What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students
Using data from an undergraduate probability sample, we aimed to: (1) describe the prevalence and demographic characteristics of students who reported having engaged in rough sex with their current partner; (2) assess which sexual behaviors students consider to be rough sex; (3) describe the frequen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of sexual behavior 2021-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1183-1195 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1195 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1183 |
container_title | Archives of sexual behavior |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Herbenick, Debby Fu, Tsung-chieh Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina Patterson, Callie Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock Guerra-Reyes, Lucia Eastman-Mueller, Heather Beckmeyer, Jonathon Rosenberg, Molly |
description | Using data from an undergraduate probability sample, we aimed to: (1) describe the prevalence and demographic characteristics of students who reported having engaged in rough sex with their current partner; (2) assess which sexual behaviors students consider to be rough sex; (3) describe the frequency with which participants report engaging in rough sex as well as their reports of initiating and liking rough sex, in relation to gender and sexual identity; and (4) examine predictors of rough sex frequency. Participants were 4998 students randomly sampled from a large Midwestern university who completed a confidential Internet-based survey (2453 women, 2445 men, 41 gender non-binary, 36 transgender or other gender non-conforming identities). Within these, 1795 individuals who reported a romantic/sexual partner of at least 3 months responded to questions about engaging, liking, and initiating rough sex. The most common behaviors participants considered to be rough sex were choking, hair pulling, and spanking. Transgender and gender non-binary students more often endorsed behaviors as rough sex. Also, rough sex was conceptualized as multidimensional, with one cluster being more consistent with earlier conceptualizations of rough sex (e.g., hair pulling, spanking) and the second cluster including behaviors such as choking, slapping, punching, and making someone have sex. About 80% of those with a current sexual or romantic partner engaged in rough sex with them and most who engaged it liked it. Bisexual women reported greater rough sex frequency and enjoyment (54.1% indicated enjoying it “very much”). Implications for sexuality research and education are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2488169329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2510493828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ea430f4c5b4d3a4d0e1ed0eedd5b9bffdd4221cf28db9cd5b288473e9ed70bf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vEzEQxS0EomnhC3BAlrhw6Ibxn83aJ4RKC5EigQhRj5Z3PU627K5Te1el3x43KSBx4DIzev7NG0uPkFcM5gygepcYlKAK4KwApllV3D0hM1ZWouAK4CmZAYAscuEn5DSlmzxVC1k-JydClAupKz0j6XpnR7pM9FuYtju6xp_n9HoX6MeAiS7Hc2oHdxBW7Y-D8p5etYNrh22iPoaeWvo1htrWbdeO93Rt-32HNHi6ma_ndDM4jNto3WRHpOtxcjiM6QV55m2X8OVjPyObq8vvF5-L1ZdPy4sPq6IRVTkWaKUAL5uylk5Y6QAZ5oLOlbWuvXdOcs4az5WrdZNFrpSsBGp0FdReizPy9ui7j-F2wjSavk0Ndp0dMEzJcKkUW2jBH9A3_6A3YYpD_p3hJQOpheIqU_xINTGkFNGbfWx7G-8NA_MQiTlGYnIk5hCJuctLrx-tp7pH92fldwYZEEcg5adhi_Hv7f_Y_gKeMJZx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2510493828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Herbenick, Debby ; Fu, Tsung-chieh ; Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina ; Patterson, Callie ; Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock ; Guerra-Reyes, Lucia ; Eastman-Mueller, Heather ; Beckmeyer, Jonathon ; Rosenberg, Molly</creator><creatorcontrib>Herbenick, Debby ; Fu, Tsung-chieh ; Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina ; Patterson, Callie ; Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock ; Guerra-Reyes, Lucia ; Eastman-Mueller, Heather ; Beckmeyer, Jonathon ; Rosenberg, Molly</creatorcontrib><description>Using data from an undergraduate probability sample, we aimed to: (1) describe the prevalence and demographic characteristics of students who reported having engaged in rough sex with their current partner; (2) assess which sexual behaviors students consider to be rough sex; (3) describe the frequency with which participants report engaging in rough sex as well as their reports of initiating and liking rough sex, in relation to gender and sexual identity; and (4) examine predictors of rough sex frequency. Participants were 4998 students randomly sampled from a large Midwestern university who completed a confidential Internet-based survey (2453 women, 2445 men, 41 gender non-binary, 36 transgender or other