sex with their current partner; (2) assess which sexual behaviors students consider to be rough sex; (3) describe the frequen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of sexual behavior 2021-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1183-1195
Hauptverfasser: Herbenick, Debby, Fu, Tsung-chieh, Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina, Patterson, Callie, Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock, Guerra-Reyes, Lucia, Eastman-Mueller, Heather, Beckmeyer, Jonathon, Rosenberg, Molly
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1195
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1183
container_title Archives of sexual behavior
container_volume 50
creator Herbenick, Debby
Fu, Tsung-chieh
Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina
Patterson, Callie
Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock
Guerra-Reyes, Lucia
Eastman-Mueller, Heather
Beckmeyer, Jonathon
Rosenberg, Molly
description Using data from an undergraduate probability sample, we aimed to: (1) describe the prevalence and demographic characteristics of students who reported having engaged in rough sex with their current partner; (2) assess which sexual behaviors students consider to be rough sex; (3) describe the frequency with which participants report engaging in rough sex as well as their reports of initiating and liking rough sex, in relation to gender and sexual identity; and (4) examine predictors of rough sex frequency. Participants were 4998 students randomly sampled from a large Midwestern university who completed a confidential Internet-based survey (2453 women, 2445 men, 41 gender non-binary, 36 transgender or other gender non-conforming identities). Within these, 1795 individuals who reported a romantic/sexual partner of at least 3 months responded to questions about engaging, liking, and initiating rough sex. The most common behaviors participants considered to be rough sex were choking, hair pulling, and spanking. Transgender and gender non-binary students more often endorsed behaviors as rough sex. Also, rough sex was conceptualized as multidimensional, with one cluster being more consistent with earlier conceptualizations of rough sex (e.g., hair pulling, spanking) and the second cluster including behaviors such as choking, slapping, punching, and making someone have sex. About 80% of those with a current sexual or romantic partner engaged in rough sex with them and most who engaged it liked it. Bisexual women reported greater rough sex frequency and enjoyment (54.1% indicated enjoying it “very much”). Implications for sexuality research and education are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2488169329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2510493828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ea430f4c5b4d3a4d0e1ed0eedd5b9bffdd4221cf28db9cd5b288473e9ed70bf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vEzEQxS0EomnhC3BAlrhw6Ibxn83aJ4RKC5EigQhRj5Z3PU627K5Te1el3x43KSBx4DIzev7NG0uPkFcM5gygepcYlKAK4KwApllV3D0hM1ZWouAK4CmZAYAscuEn5DSlmzxVC1k-JydClAupKz0j6XpnR7pM9FuYtju6xp_n9HoX6MeAiS7Hc2oHdxBW7Y-D8p5etYNrh22iPoaeWvo1htrWbdeO93Rt-32HNHi6ma_ndDM4jNto3WRHpOtxcjiM6QV55m2X8OVjPyObq8vvF5-L1ZdPy4sPq6IRVTkWaKUAL5uylk5Y6QAZ5oLOlbWuvXdOcs4az5WrdZNFrpSsBGp0FdReizPy9ui7j-F2wjSavk0Ndp0dMEzJcKkUW2jBH9A3_6A3YYpD_p3hJQOpheIqU_xINTGkFNGbfWx7G-8NA_MQiTlGYnIk5hCJuctLrx-tp7pH92fldwYZEEcg5adhi_Hv7f_Y_gKeMJZx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2510493828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Herbenick, Debby ; Fu, Tsung-chieh ; Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina ; Patterson, Callie ; Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock ; Guerra-Reyes, Lucia ; Eastman-Mueller, Heather ; Beckmeyer, Jonathon ; Rosenberg, Molly</creator><creatorcontrib>Herbenick, Debby ; Fu, Tsung-chieh ; Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina ; Patterson, Callie ; Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock ; Guerra-Reyes, Lucia ; Eastman-Mueller, Heather ; Beckmeyer, Jonathon ; Rosenberg, Molly</creatorcontrib><description>Using data from an undergraduate probability sample, we aimed to: (1) describe the prevalence and demographic characteristics of students who reported having engaged in rough sex with their current partner; (2) assess which sexual behaviors students consider to be rough sex; (3) describe the frequency with which participants report engaging in rough sex as well as their reports of initiating and liking rough sex, in relation to gender and sexual identity; and (4) examine predictors of rough sex frequency. Participants were 4998 students randomly sampled from a large Midwestern university who completed a confidential Internet-based survey (2453 women, 2445 men, 41 gender non-binary, 36 transgender or other gender non-conforming identities). Within these, 1795 individuals who reported a romantic/sexual partner of at least 3 months responded to questions about engaging, liking, and initiating rough sex. The most common behaviors participants considered to be rough sex were choking, hair pulling, and spanking. Transgender and gender non-binary students more often endorsed behaviors as rough sex. Also, rough sex was conceptualized as multidimensional, with one cluster being more consistent with earlier conceptualizations of rough sex (e.g., hair pulling, spanking) and the second cluster including behaviors such as choking, slapping, punching, and making someone have sex. About 80% of those with a current sexual or romantic partner engaged in rough sex with them and most who engaged it liked it. Bisexual women reported greater rough sex frequency and enjoyment (54.1% indicated enjoying it “very much”). Implications for sexuality research and education are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33564979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Gender ; Health behavior ; Original Paper ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Sexual Behavior ; Social Sciences ; Students ; Transgender persons</subject><ispartof>Archives of sexual behavior, 2021-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1183-1195</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ea430f4c5b4d3a4d0e1ed0eedd5b9bffdd4221cf28db9cd5b288473e9ed70bf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ea430f4c5b4d3a4d0e1ed0eedd5b9bffdd4221cf28db9cd5b288473e9ed70bf93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0352-2248</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herbenick, Debby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Tsung-chieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Callie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra-Reyes, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastman-Mueller, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckmeyer, Jonathon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Molly</creatorcontrib><title>What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students</title><title>Archives of sexual behavior</title><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><description>Using data from an undergraduate probability sample, we aimed to: (1) describe the prevalence and demographic characteristics of students who reported having engaged in rough sex with their current partner; (2) assess which sexual behaviors students consider to be rough sex; (3) describe the frequency with which participants report engaging in rough sex as well as their reports of initiating and liking rough sex, in relation to gender and sexual identity; and (4) examine predictors of rough sex frequency. Participants were 4998 students randomly sampled from a large Midwestern university who completed a confidential Internet-based survey (2453 women, 2445 men, 41 gender non-binary, 36 transgender or other gender non-conforming identities). Within these, 1795 individuals who reported a romantic/sexual partner of at least 3 months responded to questions about engaging, liking, and initiating rough sex. The most common behaviors participants considered to be rough sex were choking, hair pulling, and spanking. Transgender and gender non-binary students more often endorsed behaviors as rough sex. Also, rough sex was conceptualized as multidimensional, with one cluster being more consistent with earlier conceptualizations of rough sex (e.g., hair pulling, spanking) and the second cluster including behaviors such as choking, slapping, punching, and making someone have sex. About 80% of those with a current sexual or romantic partner engaged in rough sex with them and most who engaged it liked it. Bisexual women reported greater rough sex frequency and enjoyment (54.1% indicated enjoying it “very much”). Implications for sexuality research and education are discussed.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Transgender persons</subject><issn>0004-0002</issn><issn>1573-2800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9vEzEQxS0EomnhC3BAlrhw6Ibxn83aJ4RKC5EigQhRj5Z3PU627K5Te1el3x43KSBx4DIzev7NG0uPkFcM5gygepcYlKAK4KwApllV3D0hM1ZWouAK4CmZAYAscuEn5DSlmzxVC1k-JydClAupKz0j6XpnR7pM9FuYtju6xp_n9HoX6MeAiS7Hc2oHdxBW7Y-D8p5etYNrh22iPoaeWvo1htrWbdeO93Rt-32HNHi6ma_ndDM4jNto3WRHpOtxcjiM6QV55m2X8OVjPyObq8vvF5-L1ZdPy4sPq6IRVTkWaKUAL5uylk5Y6QAZ5oLOlbWuvXdOcs4az5WrdZNFrpSsBGp0FdReizPy9ui7j-F2wjSavk0Ndp0dMEzJcKkUW2jBH9A3_6A3YYpD_p3hJQOpheIqU_xINTGkFNGbfWx7G-8NA_MQiTlGYnIk5hCJuctLrx-tp7pH92fldwYZEEcg5adhi_Hv7f_Y_gKeMJZx</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Herbenick, Debby</creator><creator>Fu, Tsung-chieh</creator><creator>Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina</creator><creator>Patterson, Callie</creator><creator>Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock</creator><creator>Guerra-Reyes, Lucia</creator><creator>Eastman-Mueller, Heather</creator><creator>Beckmeyer, Jonathon</creator><creator>Rosenberg, Molly</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-2248</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students</title><author>Herbenick, Debby ; Fu, Tsung-chieh ; Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina ; Patterson, Callie ; Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock ; Guerra-Reyes, Lucia ; Eastman-Mueller, Heather ; Beckmeyer, Jonathon ; Rosenberg, Molly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ea430f4c5b4d3a4d0e1ed0eedd5b9bffdd4221cf28db9cd5b288473e9ed70bf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Transgender persons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herbenick, Debby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Tsung-chieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Callie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra-Reyes, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastman-Mueller, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckmeyer, Jonathon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Molly</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's &amp; Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of sexual behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herbenick, Debby</au><au>Fu, Tsung-chieh</au><au>Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina</au><au>Patterson, Callie</au><au>Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock</au><au>Guerra-Reyes, Lucia</au><au>Eastman-Mueller, Heather</au><au>Beckmeyer, Jonathon</au><au>Rosenberg, Molly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students</atitle><jtitle>Archives of sexual behavior</jtitle><stitle>Arch Sex Behav</stitle><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1183</spage><epage>1195</epage><pages>1183-1195</pages><issn>0004-0002</issn><eissn>1573-2800</eissn><abstract>Using data from an undergraduate probability sample, we aimed to: (1) describe the prevalence and demographic characteristics of students who reported having engaged in rough sex with their current partner; (2) assess which sexual behaviors students consider to be rough sex; (3) describe the frequency with which participants report engaging in rough sex as well as their reports of initiating and liking rough sex, in relation to gender and sexual identity; and (4) examine predictors of rough sex frequency. Participants were 4998 students randomly sampled from a large Midwestern university who completed a confidential Internet-based survey (2453 women, 2445 men, 41 gender non-binary, 36 transgender or other gender non-conforming identities). Within these, 1795 individuals who reported a romantic/sexual partner of at least 3 months responded to questions about engaging, liking, and initiating rough sex. The most common behaviors participants considered to be rough sex were choking, hair pulling, and spanking. Transgender and gender non-binary students more often endorsed behaviors as rough sex. Also, rough sex was conceptualized as multidimensional, with one cluster being more consistent with earlier conceptualizations of rough sex (e.g., hair pulling, spanking) and the second cluster including behaviors such as choking, slapping, punching, and making someone have sex. About 80% of those with a current sexual or romantic partner engaged in rough sex with them and most who engaged it liked it. Bisexual women reported greater rough sex frequency and enjoyment (54.1% indicated enjoying it “very much”). Implications for sexuality research and education are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33564979</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-2248</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-0002
ispartof Archives of sexual behavior, 2021-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1183-1195
issn 0004-0002
1573-2800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2488169329
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Gender
Health behavior
Original Paper
Psychology
Public Health
Sexual Behavior
Social Sciences
Students
Transgender persons
title What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T21%3A36%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Is%20Rough%20Sex,%20Who%20Does%20It,%20and%20Who%20Likes%20It?%20Findings%20from%20a%20Probability%20Sample%20of%20U.S.%20Undergraduate%20Students&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20sexual%20behavior&rft.au=Herbenick,%20Debby&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1183&rft.epage=1195&rft.pages=1183-1195&rft.issn=0004-0002&rft.eissn=1573-2800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2510493828%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2510493828&rft_id=info:pmid/33564979&rfr_iscdi=true