gender non-conforming identities). Within these, 1795 individuals who reported a romantic/sexual partner of at least 3 months responded to questions about engaging, liking, and initiating rough sex. The most common behaviors participants considered to be rough sex were choking, hair pulling, and spanking. Transgender and gender non-binary students more often endorsed behaviors as rough sex. Also, rough sex was conceptualized as multidimensional, with one cluster being more consistent with earlier conceptualizations of rough sex (e.g., hair pulling, spanking) and the second cluster including behaviors such as choking, slapping, punching, and making someone have sex. About 80% of those with a current sexual or romantic partner engaged in rough sex with them and most who engaged it liked it. Bisexual women reported greater rough sex frequency and enjoyment (54.1% indicated enjoying it “very much”). Implications for sexuality research and education are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33564979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Gender ; Health behavior ; Original Paper ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Sexual Behavior ; Social Sciences ; Students ; Transgender persons</subject><ispartof>Archives of sexual behavior, 2021-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1183-1195</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ea430f4c5b4d3a4d0e1ed0eedd5b9bffdd4221cf28db9cd5b288473e9ed70bf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ea430f4c5b4d3a4d0e1ed0eedd5b9bffdd4221cf28db9cd5b288473e9ed70bf93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0352-2248</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herbenick, Debby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Tsung-chieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Callie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra-Reyes, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastman-Mueller, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckmeyer, Jonathon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Molly</creatorcontrib><title>What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students</title><title>Archives of sexual behavior</title><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><description>Using data from an undergraduate probability sample, we aimed to: (1) describe the prevalence and demographic characteristics of students who reported having engaged in rough sex with their current partner; (2) assess which sexual behaviors students consider to be rough sex; (3) describe the frequency with which participants report engaging in rough sex as well as their reports of initiating and liking rough sex, in relation to gender and sexual identity; and (4) examine predictors of rough sex frequency. Participants were 4998 students randomly sampled from a large Midwestern university who completed a confidential Internet-based survey (2453 women, 2445 men, 41 gender non-binary, 36 transgender or other gender non-conforming identities). Within these, 1795 individuals who reported a romantic/sexual partner of at least 3 months responded to questions about engaging, liking, and initiating rough sex. The most common behaviors participants considered to be rough sex were choking, hair pulling, and spanking. Transgender and gender non-binary students more often endorsed behaviors as rough sex. Also, rough sex was conceptualized as multidimensional, with one cluster being more consistent with earlier conceptualizations of rough sex (e.g., hair pulling, spanking) and the second cluster including behaviors such as choking, slapping, punching, and making someone have sex. About 80% of those with a current sexual or romantic partner engaged in rough sex with them and most who engaged it liked it. Bisexual women reported greater rough sex frequency and enjoyment (54.1% indicated enjoying it “very much”). Implications for sexuality research and education are discussed.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Transgender persons</subject><issn>0004-0002</issn><issn>1573-2800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9vEzEQxS0EomnhC3BAlrhw6Ibxn83aJ4RKC5EigQhRj5Z3PU627K5Te1el3x43KSBx4DIzev7NG0uPkFcM5gygepcYlKAK4KwApllV3D0hM1ZWouAK4CmZAYAscuEn5DSlmzxVC1k-JydClAupKz0j6XpnR7pM9FuYtju6xp_n9HoX6MeAiS7Hc2oHdxBW7Y-D8p5etYNrh22iPoaeWvo1htrWbdeO93Rt-32HNHi6ma_ndDM4jNto3WRHpOtxcjiM6QV55m2X8OVjPyObq8vvF5-L1ZdPy4sPq6IRVTkWaKUAL5uylk5Y6QAZ5oLOlbWuvXdOcs4az5WrdZNFrpSsBGp0FdReizPy9ui7j-F2wjSavk0Ndp0dMEzJcKkUW2jBH9A3_6A3YYpD_p3hJQOpheIqU_xINTGkFNGbfWx7G-8NA_MQiTlGYnIk5hCJuctLrx-tp7pH92fldwYZEEcg5adhi_Hv7f_Y_gKeMJZx</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Herbenick, Debby</creator><creator>Fu, Tsung-chieh</creator><creator>Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina</creator><creator>Patterson, Callie</creator><creator>Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock</creator><creator>Guerra-Reyes, Lucia</creator><creator>Eastman-Mueller, Heather</creator><creator>Beckmeyer, Jonathon</creator><creator>Rosenberg, Molly</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-2248</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students</title><author>Herbenick, Debby ; Fu, Tsung-chieh ; Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina ; Patterson, Callie ; Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock ; Guerra-Reyes, Lucia ; Eastman-Mueller, Heather ; Beckmeyer, Jonathon ; Rosenberg, Molly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ea430f4c5b4d3a4d0e1ed0eedd5b9bffdd4221cf28db9cd5b288473e9ed70bf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Transgender persons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herbenick, Debby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Tsung-chieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Callie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra-Reyes, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastman-Mueller, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckmeyer, Jonathon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Molly</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of sexual behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herbenick, Debby</au><au>Fu, Tsung-chieh</au><au>Valdivia, Dubravka Svetina</au><au>Patterson, Callie</au><au>Gonzalez, Yael Rosenstock</au><au>Guerra-Reyes, Lucia</au><au>Eastman-Mueller, Heather</au><au>Beckmeyer, Jonathon</au><au>Rosenberg, Molly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students</atitle><jtitle>Archives of sexual behavior</jtitle><stitle>Arch Sex Behav</stitle><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1183</spage><epage>1195</epage><pages>1183-1195</pages><issn>0004-0002</issn><eissn>1573-2800</eissn><abstract>Using data from an undergraduate probability sample, we aimed to: (1) describe the prevalence and demographic characteristics of students who reported having engaged in rough sex with their current partner; (2) assess which sexual behaviors students consider to be rough sex; (3) describe the frequency with which participants report engaging in rough sex as well as their reports of initiating and liking rough sex, in relation to gender and sexual identity; and (4) examine predictors of rough sex frequency. Participants were 4998 students randomly sampled from a large Midwestern university who completed a confidential Internet-based survey (2453 women, 2445 men, 41 gender non-binary, 36 transgender or other gender non-conforming identities). Within these, 1795 individuals who reported a romantic/sexual partner of at least 3 months responded to questions about engaging, liking, and initiating rough sex. The most common behaviors participants considered to be rough sex were choking, hair pulling, and spanking. Transgender and gender non-binary students more often endorsed behaviors as rough sex. Also, rough sex was conceptualized as multidimensional, with one cluster being more consistent with earlier conceptualizations of rough sex (e.g., hair pulling, spanking) and the second cluster including behaviors such as choking, slapping, punching, and making someone have sex. About 80% of those with a current sexual or romantic partner engaged in rough sex with them and most who engaged it liked it. Bisexual women reported greater rough sex frequency and enjoyment (54.1% indicated enjoying it “very much”). Implications for sexuality research and education are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33564979</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-2248</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-0002 |
ispartof | Archives of sexual behavior, 2021-04, Vol.50 (3), p.1183-1195 |
issn | 0004-0002 1573-2800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2488169329 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Gender Health behavior Original Paper Psychology Public Health Sexual Behavior Social Sciences Students Transgender persons |
title | What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T21%3A36%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Is%20Rough%20Sex,%20Who%20Does%20It,%20and%20Who%20Likes%20It?%20Findings%20from%20a%20Probability%20Sample%20of%20U.S.%20Undergraduate%20Students&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20sexual%20behavior&rft.au=Herbenick,%20Debby&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1183&rft.epage=1195&rft.pages=1183-1195&rft.issn=0004-0002&rft.eissn=1573-2800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2510493828%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2510493828&rft_id=info:pmid/33564979&rfr_iscdi=true |